The woke mind virus is the biggest threat to civlization

[Dontaskme]

Should this symbol be cancelled?



Is it ok to wear ( flaunt) symbols of murder weapons?

Where does one draw the line in the world of hypocrisy?

[Iwannaplato]

Or 'Friends' when Ross had too much fake tan and ended up nearly black INCLUDING HIS FACE

I saw that episode - did the wookies get agitated over that?

Apparently Justin Trudeau painted himself black for fancy dress party, I couldn't believe all the hysteria, it's the wookies that make it seem like being "black" is a bad thing - how ironic.

He painted himself in blackface to sing a Jamaican song. IOW he was specifically making himself took like a black person. The practice has a pretty ugly history, which doesn't mean he meant this in the way it used to be used, where black people were dehumanized and mocked by people in blackface, yes, sometimes singing songs sung originally by black people. And Trudeau has nothing to stand on complaining about the criticism since he is one of the most politically correct politicians, at least on the surface and in official positions.

As far as the friends episode there were complaints because he asked a puerto rican attendant to make him as dark as him. I think that's pretty silly, and the point was not Ross imitating black people, so it's a quite different situation.

[Iwannaplato]

Should this symbol be cancelled?

Is it ok to wear ( flaunt) symbols of murder weapons?

Where does one draw the line in the world of hypocrisy?

In all these discussions it's important to remember that there is a conservative pc and a religious pc and for vast periods of american history, and in my lifetime, the right had no problem with cancelling people who went against their version of pc. There were all sorts of taboos and things that couldn't be mocked and the punishments could be official and severe and worked out in the street and severe. IOW the right wing, often spot on in their critique of wokr/cancel culture should also own up to how happy they were with their own pc and cancel culture for so long. Otherwise it just looks like sour grapes that their pc got superceded.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Should this symbol be cancelled?



Is it ok to wear ( flaunt) symbols of murder weapons?

Where does one draw the line in the world of hypocrisy?

That would depend on whether or not wokies decided it was 'offensive' to a 'protected group'. It's not beyond the bounds of possibility. Then again, newsreaders and presenters on public channels shouldn't be allowed to wear anything that makes a political statement, religious or otherwise, which is why it really fucks me off the way they all shove their stupid red poppies in our faces every chance they get. They are supposed to present an impartial and neutral face to the public. I don't want to know what the fuckers think.

[Dontaskme]

That would depend on whether or not wokies decided it was 'offensive' to a 'protected group'. It's not beyond the bounds of possibility. Then again, newsreaders and presenters on public channels shouldn't be allowed to wear anything that makes a political statement, religious or otherwise, which is why it really fucks me off the way they all shove their stupid red poppies in our faces every chance they get. They are supposed to present an impartial and neutral face to the public. I don't want to know what the fuckers think.

Oh god don't get me started on the poppy scam. . MONEY, all about money...no one gives a fuck about soldiers who sold their lives to the money making filthy rich elites.

And now this...

[Dontaskme]

Should we ban these toys?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Should we ban these toys?

You don't seem to understand what wokism is. I'm pretty sure golliwogs aren't 'banned'. You can still knit one if you really want to, but in the world of woke, if someone managed to dig up a childhood photo of a celebrity playing with a golliwog then that celebrity would more than likely be crucified and 'cancelled' in social media.

[Dontaskme]

Should we ban these toys?

You don't seem to understand what wokism is. I'm pretty sure golliwogs aren't 'banned'. You can still knit one if you really want to, but in the world of woke, if someone manages to dig up a childhood photo of a celebrity playing with a golliwog then that celebrity would more than likely be crucified and 'cancelled' in social media.

I know what wokism is..but my mind tends to wander all over the place...I mean should war toys been cancelled ?

I used to have a golliwog as a young child, I loved it, and did not know it was offensive.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

[Dontaskme]

Why is a golliwog seen as offensive by the woke?

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Should we ban these toys?

You don't seem to understand what wokism is. I'm pretty sure golliwogs aren't 'banned'. You can still knit one if you really want to, but in the world of woke, if someone manages to dig up a childhood photo of a celebrity playing with a golliwog then that celebrity would more than likely be crucified and 'cancelled' in social media.

I know what wokism is..but my mind tends to wander all over the place...I mean should war toys been cancelled ?

They never will be, because wokies love war. I would be happy for them to go out of production because they are extremely OFFENSIVE to me, but my being offended doesn't count for anything since I'm not in a 'special protected group'.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Why is a golliwog seen as offensive by the woke?

Ask Sculptor. I'm sure he would be happy to enlighten you

[Dontaskme]

Should this symbol be cancelled?

Is it ok to wear ( flaunt) symbols of murder weapons?

Where does one draw the line in the world of hypocrisy?

In all these discussions it's important to remember that there is a conservative pc and a religious pc and for vast periods of american history, and in my lifetime, the right had no problem with cancelling people who went against their version of pc. There were all sorts of taboos and things that couldn't be mocked and the punishments could be official and severe and worked out in the street and severe. IOW the right wing, often spot on in their critique of wokr/cancel culture should also own up to how happy they were with their own pc and cancel culture for so long. Otherwise it just looks like sour grapes that their pc got superceded.

Humans just make up the rules of life as they go along, the goal posts keep changing position depending on what model is more popular and working..In reality, no one alive knows what the heck they are doing...So really, at the end of the day, we're all the blind leading the blind.... And it's like, are we obliged to just go along with whatever is the flavour of the month.

[Dontaskme]

You don't seem to understand what wokism is. I'm pretty sure golliwogs aren't 'banned'. You can still knit one if you really want to, but in the world of woke, if someone manages to dig up a childhood photo of a celebrity playing with a golliwog then that celebrity would more than likely be crucified and 'cancelled' in social media.

I know what wokism is..but my mind tends to wander all over the place...I mean should war toys been cancelled ?

They never will be, because wokies love war. I would be happy for them to go out of production because they are extremely OFFENSIVE to me, but my being offended doesn't count for anything since I'm not in a 'special protected group'.

Good answer.

[trokanmariel]

I published earlier today, about pendulum art's link to speech socialism's pertaining to the historic/present angel war, over body glamour's right to be a sex smoking science.

It upset the technology-magic people community that surrounds me, ergo the woke tie in to this reply.

In the interim, I've experienced a Mason Dertry citation to dead end / sequence as block pertaining to Barolo Xylie, who is a theme keeper of Mason Dertry. The source, of the announcement of the aforementioned slashed ideas was Xylie's subject to scrutiny relative to being a universal magic deity facial style.

What's the ulterior, of this composition?
After the previous publication, aforementioned, it's likely a concentration of activity to freedom politics theme due to the continuum of Next Step publication story.

In the interim, since the last publication, these are the ideas, that I've experienced:

Left-wing transcendence, can be a pie chart (Megan Fox's idea) which slices off its own corners as an ally of the L-graph's (mathematics parallel) forness - the /, usually encountered on the graph.

But, alas, who is the target of the dichotomy?
It might be, the creator of the Thomas Heath storytelling reality of socialism to which slot, in his head.
Socialism to which slot: are the slots circular, due to circles of sunlight being an inevitable ally of body glamour, and body glamour being the matter disperser (Peek-A-Boo/God as own text matter person, as example) of the 11 New Street story?

The matter disperser aspect - what actually is it?
For one, it can't be inspiration matter, as inspiration matter is being metaphor matter that's outside Lalo's Metaphor Machine (the Metaphor Machine being the presumed target of physics of the angel war, to do with God's business bitch persona being encapsulated by the machine); or, is this a duality secret?

Is it a normal non-consequence, of Earth TV modernity as own metaphor machine, by the real Denzel Washington?
In terms of DW, as presumed creator of such macro worldwide reality, is his choice free from inspiration/citation politics, the meaning of this composition being the inspiration status of geography physics? To answer the question, yes, Denzel Washington is able to sustain this parody, especially in the context of the man to man insularity of Inside Man, with Clive Owen

Some abstract, before I close:
Left to right lines. The left's audacity to seek out the right, as a parallel theme creation as gravitation to Jessica Biel's Erin's body glamour. The shark butch, of Erin, as a real historic distinction from other body glamour's like Hecate Poole; can it be the singular body glamour that aligns left to right / theme invisible to gravitation to shark butch as secret visible, as a job seeker (Lia Haddock's story) movement to left-wing transcendence questions on Philosophy Now.


To clarify:
the latest was abstract, because it pertained directly to body glamour.