Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 11:28 am
A threat can become kinetic, or it can be held in latency.
A kinetic threat is not a threat. It is violence.
A latent threat is not threat. It is a thought, unexpressed.
An unexpressed threat only becomes real when it's expressed as really happening, when it becomes kinetic. . not before in it's potential latency stage.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 11:28 am
A threat can become kinetic, or it can be held in latency.
A kinetic threat is not a threat. It is violence.
A latent threat is not threat. It is a thought, unexpressed.
An unexpressed threat only becomes real when it's expressed as really happening, when it becomes kinetic. . not before in it's potential latency stage.
The threat becomes a real threat when it is expressed.
The threat becomes real physical violence when the threat is carried out.
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 11:25 am
When an actual threat exists, it exists now.
Yes a threat can exist now....where else is the threat supposed to exist?
Thus, the necessity of NATO.
Existence has no need to exist...any need is totally a human idea...which is dumb and stupid when all the human mind can think about is destroying itself...I mean who in their right mind would want to play that stupid game...
Yes a threat can exist now....where else is the threat supposed to exist?
Thus, the necessity of NATO.
Existence has no need to exist...any need is totally a human idea...which is dumb and stupid when all the human mind can think about is destroying itself...I mean who in their right mind would want to play that stupid game...
Thus, there is no need that NATO should be dismanteled.
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 11:36 am
The threat becomes a real threat when it is expressed.
The threat becomes real physical violence when the threat is carried out.
Yes that's true.
However, there is no NEED for any violence to happen. NEED is a human construct, and in my opinion the very idea that we need to protect ourselves from harming ourselves is a dumb, stupid idea, of low, to zero intelligence.
Last edited by Dontaskme on Mon Apr 18, 2022 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 11:36 am
The threat becomes a real threat when it is expressed.
The threat becomes real physical violence when the threat is carried out.
Yes that's true.
However, there is no NEED for any violence to happen. NEED is a human construct, and in my opinion the very idea that we need to protect ourselves from harning ourselves is a dumb, stupid idea, of low, to zero intelligence.
Human violence is a human construct.
Everything that happens, happens because it had to happen. Only a fantasy of what might have been, can refute that.
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 11:42 am
Human violence is a human construct.
Yes it is.
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 11:42 amEverything that happens, happens because it had to happen. Only a fantasy of what might have been, can refute that.
Yes that true, everything that happens is because that's exactly what's happening, no one can refute that...but lets dive deeper, if we already know that killing each other is a dumb stupid idea to play out, which I just happen to think it is..why participate in such a dumb stupid play?...when we do not NEED to?
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 11:36 am
The threat becomes a real threat when it is expressed.
The threat becomes real physical violence when the threat is carried out.
Yes that's true.
However, there is no NEED for any violence to happen. NEED is a human construct, and in my opinion the very idea that we need to protect ourselves from harning ourselves is a dumb, stupid idea, of low, to zero intelligence.
Human violence is a human construct.
Try telling that to a speeding bullet aimed at your skull.
Everything that happens, happens because it had to happen. Only a fantasy of what might have been, can refute that.
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:28 am
You said the violence is not real until there is a deliberate intention to make the violence an actual event. Putin's threat is a deliberate intention. Therefore, the violence is real.
The violence is not real until the intention becomes kinetic and is actually happening in realtime...that is correct.
An announcement is not real until the announcement actually becomes a reality happening in realtime...in other words, the effect of the cause.
A cause is only known in it's effect.
No. That's not what you said. You said the violence is real when the threat is real, and this is true. This is why a threat of violence against an individual, is a real crime.
Putin's threat was real.
No one denies that. The question is to what degree was the persistence of NATO and it expansionist policy, especially over the last 30 years have continued to that, rather than actively moving to detante have continued as ever eastwards landgrab.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Apr 14, 2022 1:59 pm
I personally think it should. I think every single country and it's unique culture should be responsible for keeping it's own house in order and not interfere with other countries right to run their country as they wish according to their own original culture. I think each country should just respect, accept and embrace other countries cultures for what they are and leave them alone to live their lives how they collectively agree to live..
There does not have to be warring nations. Nations do not need to feel threatened by other nations.
Dontaskme,
NATO would be a good idea if it were not now an instrument of United State aggression. NATO now serves its master and in doing so puts the whole world in jepordy. America is an aggressive empire and pretends to itself that the fear it instills in the global community is respect. America is a war machine that today makes the monster war machine of Nazi Germany look like a boyscout troop. Don't think for a minute that this stand-off with Russia wasn't planned some time ago.
