Walker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 9:48 am
Between individuals, threatening violence is a crime, although the action of violence is not real until it happens.
That's right, violence against another is not real until there is a deliberate intention to make the violence an actual event in realtime.
The threat is the declaration of intent.
Still no idea what you are saying...but in response...I'll say...
Then we need to ask ourselves why would there be the need to announce something that is not happening, except as an idea in someones mind, that is not real until the intent is carried out in realtime.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:00 am
Then we need to ask ourselves why would there be the need to announce something that is not happening, except as an idea in someones mind, that is not real until the intent is carried out in realtime.
Because after a nuclear bomb is dropped on your head, and the intent has been carried out, you're dead.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 9:55 amSo ask yourselves..why would you deliberately cause harm to others.
No. Ask yourself, why would Russia deliberately cause harm to others. Because, that's the reality of what's happening.
The reality that Russia is deliberately causing harm to others...is true, because it's happening right now in realtime.
However, the situation didn't need to happen. The fact that it is happening, just shows human beings for what they really are, that being really dumb and stupid, with absolutely zero intelligence... that's all.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:00 am
Then we need to ask ourselves why would there be the need to announce something that is not happening, except as an idea in someones mind, that is not real until the intent is carried out in realtime.
Russia's military buildup on the border of Ukraine was the announcement, in real time.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:05 amThe fact that it is happening, just shows human beings for what they really are, that being really dumb and stupid, with absolutely zero intelligence... that's all.
That's a really dumb and stupid conclusion, by one person, that shows little, if any, connection to the real world.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:00 am
Then we need to ask ourselves why would there be the need to announce something that is not happening, except as an idea in someones mind, that is not real until the intent is carried out in realtime.
Because after a nuclear bomb is dropped on your head, and the intent has been carried out, you're dead.
That's your cue to announce that no one dies.
But there is still zero NEED to intend to make weapons of mass destruction leading to pointless death and destruction of all living sentient organisms on earth...so I'm still confused as to what point you think you are making here.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:00 am
Then we need to ask ourselves why would there be the need to announce something that is not happening, except as an idea in someones mind, that is not real until the intent is carried out in realtime.
Because after a nuclear bomb is dropped on your head, and the intent has been carried out, you're dead.
That's your cue to announce that no one dies.
But there is still zero NEED to intend to make weapons of mass destruction leading to pointless death and destruction of all living sentient organisms on earth...so I'm still confused as to what point you think you are making here.
Now you're really confused. The point of NATO is defense against those who need to make weapons, and weapons are needed for defense.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:05 amThe fact that it is happening, just shows human beings for what they really are, that being really dumb and stupid, with absolutely zero intelligence... that's all.
That's a really dumb and stupid conclusion, by one person, that shows little, if any, connection to the real world.
But I have never participated in my own destruction...especially using radiation as a tool.
Personally, I think anyone who participates in weapon making is of zero intelligence, a fool, and a dumb stupid one at that.
Now you're really confused. The point of NATO is defense against those who need to make weapons, and weapons are needed for defense.
But it's a stupid dumb game, thinking you have to defend yourself from yourself.
I really do. But hey, if you think that's a super fun game to play with yourself, then go for it...it's just not what I would want to take part in.
I'm really not confused about not wanting to play the game of self destruction. I'm very clear about not wanting to play that stupid game thank you very much.
Last edited by Dontaskme on Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:11 am
Personally, I think anyone who participates in weapon making is of zero intelligence, a fool, and a dumb stupid one at that.
Eventually, unless allied with a sugar daddy like the US, they will also be losers when attacked with weapons.
This is why countries form alliances, like NATO.
You should check the bio's of the scientists who worked on the Manhattan Project.
Last edited by Walker on Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:11 am
Personally, I think anyone who participates in weapon making is of zero intelligence, a fool, and a dumb stupid one at that.
Eventually, unless allied with a sugar daddy like the US, they will also be losers when attacked with weapons.
This is why countries form alliances, like NATO.
Stupid idea...why not just do the intelligent thing, and form an entire one world alliance so that every single country on the entire planet is a member of the same club.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:11 am
Personally, I think anyone who participates in weapon making is of zero intelligence, a fool, and a dumb stupid one at that.
Eventually, unless allied with a sugar daddy like the US, they will also be losers when attacked with weapons.
This is why countries form alliances, like NATO.
Stupid idea...why not just do the intelligent thing, and form an entire one world alliance so that every single country on the entire planet is a member of the same club.
Walker wrote: ↑Mon Apr 18, 2022 10:14 am
Eventually, unless allied with a sugar daddy like the US, they will also be losers when attacked with weapons.
This is why countries form alliances, like NATO.
Stupid idea...why not just do the intelligent thing, and form an entire one world alliance so that every single country on the entire planet is a member of the same club.
Why not just call Putin an idiot?
That's not my call...who would be the last idiot?
I could keep on calling it...but what will that change, once an idiot always an idiot.
