If capitalism needs nationalism, wherein the latter stops names, but trading needs names, is there an idiosyncrasy?

[trokanmariel]

If capitalism needs nationalism, wherein the latter stops names, but trading needs names, is there an idiosyncrasy?

[simplicity]

If capitalism needs nationalism, wherein the latter stops names, but trading needs names, is there an idiosyncrasy?

That's easy...

If capitalism needs nationalism, wherein the latter stops names, but trading needs names, there is an idiosyncrasy.

[trokanmariel]

If capitalism needs nationalism, wherein the latter stops names, but trading needs names, is there an idiosyncrasy?

That's easy...

If capitalism needs nationalism, wherein the latter stops names, but trading needs names, there is an idiosyncrasy.

You're agreeing with the proposition? Is there a particular reason, that you're drawn to agreeing with it?

[simplicity]

If capitalism needs nationalism, wherein the latter stops names, but trading needs names, is there an idiosyncrasy?

That's easy...

If capitalism needs nationalism, wherein the latter stops names, but trading needs names, there is an idiosyncrasy.

You're agreeing with the proposition? Is there a particular reason, that you're drawn to agreeing with it?

Is there really a difference between agreeing and disagreeing?

[trokanmariel]

That's easy...

If capitalism needs nationalism, wherein the latter stops names, but trading needs names, there is an idiosyncrasy.

You're agreeing with the proposition? Is there a particular reason, that you're drawn to agreeing with it?

Is there really a difference between agreeing and disagreeing?

I suppose, if binaries as the heart of everything is the truth, then yes, your outlook makes sense. However, my rationale for the topic is the practical truth of reality. News media, films, politics and mainstream society are all using the same data, as evidence of an alternative, because the search for contradiction defines society.

To give an example:
Kremlin officials don't go to war, with Ukraine, because they are afraid of Neve Campbell. Somewhere in the science of nature, will be the rationale for that assertion, yet it never pops up in society as part of the search for contradiction.

If that data were to pop up, through CNN for example, then surely that would alter the fates of individuals, irrespective of Campbell or Kremlin officials, but merely the logistics of the sequence.

[simplicity]

However, my rationale for the topic is the practical truth of reality. News media, films, politics and mainstream society are all using the same data, as evidence of an alternative, because the search for contradiction defines society.

There are as many truths as there are moments x subjects. The actual truth changes every moment and can be defined as the sum total of all things [something that cannot be appreciated by human intelligence]. So people do the next best thing and make shit up. Is this forum not a wonderful venue to see how creative people can be?

You do quite the job yourself. My compliments.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

Hilarious the way people keep responding to this deeply bored troll. I think he's trying to do a budget 'Sokal'.

[Walker]

However, my rationale for the topic is the practical truth of reality. News media, films, politics and mainstream society are all using the same data, as evidence of an alternative, because the search for contradiction defines society.

There are as many truths as there are moments x subjects. The actual truth changes every moment and can be defined as the sum total of all things [something that cannot be appreciated by human intelligence]. So people do the next best thing and make shit up. Is this forum not a wonderful venue to see how creative people can be?

You do quite the job yourself. My compliments.

To limit "making stuff up," to this forum, would be an error in perceivable boundaries.

[Walker]

Of course, attention diverted to outrage takes the eye off the ball.

The real cause of Jan. 6 was Speaker of the House Pelosi, who purposely denied the available, routine, and obviously necessary security forces for the pre-planned, well-known and pre-publicized day, although the ignoring certainly was not in the name of US Nationalism, although patriotism is a sheep's clothing for rascals who conveniently, selectively, appropriate the constitution for The Party purposes.

[trokanmariel]

However, my rationale for the topic is the practical truth of reality. News media, films, politics and mainstream society are all using the same data, as evidence of an alternative, because the search for contradiction defines society.

There are as many truths as there are moments x subjects. The actual truth changes every moment and can be defined as the sum total of all things [something that cannot be appreciated by human intelligence]. So people do the next best thing and make shit up. Is this forum not a wonderful venue to see how creative people can be?

You do quite the job yourself. My compliments.

I thank you, for your response.

I was interested, in your comment "the actual truth changes every moment". Taking the usual definition, of what you mean, which is that the flux of reality sees visual and content difference every moment, the issue with that assertion is that there's no evidence of this in mainstream society. CNN remains CNN, being a put up job for wealthy people, and the movie calendar remains the movie calendar. Moreover, sunlight remains sunlight, which may be the takeover that results from CNN's dismantlement, meaning that if CNN's entire essence were to be disbanded, the overall physics of the universe should by principle theory (not necessarily practical science one) be finished.