Real or Unreal as in actually existing as a Fact

[Dontaskme]

That which is seen can only be known and identified as an image already within that which can NEVER be seen or known, namely, the SEER..seeing and knowing are the same one.

An image seen can only be known as a conceptual thing. While a conceptual thing can know NOTHING of it's thingyness.

Every known conceptual image is inseparable from the seer, which is imageless. Seeing and knowing is linear/ONE dimensional.

An image seen has no way of knowing of it's existence. Therefore, CANNOT know itself as a real or unreal thing that exists.

No image that is seen is real or unreal. And the IMAGE is all there IS

Bugs Bunny did not draw Bugs Bunny. There is no one behind you or in front of you.

TA DA!!
That's all folks....

[Terrapin Station]

. . . as an image already within that which can NEVER be seen or known, namely, the SEER . . .

Huh? I can't figure out what the heck that's saying.

[trokanmariel]

I'm currently studying daylight, and the possible inherent idiosyncrasy of the system. Namely, I'm attempting to align the logic of observation not being a socialist reality with the socialism of reset.

If observation is a capitalist truth, meaning that it is not an origin, then it is not hypocritical for the origin to be aware of the implausibility of reset, would you agree?

[promethean75]

"Huh? I can't figure out what the heck that's saying."

That's cuz he's/she's a zen master.

Sound of one hand clapping stuff.