Scientific Knowledge is the Most Credible & Trustworthy?

[Veritas Aequitas]

From that clue and based on those principles one can easily produce an rigorous taxonomy of human knowledge given the time and resources.

Do it then

I said the Wikipedia is a sufficient and reasonable clue and proof of a taxonomy of knowledge.

If you are willing to provide the funds I can sacrifice the time to do it.

[FlashDangerpants]

From that clue and based on those principles one can easily produce an rigorous taxonomy of human knowledge given the time and resources.

Do it then

I said the Wikipedia is a sufficient and reasonable clue and proof of a taxonomy of knowledge.

If you are willing to provide the funds I can sacrifice the time to do it.

You said it was easy. Why haven't you done it?

[Veritas Aequitas]

Do it then

I said the Wikipedia is a sufficient and reasonable clue and proof of a taxonomy of knowledge.

If you are willing to provide the funds I can sacrifice the time to do it.

You said it was easy. Why haven't you done it?

Note also the Dewey Decimal System is also a good basis for a taxonomy of knowledge.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dewey_Dec ... sification

I stated it is easy in theory and principle but it is tedious and time consuming [not impossible] in practice.
I have already explained the principles of how to go about it and given clues on it.

[FlashDangerpants]

I said the Wikipedia is a sufficient and reasonable clue and proof of a taxonomy of knowledge.

If you are willing to provide the funds I can sacrifice the time to do it.

You said it was easy. Why haven't you done it?

Note also the Dewey Decimal System is also a good basis for a taxonomy of knowledge.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dewey_Dec ... sification

I stated it is easy in theory and principle but it is tedious and time consuming [not impossible] in practice.
I have already explained the principles of how to go about it and given clues on it.

So it's an easy thing, but you can't do it. And for doubting that you can do it, I am a fool, and lazy.

But you are too lazy to go through with the thing you were fool enough to say is easy.