This is what I interpreted it to be:
One tenet of CRT is that racism and disparate racial outcomes are the result of complex, changing, and often subtle social and institutional dynamics, rather than explicit and intentional prejudices of individuals.
The apparent recent accusations of it being some kind of overt impositions in the schools is misleading. There is no doubt that a lot of it is being politicized by how many are applying special interest in granting leniency to non-whites but we have to note that the present use of it BY those on the Right are tending to counter react by substituting the particular class of theories as justification for their own behavior when much of the initial reasons for the racial injustices are uniquely related to why CRT was put forward.
I agree that there is a tendency towards opposing discrimination but believe that we have to first try expressing how particular biases are due to classification errors that inappropriately assign an economic class overrepresentation of specific races or sexes as proving to be caused uniquely by racists or sexists. The above tenet actually seems to recognize this as indirect and subtle, not necessarily intentional. But the problems occur due to segregation that is caused more by the 'favoring' of ones' own and not the 'disfavoring' of others. The reactive political solutions by many though is to strengthen their advocacy FOR their own exclusively rather than to integrate them when this only amplifies what we were previously doing already that caused the problems in the first place.
The Rightwingers want to segregate all others by removing any social programs and enhancing the power of those who are economically well endowed. This strengthens the dominating races and sexes already stereotyped of them because one defaults favor towards what one is familiar with even without overt exclusion of others. So those on the Left who are unrepresentative on the Right justifiably questions why remove the economical-class social services that are not biased to race or sex other than coincidentally? This leads them to think that they too have to advocate for their relatively larger 'familiar' class identities. No longer are they fighting for the general protections of social services that is traditionally Left, but to the largest pluralit of races or sexes among them not representative of those on the Right.
So the poorer whites who might align with the traditional 'poor' are discriminated against when they try to apply for social services and why they are forced to gravitate to the Right also based on their race or sex. This then concentrates more of the very stereotype of 'whiteness' towards the Right while transfering those who are socially Rightwing of 'nonwhites' but also poor are forced to gravitate to the Left since the anger at 'home' among the conservatives are now beginning to also stop favoring them assuming they are wanting segregation when they do not.
This continues until the concentration of those on the Right ARE 'white' and those on the Left ARE all 'non-white' due to real discrimination that was before unintended! Its feedbacking effects amplify and we all lose while segregation becomes the norm everywhere.
Solution: Right wingers stop segregating people who are poor from the wealthier; Left wingers stop segregating people based upon race and sex among the poor.
