The Left Destroys EVERYTHING It Touches

[henry quirk]

He was free to move around as he pleased.

Fellow traveler, then (or was he a full-fledged party member?).

[vegetariantaxidermy]

He was free to move around as he pleased.

Fellow traveler, then (or was he a full-fledged party member?).

What's a 'fellow traveller'? No, not a party member You really have been brainwashed...

[henry quirk]

What's a 'fellow traveller'?

A commie sympathizer, a pinko.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

What's a 'fellow traveller'?

A commie sympathizer, a pinko.

Give me strength...

[Skepdick]

What's a 'fellow traveller'?

A commie sympathizer, a pinko.

Since you are neither of those things then you must be a useful idiot.

[Age]

The biggest problem is tribalism. It's really the plague of Africa, and the main reason for all the nepotism, corruption and decay. There's no chance of Africa modernizing in a healthy way so long as the dominant paradigm in a region is one of ancient tribal hierarchies, beliefs and antipathies.

'Tribalism' is EXACTLY what "christianity IS, which is REALLY the plague of human beings and earth, itself, and the main reason for all the NEPOTISM, CORRUPTION, and DECAY.

There is NO chance of human beings modernizing in a healthy way, from the days when this is being written, so long as a dominant paradigm on earth is one of ancient tribal (here is that word again) 'hierarchies', BELIEFS, and ANTIPATHIES. Of which "christianity" is a PRIME EXAMPLE of an 'ancient tribe' STILL at play, and at work, in the days when this was being written. As CLEARLY evidenced AND proven by "immanuel can" itself.

[Age]

age,

So, do you also agree that; A 'man' does NOT own NOR possess freedom?

A man is free becuz he belongs to himself.

LOL
LOL
LOL

"A man BELONGS to himself" is a self-refuting claim. Also, how could one be 'free' if they BELONG to some thing?

An adult human being is, JUST, FREE, because they do NOT 'belong' to ANY thing, including "themselves".

So, to you, do you have the 'right' to kill "another" human being or not, if and when they deprive you of your property?

I'll defend what's mine (my life, my liberty, my property);

LOL "what's mine".

So, what does this MEAN, EXACTLY?

In case you are STILL UNAWARE my question, to you, was, and STILL IS, 'To you, do you have the 'right' to kill "another" human being or not, if and when they deprive you of your property?

I'll defend what's yours (your life, your liberty, your property) unless you tell me to bug off.

So, completely OFF TRACK, AGAIN. Or, just plain DEFLECTING, or DETRACTING, AGAIN.

If, in that defense, the thief takes a permanent dirt nap, well, that's his call. He's the aggressor. He determines how far I go.

LOL So, REALLY, it is "others" who CONTROL 'you'.

And, ONCE AGAIN, we can CLEARLY SEE the "justifications" you use, for your OBVIOUSLY aggressive and Wrong behaviors.

If he walks away empty-handed: great! If he persists in tryin' to takin' what's mine or yours: the consequence is his.

What happens if "he" takes 'your toothpick', for example? What would 'you' do to "him"?

So, which dictionary did you use to look up forfeit?

The one you provided.

Ah, so you lied when you said you looked up forfeit...

WHY would you ASSUME such an ABSURD thing as this here?

You still misuse forfeit.

How can I be using 'forfeit' wrong?

Consult a dictionary: you'll see the error.

Done this. There is NO error. End of story.

...becuz, at that time, I'd provided no dictionary.

REALLY?

Will you PROVE this?

If no, then WHY NOT?

[Age]

The biggest problem is tribalism. It's really the plague of Africa, and the main reason for all the nepotism, corruption and decay. There's no chance of Africa modernizing in a healthy way so long as the dominant paradigm in a region is one of ancient tribal hierarchies, beliefs and antipathies.

Well they've certainly made a dog's dinner out of South Africa, so much so that they are leaving in droves to go and live in properly run countries.

That's a great example of what I'm suggesting is the deep problem.

A lot of Westerners believed that once Apartied was gone, peace and love would break out...there would be "truth and reconcilliation," and then a full-on Western democracy would follow.

But we can see how that's worked out.

The catchphrase 'wealthy 'Western' countries' is just another agenda-laden bs political phrase. Is india 'Western'? It's a lot wealthier then where I'm from. Wealthy enough to have a nuclear arsenal... It's just another racist term to describe countries where the majority of inhabitants are 'white'.

The fly in the CRT ointment are the Asians. The most successful, highest earning, highest educated populations per capita in North America are the Chinese, the Indians and other S.E. Asians, like the Koreans. According to CRT dogma, though, they don't count as "minorities." The proof is not that they were not historically discriminated against; it's that they are successful NOW, which means they are successfully climbing the "system" that CRT says is inherently "racist" and "white."

So Indians, Koreans and Chinese get to be what CRTers call "white adjacent." No kidding: that's their idiotic term. It means, "You're Chinese or Indian, but we're going to count you as 'white,' because you don't fit our narrative at all, otherwise."

Assuming all 'white' people are rich is just another example of woke arsewipery.

Sure is.

It's fascinating that there are only two constituencies keeping the idea of "race" viable at all. One would be the extreme Right, which is absurdly small and has practically zero influence on the public anyway; the other, and the one that has influence, is the CRT crowd, the extreme Left, which is large, political, media-backed and powerful in key areas like education and governance.

If it would seem that if it were not for the Wokies, the whole idea of "race" would soon be dead...as it should be.

How could 'race' die, when it is 'you' who keeps 'race' VERY ALIVE. As SEEN and PROVEN in and by YOUR WORDS here.

[Age]

Russians tend to be quiet, modest people in my experience, while Americans....

Tyrannized folks, I think, would naturally skew toward bein' quiet and modest. They don't wanna be targets.

Free folks, on the other hand, probably are loud and rowdy, to the point of being annoying.

Contrary to YOUR BELIEF you are NOT free "henry quirk".

[Age]

Other people are 'hoodwinked', not Henry.

I get hoodwinked all the time. But not like veg's pop. He musta been a moron...or mebbe a fellow traveler.

Have you been to the country in question here "henry quirk"?

[Age]

What's a 'fellow traveller'?

A commie sympathizer, a pinko.

How did the words "fellow traveler" come from "commie sympathizer" or "pinko"?

Is this term used by "others", or did you make it up?

[FlashDangerpants]

It's fascinating that there are only two constituencies keeping the idea of "race" viable at all. One would be the extreme Right, which is absurdly small and has practically zero influence on the public anyway; the other, and the one that has influence, is the CRT crowd, the extreme Left, which is large, political, media-backed and powerful in key areas like education and governance.

If it would seem that if it were not for the Wokies, the whole idea of "race" would soon be dead...as it should be.

What about the Great Replacement Theory? It's all about white people getting replaced by hordes of dark skinned heathens in a left wing plot to do something bad, so it's inherently racist by your own reasoning.

There's a very broad overlap between the people who like GRT and those who think CRT is this enormous threat to .... something or other, whatever this grift you're working happens to be.

[uwot]

...in the irony void between Mr Can's ears:

...the extreme Right, which is absurdly small...

That's because on planet Can "extreme Right" means to the right of Mr Can, to whom, let us not forget, the Nazi Party were leftists.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

It's fascinating that there are only two constituencies keeping the idea of "race" viable at all. One would be the extreme Right, which is absurdly small and has practically zero influence on the public anyway; the other, and the one that has influence, is the CRT crowd, the extreme Left, which is large, political, media-backed and powerful in key areas like education and governance.

If it would seem that if it were not for the Wokies, the whole idea of "race" would soon be dead...as it should be.

What about the Great Replacement Theory? It's all about white people getting replaced by hordes of dark skinned heathens in a left wing plot to do something bad, so it's inherently racist by your own reasoning.

There's a very broad overlap between the people who like GRT and those who think CRT is this enormous threat to .... something or other, whatever this grift you're working happens to be.

That's a particularly disingenuous and wanky response which doesn't appear to have anything to do with anything he wrote.

[Belinda]

BTW Boko Haram are islamists not Muslims.

What alleged difference are you thinking you're pointing to?

If you ask anybody in Boko Haram or Al Shabaab "Are you a Muslim," what do you think they say?

We are Muslims and Boko Haram terrify us, kill us, and abduct our children.