Conspiracy nuts

[Age]

He also said this...

By the way, your "reason" 2. is just a twisted and distortion of your own making, from your wrong assumptions.

What I have ACTUALLY said IS DIFFERENT, and which can be CLEARLY SEEN, by the readers.

Just for the record, as it pertains to reason number "2", here is what he actually said in a post long ago...

...This impatience comes out and through the one, which I am using, who is writing this. This is a bit like how the ones, I used who wrote the bible, misinterpreted what I was actually trans and in spiring to them, which obviously has caused a lot of confusion. Now I found another human being who I can use to share things...

...which can now be CLEARLY SEEN by the readers ("in the days when this is being written").

I don't mean to make fun of Age, for lord knows I've presented some wild and questionable ideas of my own. But his brazen dishonesty in denying (or not recognizing) the implications of his own statements, demands a calling out.
_______

I am so happy that 'you', posters, keep bringing forward, and sharing, what I have previously written. How much this keeps reinforcing in the 'readers' what my True intention and message IS, EXACTLY, is working brilliantly.

In fact, 'you' are doing 'my' work, for 'Me'.

In case 'you' have NOT YET FULLY REALIZED, 'I' am, literally, using 'you', to SHARE THINGS.

Finding another human being who I can use, and have found another that I am actually using now, to 'share things', is really NOT that hard NOR complicated AT ALL. As can be CLEARLY SEEN. So, thank you.

Again, the more people 'try to' make fun of 'me', and/or Dishonestly claim, "I don't mean to make fun of ...", actually works in my favor far more than yet recognized by the people, in the days when this was being written. So, please continue on in the EXACT SAME WAY that you have been.

[Lacewing]

2. Because the ancient and "channeled entity" who claims to have been the inspiration for the writing of the Bible, and who claims to be using the human who goes by the names "ken/Age" on this forum, should already be wise enough to know the answers to the questions that he (she/it) is asking.

Brilliant. Age will probably respond something like "but "I" DO KNOW the anSWers, I just ask YOU to sEe if YOU KNOW!"

Girl, you nailed that prediction!

his brazen dishonesty in denying (or not recognizing) the implications of his own statements, demands a calling out

Yes, it does.

So many people have come to this forum to proclaim their unique association with a god... and it's always similar in claiming how much they know that others don't know. They never offer anything truly compelling or significant... rather, their own words/claims reveal their delusions and their ego, and their dishonesty and denial. Somehow, they seem completely unaware of this, so wrapped up in it they are. They just repeat it over and over as if hypnotized or possessed, and as if repeating it drowns out all else to the contrary. It doesn't matter if other people notice their delusion -- as long as they themselves never acknowledge it, the pretense can go on. It's fascinating.

[Age]

Brilliant. Age will probably respond something like "but "I" DO KNOW the anSWers, I just ask YOU to sEe if YOU KNOW!"

Girl, you nailed that prediction!

his brazen dishonesty in denying (or not recognizing) the implications of his own statements, demands a calling out

Yes, it does.

So, how about calling out the, alleged, "implications". What are the 'implications', EXACTLY?

So many people have come to this forum to proclaim their unique association with a god... and it's always similar in claiming how much they know that others don't know.

EXCEPT I have NEVER claimed this.

This one known as "lacewing" only BELIEVES that I have been because "lacewing" follows only one path and thus can NOT see thee ACTUAL Truth, before them.

They never offer anything truly compelling or significant...

"lacewing" can NOT see ANY thing truly compelling or significant BECAUSE "lacewing" BELIEVES there is NONE.

As already been noted, Extreme conspiracy addiction seems to be an attempt to justify one's own inability and refusal to see/think more broadly. It's easier, perhaps, (and more exciting) to make up big stories about foes who are distorting/ruining everything. "War" gets the juices flowing and gives one a supposed righteous mission as a brave warrior of truth who stands alone for liberty and justice.

Which is EXACTLY what "lacewing", itself, is doing here.

rather, their own words/claims reveal their delusions and their ego, and their dishonesty and denial.

As can be CLEARLY SEEN and PROVEN True, by this very person, "them self".

Somehow, they seem completely unaware of this, so wrapped up in it they are.

LOL If only this one could see CLEARLY they would see just how humorous this really is.

They just repeat it over and over as if hypnotized or possessed, and as if repeating it drowns out all else to the contrary.

EXACTLY THE SAME as this one here keeps repeating this same thing, over and over.

It doesn't matter if other people notice their delusion -- as long as they themselves never acknowledge it, the pretense can go on. It's fascinating.

And yet here this one here is completely and utterly UNAWARE that it is doing the EXACT SAME thing, itself.

To "lacewing", the association is with itself here, and thinks itself knows better than "others". As such it thinks itself as as god, and is therefore caught up in its own self-delusion.

[Atla]

I am so happy that 'you', posters, keep bringing forward, and sharing, what I have previously written. How much this keeps reinforcing in the 'readers' what my True intention and message IS, EXACTLY, is working brilliantly.

In fact, 'you' are doing 'my' work, for 'Me'.

In case 'you' have NOT YET FULLY REALIZED, 'I' am, literally, using 'you', to SHARE THINGS.

Finding another human being who I can use, and have found another that I am actually using now, to 'share things', is really NOT that hard NOR complicated AT ALL. As can be CLEARLY SEEN. So, thank you.

Again, the more people 'try to' make fun of 'me', and/or Dishonestly claim, "I don't mean to make fun of ...", actually works in my favor far more than yet recognized by the people, in the days when this was being written. So, please continue on in the EXACT SAME WAY that you have been.

Go away "God", no one likes you. You can take Age with you.

The real God would know how to communicate with humans. You are an impostor, you are only fooling Age.

[Age]

I am so happy that 'you', posters, keep bringing forward, and sharing, what I have previously written. How much this keeps reinforcing in the 'readers' what my True intention and message IS, EXACTLY, is working brilliantly.

In fact, 'you' are doing 'my' work, for 'Me'.

In case 'you' have NOT YET FULLY REALIZED, 'I' am, literally, using 'you', to SHARE THINGS.

Finding another human being who I can use, and have found another that I am actually using now, to 'share things', is really NOT that hard NOR complicated AT ALL. As can be CLEARLY SEEN. So, thank you.

Again, the more people 'try to' make fun of 'me', and/or Dishonestly claim, "I don't mean to make fun of ...", actually works in my favor far more than yet recognized by the people, in the days when this was being written. So, please continue on in the EXACT SAME WAY that you have been.

Go away "God", no one likes you. You can take Age with you.

The real God would know how to communicate with humans. You are an impostor, you are only fooling Age.

LOL

Thank you for continuing on in your SAME WAY "atla".

By the way, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is we have ANOTHER human being who BELIEVES that they KNOW who the REAL God IS.

[Atla]

I am so happy that 'you', posters, keep bringing forward, and sharing, what I have previously written. How much this keeps reinforcing in the 'readers' what my True intention and message IS, EXACTLY, is working brilliantly.

In fact, 'you' are doing 'my' work, for 'Me'.

In case 'you' have NOT YET FULLY REALIZED, 'I' am, literally, using 'you', to SHARE THINGS.

Finding another human being who I can use, and have found another that I am actually using now, to 'share things', is really NOT that hard NOR complicated AT ALL. As can be CLEARLY SEEN. So, thank you.

Again, the more people 'try to' make fun of 'me', and/or Dishonestly claim, "I don't mean to make fun of ...", actually works in my favor far more than yet recognized by the people, in the days when this was being written. So, please continue on in the EXACT SAME WAY that you have been.

Go away "God", no one likes you. You can take Age with you.

The real God would know how to communicate with humans. You are an impostor, you are only fooling Age.

LOL

Thank you for continuing on in your SAME WAY "atla".

By the way, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is we have ANOTHER human being who BELIEVES that they KNOW who the REAL God IS.

Yes, and that human being is called Age.

[Age]

Go away "God", no one likes you. You can take Age with you.

The real God would know how to communicate with humans. You are an impostor, you are only fooling Age.

LOL

Thank you for continuing on in your SAME WAY "atla".

By the way, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is we have ANOTHER human being who BELIEVES that they KNOW who the REAL God IS.

Yes, and that human being is called Age.

But I do NOT believe that.

What can be CLEARLY SEEN is that the one known as "atla" here wrote, "The real God would know ...". So, this MEANS that "atla" actually BELIEVES that it KNOWS what the REAL God IS.

[Atla]

LOL

Thank you for continuing on in your SAME WAY "atla".

By the way, what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is we have ANOTHER human being who BELIEVES that they KNOW who the REAL God IS.

Yes, and that human being is called Age.

But I do NOT believe that.

What can be CLEARLY SEEN is that the one known as "atla" here wrote, "The real God would know ...". So, this MEANS that "atla" actually BELIEVES that it KNOWS what the REAL God IS.

Why would the real God be as dumb and ignorant as a rock, like you are?

[Age]

Yes, and that human being is called Age.

But I do NOT believe that.

What can be CLEARLY SEEN is that the one known as "atla" here wrote, "The real God would know ...". So, this MEANS that "atla" actually BELIEVES that it KNOWS what the REAL God IS.

Why would the real God be as dumb and ignorant as a rock, like you are?

So, some people think this is the way to address things in a philosophy forum.

If I have said ANY thing that you could refute, then I suggest just doing that. That is; If you can.

First, write the ACTUAL WORDS that I have used, and inform us of what you THINK I am saying AND MEANING.

Second, explain why you think or believe that 'that' is false, wrong, and/or incorrect.

Third, remain open to the fact that it could actually be your interpretation of what I am saying, AND MEANING, which is false, wrong, and/or incorrect, or, that actually what I have said, AND MEANT, was NOT false, wrong, nor incorrect at all anyway.

By the way, 'remaining open', means allowing me to reply to what you said, while LISTENING to what I am ACTUALLY saying, AND MEANING, in my reply to what you have ACTUALLY said, AND MEANT.

[Atla]

But I do NOT believe that.

What can be CLEARLY SEEN is that the one known as "atla" here wrote, "The real God would know ...". So, this MEANS that "atla" actually BELIEVES that it KNOWS what the REAL God IS.

Why would the real God be as dumb and ignorant as a rock, like you are?

So, some people think this is the way to address things in a philosophy forum.

If I have said ANY thing that you could refute, then I suggest just doing that. That is; If you can.

First, write the ACTUAL WORDS that I have used, and inform us of what you THINK I am saying AND MEANING.

Second, explain why you think or believe that 'that' is false, wrong, and/or incorrect.

Third, remain open to the fact that it could actually be your interpretation of what I am saying, AND MEANING, which is false, wrong, and/or incorrect, or, that actually what I have said, AND MEANT, was NOT false, wrong, nor incorrect at all anyway.

By the way, 'remaining open', means allowing me to reply to what you said, while LISTENING to what I am ACTUALLY saying, AND MEANING, in my reply to what you have ACTUALLY said, AND MEANT.

We did that a few times and it was proven that you are dumb and ignorant. Why is God dumber and more ignorant than the average human?

[Dontaskme]

Yes, and that human being is called Age.

But I do NOT believe that.

What can be CLEARLY SEEN is that the one known as "atla" here wrote, "The real God would know ...". So, this MEANS that "atla" actually BELIEVES that it KNOWS what the REAL God IS.

Why would the real God be as dumb and ignorant as a rock, like you are?

Lol your funny, I like reading your responses to Age.

Well we are living on a big rock. And that big rock has spawned everything that lives on it. In others words everything alive today has been birthed by a big rock.



Rocks can only give birth to rocks.

We’re all nutters here, so let’s all relax and get nutty…. Weeeee!

Let’s all stop putting on a fake front, and just be the crazy nutters we are…yay!

[Age]

Why would the real God be as dumb and ignorant as a rock, like you are?

So, some people think this is the way to address things in a philosophy forum.

If I have said ANY thing that you could refute, then I suggest just doing that. That is; If you can.

First, write the ACTUAL WORDS that I have used, and inform us of what you THINK I am saying AND MEANING.

Second, explain why you think or believe that 'that' is false, wrong, and/or incorrect.

Third, remain open to the fact that it could actually be your interpretation of what I am saying, AND MEANING, which is false, wrong, and/or incorrect, or, that actually what I have said, AND MEANT, was NOT false, wrong, nor incorrect at all anyway.

By the way, 'remaining open', means allowing me to reply to what you said, while LISTENING to what I am ACTUALLY saying, AND MEANING, in my reply to what you have ACTUALLY said, AND MEANT.

We did that a few times and it was proven that you are dumb AND ignorant.

So, to you, it is an irrefutable fact that I am dumb and ignorant, correct?

By the way, how do you define the word 'dumb'?

Why is God dumber and more ignorant than the average human?

So you still BELIEVE that you KNOW what IS, correct?

Also, is the way you reply to "others" how you really think discussions are made in philosophy forums?

By the way, what is an "average human", to you?

If you would answer yes to my first clarifying question in this reply, then WHY would you even continue to ask me ANY questions?

Do you really BELIEVE that you are more clever and smarter?

And, what exactly is 'it', which I am supposedly "ignorant" of?

[Dontaskme]

And, what exactly is 'it', which I am supposedly "ignorant" of?

Only ignorance is original, everything is else ( knowledge) is a poor substitute.





The Human condition, the artificial sense of I am... will only hear what it wants to hear.

It can even hear what it ''does not'' want to hear. And when it hears what it does not want to hear, it can never unhear it.

That's when the human condition comes face to face with it's original reality which is the faceless face.


.

[Age]

And, what exactly is 'it', which I am supposedly "ignorant" of?

Only ignorance is original, everything is else ( knowledge) is a poor substitute.





The Human condition, the artificial sense of I am... will only hear what it wants to hear.

That is ONLY IF 'you' listen to the 'artificial sense' of "I am ...".

It can even hear what it ''does not'' want to hear. And when it hears what it does not want to hear, it can never unhear it.

And that 'it' is just 'you', human beings.

Get rid of the 'artificial sense' of who I am, then thee Real One comes out and into play.

That's when the human condition comes face to face with it's original reality which is the faceless face.


.

AND, does the Mind have a face?

Could thee One and ONLY Mind, Itself, be the 'faceless face', which 'you', human beings talk about and refer to?

Or, are you one of those human beings who BELIEVES 'it' has its OWN mind?

If you are, then WHERE, exactly, does this, so called, "human mind" exist? What does 'it' look like? AND, what does 'it' ACTUALLY do, exactly?

By the way, one can only provide an "admission of ignorance" ONCE they KNOW what they were PREVIOUSLY ignorant about. AND, once they KNOW 'that', then they are NOT ignorant, of that thing, ANYMORE.

Also, how to differentiate between false and true knowledge is a VERY SIMPLE and VERY EASY thing to do, that is; once one learns HOW, to do that.

[uwot]

Gotta admit (and I'll probably regret it) this from Skepdick is on the money:

Conspiracy theorists are trapped in the fantasy of their own epistemic inadequacy.

They've never done anything sufficiently hard/complex in their life to recognise the limits of human knowledge/ability so they grossly over-estimate what others can do - they are deeply insecure about their knowledge/abilities.

Combine that with general misanthropy and distrust and what they effectively believe in is Descartes' demon.

I guess conspiracy nuts are a special case, but I think you could apply the same to some of the other assorted nuts, like...well, no names. Perhaps if we're very quiet, they'll foxtrot oscar.