The character posing as AGE makes a claim … but is it FACT?

[Age]

You predicted "future generations", so that's a bust.
What else have you got?

I do NOT need ANY thing else.

Did I predict future "generations" EVERY time?

And, how do you separate "generations", EXACTLY?

You predicted generations. And you have been VERY strict about that too, you gave me an unecessarily hard time when I forgot a detail and wrote "future historians" one time. You can re-read that stupid shit if you need reminding here viewtopic.php?f=5&t=26874&hilit=historians&start=75

So yes, your prediction was very definitely future generations and you have not demonstrated any such thing, nor is it possible to do so for decades yet.

That shouldn't be a problem. If you experience past present and future all as one the way your "in this time" rhetoric implies, you should be able to whip out a new prediction no problem. You can just tell us about a world news event that will happen next week.

You OBVIOUSLY keep MISSING things, and this partly due to the FACT that you will NOT answer, Honestly, the ACTUAL clarifying questions posed to you.

Also, I have continually been INFORMING that what thee ACTUAL Truth of things is DEPENDED upon the observer, and thus HOW they LOOK AT and SEE things.

[Atla]

'what' human beings evolve FROM is Creation, Itself.

If you EVER become Truly interested in LEARNING MORE, then let us KNOW.

Yet another belief of yours you can't prove?

Besides the FACT that this is CLEARLY a BELIEF of YOURS, which you could NOT prove, it is also PLAINLY OBVIOUS that you are COMPLETELY Wrong here as well, ONCE AGAIN.

If ANY one is Truly interested in what I say here, then what I say can be, and will be, PROVEN True.

How is it my belief when you wrote it?

[Atla]

Also, I have continually been INFORMING that what thee ACTUAL Truth of things is DEPENDED upon the observer, and thus HOW they LOOK AT and SEE things.

Objective truth by definition can't be depended upon the observer. You really have no fucking clue what you're talking about do you.

[Age]

Yet another belief of yours you can't prove?

Besides the FACT that this is CLEARLY a BELIEF of YOURS, which you could NOT prove, it is also PLAINLY OBVIOUS that you are COMPLETELY Wrong here as well, ONCE AGAIN.

If ANY one is Truly interested in what I say here, then what I say can be, and will be, PROVEN True.

How is it my belief when you wrote it?

I was, OBVIOUSLY, NOT referring to that.

I was, OBVIOUSLY, referring to YOUR BELIEF here.

[Age]

Also, I have continually been INFORMING that what thee ACTUAL Truth of things is DEPENDED upon the observer, and thus HOW they LOOK AT and SEE things.

Objective truth by definition can't be depended upon the observer.

LOL. Okay, if that is what your subjective truth and BELIEF is.

You really have no fucking clue what you're talking about do you.

Okay, if that is what you BELIEVE.

But let us LOOK at this from an another, objective, persective.

Who, EXACTLY, would have MORE of a clue about what 'I' am talking about here, 'you' or 'I'?

Have 'you' ever even considered that because 'you' do NOT CLARIFY with 'me' in regards to what 'i' talk about, and that 'you' ONLY MAKE ASSUMPTIONS, then it is 'you' who has absolutely NO clue AT ALL about what 'i' ambtaljing about here?

[Dontaskme]

I know sometimes most social interaction on the Internet seems dominated by people with various mental and personality issues, but sometimes this board literally seems like it must be mostly populated by people who are institutionalized.

Yes, it does! Or... people who should be.

It appears to me that people on this forum who manically present their views/beliefs/ideas as uniquely tied to some kind of divine/profound truth, often seem to use this forum to go even deeper into whatever madness/delusion they feel driven/possessed by. Perhaps if they were courageous and creative enough to function like productive human beings in the world and in their communities, and to explore a broader range of awareness and potential than the little nits they love to focus on and possess, they might not fester away here as hateful, lazy, dishonest, and/or delusional cowards claiming that such bullshit is their supposed proof of association with truth/god.

Exactly.

Hey, those people don't think like we do, quick, lets institutionalize them.

Evil.

[Dontaskme]

Also, I have continually been INFORMING that what thee ACTUAL Truth of things is DEPENDED upon the observer, and thus HOW they LOOK AT and SEE things.

Objective truth by definition can't be depended upon the observer. You really have no fucking clue what you're talking about do you.

It likes to cluck, it gives purposeless life purpose.

Oh, just let them have their beliefs....oh wait..!! ...beliefless beliefs are here again, and the sun shines up my arse.

[FlashDangerpants]

I do NOT need ANY thing else.

Did I predict future "generations" EVERY time?

And, how do you separate "generations", EXACTLY?

You predicted generations. And you have been VERY strict about that too, you gave me an unecessarily hard time when I forgot a detail and wrote "future historians" one time. You can re-read that stupid shit if you need reminding here viewtopic.php?f=5&t=26874&hilit=historians&start=75

So yes, your prediction was very definitely future generations and you have not demonstrated any such thing, nor is it possible to do so for decades yet.

That shouldn't be a problem. If you experience past present and future all as one the way your "in this time" rhetoric implies, you should be able to whip out a new prediction no problem. You can just tell us about a world news event that will happen next week.

You OBVIOUSLY keep MISSING things, and this partly due to the FACT that you will NOT answer, Honestly, the ACTUAL clarifying questions posed to you.

Also, I have continually been INFORMING that what thee ACTUAL Truth of things is DEPENDED upon the observer, and thus HOW they LOOK AT and SEE things.

You failed. Your prediction was for future generations to read this stuff. You don't seem to have any other predictions to base your boasts upon. The only one you have is stupid.

[Age]

Also, I have continually been INFORMING that what thee ACTUAL Truth of things is DEPENDED upon the observer, and thus HOW they LOOK AT and SEE things.

Objective truth by definition can't be depended upon the observer.

LOL
LOL
LOL

You sound like you think you KNOW what 'objective truth', itself, IS, EXACTLY. So, instead of telling us what 'objective truth' is NOT depended upon, how about telling us what 'objective truth' IS depended upon, EXACTLY?

Are you capable of just doing that at least?

You really have no fucking clue what you're talking about do you.

Saying this means, or at least implies, that 'you', "atla", actually do KNOW what 'you' are talking about. SO, who was the observer who decided that 'objective truth' is NOT depended upon the observer?

And, is the claim that 'objective truth' is NOT depended upon the observer a 'relative' or an 'objective' truth?

[Age]

You predicted generations. And you have been VERY strict about that too, you gave me an unecessarily hard time when I forgot a detail and wrote "future historians" one time. You can re-read that stupid shit if you need reminding here viewtopic.php?f=5&t=26874&hilit=historians&start=75

So yes, your prediction was very definitely future generations and you have not demonstrated any such thing, nor is it possible to do so for decades yet.

That shouldn't be a problem. If you experience past present and future all as one the way your "in this time" rhetoric implies, you should be able to whip out a new prediction no problem. You can just tell us about a world news event that will happen next week.

You OBVIOUSLY keep MISSING things, and this partly due to the FACT that you will NOT answer, Honestly, the ACTUAL clarifying questions posed to you.

Also, I have continually been INFORMING that what thee ACTUAL Truth of things is DEPENDED upon the observer, and thus HOW they LOOK AT and SEE things.

You failed. Your prediction was for future generations to read this stuff. You don't seem to have any other predictions to base your boasts upon. The only one you have is stupid.

I will ask 'you', AGAIN, "flashdangerpants",
Did I predict future "generations" EVERY time?

[FlashDangerpants]

You OBVIOUSLY keep MISSING things, and this partly due to the FACT that you will NOT answer, Honestly, the ACTUAL clarifying questions posed to you.

Also, I have continually been INFORMING that what thee ACTUAL Truth of things is DEPENDED upon the observer, and thus HOW they LOOK AT and SEE things.

You failed. Your prediction was for future generations to read this stuff. You don't seem to have any other predictions to base your boasts upon. The only one you have is stupid.

I will ask 'you', AGAIN, "flashdangerpants",
Did I predict future "generations" EVERY time?

Fuck knows, if I see a thread where you are arguing with Eggnog7 and Vagianl Aquafresh I'm not going to bother reading that shit, I cba with three crack babies all at once, so I have no idea what boasts you have made in conversation with those chumps, let alone whether you mentioned generations at the time.

But I did originaly ask whether you had a verified prediction that wasn't unimpressive shit. So if all you have is the prediction that your future self would still be writing gnomic junk, and future me or future uwot would still be holding you to account for stuff you had written, you have failed on shitness part instead of failing on the generations part.

[Age]

You failed. Your prediction was for future generations to read this stuff. You don't seem to have any other predictions to base your boasts upon. The only one you have is stupid.

I will ask 'you', AGAIN, "flashdangerpants",
Did I predict future "generations" EVERY time?

Fuck knows, if I see a thread where you are arguing with Eggnog7 and Vagianl Aquafresh I'm not going to bother reading that shit, I cba with three crack babies all at once, so I have no idea what boasts you have made in conversation with those chumps, let alone whether you mentioned generations at the time.

But I did originaly ask whether you had a verified prediction that wasn't unimpressive shit. So if all you have is the prediction that your future self would still be writing gnomic junk, and future me or future uwot would still be holding you to account for stuff you had written, you have failed on shitness part instead of failing on the generations part.

If you say and BELIEVE so.

[FlashDangerpants]

Ahem

future generations are coming to this site to read about your journey to greatness aren't they?

Yes.

[Age]

Ahem

future generations are coming to this site to read about your journey to greatness aren't they?

Yes.

LOL

Did you REALLY NOT UNDERSTAND even this?

Considering the FACT that it was 'you', "flashdangerpants", who posed the question, to wit I just wrote and responded with the answer, 'Yes', to, then SURELY you SHOULD NOT HAVE, ONCE AGAIN, completely AND utterly MISUNDERSTOOD. But, as can be CLEARLY SEEN here, 'you' HAVE, ONCE MORE.

I suggest that while you are coming up with a question, then you FULLY UNDERSTAND the question, itself, BEFORE you asked it, and write it down. That way you will NOT fall to MISUNDERSTANDING, as OFTEN as you CLEARLY DO.

Now read your OWN question AGAIN, and then read MY answer AGAIN, and let us SEE if you come to the SAME Wrong CONCLUSION as you OBVIOUSLY have and did here.

[FlashDangerpants]

Ahem

Yes.

LOL

Did you REALLY NOT UNDERSTAND even this?

Considering the FACT that it was 'you', "flashdangerpants", who posed the question, to wit I just wrote and responded with the answer, 'Yes', to, then SURELY you SHOULD NOT HAVE, ONCE AGAIN, completely AND utterly MISUNDERSTOOD. But, as can be CLEARLY SEEN here, 'you' HAVE, ONCE MORE.

I suggest that while you are coming up with a question, then you FULLY UNDERSTAND the question, itself, BEFORE you asked it, and write it down. That way you will NOT fall to MISUNDERSTANDING, as OFTEN as you CLEARLY DO.

Now read your OWN question AGAIN, and then read MY answer AGAIN, and let us SEE if you come to the SAME Wrong CONCLUSION as you OBVIOUSLY have and did here.

It's perfectly clear though. You hold the unsubstantiated belief that future generations will seek your wisdom from this site. Your protestations that it isn't a belief can be ignored because they are bullshit.