A World Without Men?

[FlashDangerpants]

NO. You are, ONCE AGAIN, COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MISSING and MISUNDERSTANDING the POINT.

So theeEEeeeEEEEEEE truth is exactly one thing, but it seems like different things, and you only see it exactly as it is, or so it seems to you?

LOL
LOL
LOL

You are only getting EVEN FURTHER AWAY from thee ACTUAL Truth of things now.

So this thing where you tell us you can see the future... clarifying question ... can you actually see the future, or do you "seem" to see the future?

[Age]

By the way, this is a good time to REMIND you that you STILL DO NOT YET KNOW what I have to say here.

That's because you are not truly open and honest. Either that or you are a fucking moron.

'you' can choose the latter one, and stay STUCK with that view.

OR, if there was some thing that you want to know or clarified, then, hopefully, by now you already KNOW what to do.

[FlashDangerpants]

Was it something obvious and shit like "people will think Ken is stupid"?
Or was it something that actually required foreknowledge of non-obvious outcomes?

I have TOLD YOU ENOUGH TIMES ALREADY. If you REALLY can NOT SEE where it is, then that is NOT my fault.

CLARIFYING QUESTION.... what was your prediction that already came true?

[uwot]

By the way, this is a good time to REMIND you that you STILL DO NOT YET KNOW what I have to say here.

That's because you are not truly open and honest. Either that or you are a fucking moron.

'you' can choose the latter one, and stay STUCK with that view.

It's not a matter of choice Age; I am stuck with the view that you are a fucking moron because you are manifestly incapable of providing evidence to the contrary.

OR, if there was some thing that you want to know or clarified, then, hopefully, by now you already KNOW what to do.

I do Age; it is to assume that you are a fucking moron. If you care for my opinion, then you have some work to do to change it. If

...this is a good time to REMIND you that you STILL DO NOT YET KNOW what I have to say here.

then now is a good time to say what you have to say.

[Dubious]

By the way, this is a good time to REMIND you that you STILL DO NOT YET KNOW what I have to say here.

Any possibility of making that into a permanent condition?

[Skepdick]

Good news then: you're on your own.

Thanks for keeping your hands away from my crotch.

[Age]

By the way, this is a good time to REMIND you that you STILL DO NOT YET KNOW what I have to say here.

Any possibility of making that into a permanent condition?

If people do not ask questions and do not reply, then yes.

[Dubious]

By the way, this is a good time to REMIND you that you STILL DO NOT YET KNOW what I have to say here.

Any possibility of making that into a permanent condition?

If people do not ask questions and do not reply, then yes.

It's important to be circumspect in who one replies to otherwise it's just a waste of time.

[Age]

Any possibility of making that into a permanent condition?

If people do not ask questions and do not reply, then yes.

It's important to be circumspect in who one replies to otherwise it's just a waste of time.

If you say so.

[Age]

That's because you are not truly open and honest. Either that or you are a fucking moron.

'you' can choose the latter one, and stay STUCK with that view.

It's not a matter of choice Age; I am stuck with the view that you are a fucking moron because you are manifestly incapable of providing evidence to the contrary.

OR, if there was some thing that you want to know or clarified, then, hopefully, by now you already KNOW what to do.

I do Age; it is to assume that you are a fucking moron. If you care for my opinion, then you have some work to do to change it. If

...this is a good time to REMIND you that you STILL DO NOT YET KNOW what I have to say here.

then now is a good time to say what you have to say.

So, is there STILL NO one who Truly wants to CHALLENGE or QUESTION me on the FACT that thee One and ONLY Universe could NEVER expand NOR could EVER begin?

Considering the FACT that ABSOLUTELY NO proof AT ALL has EVER been provided for ANY thing contrary to the FACT that thee Universe is infinite AND eternal, then it is of NO surprise that there is NO one even wanting to, let alone capable to, CHALLENGE or QUESTION the FACT and CLAIM that thee Universe IS eternal AND infinite.

Next we can move onto the FACT that once traveling faster than the speed of light becomes possible, then what is wrongly called "time travel" also becomes possible, and to the FACT that traveling at different speeds does NOT alter the "ageing process" one iota. That is; if ANY one is Truly up to the CHALLENGING and to the QUESTIONING?

[uwot]

Considering the FACT that ABSOLUTELY NO proof AT ALL has EVER been provided for ANY thing contrary to the FACT that thee Universe is infinite AND eternal, then it is of NO surprise that there is NO one even wanting to, let alone capable to, CHALLENGE or QUESTION the FACT and CLAIM that thee Universe IS eternal AND infinite.

What is your proof that the universe is infinite and eternal?

[Age]

Considering the FACT that ABSOLUTELY NO proof AT ALL has EVER been provided for ANY thing contrary to the FACT that thee Universe is infinite AND eternal, then it is of NO surprise that there is NO one even wanting to, let alone capable to, CHALLENGE or QUESTION the FACT and CLAIM that thee Universe IS eternal AND infinite.

What is your proof that the universe is infinite and eternal?

Just that it is IMPOSSIBLE to have an edge, boundary, or limit to the Universe is enough. But,

As technology advances the further 'you', human beings, are able to see, and when 'you' evolve enough you then realize that it would not matter how far 'we' can see, there will always be more and further, afield.

Considering what the Universe is fundamentally made up of, then there could NEVER be a way that the Universe could expand. One just has to look at and discuss what actually exists to realize this, and if ANY one wants to LOOK AT and DISCUSS this subject, then let us continue.

But let us not forget that the definition of the word 'Universe' needs to be discussed, agreed with, and accepted before what is ACTUALLY True can be uncovered and revealed.

[Gary Childress]

But let us not forget that the definition of the word 'Universe' needs to be discussed, agreed with, and accepted before what is ACTUALLY True can be uncovered and revealed.

That's a fair question. Right now science seems to consider the "universe" everything that "exists" (for lack of a better word). That which is outside the universe does not exist. But now there are also those who believe there might be multiple universes, in which case it might be more accurate to say, that which is outside A universe does not exist. That which is inside a universe does exist.

[henry quirk]

But let us not forget that *the definition of the word 'Universe' needs to be discussed, agreed with, and accepted before what is ACTUALLY True can be uncovered and revealed.

That's a fair question. Right now science seems to consider the "universe" everything that "exists" (for lack of a better word). That which is outside the universe does not exist. But now there are also those who believe there might be multiple universes, in which case it might be more accurate to say, that which is outside A universe does not exist. That which is inside a universe does exist.

Well, if we gotta have a mutually agreed upon definition, we'll never get to what is ACTUALLY True.

Watch all this disagreement with this, for example...

I say the universe or Reality is a big, and I mean BIG, mostly empty, box. Inside this box is a minuscule amount of matter, most of which is simple hydrogen (an electron dancin' with a proton). A tiny percent of that hydrogen is organized into fusing spheres which, over time, produced and produces complex matter. Some tiny amount of that complex matter is animate, and an even tinier amount is animate and self-aware/-directing.

[Gary Childress]

But let us not forget that *the definition of the word 'Universe' needs to be discussed, agreed with, and accepted before what is ACTUALLY True can be uncovered and revealed.

That's a fair question. Right now science seems to consider the "universe" everything that "exists" (for lack of a better word). That which is outside the universe does not exist. But now there are also those who believe there might be multiple universes, in which case it might be more accurate to say, that which is outside A universe does not exist. That which is inside a universe does exist.

Well, if we gotta have a mutually agreed upon definition, we'll never get to what is ACTUALLY True.

Watch all this disagreement with this, for example...

I say the universe or Reality is a big, and I mean BIG, mostly empty, box. Inside this box is a minuscule amount of matter, most of which is simple hydrogen (an electron dancin' with a proton). A tiny percent of that hydrogen is organized into fusing spheres which, over time, produced and produces complex matter. Some tiny amount of that complex matter is animate, and an even tinier amount is animate and self-aware/-directing.

I think it's possible we could get to what is actually true by guessing. We possibly might not know we have an accurate picture of it, though, depending upon whether or not the human mind has the capacity to understand the fundamentals of reality. For example, will we ever be able to determine if there are multiple universes or just one? It might be something that no human will ever know but we can only guess about.