A World Without Men?

[FlashDangerpants]

I KNOW you were NOT. I WAS. And, I have ALREADY SHOWN that I can and HAVE made accurate predictions.

I missed that. Tell us about it again.

[Age]

We can move on either: when you finally understand a point I made back in March 2019, which I have made several times since, and which you still don't understand

I just checked when first I told him he has an untranslatable private language problem. He's been failing to understand that since 2016.

And YET here 'you', human beings, are living in the days when this was written, with a translatable public language, and you STILL BELIEVE the things you do, which soon become BLATANTLY OBVIOUS were False, Wrong, and Incorrect ALL ALONG.

[FlashDangerpants]

We can move on either: when you finally understand a point I made back in March 2019, which I have made several times since, and which you still don't understand

I just checked when first I told him he has an untranslatable private language problem. He's been failing to understand that since 2016.

And YET here 'you', human beings, are living in the days when this was written, with a translatable public language, and you STILL BELIEVE the things you do, which soon become BLATANTLY OBVIOUS were False, Wrong, and Incorrect ALL ALONG.

If only there was some meaningful way to tell anyone from within a language of private rules that only "you" the God-who-is-not-god-but-calls-god-"I" can ever interpret. But alas, you built a prison for yourself and refuse to come out of it. So nobody ever could understand any of ttHHHEEEeeEEE TrooOOOOoooOth except the only person who will ever know what any of the words it uses are...

and he's just a crusty wanksock on a stick pretending to amount to a muppet.

[Age]

The facts of the matter are already established. When I wrote this...

And, going by this 'logic' the facts of the matter are already established. When I wrote what I have.

It was entirely clear to anyone who can use pronouns that "it" referred to the information to be categorised.

And, I am some one, OBVIOUSLY, who can USE 'pronouns'. Therefore, by your own 'logic' again I am ENTIRELY CLEAR what "information" you WANTED "categorized". YET here I am STILL ENTIRELY UNCLEAR what "information" you WANT "categorized".

How can it be unclear?

BECAUSE you REFUSE to ANSWER the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTIONS I pose and ask you.

That is how 'it' can be UNCLEAR.

Can and do you COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND this now?

If no, then WHY NOT?

I gave you examples of available categories such as memory and belief and knowledge. What more do you need if you have actually read what I wrote?

I NEED 'you' to be Honest AND OPEN, and I will wait PATIENTLY till then to SEE if it does happen or NOT.

But you repsonded with apparent ignorance of the rules that govern how words such as "it" "that" and so on refer to preceding objects and the general necessity of context in communiction.

WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY do you JUMP to this ASSUMPTION?

WHAT, EXACTLY, lead 'you' to MAKE SUCH AN ASSUMPTION?

The answer to that was in the next block of text. I coloured it green, it should have been obvious that it was there for some purpose.

But it was NOT OBVIOUS because it was you who MISSED it COMPLETELY.

But because you are lying when you say that you read posts before hitting reply, you ended up just ignoring it.

If you STILL BELIEVE that I am LYING and DOING what you CLAIM here, then 'you' are FAR MORE BLINDED by YOUR OWN BELIEFS than I FIRST SAW you were.

But you use pronouns correctly whenever you want to as evidenced here and in pretty much every other post you have written

So either you pretend not to understand pronouns when it suits you because you are a liar. Or you fail to unerstand them by accident because you are incapable of applying basic rues of language.

AGAIN two options ONLY.

There is no need for a third option.

You are RIGHT there is NO 'need' for a third option, and this is because thee One and ONLY Truth suffices.

LOOK, I have NO IDEA what a 'pronoun' IS, and this is because I do NOT KNOW what the word 'pronoun' means NOR refers to. And the reason I do NOT YET KNOW these things is because of, as I have ALREADY INFORMED you, a VERY SPECIFIC REASON.

Was this REALLY that HARD to UNDERSTAND?

Fine, what specific reason do you need to not know that a pronoun is a word such as it, that, they or I which can represent nouns ... (a noun is a special sort of word that can specify or name things such as Ken, and bullshit)?

I TOLD YOU BELOW.

It doesn't matter that you don't know what 'pronoun' or 'noun' means, although if you are a native English speaker and you don't, then your education was highly questionable.

I have ALREADY made it VERY CLEAR that i am the MOST UNEDUCATED one in this forum.

The important thing is that you clearly do know how to use all the basic classes of words so this gambit is foolish.

But it is NOT foolish. You just ASSUME and BELIEVE it IS.

But sure, tell us what you think the workable alternative my be, give us a slice of tHEeeEEEEEeeEEEEE ACtuAL TRUUUUUUUUUUUUuuuUUUUUUUUUtttHHHHHHHHHHHH.

I do NOT YET WANT TO KNOW what 'pronouns' are NOR what the word 'pronoun' means or refers to.

Now, IMAGINE if you did NOT JUMP TO ASSUMPTIONS earlier and JUST ASKED CLARIFYING QUESTIONS from thee start?

No clarifying question has ever resulted in actual clarity.

Okay.

You just respond with even less intelligble nonsense.

Okay.

For example, I asked you what "I" meant and you replied that it means God.

I DID ACTUALLY replied with MORE. But as you have ALREADY ADMITTED you do NOT read ALL of what I write in my replies.

So what, then I have to ask 4 new CLAifYInG QUEstiONs just because you make up absurd meanings for normal words to represent nonviable objects in Kengrish?

So, to 'you' 'I' is a "normal" word YET 'you', human beings, in the days when this is being written, do NOT YET even KNOW thee answer to the 'age old' question, 'Who am 'i'?'

And, supposedly, 'I' am the One with the, so called, "untranslatable" language.

There's no route to understanding you via clarifing questions Ken, that's just a trip down the rabbit hole.

But I was OBVIOUSLY NOT referring to that.

You just continually MISSING and MISUNDERSTANDING what that IS, ACTUALLY.

[Age]

I KNOW you were NOT. I WAS. And, I have ALREADY SHOWN that I can and HAVE made accurate predictions.

I missed that.

I ALREADY KNEW. You have ALREADY PROVED this.

Tell us about it again.

I said something would happen in the future, and it happened.

[Age]

I just checked when first I told him he has an untranslatable private language problem. He's been failing to understand that since 2016.

And YET here 'you', human beings, are living in the days when this was written, with a translatable public language, and you STILL BELIEVE the things you do, which soon become BLATANTLY OBVIOUS were False, Wrong, and Incorrect ALL ALONG.

If only there was some meaningful way to tell anyone from within a language of private rules that only "you" the God-who-is-not-god-but-calls-god-"I" can ever interpret.

LOL you STILL can NOT COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND the PLAIN ENGLISH WORDS BEFORE 'you'.

The 'you' is NOT God. How MANY TIMES do 'you' have to be TOLD before 'you' can COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND this FACT?

I suggest just STICKING with YOUR, so called, "translatable public language", which 'you', human beings, have used for thousands upon thousands of years YET it is 'you' who still does NOT YET KNOW thy Self. 'you' can NOT even answer, properly AND correctly, the VERY SIMPLE QUESTION, 'Who am 'I'?'

But alas, you built a prison for yourself and refuse to come out of it.

LOL Talk about PROJECTION at its finest.

I can and WILL PROVE the CLAIMS I MAKE.

'you' can NOT do ANY thing here other than just 'TRY TO' RIDICULE 'me', with the HOPE that what I am saying WILL NOT come to fruition.

So nobody ever could understand any of ttHHHEEEeeEEE TrooOOOOoooOth except the only person who will ever know what any of the words it uses are...

Okay. So, you now ADMIT that you do NOT UNDERSTAND ANY of thee Truth of things, and, you NEVER could.

Now, that that has been SETTLED, ONCE, and for ALL.

Is there absolutely ANY other MESSAGE or POINT that you want to SHARE with 'us' here?

and he's just a crusty wanksock on a stick pretending to amount to a muppet.

Okay. That should back up and support FULLY EVERY thing that you have said here.

[FlashDangerpants]

I KNOW you were NOT. I WAS. And, I have ALREADY SHOWN that I can and HAVE made accurate predictions.

I missed that.

I ALREADY KNEW. You have ALREADY PROVED this.

Tell us about it again.

I said something would happen in the future, and it happened.

Was it something obvious and shit like "people will think Ken is stupid"?
Or was it something that actually required foreknowledge of non-obvious outcomes?

[FlashDangerpants]

LOL you STILL can NOT COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND the PLAIN ENGLISH WORDS BEFORE 'you'.

The fact you had to put "you" in scare quotes tells us that is not plain English.

[FlashDangerpants]

And, going by this 'logic' the facts of the matter are already established. When I wrote what I have.



And, I am some one, OBVIOUSLY, who can USE 'pronouns'. Therefore, by your own 'logic' again I am ENTIRELY CLEAR what "information" you WANTED "categorized". YET here I am STILL ENTIRELY UNCLEAR what "information" you WANT "categorized".

How can it be unclear?

BECAUSE you REFUSE to ANSWER the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTIONS I pose and ask you.

That is how 'it' can be UNCLEAR.

Can and do you COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND this now?

If no, then WHY NOT?

I gave you examples of available categories such as memory and belief and knowledge. What more do you need if you have actually read what I wrote?

I NEED 'you' to be Honest AND OPEN, and I will wait PATIENTLY till then to SEE if it does happen or NOT.

You set a lot of tasks for other people, but you don't put in much effort yourself do you?
All you needed to do to understand what I wrote there was read a few sentences and treat them as related to each other.

WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY do you JUMP to this ASSUMPTION?

WHAT, EXACTLY, lead 'you' to MAKE SUCH AN ASSUMPTION?

The answer to that was in the next block of text. I coloured it green, it should have been obvious that it was there for some purpose.

But it was NOT OBVIOUS because it was you who MISSED it COMPLETELY.

But because you are lying when you say that you read posts before hitting reply, you ended up just ignoring it.

If you STILL BELIEVE that I am LYING and DOING what you CLAIM here, then 'you' are FAR MORE BLINDED by YOUR OWN BELIEFS than I FIRST SAW you were.

Well there is some reason why you continually fail to relate simple sentences to those that precede them in simple paragraphs.

AGAIN two options ONLY.


You are RIGHT there is NO 'need' for a third option, and this is because thee One and ONLY Truth suffices.

LOOK, I have NO IDEA what a 'pronoun' IS, and this is because I do NOT KNOW what the word 'pronoun' means NOR refers to. And the reason I do NOT YET KNOW these things is because of, as I have ALREADY INFORMED you, a VERY SPECIFIC REASON.

Was this REALLY that HARD to UNDERSTAND?

Fine, what specific reason do you need to not know that a pronoun is a word such as it, that, they or I which can represent nouns ... (a noun is a special sort of word that can specify or name things such as Ken, and bullshit)?

I TOLD YOU BELOW.

It doesn't matter that you don't know what 'pronoun' or 'noun' means, although if you are a native English speaker and you don't, then your education was highly questionable.

I have ALREADY made it VERY CLEAR that i am the MOST UNEDUCATED one in this forum.

The important thing is that you clearly do know how to use all the basic classes of words so this gambit is foolish.

But it is NOT foolish. You just ASSUME and BELIEVE it IS.

Whatever. Where is the answer to the clarifying question I presented? What is your "VERY SPECIFIC REASON" for wanting to be ignorant in this matter?

I do NOT YET WANT TO KNOW what 'pronouns' are NOR what the word 'pronoun' means or refers to.

Now, IMAGINE if you did NOT JUMP TO ASSUMPTIONS earlier and JUST ASKED CLARIFYING QUESTIONS from thee start?

No clarifying question has ever resulted in actual clarity.

Okay.

You just respond with even less intelligble nonsense.

Okay.

For example, I asked you what "I" meant and you replied that it means God.

I DID ACTUALLY replied with MORE. But as you have ALREADY ADMITTED you do NOT read ALL of what I write in my replies.

So what, then I have to ask 4 new CLAifYInG QUEstiONs just because you make up absurd meanings for normal words to represent nonviable objects in Kengrish?

So, to 'you' 'I' is a "normal" word YET 'you', human beings, in the days when this is being written, do NOT YET even KNOW thee answer to the 'age old' question, 'Who am 'i'?'

And, supposedly, 'I' am the One with the, so called, "untranslatable" language.

I know who I am, everyone knows who they are.
Pretending otherwise is fun for wannabe mystics because it sounds mysterious, but I don't give a flying one for that sort of sophistry.

There's no route to understanding you via clarifing questions Ken, that's just a trip down the rabbit hole.

But I was OBVIOUSLY NOT referring to that.

You just continually MISSING and MISUNDERSTANDING what that IS, ACTUALLY.

So what? There is no way for you to explain it if your only method is to heap all the work on me and require me to investigate the current hidden meaning you have for any given word via clarifying questions that deliver only secret unclear answers for eternity.

So it is impossible for anyone who isn't you to know what you really mean bout anything you say, and therefore nobody is justified in pursuing the matter further than that.

[Age]

I missed that.

I ALREADY KNEW. You have ALREADY PROVED this.

Tell us about it again.

I said something would happen in the future, and it happened.

Was it something obvious and shit like "people will think Ken is stupid"?
Or was it something that actually required foreknowledge of non-obvious outcomes?

I have TOLD YOU ENOUGH TIMES ALREADY. If you REALLY can NOT SEE where it is, then that is NOT my fault.

[Age]

LOL you STILL can NOT COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND the PLAIN ENGLISH WORDS BEFORE 'you'.

The fact you had to put "you" in scare quotes tells us that is not plain English.

Scare quotes is ONLY YOUR ASSUMPTION. Like just about EVERY thing else you say and claim here.

[Age]

How can it be unclear?

BECAUSE you REFUSE to ANSWER the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTIONS I pose and ask you.

That is how 'it' can be UNCLEAR.

Can and do you COMPREHEND and UNDERSTAND this now?

If no, then WHY NOT?

I gave you examples of available categories such as memory and belief and knowledge. What more do you need if you have actually read what I wrote?

I NEED 'you' to be Honest AND OPEN, and I will wait PATIENTLY till then to SEE if it does happen or NOT.

You set a lot of tasks for other people, but you don't put in much effort yourself do you?
All you needed to do to understand what I wrote there was read a few sentences and treat them as related to each other.

And considering you could NOT UNDERSTAND what I wrote from the beginning, and have NEVER even ATTEMPTED to UNDERSTAND, says MORE about 'you' than it does 'me'.

The answer to that was in the next block of text. I coloured it green, it should have been obvious that it was there for some purpose.

But it was NOT OBVIOUS because it was you who MISSED it COMPLETELY.

But because you are lying when you say that you read posts before hitting reply, you ended up just ignoring it.

If you STILL BELIEVE that I am LYING and DOING what you CLAIM here, then 'you' are FAR MORE BLINDED by YOUR OWN BELIEFS than I FIRST SAW you were.

Well there is some reason why you continually fail to relate simple sentences to those that precede them in simple paragraphs.

But you are YET to work out what it is, correct?

Fine, what specific reason do you need to not know that a pronoun is a word such as it, that, they or I which can represent nouns ... (a noun is a special sort of word that can specify or name things such as Ken, and bullshit)?

I TOLD YOU BELOW.

It doesn't matter that you don't know what 'pronoun' or 'noun' means, although if you are a native English speaker and you don't, then your education was highly questionable.

I have ALREADY made it VERY CLEAR that i am the MOST UNEDUCATED one in this forum.

The important thing is that you clearly do know how to use all the basic classes of words so this gambit is foolish.

But it is NOT foolish. You just ASSUME and BELIEVE it IS.

Whatever. Where is the answer to the clarifying question I presented?

It is in the proceeding response.

What is your "VERY SPECIFIC REASON" for wanting to be ignorant in this matter?

But I do NOT want this. This is just YOUR WRONG ASSUMPTION and BELIEF ONLY.

No clarifying question has ever resulted in actual clarity.

Okay.

You just respond with even less intelligble nonsense.

Okay.

For example, I asked you what "I" meant and you replied that it means God.

I DID ACTUALLY replied with MORE. But as you have ALREADY ADMITTED you do NOT read ALL of what I write in my replies.

So what, then I have to ask 4 new CLAifYInG QUEstiONs just because you make up absurd meanings for normal words to represent nonviable objects in Kengrish?

So, to 'you' 'I' is a "normal" word YET 'you', human beings, in the days when this is being written, do NOT YET even KNOW thee answer to the 'age old' question, 'Who am 'i'?'

And, supposedly, 'I' am the One with the, so called, "untranslatable" language.

I know who I am, everyone knows who they are.

So, PROVE this. What is the answer to the question; 'Who am 'I'?'

Pretending otherwise is fun for wannabe mystics because it sounds mysterious, but I don't give a flying one for that sort of sophistry.

Okay.

There's no route to understanding you via clarifing questions Ken, that's just a trip down the rabbit hole.

But I was OBVIOUSLY NOT referring to that.

You just continually MISSING and MISUNDERSTANDING what that IS, ACTUALLY.

So what?

NOTHING besides you keep continually MISSING and MISUNDERSTANDING what that is.

There is no way for you to explain it if your only method is to heap all the work on me and require me to investigate the current hidden meaning you have for any given word via clarifying questions that deliver only secret unclear answers for eternity.

But I have ALREADY EXPLAINED it in VERY EASY and VERY SIMPLE EXPLANATORY TERMS by the way. BUT, you just keep MISSING and MISUNDERSTANDING it.

You have SHOWN and PROVED continuously that you keep MISSING and MISUNDERSTANDING it.

So it is impossible for anyone who isn't you to know what you really mean bout anything you say, and therefore nobody is justified in pursuing the matter further than that.

YET here 'you' STILL ARE, STILL pursuing this matter FURTHER. Even after what you have previously STATED and CLAIMED is true.

How much LONGER will you continue doing this MISSING and MISUNDERSTANDING thing?

[FlashDangerpants]

I ALREADY KNEW. You have ALREADY PROVED this.


I said something would happen in the future, and it happened.

Was it something obvious and shit like "people will think Ken is stupid"?
Or was it something that actually required foreknowledge of non-obvious outcomes?

I have TOLD YOU ENOUGH TIMES ALREADY. If you REALLY can NOT SEE where it is, then that is NOT my fault.

CLARIFYING QUESTION.... what was your prediction that already came true?

[FlashDangerpants]

I know who I am, everyone knows who they are.

So, PROVE this. What is the answer to the question; 'Who am 'I'?'

I am FlopDandyPoots, who are you?

[uwot]

What is now dangerously close to insanity is any residual hope I have that someone as dim as you could ever understand any of it.

And what you OBVIOUSLY are NOT YET AWARE of IS; what I ACTUALLY DO UNDERSTAND.

Maybe you do Age, but clearly something about how you communicate is failing to get that across. Have another go at explaining what red shift is evidence for.