A World Without Men?

Anything to do with gender and the status of women and men.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:58 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:33 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:08 pm
Well then how can "I" mean God in the question "who am I"?
VERY EASILY, and VERY SIMPLY.

'I' is a word describing One. That is one way how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

'you', human beings, can confuse, and/or even think or believe, that thee 'I' means or refers to 'you'. But, 'you', human beings, have been Wrong, before. That is another way. how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

For a human being to even think or believe that the capital 'I' means or refers to "them self", as though they have some REAL importance in Life, can be a VERY egotistical way of seeing things, which is OBVIOUSLY ONLY a human being thing. This is another way of how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

Because there is NO actual separation in the Universe, thee 'I' means and refers to 'That', which is thee One. That is another way of how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

Because of thee Truly OPEN Mind this is how human beings keep continually learning, and creating, anew. This is another way of how 'I' can mean or refer to God, thee Creator.

There are MANY upon MANY other reasons of HOW 'I' means or refers to God, in the question 'Who am 'I'?"
In English, I is the personal pronoun by which one references oneself. In English the phrase "Who am I?" uses that content in that context.
And, "english" is NOT everything and does NOT answer EVERY thing.
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:58 pm In Kengrish the question "Who am I?" means "who am God?" which really makes the word "am" look quite unruly.
But this way of LOOKING AT this exists ONLY in "flashdangerpants" OWN little "world".
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 12:58 pm Kengrish is clearly weird, are there any reliable rules of interpretation in English or does everything have to devolve into an endless series of CLAriFYInG queSTIOnS?
I use CLARIFYING QUESTIONS to 'you', human beings, in this forum, in the days when this was written, to SHOW "others" just how much 'you', people, JUMP to ASSUMPTIONS, without EVER ACTUALLY CLARIFYING what you SAY and ASSUME. This the reason WHY so much MISUNDERSTANDING existed, in those days.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:11 pm in the days when this was written
So when am "you" at mister God-is-I ?
User avatar
Lacewing
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Lacewing »

Age to Mr. Dangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:11 pm I use CLARIFYING QUESTIONS to 'you', human beings, in this forum, in the days when this was written, to SHOW "others" just how much 'you', people, JUMP to ASSUMPTIONS, without EVER ACTUALLY CLARIFYING what you SAY and ASSUME.
Why would any "others" care?

Any "others" would likely see how ineffective you are at proving or describing anything, as well as all of the mistaken assumptions you jump to, with exhausting frequency.

Any "others" might also think that nothing you claim or write 'in the days when this is written' matter beyond the entertainment of doing so in this moment.

But keep on imagining that they will erect a statue to you, and then you'll sit up from your grave and say "See! Somebody finally appreciates how advanced I was!" Nice (but dumb) fantasy, Ken.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:52 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:11 pm in the days when this was written
So when am "you" at mister God-is-I ?
If you are here asking when can the 'you', the human being, become, or be One with, or as, God, then that is when 'you' stop doing for oneself, and thus stop being a selfish, greedy one, and start doing for thy One Self, which is just EVERY one, as One.

This is a gradually evolving process, which is just happening and occurring anyway. 'you', human beings, cannot NOT stop evolving into becoming what 'you' ALL WILL BECOME. Unless of course, you ALL wipe "yourselves" out through and by you OWN WRONG and SELFISH behaviors.

In order to become and be this Being, however, 'you', human beings, just had to first discover, or learn, and understand a few more new things, like; how and why 'you', adult human beings, ALL do WRONG, how the Mind and the brain ACTUALLY WORK, and thus also who and what the 'you' IS and thee 'I' AM, and then 'you', just evolve, NATURALLY, into the next stage of Life. Just like 'you' ALL have been, 'since the beginning', as they say.

So, that is WHEN.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:40 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:52 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:11 pm in the days when this was written
So when am "you" at mister God-is-I ?
If you are here asking when can the 'you', the human being, become, or be One with, or as, God
Oh my no, I'm not interested in joining your silly cult. I'm looking for how anyone can ever understand anything you write when there are no rules that govern meaning at all in anything you write.

Now we have the guy who uses the word "I" to talk about a God who is not himself... who doesn't believe, or know, but does think that "future generations" from some time in the future will read this shit to find out how much of a genius he was ... but now is not now and the future is not the future ... and when you ask him about that he just blathers on about God again.

And on top of that, if we ever were to discover the current meaning of any word you use, it would be imediately invalidated because nothing requires them to still mean the same thing in the future, and the future and the past and the now are all a complete mess in conversation with someone who writes about "now" as "the time when this was written"

In short, nobody should ever try to understand you, you will only respond with new absurdities. Therefore nobody should ever commit the sin of asking you any CLAriFYinG QueSTIonS
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

Lacewing wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 3:54 pm
Age to Mr. Dangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:11 pm I use CLARIFYING QUESTIONS to 'you', human beings, in this forum, in the days when this was written, to SHOW "others" just how much 'you', people, JUMP to ASSUMPTIONS, without EVER ACTUALLY CLARIFYING what you SAY and ASSUME.
Why would any "others" care?
They care because they have LIVING PROOF of what NOT to do.

By being able to OBSERVE and SEE how 'you', human beings, in the days when this was being written, were ACTUALLY reacting and misbehaving, 'we' now have thee ACTUAL PROOF and thus now KNOW exactly how NOT to react and how NOT to "behave". We now KNOW what NOT to do.
Lacewing wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 3:54 pm Any "others" would likely see how ineffective you are at proving or describing anything, as well as all of the mistaken assumptions you jump to, with exhausting frequency.
If you FEEL like 'you' are capable of PREDICTING the FUTURE, then keep on going. Also, you appear to be thinking of "yourselves" ONLY here. Which is a "normal" trait for the greedy and selfish human being culture, in the days when this was being written. 'you', "lacewing", keep FORGETTING what I write Is NOT necessarily to be effective for just 'you', people, responding in this forum. In fact I have been continually INFORMING 'you' that I am USING 'you' for my OWN purposes, ONLY.

Also, 'you', "lacewing", ONCE AGAIN, have made ANOTHER CLAIM here, by this time CLAIMING that I have been JUMPING to ASSUMPTIONS, with MISTAKEN ones at that. YET you, ONCE AGAIN, did NOT PROVIDE ANY of ALL the MISTAKEN ASSUMPTIONS you CLAIM I MAKE. This is either because you can NOT or are just to AFRAID to in case I PROVE that your CLAIM is, ONCE AGAIN, False, Wrong, and/or Incorrect.

But PLEASE FEEL FREE to back up YOUR CLAIM with at least SOME SUPPORTING EVIDENCE. I, for one, would be VERY HAPPY to LOOK AT it/them.
Lacewing wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 3:54 pm Any "others" might also think that nothing you claim or write 'in the days when this is written' matter beyond the entertainment of doing so in this moment.
And the care factor in that to me is absolutely ZERO.

And, if you think or believe that "others" SEE and THINK EXACTLY the same way as 'you' do, "lacewing", then 'you' might find "yourself" SADLY MISTAKEN.

But you are EXACTLY RIGHT "others" might THINK EXACTLY like 'you' do here, while "others" MIGHT NOT. But each to their OWN, correct?
Lacewing wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 3:54 pm But keep on imagining that they will erect a statue to you,
LOL
LOL
LOL

This kind of thinking is what I find the MOST AMUSING and the MOST ENTERTAINING with 'you', human beings, in the days of when this is being written. That is; because 'you' have grown up to become SO SELFISH and SO GREEDY, and thus SO 'self-centered that when 'you' SEE "others" writings that ALL you can SEE is that they write ONLY for some benefit to "them" ONLY.

The EVIDENCE and PROOF of this can be CLEARLY SEEN in the way those adult human beings generally use to write. Most of what they write is for self-recognition, and usually because each one was 'trying' their hardest to be SEEN as BETTER or SMARTER than the "other". And, because this is EXACTLY how they were thinking, they PROJECTED this into "others", What they SAW in "others" was just a PROJECTION of their OWN "selves".

By the way if I am imagining that "they" will erect a statue to 'you', then it would be a statue of 'you', the 'human being', which are the ones who NEED to be THANKED for CHANGING their ways in order for 'us' to have BECOME who and what 'we' Truly ARE, and that is; A Truly LOVING and CARING Being.
Lacewing wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 3:54 pm and then you'll sit up from your grave and say "See! Somebody finally appreciates how advanced I was!" Nice (but dumb) fantasy, Ken.
But 'i' am NOT advanced AT ALL.

Just LOOK AT how MANY TIMES i have been INFORMED, in this forum, of just HOW much of a STUPID, DUMB, INSANE, FUCKING MORON that i REALLY AM.
No matter what i say, in this forum, i have been continually IN-FORMED that i am of a LESSER one than ALL of 'you' ARE.

Also, if i KNEW ANY thing at all, then that is NOT because 'i' was ANY thing different from "others" but ONLY because of what this one body has experienced, which HAD TO BE OBVIOUSLY DIFFERENT from EVERY 'other' body. EVERY 'you' just becomes a 'one' because of what the individual physical human body has experienced. The one 'you', people', here call "ken" or "age" are just names used for anonymity, so that ALL of the writings here, together, help in creating life, itself, BETTER for EVERY one.

It, IN FACT, will be 'you', people, here, in this generation, who will be THANKED, for being 'advanced' enough for having the actual COURAGE to make the CHANGE, for the better.

No one human beings writings, nor thoughts, are "more advanced" than "another's" are, however. ALL thoughts are ALL just, NATURALLY, different. But together they ALL HELPED in Creating 'what it is' that IS about to become, 'on earth as it IS heaven', as some say.
User avatar
Lacewing
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Lacewing »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:40 pm...
In short, nobody should ever try to understand you, you will only respond with new absurdities. Therefore nobody should ever commit the sin of asking you any CLAriFYinG QueSTIonS
Hilarious and true!
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:40 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 1:52 pm
So when am "you" at mister God-is-I ?
If you are here asking when can the 'you', the human being, become, or be One with, or as, God
Oh my no, I'm not interested in joining your silly cult. I'm looking for how anyone can ever understand anything you write when there are no rules that govern meaning at all in anything you write.
But WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY did this ASSUMPTION of YOURS ARISE that there are "NO RULES"?
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm Now we have the guy who uses the word "I" to talk about a God who is not himself... who doesn't believe, or know,
WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY did this ASSUMPTION of YOURS ARISE that this 'i' does NOT KNOW?

The EXACT OPPOSITE of YOUR ASSUMPTION here is what is ACTUALLY True, Right, and Correct.
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm but does think that "future generations" from some time in the future will read this shit to find out how much of a genius he was
But that one is NOT a genius, anymore than EVERY one "else" IS. WHY would you even think and say such a thing, as what you are implying and 'trying to' portray here?

Also, if you are NOT YET AWARE, the 'future', from what was written a few years ago, has ALREADY arrived, and as such has ALREADY BEEN READ.

But you have OBVIOUSLY MISSED this FACT in my PAST WRITINGS.
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm .. but now is not now and the future is not the future ... and when you ask him about that he just blathers on about God again.

And on top of that, if we ever were to discover the current meaning of any word you use, it would be imediately invalidated because nothing requires them to still mean the same thing in the future, and the future and the past and the now are all a complete mess in conversation with someone who writes about "now" as "the time when this was written"
If you were even SLIGHTLY AWARE I use the words 'now' and 'NOW', and if you were even SLIGHTLY CURIOS 'you' would have asked the CLARIFYING QUESTION, WHY? Instead of creating the 'mess', which you OBVIOUSLY currently have and are HOLDING ONTO here.
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm In short, nobody should ever try to understand you, you will only respond with new absurdities. Therefore nobody should ever commit the sin of asking you any CLAriFYinG QueSTIonS
And here is the PRIME EXAMPLE of EXACTLY WHY, in the days when this was being written, human beings were SO LOST, SO CONFUSED, and SO MISUNDERSTANDING of "each other", which, ULTIMATELY, is WHY they COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MISUNDERSTOOD "themselves", and thus the VERY REASON WHY they did NOT even KNOW - "them selfs", that is; - Thy Self.

The FACT they did NOT YET even KNOW them 'self's', what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that some even BELIEVED that absolutely NO one should even EVER 'try to' UNDERSTAND "another", and that even just asking CLARIFYING QUESTIONS to "another" was A SIN, which absolutely NO one SHOULD DO.

Besides the FACT that the ABSURDITY and NONSENSICAL, ILLOGICAL, NATURAL RIDICULOUS of this type of thinking and "behaving" SPEAKS FOR ITSELF, some, like this one, even BELIEVED that even just 'trying to' UNDERSTAND "another one" was A SIN, in itself. Which EXPLAINS WHY just about absolutely NO CLARIFYING QUESTIONS get posed to me, or if they are, then it was ONLY done in the HOPE of PROVING 'me' WRONG and/or making 'me' look "MORE SILLY", and WHY some like this one NEVER ANSWER ANY of the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTIONS I posed to "them". Some ACTUALLY thought and BELIEVED that I was asking those questions for the EXACT SAME REASONS they do, which could NOT be ANY FURTHER from thee ACTUAL Truth of things.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

Lacewing wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:31 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:40 pm...
In short, nobody should ever try to understand you, you will only respond with new absurdities. Therefore nobody should ever commit the sin of asking you any CLAriFYinG QueSTIonS
Hilarious and true!
And here is even MORE PROOF of EXACTLY WHY the human beings, in the days of when this was written, were so UTTERLY LOST and CONFUSED.

MISUNDERSTANDING was FAR MORE COMMON than UNDERSTANDING ever was, and NOW there is NO wonder of WHY.

So, THANK YOU ALL AGAIN for PROVING my claims and helping 'me' out here TREMENDOUSLY.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:45 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 9:40 pm

If you are here asking when can the 'you', the human being, become, or be One with, or as, God
Oh my no, I'm not interested in joining your silly cult. I'm looking for how anyone can ever understand anything you write when there are no rules that govern meaning at all in anything you write.
But WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY did this ASSUMPTION of YOURS ARISE that there are "NO RULES"?
You arbitrarily refuse to acknowledge any purpose for pronouns, then then you use them. If there are rules, you don't follow any and you require us to continually ask you what any given sentence could possibly mean. Then we get an asnwer that follows no particular rules of meaning and the carrousel goes round without end.
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:45 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm Now we have the guy who uses the word "I" to talk about a God who is not himself... who doesn't believe, or know,
WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY did this ASSUMPTION of YOURS ARISE that this 'i' does NOT KNOW?

The EXACT OPPOSITE of YOUR ASSUMPTION here is what is ACTUALLY True, Right, and Correct.
LOOK,'i' can NOT KNOW what will happen. So, 'you' are EXACTLY RIGHT, in that regards.
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:45 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm but does think that "future generations" from some time in the future will read this shit to find out how much of a genius he was
But that one is NOT a genius, anymore than EVERY one "else" IS. WHY would you even think and say such a thing, as what you are implying and 'trying to' portray here?

Also, if you are NOT YET AWARE, the 'future', from what was written a few years ago, has ALREADY arrived, and as such has ALREADY BEEN READ.

But you have OBVIOUSLY MISSED this FACT in my PAST WRITINGS.
Name somebody who is going to visit this site in 100 years and read this to find out about you. If the future is written and you have read it already, you should be able to do that.

There's a European football tournament going on right now. Which country wins? You have access to that information so get on with it.
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:45 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm .. but now is not now and the future is not the future ... and when you ask him about that he just blathers on about God again.

And on top of that, if we ever were to discover the current meaning of any word you use, it would be imediately invalidated because nothing requires them to still mean the same thing in the future, and the future and the past and the now are all a complete mess in conversation with someone who writes about "now" as "the time when this was written"
If you were even SLIGHTLY AWARE I use the words 'now' and 'NOW', and if you were even SLIGHTLY CURIOS 'you' would have asked the CLARIFYING QUESTION, WHY? Instead of creating the 'mess', which you OBVIOUSLY currently have and are HOLDING ONTO here.
You don't have any access to information about the future, your explanation will be bullshit no matter what you write. You've already made a stupid excuse for why you can't tell me who wins the football tournament before you even knew I wrote these words for that very reason.
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:45 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm In short, nobody should ever try to understand you, you will only respond with new absurdities. Therefore nobody should ever commit the sin of asking you any CLAriFYinG QueSTIonS
And here is the PRIME EXAMPLE of EXACTLY WHY, in the days when this was being written, human beings were SO LOST, SO CONFUSED, and SO MISUNDERSTANDING of "each other", which, ULTIMATELY, is WHY they COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MISUNDERSTOOD "themselves", and thus the VERY REASON WHY they did NOT even KNOW - "them selfs", that is; - Thy Self.

The FACT they did NOT YET even KNOW them 'self's', what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that some even BELIEVED that absolutely NO one should even EVER 'try to' UNDERSTAND "another", and that even just asking CLARIFYING QUESTIONS to "another" was A SIN, which absolutely NO one SHOULD DO.

Besides the FACT that the ABSURDITY and NONSENSICAL, ILLOGICAL, NATURAL RIDICULOUS of this type of thinking and "behaving" SPEAKS FOR ITSELF, some, like this one, even BELIEVED that even just 'trying to' UNDERSTAND "another one" was A SIN, in itself. Which EXPLAINS WHY just about absolutely NO CLARIFYING QUESTIONS get posed to me, or if they are, then it was ONLY done in the HOPE of PROVING 'me' WRONG and/or making 'me' look "MORE SILLY", and WHY some like this one NEVER ANSWER ANY of the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTIONS I posed to "them". Some ACTUALLY thought and BELIEVED that I was asking those questions for the EXACT SAME REASONS they do, which could NOT be ANY FURTHER from thee ACTUAL Truth of things.
Lacewing understands me, and I understand her. When she uses the word "I" I don't have to interrogate her in case she calls God I and herself "i", that would be stupid and she would be mad if I needed to do that.

Lacewing and I, and almost everyone else, speak a language in which we use the rules of common meaning, which makes communication possible. You either use no rules whatsoever, or you have private rules but they apply only when you are using them and nobody can tell when that is.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:45 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm
Oh my no, I'm not interested in joining your silly cult. I'm looking for how anyone can ever understand anything you write when there are no rules that govern meaning at all in anything you write.
But WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY did this ASSUMPTION of YOURS ARISE that there are "NO RULES"?
You arbitrarily refuse to acknowledge any purpose for pronouns, then then you use them.
I NEVER did ANY such thing.

I SUGGEST you go back and READ the ACTUAL WORDS that I USED, and NOT JUMP to ASSUMPTIONS.

I ALSO SUGGEST doing this for EVERY thing I wrote, by the way.

What 'you' have been MISSING, MISINTERPRETING, and MISUNDERSTANDING is COMPLETELY OBVIOUS to me. But it is NOT my job to help you if you are NOT going to help "yourself".
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm If there are rules, you don't follow any and you require us to continually ask you what any given sentence could possibly mean.
I do NOT "require" 'you' to do absolutely ANY thing. In fact, I am LOVING EXACTLY what 'you' are DOING. As 'you' are HELPING 'me' TREMENDOUSLY.

I have been SUGGESTING that you ask CLARIFYING QUESTIONS BEFORE you JUMP TO or MAKE ASSUMPTIONS.

The VERY REASON WHY you are NOT UNDERSTANDING me is because you are ASSUMING things that I have NOT even SAID, let alone even THOUGHT.
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm Then we get an asnwer that follows no particular rules of meaning and the carrousel goes round without end.
LOL if this is what you ASSUME and think or BELIEVE is happening, then PLEASE carry on thinking or BELIEVING this.
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:45 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm Now we have the guy who uses the word "I" to talk about a God who is not himself... who doesn't believe, or know,
WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY did this ASSUMPTION of YOURS ARISE that this 'i' does NOT KNOW?

The EXACT OPPOSITE of YOUR ASSUMPTION here is what is ACTUALLY True, Right, and Correct.
LOOK,'i' can NOT KNOW what will happen. So, 'you' are EXACTLY RIGHT, in that regards.
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:45 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm but does think that "future generations" from some time in the future will read this shit to find out how much of a genius he was
But that one is NOT a genius, anymore than EVERY one "else" IS. WHY would you even think and say such a thing, as what you are implying and 'trying to' portray here?

Also, if you are NOT YET AWARE, the 'future', from what was written a few years ago, has ALREADY arrived, and as such has ALREADY BEEN READ.

But you have OBVIOUSLY MISSED this FACT in my PAST WRITINGS.
Name somebody who is going to visit this site in 100 years and read this to find out about you.
WHY? What has that got to do with what I have ACTUALLY SAID, and MEANT?

You REALLY just KEEP MISSING what I have been SAYING and MEANING. But PLEASE KEEP MISSING and MISUNDERSTANDING. The WAY you are MISSING and MISUNDERSTANDING is PROVING EXACTLY what I have been ACTUALLY SAYING and CLAIMING.
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm If the future is written and you have read it already, you should be able to do that.
ALREADY DONE, and ALREADY EXPLAINED EXACTLY HOW above.
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm There's a European football tournament going on right now. Which country wins? You have access to that information so get on with it.
LOL you REALLY ARE SHOWING and PROVING just how Truly INCAPABLE you ARE of being ABLE TO JUST READ and gather and OBTAIN what IS ACTUALLY MEANT on THOSE WORDS.

I suggest, EVEN MORE STRONGLY NOW, STOP ASSUMING things when you READ or LISTEN to what "others" are SAYING and TELLING you.
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:45 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm .. but now is not now and the future is not the future ... and when you ask him about that he just blathers on about God again.

And on top of that, if we ever were to discover the current meaning of any word you use, it would be imediately invalidated because nothing requires them to still mean the same thing in the future, and the future and the past and the now are all a complete mess in conversation with someone who writes about "now" as "the time when this was written"
If you were even SLIGHTLY AWARE I use the words 'now' and 'NOW', and if you were even SLIGHTLY CURIOS 'you' would have asked the CLARIFYING QUESTION, WHY? Instead of creating the 'mess', which you OBVIOUSLY currently have and are HOLDING ONTO here.
You don't have any access to information about the future, your explanation will be bullshit no matter what you write.
LOL I have ALREADY EXPLAINED 'this' to you, but because you are so BLINDED by your OWN ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS you were NOT EVEN AWARE OF THIS FACT.
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm You've already made a stupid excuse for why you can't tell me who wins the football tournament before you even knew I wrote these words for that very reason.
WHAT???

WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY did you JUMP to this ASSUMPTION here?
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:45 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 10:09 pm In short, nobody should ever try to understand you, you will only respond with new absurdities. Therefore nobody should ever commit the sin of asking you any CLAriFYinG QueSTIonS
And here is the PRIME EXAMPLE of EXACTLY WHY, in the days when this was being written, human beings were SO LOST, SO CONFUSED, and SO MISUNDERSTANDING of "each other", which, ULTIMATELY, is WHY they COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MISUNDERSTOOD "themselves", and thus the VERY REASON WHY they did NOT even KNOW - "them selfs", that is; - Thy Self.

The FACT they did NOT YET even KNOW them 'self's', what can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that some even BELIEVED that absolutely NO one should even EVER 'try to' UNDERSTAND "another", and that even just asking CLARIFYING QUESTIONS to "another" was A SIN, which absolutely NO one SHOULD DO.

Besides the FACT that the ABSURDITY and NONSENSICAL, ILLOGICAL, NATURAL RIDICULOUS of this type of thinking and "behaving" SPEAKS FOR ITSELF, some, like this one, even BELIEVED that even just 'trying to' UNDERSTAND "another one" was A SIN, in itself. Which EXPLAINS WHY just about absolutely NO CLARIFYING QUESTIONS get posed to me, or if they are, then it was ONLY done in the HOPE of PROVING 'me' WRONG and/or making 'me' look "MORE SILLY", and WHY some like this one NEVER ANSWER ANY of the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTIONS I posed to "them". Some ACTUALLY thought and BELIEVED that I was asking those questions for the EXACT SAME REASONS they do, which could NOT be ANY FURTHER from thee ACTUAL Truth of things.
Lacewing understands me, and I understand her. When she uses the word "I" I don't have to interrogate her in case she calls God I and herself "i", that would be stupid and she would be mad if I needed to do that.
Okay. So 'you' two UNDERSTAND VERY WELL, correct?

If yes, then what is the proper and correct answer to the question; 'Who am 'I'?'
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm Lacewing and I, and almost everyone else, speak a language in which we use the rules of common meaning, which makes communication possible.
YET, here 'you' ALL were, in the days when this was written, STILL DISAGREEING and ARGUING over things, which end up CAUSING wars, and the, unbelievable, if it were not true, ACTUAL KILLING of "each other", or "other" human beings just because they THOUGHT, DIFFERENTLY.

The words and definitions 'you' use, or in other words the language 'you' use, may make communication possible, but it CERTAINLY does NOT make communication Peaceful AND Harmonious.

'you', human beings, in those days, were even after thousands upon thousands of years, STILL DISAGREEING and 'arguing' about, so called, "philosophical questions", which the ACTUAL ANSWERS to, were so BLINDINGLY OBVIOUS, if 'you' HAD just STOPPED ASSUMING and/or BELIEVING that 'you' each individually ACTUALLY KNEW what was true, right, and/or correct.

You either use no rules whatsoever, or you have private rules but they apply only when you are using them and nobody can tell when that is.
[/quote]
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:53 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm You've already made a stupid excuse for why you can't tell me who wins the football tournament before you even knew I wrote these words for that very reason.
WHAT???

WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY did you JUMP to this ASSUMPTION here?
I was right.

It wasn't a difficult to predict that you would have no acutal information about the future.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm You either use no rules whatsoever, or you have private rules but they apply only when you are using them and nobody can tell when that is.
Can, to you, there be ONLY these two options, ALONE?

Could there REALLY NOT be ANY other option here, to you here?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by Age »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:58 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:53 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:17 pm You've already made a stupid excuse for why you can't tell me who wins the football tournament before you even knew I wrote these words for that very reason.
WHAT???

WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY did you JUMP to this ASSUMPTION here?
I was right.

It wasn't a difficult to predict that you would have no acutal information about the future.
I ALREADY INFORMED 'you' of HOW I have ALREADY PROVEN HOW I KNEW what would happen, in the future.

And, I ALREADY TOLD you that I have ALREADY DONE THIS but you HAD MISSED THIS.

Are you REALLY just going to SIT there, BELIEVING what you ALREADY ASSUME is TRUE, without EVER making ANY FURTHER CLARIFICATION?

If so, GREAT.

My POINT is PROVED ONCE AGAIN.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: A World Without Men?

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Age wrote: Thu Jul 01, 2021 7:40 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:58 pm
Age wrote: Wed Jun 30, 2021 11:53 pm

WHAT???

WHERE, WHEN, HOW, and WHY did you JUMP to this ASSUMPTION here?
I was right.

It wasn't a difficult to predict that you would have no acutal information about the future.
I ALREADY INFORMED 'you' of HOW I have ALREADY PROVEN HOW I KNEW what would happen, in the future.

And, I ALREADY TOLD you that I have ALREADY DONE THIS but you HAD MISSED THIS.

Are you REALLY just going to SIT there, BELIEVING what you ALREADY ASSUME is TRUE, without EVER making ANY FURTHER CLARIFICATION?

If so, GREAT.

My POINT is PROVED ONCE AGAIN.
Go on then, what did I miss that proves you can know what will happen in the future.
But why don't you know anything interesting about it?
Post Reply