A World Without Men?

[FlashDangerpants]

1. I do NOT believe ANY thing you wrote here.

2. Future generations will, and have ALREADY, read this website, out of CURIOSITY in 'things', which includes the 'me' and the 'you', and NOT necessarily in the 'your', so called, "wisdom" at all.

Now categorise this information.

What do you mean by "categorise this information"?

And what is 'this', in relation to 'this information?

You insist it isn't a belief.

What does 'it', refer to here?

And, I do NOT EVER recall insisting that 'it' is NOT a belief.

It obviously isn't a memory

What does the 'it' word refer to here?

even if you are going to try and do something cute by pretending you transcend time.

WHY would you call doing that "cute"?

And, 'it' could be a memory without "transcending time".

Also, what ACTUALLY is 'time', to you, EXACTLY?

It isn't something you know by virtue of having a memory of the event.

How would you KNOW?

Do 'you' KNOW EVERY 'event' 'I' have been?

Also, from what you are saying here, you are OBVIOUSLY MAKING ASSUMPTIONS, and thus PRESUMING 'things', BEFORE 'you' EVER asked 'me' a CLARIFYING QUESTION, regarding 'this', or 'that'.

All of that nonsense and confusion was your problem. You took a paragraph where each sentence referred to those before it and you chopped it up and pretended they were an unrelated set of sentences. That's why you could waste my patience with that pathetic failure to understand that the pronoun "it" referred to the noun from a preceding sentence.

So it's something you .... "know" will happen but which might not happen because possibly nobody will have any interest in you after you are dead?

'you' does NOT die.

What does "it's something" refer to, EXACTLY.

NOBODY is interest in 'me' now, and nor NEVER has, let alone in ANY time AFTER.

LOOK,'i' can NOT KNOW what will happen. So, 'you' are EXACTLY RIGHT, in that regards. But, because you MISSED the ACTUAL POINT that I was making, and what has ALREADY HAPPENED has EXPLAINED, what 'you' are EXACTLY RIGHT about here has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with 'me'.

Yeah, when we get to those private language problems, the fact that nobody can be expected to work out what you mean by the word "i" is probably going to factor rather heavily.

In the meantime, if you "think" something is going to happen in the future, but you cannot "know" what will happen in the future, then everyone who uses the English language understands that makes the thing you "think" a belief. If your contention is that everyone else in the world is wrong about this, then you are not speaking English, and we should call your language something else.

I suggest we adopt "Kenglish" as the name for the language in which all the words sound like English but their meanings are special to Ken.

And here we have an EXAMPLE of CONFIRMATION BIAS at work.

Is it REALLY IMPOSSIBLE, for you, to 'think' some thing COULD happen WITHOUT necessarily 'believing' that it WILL happen?

I don't think it would be fair for me to lay a secret trap for you. So here's how this is going to play out...

Step 1 ... we establish that "you" the HUmaN BEiNg who calls "himself" Age have a special and incompatible personal definition of what "believe" means that is at odds with that of the rest of the world.

Okay.

But we will just have to WAIT and SEE.

Step 2 ... then we discover that "you" the HUmaN BEiNg who calls "himself" Age also has a special and universally incompatible definition of what "think" means

"incompatible" relative to 'what', EXACTLY?

Step 3 ... possibly a short dicussion of "quus" ... you won't get that, before or after the conversation, but it basically means that we will establish that in conversation with you, nobody ever knows what any word means, and if they did, they would have no particular guide to what it means the next time you use it. Any word in Kenglish could mean anything at any time.

Step 4 ... therefore there is never under any circumstances any correct way to interpret any word or phrase that "you" the HUmaN BEiNg who calls "himself" Age ever uses.

Step 5 ... Clarifying Questions can only result in new words to ask clarifying questions about, and there is never any possibility of resolving a definition of any word "to age" except by being age himself.

Step 6 ... Therefore age, by refusing to work in the framework of a public language with shared meanings, has locked himself in a prison of private language with personal meanings that are impossible to describe and useless for communication.

Step 7 ... I told you this would happen when you were still ken.

Step 8 ... There would be no need for most of those steps if you undestood what "quus" means. But I guess this problem goes both ways.

But what 'you' have FAILED to RECOGNIZE and SEE is that 'I' am the One saying that through language and words, what thee One and ONLY ACTUAL Truth of things is can and will become KNOWN, and FULLY UNDERSTOOD. And that is BECAUSE OF and FROM using the RIGHT WORDS and the RIGHT DEFINITIONS for those words, which EVERY one can AGREE WITH and ACCEPT.

So you are a sort of god are you?
Or are you just a delusional megalomaniac?

Also, HOW do 'you' KNOW 'what' is, supposedly, going to "play out", in the future?

I don't know. I just laid out my plan. If you were smart you would realise it will work unless you suddenly come to the conclusion that actually you want to use the words to mean the same things as everyone else means when they use them.

My prediction about the future is based on you being an idiot. I'm feeling pretty secure about it.

[Age]

Now categorise this information.

What do you mean by "categorise this information"?

And what is 'this', in relation to 'this information?

You insist it isn't a belief.

What does 'it', refer to here?

And, I do NOT EVER recall insisting that 'it' is NOT a belief.

It obviously isn't a memory

What does the 'it' word refer to here?

even if you are going to try and do something cute by pretending you transcend time.

WHY would you call doing that "cute"?

And, 'it' could be a memory without "transcending time".

Also, what ACTUALLY is 'time', to you, EXACTLY?

It isn't something you know by virtue of having a memory of the event.

How would you KNOW?

Do 'you' KNOW EVERY 'event' 'I' have been?

Also, from what you are saying here, you are OBVIOUSLY MAKING ASSUMPTIONS, and thus PRESUMING 'things', BEFORE 'you' EVER asked 'me' a CLARIFYING QUESTION, regarding 'this', or 'that'.

All of that nonsense and confusion was your problem. You took a paragraph where each sentence referred to those before it and you chopped it up and pretended they were an unrelated set of sentences. That's why you could waste my patience with that pathetic failure to understand that the pronoun "it" referred to the noun from a preceding sentence.

But I do NOT know what 'pronouns', 'nouns', 'adjectives', and those other types of words are. And, I purposely do NOT intend to learn what they are, for a VERY SPECIFIC REASON.

Besides you did NOT have ANY thing in the preceding sentences which the 'it' could be LOGICALLY referred to, and you will NOT PROVIDE ANY thing because there is NONE, there is ALSO the FACT that you will NOT answer my OTHER CLARIFYING QUESTIONS posed to you. So, you are just become MORE UNDERSTANDABLE.

So it's something you .... "know" will happen but which might not happen because possibly nobody will have any interest in you after you are dead?

'you' does NOT die.

What does "it's something" refer to, EXACTLY.

NOBODY is interest in 'me' now, and nor NEVER has, let alone in ANY time AFTER.

LOOK,'i' can NOT KNOW what will happen. So, 'you' are EXACTLY RIGHT, in that regards. But, because you MISSED the ACTUAL POINT that I was making, and what has ALREADY HAPPENED has EXPLAINED, what 'you' are EXACTLY RIGHT about here has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with 'me'.

Yeah, when we get to those private language problems, the fact that nobody can be expected to work out what you mean by the word "i" is probably going to factor rather heavily.

In the meantime, if you "think" something is going to happen in the future, but you cannot "know" what will happen in the future, then everyone who uses the English language understands that makes the thing you "think" a belief.

LOL
LOL
LOL

You are just getting FURTHER and FURTHER OFF TRACK.

You COMPLETELY and UTTERLY MISSED what has ALREADY TAKEN PLACE here.

If your contention is that everyone else in the world is wrong about this, then you are not speaking English, and we should call your language something else.

But 'you', "flashdangerpants" are the ONLY one getting things WRONG here, and this is BECAUSE you are MISSING what is ACTUALLY TAKING PLACE and BEING SAID here.

And BECAUSE you will NOT ask ANY CLARIFYING QUESTIONS BEFORE you JUMP to MAKING ASSUMPTIONS, which a GREAT EXAMPLE of you doing this is in this last sentence of yours here, you will KEEP MISSING what has ALREADY TAKEN PLACE and SAID here.

I suggest we adopt "Kenglish" as the name for the language in which all the words sound like English but their meanings are special to Ken.

Okay. 'you' and "others" are ABSOLUTELY FREE to do and adopt WHATEVER you WANT.

I don't think it would be fair for me to lay a secret trap for you. So here's how this is going to play out...

Step 1 ... we establish that "you" the HUmaN BEiNg who calls "himself" Age have a special and incompatible personal definition of what "believe" means that is at odds with that of the rest of the world.

Okay.

But we will just have to WAIT and SEE.

Step 2 ... then we discover that "you" the HUmaN BEiNg who calls "himself" Age also has a special and universally incompatible definition of what "think" means

"incompatible" relative to 'what', EXACTLY?

Step 3 ... possibly a short dicussion of "quus" ... you won't get that, before or after the conversation, but it basically means that we will establish that in conversation with you, nobody ever knows what any word means, and if they did, they would have no particular guide to what it means the next time you use it. Any word in Kenglish could mean anything at any time.

Step 4 ... therefore there is never under any circumstances any correct way to interpret any word or phrase that "you" the HUmaN BEiNg who calls "himself" Age ever uses.

Step 5 ... Clarifying Questions can only result in new words to ask clarifying questions about, and there is never any possibility of resolving a definition of any word "to age" except by being age himself.

Step 6 ... Therefore age, by refusing to work in the framework of a public language with shared meanings, has locked himself in a prison of private language with personal meanings that are impossible to describe and useless for communication.

Step 7 ... I told you this would happen when you were still ken.

Step 8 ... There would be no need for most of those steps if you undestood what "quus" means. But I guess this problem goes both ways.

But what 'you' have FAILED to RECOGNIZE and SEE is that 'I' am the One saying that through language and words, what thee One and ONLY ACTUAL Truth of things is can and will become KNOWN, and FULLY UNDERSTOOD. And that is BECAUSE OF and FROM using the RIGHT WORDS and the RIGHT DEFINITIONS for those words, which EVERY one can AGREE WITH and ACCEPT.

So you are a sort of god are you?

Here is ABSOLUTE MORE PROOF that this one has NOT been LISTENING, and/or has been completely MISSING what I have been SAYING.

Or are you just a delusional megalomaniac?

If I answer yes, then what does then that make 'me', and, if I answer no, then what does that then make 'me', to you?

Also, HOW do 'you' KNOW 'what' is, supposedly, going to "play out", in the future?

I don't know. I just laid out my plan. If you were smart you would realise it will work unless you suddenly come to the conclusion that actually you want to use the words to mean the same things as everyone else means when they use them.

My prediction about the future is based on you being an idiot. I'm feeling pretty secure about it.

GREAT. As I have ALREADY EXPLAINED, the MORE 'you', people, in the days when this is written SEE and BELIEVE 'me' to be AN IDIOT, and a A COMPLETE and UTTER IDIOT, then the BETTER this will ALL WORK OUT.

By the way, I have ALREADY ACKNOWLEDGED that the words, and the definitions for those words, that I use can and WILL BE agreed with AND accept by EVERY one. This is because they are NOT that much different than the current definitions ALREADY USED by 'you', human beings.

But you have OBVIOUSLY MISUNDERSTOOD or MISSED this FACT.

[FlashDangerpants]

But I do NOT know what 'pronouns', 'nouns', 'adjectives', and those other types of words are. And, I purposely do NOT intend to learn what they are, for a VERY SPECIFIC REASON.

They and Those are pronouns you fucking moron.

If you can't work out what "it" means, then you also can't use they, them, those, we, I, you, it, theirs, that, and quite a lot of other words.
Good luck with your new life without pronouns. It will be unpleasant.

[Age]

But I do NOT know what 'pronouns', 'nouns', 'adjectives', and those other types of words are. And, I purposely do NOT intend to learn what they are, for a VERY SPECIFIC REASON.

They and Those are pronouns you fucking moron.

So, when you use the word 'it' and 'it' refers to the 'they' and 'those' in the preceding sentence, then we are back to square one.

If you can't work out what "it" means, then you also can't use they, them, those, we, I, you, it, theirs, that, and quite a lot of other words.[/quote]

If I can NOT use the 'those' word, and those other words here, then so be it.

Good luck with your new life without pronouns.

LOL Just about EVERY time I say some thing, you completely MISUNDERSTAND or MISS what I am ACTUALLY SAYING and MEANING.

LOL WHERE did this ASSUMPTION that I would now becoming to live a "new life without pronouns"' come from, EXACTLY?

I wonder if one of YOUR ASSUMPTIONS will EVER be even CLOSE to an actual truth, let alone being thee ACTUAL Truth.

It will be unpleasant.

[FlashDangerpants]

Good luck with your new life without pronouns.

LOL Just about EVERY time I

What does "I" mean?

say some

What does "some" mean?

thing, you

What does "you" mean?

completely MISUNDERSTAND or MISS what I

Does "I" still mean the same thing it did last time?

am ACTUALLY SAYING and MEANING.

What does "meaning" really mean?

LOL WHERE did this ASSUMPTION that I would now becoming to live a "new life without pronouns"' come from, EXACTLY?

Are you still referring to the same thing when you say "I" that you meant before?

I wonder if one of YOUR ASSUMPTIONS will EVER be even CLOSE to an actual truth, let alone being thee ACTUAL Truth.

Is that a new "I" or is it one you have previously used?

[Age]

Good luck with your new life without pronouns.

LOL Just about EVERY time I

What does "I" mean?

What the word 'I' refers to, in the question, 'Who am 'I'? is God, in the spiritual sense, and in the absolutely True, Right, and Correct irrefutable sense.

However, what the word 'I' means, to you, will probably be COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, although 'you' probably have ABSOLUTELY NO idea at all what the word 'I' ACTUALLY MEANS and refers to, in the question, 'Who am 'i'?'.

say some

What does "some" mean?

The word 'some' refers to any number of 'things', from at least one up to but not including all in any group of 'things'.

thing, you

What does "you" mean?

The word 'you' refers to those thoughts and internal or emotional feelings, within human bodies.

completely MISUNDERSTAND or MISS what I

Does "I" still mean the same thing it did last time?

YES.

am ACTUALLY SAYING and MEANING.

What does "meaning" really mean?

What the word 'meaning' REALLY means, and refers to, is WHATEVER ANY one WANTS 'it' to MEAN.

LOL WHERE did this ASSUMPTION that I would now becoming to live a "new life without pronouns"' come from, EXACTLY?

Are you still referring to the same thing when you say "I" that you meant before?

YES.

And WHY does it appear that 'you' are completely and utterly INCAPABLE of just answering OPENLY and Honestly the CLARIFYING QUESTIONS posed to 'you'?

I wonder if one of YOUR ASSUMPTIONS will EVER be even CLOSE to an actual truth, let alone being thee ACTUAL Truth.

Is that a new "I" or is it one you have previously used?

It is the SAME ONE.

WHY do 'you' ask?

[FlashDangerpants]

LOL Just about EVERY time I

What does "I" mean?

What the word 'I' refers to, in the question, 'Who am 'I'? is God, in the spiritual sense, and in the absolutely True, Right, and Correct irrefutable sense.

However, what the word 'I' means, to you, will probably be COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, although 'you' probably have ABSOLUTELY NO idea at all what the word 'I' ACTUALLY MEANS and refers to, in the question, 'Who am 'i'?'.

Do you think you are God?

[Age]

What does "I" mean?

What the word 'I' refers to, in the question, 'Who am 'I'? is God, in the spiritual sense, and in the absolutely True, Right, and Correct irrefutable sense.

However, what the word 'I' means, to you, will probably be COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, although 'you' probably have ABSOLUTELY NO idea at all what the word 'I' ACTUALLY MEANS and refers to, in the question, 'Who am 'i'?'.

Do you think you are God?

NO.

If you READ the words that I wrote in my prior post here, then 'you' can CLEARLY SEE this.

[FlashDangerpants]

am ACTUALLY SAYING and MEANING.

What does "meaning" really mean?

What the word 'meaning' REALLY means, and refers to, is WHATEVER ANY one WANTS 'it' to MEAN.

Unfortunately, "any" is a pronoun. So now we need to know what "any" means.

[FlashDangerpants]

What the word 'I' refers to, in the question, 'Who am 'I'? is God, in the spiritual sense, and in the absolutely True, Right, and Correct irrefutable sense.

However, what the word 'I' means, to you, will probably be COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, although 'you' probably have ABSOLUTELY NO idea at all what the word 'I' ACTUALLY MEANS and refers to, in the question, 'Who am 'i'?'.

Do you think you are God?

NO.

Well then how can "I" mean God in the question "who am I"?

[Age]

What does "meaning" really mean?

What the word 'meaning' REALLY means, and refers to, is WHATEVER ANY one WANTS 'it' to MEAN.

Unfortunately, "any" is a pronoun.

What has a 'pronoun' got to do with ANY thing here? And what is with the 'unfortunately' word here?

You now seem even MORE COMPLETELY and UTTERLY CONFUSED about what I SAID and MEANT before. But this is NOT UNUSUAL for 'you' AT ALL, with 'me'.

So now we need to know what "any" means.

Who and/or what does the 'we' word here refer to, EXACTLY?

The word 'any' refers to one or some of a thing or number of things, no matter how much or how many.

[FlashDangerpants]

What the word 'meaning' REALLY means, and refers to, is WHATEVER ANY one WANTS 'it' to MEAN.

Unfortunately, "any" is a pronoun.

What has a 'pronoun' got to do with ANY thing here? And what is with the 'unfortunately' word here?

You now seem even MORE COMPLETELY and UTTERLY CONFUSED about what I SAID and MEANT before. But this is NOT UNUSUAL for 'you' AT ALL, with 'me'.

Well this person who refers to God as "I" but isn't himself God, recently wrote "But I do NOT know what 'pronouns', 'nouns', 'adjectives', and those other types of words are. And, I purposely do NOT intend to learn what they are, for a VERY SPECIFIC REASON." And was unable to attach any reference to the word "it".

Therefore, if some rule of meaning is being applied for "it" by the person who is God when he says "I" but is not God, that rule must apply to "any" also. Unless there are no rules for words to mean anything.

So now we need to know what "any" means.

Who and/or what does the 'we' word here refer to, EXACTLY?

The word 'any' refers to one or some of a thing or number of things, no matter how much or how many.

But we don't know what "some" means. Or "thing" really. Not unless we are back in the world where pronouns and nouns have shared meanings in a language of public concepts and stuff like that.

If we were in some foolish nonsense universe where some idiot pissant can actually fail to understand the word "it" without being just an obnoxious bullshitting p****, there be no sentence that had any meaning to anybody whatsoever. It wouldn't even be possible to explain the problem to the poor shitwits who inhabited such a dimension of stupid.

[Age]

Do you think you are God?

NO.

Well then how can "I" mean God in the question "who am I"?

VERY EASILY, and VERY SIMPLY.

'I' is a word describing One. That is one way how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

'you', human beings, can confuse, and/or even think or believe, that thee 'I' means or refers to 'you'. But, 'you', human beings, have been Wrong, before. That is another way. how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

For a human being to even think or believe that the capital 'I' means or refers to "them self", as though they have some REAL importance in Life, can be a VERY egotistical way of seeing things, which is OBVIOUSLY ONLY a human being thing. This is another way of how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

Because there is NO actual separation in the Universe, thee 'I' means and refers to 'That', which is thee One. That is another way of how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

Because of thee Truly OPEN Mind this is how human beings keep continually learning, and creating, anew. This is another way of how 'I' can mean or refer to God, thee Creator.

There are MANY upon MANY other reasons of HOW 'I' means or refers to God, in the question 'Who am 'I'?"

[Age]

Unfortunately, "any" is a pronoun.

What has a 'pronoun' got to do with ANY thing here? And what is with the 'unfortunately' word here?

You now seem even MORE COMPLETELY and UTTERLY CONFUSED about what I SAID and MEANT before. But this is NOT UNUSUAL for 'you' AT ALL, with 'me'.

Well this person who refers to God as "I" but isn't himself God, recently wrote "But I do NOT know what 'pronouns', 'nouns', 'adjectives', and those other types of words are. And, I purposely do NOT intend to learn what they are, for a VERY SPECIFIC REASON." And was unable to attach any reference to the word "it".

WHERE, WHEN, and WHY did you START PRESUMING that I was UNABLE to attach ANY reference to the word 'it'?

Just asking 'you', the human being, a CLARIFYING QUESTION does NOT then necessarily MEAN what 'you' just START ASSUMING.

Therefore, if some rule of meaning is being applied for "it" by the person who is God when he says "I" but is not God, that rule must apply to "any" also. Unless there are no rules for words to mean anything.

What are you on about now?

There is NO 'person' who is God. And, there is NO 'gender' in regards to God, Itself.

The same Universal rules apply to ANY, and ALL, OBVIOUSLY.

HOWEVER, 'you', human beings, can and do make up rules, which 'you' like to do, by the way, individually and/or collectively.

So now we need to know what "any" means.

Who and/or what does the 'we' word here refer to, EXACTLY?

The word 'any' refers to one or some of a thing or number of things, no matter how much or how many.

But we don't know what "some" means.

Well 'I' did TELL 'you' BEFORE.

'you', "flashdangerpants" REALLY do NOT READ what I write, correct?

Nor, will EVER just answer the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTIONS 'I' pose to 'you', correct?

Or "thing" really. Not unless we are back in the world where pronouns and nouns have shared meanings in a language of public concepts and stuff like that.

LOL You STILL have NOT YET worked out what I ACTUALLY SAID and MEANT. Even when what I SAID was WRITTEN CLEARLY BEFORE 'you'.

If we were in some foolish nonsense universe where some idiot pissant can actually fail to understand the word "it" without being just an obnoxious bullshitting p****, there be no sentence that had any meaning to anybody whatsoever. It wouldn't even be possible to explain the problem to the poor shitwits who inhabited such a dimension of stupid.

Okay.

But besides you just 'trying' your VERY HARDEST to PROVE me WRONG, and to be a COMPLETE MORON and IDIOT, is there REALLY ANY thing of substance, which you are 'trying to' convey and share here?

[FlashDangerpants]

NO.

Well then how can "I" mean God in the question "who am I"?

VERY EASILY, and VERY SIMPLY.

'I' is a word describing One. That is one way how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

'you', human beings, can confuse, and/or even think or believe, that thee 'I' means or refers to 'you'. But, 'you', human beings, have been Wrong, before. That is another way. how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

For a human being to even think or believe that the capital 'I' means or refers to "them self", as though they have some REAL importance in Life, can be a VERY egotistical way of seeing things, which is OBVIOUSLY ONLY a human being thing. This is another way of how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

Because there is NO actual separation in the Universe, thee 'I' means and refers to 'That', which is thee One. That is another way of how 'I' can mean or refer to God.

Because of thee Truly OPEN Mind this is how human beings keep continually learning, and creating, anew. This is another way of how 'I' can mean or refer to God, thee Creator.

There are MANY upon MANY other reasons of HOW 'I' means or refers to God, in the question 'Who am 'I'?"

In English, I is the personal pronoun by which one references oneself. In English the phrase "Who am I?" uses that content in that context.

In Kengrish the question "Who am I?" means "who am God?" which really makes the word "am" look quite unruly.

Kengrish is clearly weird, are there any reliable rules of interpretation in English or does everything have to devolve into an endless series of CLAriFYInG queSTIOnS?