A World Without Men?

[Age]

Be that way then. Your inability to connect small pieces of information together into a cogent whole will never be fixed if you don't even try though.

Will you PROVIDE ANY example of where you think or BELIEVE that I have NOT "connected small pieces of information together into a cogent whole"?

You can barely piece together a cogent sentence, let alone multiple related sentences on any topic that doesn't simply devolve into a shapeless rant. My case proves itself, you will not repsond with a cogent post.

If you do NOT PROVIDE PROOF, then what 'you' are ALLEGING and CLAIMING could exist SOLELY within that head.

Similarly, you are incapable of addressing any topic other than yourself and your own immense importance.

LOL It is people, like 'you', "flashdangerpants", who KEEP bringing 'me' into these conversations and discussions. If you would care to take a LOOK through the threads, what is CLEARLY SEEN, EVIDENCED, and PROVED is 'you', people, end up TALKING ABOUT 'me', among "yourselves", and usually in an attempt to RIDICULE and HUMILIATE 'me' while 'trying to' gather a bigger and wider support AGAINST 'me' and my WORDS and CLAIMS'. The DIFFERENCE, however, between 'you' and 'I' IS I can back up and support my WORDS and CLAIMS, when 'you' have NEVER. 'you' can NOT even JUST PROVIDE ONE EXAMPLE of YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT 'me'.

As EVIDENCED and PROVED above.

This thread was discussing someone else's weird self-hatred of his own penis, yet somehow it became about you.

Did this thread, SUPPOSEDLY, become about 'me' BECAUSE of 'me' OR BECAUSE of ONE OF 'you'?

SHOW US WHERE, WHEN, and HOW this thread, SUPPOSEDLY, became about 'me', and LET US SEE who ACTUALLY CAUSED and CREATED this thread to be about 'me'. If you do NOT, then, ONCE AGAIN, MORE PROOF that you can NOT or will NOT back up and support your ACTUAL CLAIMS here.

The "what is philosophy" thread became a discussion of you.

WELL I CERTAINLY NEVER STARTED NOR MADE that thread a discussion OF 'me'.

It is like you are 'trying to' BLAME 'me' now for what 'you', people, STARTED, and CONTINUED on with.

No matter what the topic of discussion may be, you always turn it into you and your "THeeEEHEEeEE ACtuAl tRUTh" obsession.

And you are STARTING TO TURN topics of discussion into your OWN OBSESSION now, which is 'me', 'me', 'me'.

'you', "flashdangerpants", can NOT find fault in my WORDS and WRITINGS' and so CAN NOT counter NOR refute what I ACTUALLY SAY, and MEAN. But, 'you', can CERTAINLY FIND and SEE PLENTY OF FAULT in, and of, 'me', correct.

You simply don't have the discipline to generate a cogent whole of anything at all.

LOL If ONLY 'you' KNEW.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

That ALL DEPENDS.

I have corrected what I said here.

Simple logic Age. If my future happiness relies on you looking like a complete idiot, I thank you in advance for your tireless effort.

YOUR WELCOME.

At least some one did, in the days when this was written.

'someone'

[FlashDangerpants]

Will you PROVIDE ANY example of where you think or BELIEVE that I have NOT "connected small pieces of information together into a cogent whole"?

You can barely piece together a cogent sentence, let alone multiple related sentences on any topic that doesn't simply devolve into a shapeless rant. My case proves itself, you will not repsond with a cogent post.

If you do NOT PROVIDE PROOF, then what 'you' are ALLEGING and CLAIMING could exist SOLELY within that head.

Similarly, you are incapable of addressing any topic other than yourself and your own immense importance.

LOL It is people, like 'you', "flashdangerpants", who KEEP bringing 'me' into these conversations and discussions. If you would care to take a LOOK through the threads, what is CLEARLY SEEN, EVIDENCED, and PROVED is 'you', people, end up TALKING ABOUT 'me', among "yourselves", and usually in an attempt to RIDICULE and HUMILIATE 'me' while 'trying to' gather a bigger and wider support AGAINST 'me' and my WORDS and CLAIMS'. The DIFFERENCE, however, between 'you' and 'I' IS I can back up and support my WORDS and CLAIMS, when 'you' have NEVER. 'you' can NOT even JUST PROVIDE ONE EXAMPLE of YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT 'me'.

As EVIDENCED and PROVED above.

This thread was discussing someone else's weird self-hatred of his own penis, yet somehow it became about you.

Did this thread, SUPPOSEDLY, become about 'me' BECAUSE of 'me' OR BECAUSE of ONE OF 'you'?

SHOW US WHERE, WHEN, and HOW this thread, SUPPOSEDLY, became about 'me', and LET US SEE who ACTUALLY CAUSED and CREATED this thread to be about 'me'. If you do NOT, then, ONCE AGAIN, MORE PROOF that you can NOT or will NOT back up and support your ACTUAL CLAIMS here.

The "what is philosophy" thread became a discussion of you.

WELL I CERTAINLY NEVER STARTED NOR MADE that thread a discussion OF 'me'.

It is like you are 'trying to' BLAME 'me' now for what 'you', people, STARTED, and CONTINUED on with.

No matter what the topic of discussion may be, you always turn it into you and your "THeeEEHEEeEE ACtuAl tRUTh" obsession.

And you are STARTING TO TURN topics of discussion into your OWN OBSESSION now, which is 'me', 'me', 'me'.

'you', "flashdangerpants", can NOT find fault in my WORDS and WRITINGS' and so CAN NOT counter NOR refute what I ACTUALLY SAY, and MEAN. But, 'you', can CERTAINLY FIND and SEE PLENTY OF FAULT in, and of, 'me', correct.

You simply don't have the discipline to generate a cogent whole of anything at all.

LOL If ONLY 'you' KNEW.

I seldom bother reading what you write at all Ken. There seems to be no point as it is always much like this shapeless rant. Same as I rarely read Hedgehog7 because it's just more of his geometry nonsense. And I'm probably not going to read much that new "theory" guy writes because it's all paranoid blather about people trying to murder him for unlikely reasons. None of this shit is interesting enough to be obsessed with.

I looked at one of your posts recently simply because I noticed what, to my knowledge, was your first ever attempt at anything fulfilling either form or purpose of an actual philosophical argument. It didn't work out, that effort had brief possibilities, but ultimately it was beyond your capabilities to piece together a cogent whole. That was why you got a little of my attention recently, it won't last. I can pay you no heed for a few months now and I won't be missing out on anything interesting.

[Age]

Simple logic Age. If my future happiness relies on you looking like a complete idiot, I thank you in advance for your tireless effort.

YOUR WELCOME.

At least some one did, in the days when this was written.

'someone'

Yes, 'someone'.

[Walker]

YOU'RE WELCOME i.e. YOU ARE WELCOME

Yes I did understand, when you CORRECTED me. That is WHY I apologized for, AGAIN, being INCORRECT.

Also, you could also NOTICE, once more, that I was, in that last sentence, AGAIN INCORRECT, from YOUR perspective of things.

But learning how to please EVERY one, ALL of the time, is a journey.

And, this partly explains WHY learning how to communicate correctly, or better, with 'you', human beings, can be a very lengthy process.

By the way, the reason WHY, if it has NOT YET been NOTICED, I do NOT use apostrophes to contract words, like 'you are', is because words, and their meanings, and thus language, itself, is ALWAYS EVOLVING and CHANGING. So, what is right and correct to some of 'you', human beings, in one day, is, or can become, wrong, incorrect, or just plain old 'out of date' to "others", in the same day, or in another day.

In other words, what is being written, in these days, when this is being written, can be LOOKED AT and SEEN DIFFERENTLY, in the days, in the "future".

Pathetic. 'Your' and 'you're' have completely different meanings. If you use one in place of the other it makes you look like a moron and renders whatever you wrote meaningless. People who don't have a clue about grammar and punctuation always use the old 'but language is evolving' excuse The way it's used might change, but the rules don't. Do the rules of physics change because some people are incapable of understanding them? Or the rules of music? You have to understand the rules in the first place to be able to mess around with them.

(In the reasonable voice and timbre of Buster Scruggs, a recent earworm …)

“Your welcome,” as used in context by Age, explicitly states that uwot’s discovered thoughts are welcomed by uwot.

Age’s obvious overlooked explanation of such indicates that perhaps he (or preferred woke pronoun) is indeed a true channeler, which as I gather from admittedly semi-interested attention, is a bone of contention in these parts. The question is neither how nor why, but channeler of what?

[Age]

You can barely piece together a cogent sentence, let alone multiple related sentences on any topic that doesn't simply devolve into a shapeless rant. My case proves itself, you will not repsond with a cogent post.

If you do NOT PROVIDE PROOF, then what 'you' are ALLEGING and CLAIMING could exist SOLELY within that head.

Similarly, you are incapable of addressing any topic other than yourself and your own immense importance.

LOL It is people, like 'you', "flashdangerpants", who KEEP bringing 'me' into these conversations and discussions. If you would care to take a LOOK through the threads, what is CLEARLY SEEN, EVIDENCED, and PROVED is 'you', people, end up TALKING ABOUT 'me', among "yourselves", and usually in an attempt to RIDICULE and HUMILIATE 'me' while 'trying to' gather a bigger and wider support AGAINST 'me' and my WORDS and CLAIMS'. The DIFFERENCE, however, between 'you' and 'I' IS I can back up and support my WORDS and CLAIMS, when 'you' have NEVER. 'you' can NOT even JUST PROVIDE ONE EXAMPLE of YOUR CLAIMS ABOUT 'me'.

As EVIDENCED and PROVED above.

This thread was discussing someone else's weird self-hatred of his own penis, yet somehow it became about you.

Did this thread, SUPPOSEDLY, become about 'me' BECAUSE of 'me' OR BECAUSE of ONE OF 'you'?

SHOW US WHERE, WHEN, and HOW this thread, SUPPOSEDLY, became about 'me', and LET US SEE who ACTUALLY CAUSED and CREATED this thread to be about 'me'. If you do NOT, then, ONCE AGAIN, MORE PROOF that you can NOT or will NOT back up and support your ACTUAL CLAIMS here.

The "what is philosophy" thread became a discussion of you.

WELL I CERTAINLY NEVER STARTED NOR MADE that thread a discussion OF 'me'.

It is like you are 'trying to' BLAME 'me' now for what 'you', people, STARTED, and CONTINUED on with.

No matter what the topic of discussion may be, you always turn it into you and your "THeeEEHEEeEE ACtuAl tRUTh" obsession.

And you are STARTING TO TURN topics of discussion into your OWN OBSESSION now, which is 'me', 'me', 'me'.

'you', "flashdangerpants", can NOT find fault in my WORDS and WRITINGS' and so CAN NOT counter NOR refute what I ACTUALLY SAY, and MEAN. But, 'you', can CERTAINLY FIND and SEE PLENTY OF FAULT in, and of, 'me', correct.

You simply don't have the discipline to generate a cogent whole of anything at all.

LOL If ONLY 'you' KNEW.

I seldom bother reading what you write at all Ken.

This is EXTREMELY OBVIOUS.

But, YET it is YOU who ALSO made the CLAIM:
You can barely piece together a cogent sentence, let alone multiple related sentences on any topic that doesn't simply devolve into a shapeless rant. My case proves itself, you will not repsond with a cogent post.

However, and CONTRADICTORY, you, SUPPOSEDLY, SELDOM BOTHER READING WHAT I WRITE.

And, you COULD NOT even bring ONE OF MY, SUPPOSED, "barely pieced together non cogent sentences" EITHER, by the way.

There seems to be no point as it is always much like this shapeless rant.

Calling "anther's" post a "shapeless rant", with PROVIDING ANY THING, which PROVES this CLAIM SHOWS and REVEALS what is happening within that head.

Same as I rarely read Hedgehog7 because it's just more of his geometry nonsense. And I'm probably not going to read much that new "theory" guy writes because it's all paranoid blather about people trying to murder him for unlikely reasons. None of this shit is interesting enough to be obsessed with.

One does NOT have to become obsessed, over ANY thing, while just reading words in front of them.

Maybe if you did MORE READING, instead of SO MUCH ASSUMING, then you might ACTUALLY SEE and LEARN some thing NEW.

I looked at one of your posts recently simply because I noticed what, to my knowledge, was your first ever attempt at anything fulfilling either form or purpose of an actual philosophical argument. It didn't work out, that effort had brief possibilities, but ultimately it was beyond your capabilities to piece together a cogent whole. That was why you got a little of my attention recently, it won't last. I can pay you no heed for a few months now and I won't be missing out on anything interesting.

And, if we are going to make ASSUMPTIONS and JUDGMENTS on what was PREVIOUSLY written by "others", then OBVIOUSLY there is going to be ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER WORTHWHILE EVER coming from 'you'.

There is NOTHING that you have written, which I have seen, that was even worth the time spent reading 'it'.

What you wrote was just ILLOGICAL, ABSURD, and RIDICULOUS, besides the FACT that you have NOT written ANY thing that is sound and valid, anyway. If you had written ANY cogent, then I have YET to SEE 'it'.

[FlashDangerpants]

Yeah, that was shapeless, and it was a rant. So... shapeless rant.

I can read one out of a hundred of your posts by now and they're all the same general thing, it's reasonable to infer from prior observation that I won't be likely to miss out on anything of import that way. And I probably won't find anyone who isn't you that disagrees with this observation.

[Age]

Yes I did understand, when you CORRECTED me. That is WHY I apologized for, AGAIN, being INCORRECT.

Also, you could also NOTICE, once more, that I was, in that last sentence, AGAIN INCORRECT, from YOUR perspective of things.

But learning how to please EVERY one, ALL of the time, is a journey.

And, this partly explains WHY learning how to communicate correctly, or better, with 'you', human beings, can be a very lengthy process.

By the way, the reason WHY, if it has NOT YET been NOTICED, I do NOT use apostrophes to contract words, like 'you are', is because words, and their meanings, and thus language, itself, is ALWAYS EVOLVING and CHANGING. So, what is right and correct to some of 'you', human beings, in one day, is, or can become, wrong, incorrect, or just plain old 'out of date' to "others", in the same day, or in another day.

In other words, what is being written, in these days, when this is being written, can be LOOKED AT and SEEN DIFFERENTLY, in the days, in the "future".

Pathetic. 'Your' and 'you're' have completely different meanings. If you use one in place of the other it makes you look like a moron and renders whatever you wrote meaningless. People who don't have a clue about grammar and punctuation always use the old 'but language is evolving' excuse The way it's used might change, but the rules don't. Do the rules of physics change because some people are incapable of understanding them? Or the rules of music? You have to understand the rules in the first place to be able to mess around with them.

(In the reasonable voice and timbre of Buster Scruggs, a recent earworm …)

“Your welcome,” as used in context by Age, explicitly states that uwot’s discovered thoughts are welcomed by uwot.

WHAT???

Did you MEAN "... are welcomed by "age""?

If no, then here is ANOTHER EXAMPLE of WHY it is BEST to CLARIFY, BEFORE EVER making an ASSUMPTION.

Can 'you', people, REALLY NOT work out what I was ACTUALLY SAYING, and MEANING, in my MEANT, 'You are welcome', comment?

I can NOT even say, 'you are welcome' without being MISUNDERSTOOD. Although it is COMPLETELY and UTTERLY 100% my fault, for writing one word, INCORRECTLY.

AND, if you did mean to write, what you did, then you are ABSOLUTELY, COMPLETELY and UTTERLY WRONG and SO FAR OFF TRACK from what I MEANT, at the time I wrote that, that this is NOT even a JOKE ANYMORE. Just HOW MANY DIFFERENT VIEWS and VERSIONS OF THINGS, which can be GATHERED and ASCERTAINED from the EXACT SAME WORDS, before EACH and EVERY one, should NOT be DISMISSED as THEE CAUSE of WHY EVERY one of 'you', adult human beings, ends up BICKERING and DISAGREEING with "EACH OTHER".

Truly OPEN CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, with SUPPLIED Honesty and ANSWERS, WILL RESOLVE ALL of these types of issues among 'you', human beings.

Also, and by the way, that 'your' that I wrote, MIGHT WELL HAVE BEEN what is sometimes called and known as a "freudian slip". Which I had NOT YET NOTICED until halfway through replying to what you said and POINTED OUT here "walker". But I will leave what I wrote so far, as it is.

So, THANK YOU "walker" for adding your different insights into this.

Age’s obvious overlooked explanation of such indicates that perhaps he (or preferred woke pronoun) is indeed a true channeler, which as I gather from admittedly semi-interested attention, is a bone of contention in these parts. The question is neither how nor why, but channeler of what?

ALL I said to "uwot" there was:

YOUR WELCOME.

At least some one did, in the days when this was written.


OBVIOUSLY I MISSPELLED A WORD, which I THANKED the person who CORRECTED me on this.

But, what else is there to SEE?

What are people MISSING or NOT UNDERSTANDING in those FEW WORDS? Or, what am I MISSING or NOT UNDERSTANDING here.

If NOTHING, then let us move along.

But if there is something someone is MISSING, or NOT UNDERSTANDING, ANYWHERE, then I suggest just asking me A CLARIFYING QUESTION.

Now, I would like to ask 'you', "walker", do you have ANY thought about who or what the 'what' IS, which is being channeled?

If yes, then will you share?

[Walker]

Did you MEAN "... are welcomed by "age""?

No.

[Age]

Yeah, that was shapeless, and it was a rant. So... shapeless rant.

Yes, another unproven CLAIM.

I can read one out of a hundred of your posts by now and they're all the same general thing, it's reasonable to infer from prior observation that I won't be likely to miss out on anything of import that way.

If it has taken you this long to WORK OUT that 'you' would be MUCH BETTER OFF NOT READING my posts, then SURELY, and HOPEFULLY, you now KNOW EXACTLY what to do.

And I probably won't find anyone who isn't you that disagrees with this observation.

So, you think you could probably NOT find ANY one, besides me, who does NOT DISAGREE WITH YOU, that ANY one hundred of my posts are ALL the "same general thing", correct?

Will you ELABORATE on what the "same general thing" ACTUALLY means, or is referring to, so ALL of 'us' ACTUALLY KNOW what you are rambling on about and referring to? Or, would you like to keep "this" ANOTHER one of YOUR SECRETS, which exist in that head ONLY, ALSO?

[uwot]

And I probably won't find anyone who isn't you that disagrees with this observation.

So, you think you could probably NOT find ANY one, besides me, who does NOT DISAGREE WITH YOU, that ANY one hundred of my posts are ALL the "same general thing", correct?

It's true Age; it's all the same stuff as your original post as ken:

As long as we are open, and thus not believing nor disbelieving (in) anything, then we are being truly intelligent enough to learn more and absolutely anything, including how easy it really is for all of us to being living in true peace and harmony together.

But with a lot more capitals.

[Age]

And I probably won't find anyone who isn't you that disagrees with this observation.

So, you think you could probably NOT find ANY one, besides me, who does NOT DISAGREE WITH YOU, that ANY one hundred of my posts are ALL the "same general thing", correct?

It's true Age; it's all the same stuff as your original post as ken:

AND WHAT? So 'you', people, REALLY BELIEVE that 'you' are SAYING NEW THINGS, which "others" are thinking or saying, "Yeah "uwot" and/or "flashdangerpants" have just said some thing, which is Truly NEW, and now I am going to CHANGE my BELIEFS?

Besides the FACT that 'you', people, in this forum, are NOT SAYING ANYTHING NEW or DIFFERENT, 'you', human beings, have been SAYING ROUGHLY the EXACT SAME things, and DEBATING OVER THE EXACT SAME things, in regards to philosophical questions, for thousands upon thousands of years without EVER coming to a RESOLUTION.

In FACT 'you', human beings, appear to be COMPLETELY and UTTERLY USELESS when it comes to RESOLVING ISSUES, through THOUGHT, ALONE.

You HAVE TO create instruments, in order to be able to do the WORK for you.

The True, Right AND Correct ANSWERS to ALL philosophical/meaningful questions can be and have been ANSWERED, and even HOW to arrive at ALL the Right ANSWERS, properly AND correctly, is ALSO ALREADY KNOWN. But, the reason WHY 'you', human beings, are NOT HERE YET, is because INSTRUMENTS can NOT work out these ANSWERS, for you.

And, besides the FACT that NONE of 'you' are saying ANY thing NEW, I am ALSO the MOST uneducated one here, and have also NEVER read ANY of the stuff 'you', people, here have, and as such just about EVERY thing I say and write down here is from my OWN thinking, and OWN arrived at ANSWERS and CONCLUSIONS. Whereas, what a LOT of 'you' do here, and ESPECIALLY 'you', "uwot", is just COPY what 'you' have read or heard, from "others".

And WORSE STILL, you copy and say "it", as though "it" is GOSPEL and irrefutably TRUE. Which is TOTALLY HILARIOUS, well from MY PERSPECTIVE OF THINGS this is.

For example, YOUR CLAIM that "the Universe IS EXPANDING, AND because It IS EXPANDING, that means that It WAS SMALLER, which eventually leads to and MEANS that It did begin", is NOT even some thing that you thought up and imagined. You have ONLY ever said WHAT OTHERS TELL YOU, let alone NEVER SAID ANY thing, which is even REMOTELY BEING CLOSE TO BEING NEW.

As long as we are open, and thus not believing nor disbelieving (in) anything, then we are being truly intelligent enough to learn more and absolutely anything, including how easy it really is for all of us to being living in true peace and harmony together.

But with a lot more capitals.

And, what is your issue with this?

What I said there is ABSOLUTELY and IRREFUTABLY True.

And, although it IS "the SAME STUFF". At least 'it' is MY STUFF, and NOT some one "else's" STUFF.

My STUFF, UNLIKE 'your' STUFF, can be PROVED True, AND can be backed up and support with REAL and SUBSTANTIAL STUFF.

I am JUST STILL WAITING for those who Truly are CAPABLE of CHALLENGING ME on this.

[vegetariantaxidermy]

So, you think you could probably NOT find ANY one, besides me, who does NOT DISAGREE WITH YOU, that ANY one hundred of my posts are ALL the "same general thing", correct?

It's true Age; it's all the same stuff as your original post as ken:

AND WHAT? So 'you', people, REALLY BELIEVE that 'you' are SAYING NEW THINGS, which "others" are thinking or saying, "Yeah "uwot" and/or "flashdangerpants" have just said some thing, which is Truly NEW, and now I am going to CHANGE my BELIEFS?

Besides the FACT that 'you', people, in this forum, are NOT SAYING ANYTHING NEW or DIFFERENT, 'you', human beings, have been SAYING ROUGHLY the EXACT SAME things, and DEBATING OVER THE EXACT SAME things, in regards to philosophical questions, for thousands upon thousands of years without EVER coming to a RESOLUTION.

In FACT 'you', human beings, appear to be COMPLETELY and UTTERLY USELESS when it comes to RESOLVING ISSUES, through THOUGHT, ALONE.

You HAVE TO create instruments, in order to be able to do the WORK for you.

The True, Right AND Correct ANSWERS to ALL philosophical/meaningful questions can be and have been ANSWERED, and even HOW to arrive at ALL the Right ANSWERS, properly AND correctly, is ALSO ALREADY KNOWN. But, the reason WHY 'you', human beings, are NOT HERE YET, is because INSTRUMENTS can NOT work out these ANSWERS, for you.

And, besides the FACT that NONE of 'you' are saying ANY thing NEW, I am ALSO the MOST uneducated one here, and have also NEVER read ANY of the stuff 'you', people, here have, and as such just about EVERY thing I say and write down here is from my OWN thinking, and OWN arrived at ANSWERS and CONCLUSIONS. Whereas, what a LOT of 'you' do here, and ESPECIALLY 'you', "uwot", is just COPY what 'you' have read or heard, from "others".

And WORSE STILL, you copy and say "it", as though "it" is GOSPEL and irrefutably TRUE. Which is TOTALLY HILARIOUS, well from MY PERSPECTIVE OF THINGS this is.

For example, YOUR CLAIM that "the Universe IS EXPANDING, AND because It IS EXPANDING, that means that It WAS SMALLER, which eventually leads to and MEANS that It did begin", is NOT even some thing that you thought up and imagined. You have ONLY ever said WHAT OTHERS TELL YOU, let alone NEVER SAID ANY thing, which is even REMOTELY BEING CLOSE TO BEING NEW.

But with a lot more capitals.

And, what is your issue with this?

What I said there is ABSOLUTELY and IRREFUTABLY True.

And, although it IS "the SAME STUFF". At least 'it' is MY STUFF, and NOT some one "else's" STUFF.

My STUFF, UNLIKE 'your' STUFF, by the way, can be PROVED True, AND backed up and support with SUBSTANTIAL STUFF.

I am JUST STILL WAITING for those who Truly are CAPABLE of CHALLENGING ME.

All those random capitals only make you look insane. Just saying...

[FlashDangerpants]

I can read one out of a hundred of your posts by now and they're all the same general thing, it's reasonable to infer from prior observation that I won't be likely to miss out on anything of import that way.

If it has taken you this long to WORK OUT that 'you' would be MUCH BETTER OFF NOT READING my posts, then SURELY, and HOPEFULLY, you now KNOW EXACTLY what to do.

I already don't read most of what you write. I've told you that before and then spent happy months readin none of your posts. Normal service will resume shortly.

And I probably won't find anyone who isn't you that disagrees with this observation.

So, you think you could probably NOT find ANY one, besides me, who does NOT DISAGREE WITH YOU, that ANY one hundred of my posts are ALL the "same general thing", correct?

Will you ELABORATE on what the "same general thing" ACTUALLY means, or is referring to, so ALL of 'us' ACTUALLY KNOW what you are rambling on about and referring to? Or, would you like to keep "this" ANOTHER one of YOUR SECRETS, which exist in that head ONLY, ALSO?

It's not a secret. You write the same few pieces of trivial shit over and over again. TheeeeEEEeeEE TRUTH, The "I have no beliefs", the "if you BELIEVE itITMUSTBESO?????" routine, and so on. You are boring and repitive and you make little sense. Everyone knows that.

[Age]

I can read one out of a hundred of your posts by now and they're all the same general thing, it's reasonable to infer from prior observation that I won't be likely to miss out on anything of import that way.

If it has taken you this long to WORK OUT that 'you' would be MUCH BETTER OFF NOT READING my posts, then SURELY, and HOPEFULLY, you now KNOW EXACTLY what to do.

I already don't read most of what you write. I've told you that before and then spent happy months readin none of your posts. Normal service will resume shortly.

WHY NOT now?

Are you DESPERATELY WANTING TO LEARN SOME THING NEW? Or, is there some OTHER reason?

If yes, then WHAT IS that REASON?

Or, will you HIDE this ALSO?

And I probably won't find anyone who isn't you that disagrees with this observation.

So, you think you could probably NOT find ANY one, besides me, who does NOT DISAGREE WITH YOU, that ANY one hundred of my posts are ALL the "same general thing", correct?

Will you ELABORATE on what the "same general thing" ACTUALLY means, or is referring to, so ALL of 'us' ACTUALLY KNOW what you are rambling on about and referring to? Or, would you like to keep "this" ANOTHER one of YOUR SECRETS, which exist in that head ONLY, ALSO?

It's not a secret. You write the same few pieces of trivial shit over and over again. TheeeeEEEeeEE TRUTH, The "I have no beliefs", the "if you BELIEVE itITMUSTBESO?????" routine, and so on. You are boring and repitive and you make little sense. Everyone knows that.

And LOL 'you' ARE STILL READING MY WORDS.

WHEN 'you', people, STOP 'trying to' TELL ME that I BELIEVE things, then I will STOP telling 'you' that I DO NOT. VERY SIMPLE REALLY.

And, if thee Truth makes LITTLE SENSE to 'you' and you can NOT YET work out that WHILE one is BELIEVING some thing is true, then they are NOT OPEN to ANY thing contrary or opposing, then this could REVEAL and SHOW just HOW LITTLE you REALLY KNOW or could EVEN UNDERSTAND.