Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 4:02 pm
Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:45 pm
I'm not "offering" you the wrong choice; I'm offering the one I believe is "genuine and true." You're declining it. I'm respecting your decision.
So, to coin an old phrase, "Where's the beef?"
I'm declining the belief in God yes that is correct. I do not believe in the Man/God relationship. But I do not disrespect your decision to believe. And if your decision is the only genuine and true decision.
Well, same, of course.
And that the genuine and true decision is to live a life where sentient creatures suffer pain...
That part is not a matter of choice, but of observation. The important question is not whether it
happens that way, but what it
means when it does.
If this was my design, I would seriously start thinking about another plan,
I don't doubt that's true, that you would. But since nobody's asking us to do that, it's a moot point. What's important is "What does THIS plan mean?"
Imagining away the evil and suffering we realize is around us doesn't actually speak to the problem at all: it just denies the problem even exists.

After all, if all of what we think we are seeing is merely imaginary, then, as the movie caveat always says, "No animals were harmed in the making of this film." It's not real. It didn't happen as you think it did. So there is no "problem of evil," then.
Obviously, I disagree with that perspective. I think pain and suffering and evil are real, and are a justifiable concern. The darkness in this world demands an answer, and I think people are perfectly justified in wanting one.
No such answer is possible or available in an imaginary world. Unicorns don't suffer.