If you don't have an idea already whether it has an implication, then it wouldn't make much sense that you'd argue that it does.Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:16 pmHypothesis A: It has an implication.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:15 pmI'd have to go step by step over some very simple things.
For example:
Joe thinks, "I ought to pay my taxes."
Does this have an implication for Frank and whether he ought to pay his taxes or not?
Hypothesis B: It doesn't have an implication.
What measurement/test/verification do you suggest we perform to distinguish which of the two universes we exist in.
There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Wow! The irony!Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:18 pm If you don't have an idea already whether it has an implication, then it wouldn't make much sense that you'd argue that it does.
I DO have an idea (whereas, you don't). Which is precisely why I suggested an experiment! Stop paying your taxes!
If you are right then your choice will have no implication.
And I am suggesting the experiment because I know PRECISELY the kind of implication one ought to expect to observe given your kind of stupid.
Last edited by Skepdick on Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Yes. That's precisely an implication.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:22 pm Again, let's say that if you don't pay your taxes you're imprisoned.
So which universe are we in? A or B?
Last edited by Skepdick on Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
I'm trying to explain this to you. Let's say that it's the case that if you don't pay your taxes you're imprisoned.Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:22 pmLets not talk about it. Just stop paying your taxes.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:22 pm Again, let's say that if you don't pay your taxes you're imprisoned.
Now, should Frank pay his taxes? Or should Frank not pay his taxes?
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
What does this have to do with anyting? Frank can do whatever the fuck Frank wants to do - he has free will over his choices, not over the implications of his choices.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:23 pm I'm trying to explain this to you. Let's say that it's the case that if you don't pay your taxes you're imprisoned.
Now, should Frank pay his taxes? Or should Frank not pay his taxes?
Going to prison is an implication of not paying your taxes.
So which universe are we in? A or B?
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
When we're talking about normatives, we're talking about what people should or ought to do. Such as Frank. Should Frank pay his taxes or should Frank not pay his taxes. That's the whole gist of normatives. Otherwise we're talking about something else.Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:24 pmWhat does this have to do with anyting?Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:23 pm I'm trying to explain this to you. Let's say that it's the case that if you don't pay your taxes you're imprisoned.
Now, should Frank pay his taxes? Or should Frank not pay his taxes?
Going to prison is an implication of not paying your taxes.
So which universe are we in? A or B?
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
You have absolutely no fucking idea what you are talking about.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:25 pm When we're talking about normatives, we're talking about what people should or ought to do. Such as Frank. Should Frank pay his taxes or should Frank not pay his taxes. That's the whole gist of normatives. Otherwise we're talking about something else.
In Universe A Frank should pay his taxes.
in Universe B Frank should not pay his taxes.
What sort of measurement do you propose so we can determine which universe we are in?
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Based on what? What if Frank prefers to go to prision?Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:26 pmIn Universe A Frank should pay his taxes.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:25 pm When we're talking about normatives, we're talking about what people should or ought to do. Such as Frank. Should Frank pay his taxes or should Frank not pay his taxes. That's the whole gist of normatives. Otherwise we're talking about something else.
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
You missed 50% of my response you filthy fucking cherry-picker.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:27 pmBased on what? What if Frank prefers to go to prision?Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:26 pmIn Universe A Frank should pay his taxes.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:25 pm When we're talking about normatives, we're talking about what people should or ought to do. Such as Frank. Should Frank pay his taxes or should Frank not pay his taxes. That's the whole gist of normatives. Otherwise we're talking about something else.
In Universe A Frank should pay his taxes.
in Universe B Frank should not pay his taxes.
In Universe A Frank should pay his taxes based on whatever fucking argument/reasons Frank comes up with.
In Universe B Frank should not pay his taxes based on whatever fucking argument/reasons Frank comes up with.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
Are we talking about whether he'll go to prison if he doesn't pay his taxes, or whether the mere fact that Joe thinks that "I ought to pay my taxes" (and only that fact) has an implication for Frank?Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:28 pm In Universe A Frank should pay his taxes.
in Universe B Frank should not pay his taxes.
In Universe A Frank should pay his taxes based on whatever fucking argument/reasons Frank comes up with.
In Universe B Frank should not pay his taxes based on whatever fucking argument/reasons Frank comes up with.
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
I have no idea what YOU are talking about when you speak of "ought implications"!Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:33 pm Are we talking about whether he'll go to prison if he doesn't pay his taxes, or whether the mere fact that Joe thinks that "I ought to pay my taxes" (and only that fact) has an implication for Frank?
The concept is incoherent to me. That's why I am asking you to tell me what YOU are talking about.
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
If it's incoherent to you, then probably we'd agree that the mere fact that Joe thinks that "I ought to pay my taxes" doesn't imply anything for what Frank should do, because we don't even know how that could make sense.Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:34 pmI have no idea what YOU are talking about when you speak of "ought implications"!Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:33 pm Are we talking about whether he'll go to prison if he doesn't pay his taxes, or whether the mere fact that Joe thinks that "I ought to pay my taxes" (and only that fact) has an implication for Frank?
The concept is incoherent to me. That's why I am asking you to tell me what YOU are talking about.
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
No! I don't agree. And I don't disagree.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:36 pm If it's incoherent to you, then probably we'd agree that the mere fact that Joe thinks that "I ought to pay my taxes" doesn't imply anything for what Frank should do, because we don't even know how that could make sense.
There is a universe in which you ought to pay your taxes; and a universe in which you ought not pay your taxes?
How would you determine which universe YOU find yourself in?
- Terrapin Station
- Posts: 4548
- Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2016 7:18 pm
- Location: NYC Man
Re: There is no 'Matter of Fact' [Analytic].
There are different universes?Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:39 pmNo! I don't agree. And I don't disagree.Terrapin Station wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:36 pm If it's incoherent to you, then probably we'd agree that the mere fact that Joe thinks that "I ought to pay my taxes" doesn't imply anything for what Frank should do, because we don't even know how that could make sense.
There is a universe in which you ought to pay your taxes; and a universe in which you ought not pay your taxes?
How would you determine which universe YOU find yourself in?