I have.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:44 pmShow us your working. Who are the antifa who have already been identified by facial recognition software?
Show us some comprehension.
Prove that you're more than a waste of time.
I have.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:44 pmShow us your working. Who are the antifa who have already been identified by facial recognition software?
Really? You have shown us who was identified by facial recognition software?Walker wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:46 pmI have.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:44 pmShow us your working. Who are the antifa who have already been identified by facial recognition software?
Show us some comprehension.
Prove that you're more than a waste of time.
Some names and bios are beginning to appear.
You have to do a lot better than that.
That statement is why people like you are cowards and intellectual shysters.tillingborn wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:24 pmThe evidence is compelling, but not conclusive. You have jumped to a conclusion; that is why people like you don't make it through law school.
You are dismissed, for the second time.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 5:05 pm You could just admit that no antifa people had actually been identified by facial recongition software.
It wouldn't be that big a deal. You fell for a small ruse, a little bit of propganda, but were sane enough to realise the error.
*yepFlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:17 pm*But you will be on the next thing and will have forgotten all about this one.henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 3:49 pmmight be masqueraders...might not be
I gave you a way to check for yourself
let's see how it plays out
Like when you lot were convinced there was proof of **ten thousand dead people voting, you forgot all about that by the time anyone checked that big list of names - conveniently so because it was untrue.
Walker is pissed off right now becuase he floated a claim that facial recongition software had identified antifa agents in the crowd that stormed the Capitol, but that was untrue, it identified white supremacists. Time has told on that story but the howling right simply moves onto the next bullshit.
You are going to make good and sure you have moved on before this one plays out and then you will just say ***"old news".
Some of that is true, but you say "I'm bright enough know who the Big Guy is." You don't know who the Big Guy is, and you are not bright enough even to follow your own logic.Walker wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 5:13 pmThat statement is why people like you are cowards and intellectual shysters.tillingborn wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:24 pmThe evidence is compelling, but not conclusive. You have jumped to a conclusion; that is why people like you don't make it through law school.
Conclusive evidence is not required in initial stages of inquiry.
Withheld information does not permit initial stages of inquiry.
This does not stop inquiry.
Physics rarely allows for total and complete information about the universe in order to begin inquiry with what is known.
And so on, and so on.
You're piss stream is weak.
Counselor.![]()
SMHWalker wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 1:39 pmI don't know those people.Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 1:35 pm Here's your friends watching the fun on TV as people are collected by ambulance.
https://twitter.com/DancingTheMind/stat ... gXKUXdlesk
"Do the right thing fight".
There version of fighting is trying fight through the ice to down the Scotch and Coke.
I wan't there.
They're not my friends.
I don't condone senseless violence.
Don't hold your breath!FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 5:21 pmShow us your working. Who are the antifa who have already been identified by facial recognition software?
Some of that is true, but you say "I'm bright enough know who the Big Guy is." You don't know who the Big Guy is, and you are not bright enough even to follow your own logic.