Have they identified any yet from the many cameras and existent facial recognition software?
If they haven't yet, they will.
They don't install that stuff just for decoration.
You are aware that it exists, aren't you?
(That's my work, Einstein.)
I won't hold my breath waiting for reciprocation.
Tell you what. Could you save us the bother and see if any Antifa have been identified yet? It seems to be a hot topic of interest for you. Looking for someone you know?
Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Wed Jan 06, 2021 9:17 pm
Okay, Trump has just Tweeted this:
Donald J. Trump wrote:"I am asking for everyone at the U.S. Capitol to remain peaceful. No violence! Remember, WE are the Party of Law & Order – respect the Law and our great men and women in Blue. Thank you!"
and
Donald J. Trump wrote:
"Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!"
This may help reduce the violence but he now cannot escape his criminal culpability. Mind you, considering the conservatives think all the media is fake, these announcements may be considered fake themselves?
He said that 3 hours AFTER he lied to the crowd, and told them to march on the Capitol. And after that woman was shot.
He was clever enough to hold back when he first incited the riot.
He did try to get Pence to illegally disrupt the ceremony.
He also tried to "find" 11000 voted illegally.
He is a criminal.
Yes, I recognize these factors. I'm tired of the blatant tactics being used on the Right and think it is about time that while permitting free speech, one still requires being truthful and sincere. I'm fed up with arguing with people who at first prove they CAN argue logically but then take a complete alternate personality that proves to me intentional deception. What concerns me is that it imposes upon those who did have sincere intentions and remain honest to either play the same game or lose out on all the noise that gets used to bury their own sincere views. Personally, I prefer that the sincere politicans remain honest but find some means to determine when and where this occurs and expose them.
Scott Mayers wrote: ↑Wed Jan 06, 2021 9:17 pm
Okay, Trump has just Tweeted this:
and
This may help reduce the violence but he now cannot escape his criminal culpability. Mind you, considering the conservatives think all the media is fake, these announcements may be considered fake themselves?
He said that 3 hours AFTER he lied to the crowd, and told them to march on the Capitol. And after that woman was shot.
He was clever enough to hold back when he first incited the riot.
He did try to get Pence to illegally disrupt the ceremony.
He also tried to "find" 11000 voted illegally.
He is a criminal.
Yes, I recognize these factors. I'm tired of the blatant tactics being used on the Right and think it is about time that while permitting free speech, one still requires being truthful and sincere. I'm fed up with arguing with people who at first prove they CAN argue logically but then take a complete alternate personality that proves to me intentional deception. What concerns me is that it imposes upon those who did have sincere intentions and remain honest to either play the same game or lose out on all the noise that gets used to bury their own sincere views. Personally, I prefer that the sincere politicans remain honest but find some means to determine when and where this occurs and expose them.
What degree of self deception does it take to promote and retweet the theory that the assault on Capitol Hill was the work of Antifa?
Sadly I think it is part of American culture formed of immigrant religious zealots fleeing too much toleration. The so called "Pilgrim Fathers" were not fleeing oppression but toleration. But on the other hand the very toleration they were fleeing, gave licence to others to cherry pick whatever nonsense they wanted
The mantra; you are entitled to your own beliefs is a dangerous thing to teach children.
It is clear that Trump has a very selective relationship with reality.
Walker wrote: ↑Fri Jan 08, 2021 2:44 am
Have they identified any yet from the many cameras and existent facial recognition software?
If they haven't yet, they will.
They don't install that stuff just for decoration.
You are aware that it exists, aren't you?
(That's my work, Einstein.)
I won't hold my breath waiting for reciprocation.
Tell you what. Could you save us the bother and see if any Antifa have been identified yet? It seems to be a hot topic of interest for you. Looking for someone you know?
You earlier said they already had. Now you say that they probably will?
You have half of it right, you little fact checker you.
Of course they have it. It takes time to analyze the data and correlate it with what the public should hear, see, and think.
However, the instant media denial of Antifa’s presence before the data could have been examined once again indicates that whatever doesn’t match the Leftist narrative will be suppressed and discounted.
It’s the way they’ve been rolling for quite awhile now, and if you’re still trusting the discredited MSM as verification, and still checking your brain at the door looking for evidence of some folks with Antifa tattooed on their foreheads, you have yet to adapt to conditions. You’re continuing with the old, discredited delusions.
Hell, the president is currently being censored. He no longer can speak directly to the people without media approval.