That’s exactly right.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Sun Dec 13, 2020 10:23 amThat's the idea. Flush the embryos. Job done.Walker wrote: ↑Sun Dec 13, 2020 10:15 am The distinction is clear.
Innocents die from capital punishment as the result of human error as defined by unintended consequences.
Innocents die from abortion as the result of intended consequences.
Calling good folks names doesn't change that fact of life.
(Doing such only reveals your fear and ignorance.)
Couldn't be any more clear.
Abortion is purposely killing a human being in the embryonic stage of development.
Abortion is much the same as purposely killing a human being in the aged stage of development.
Both are killed on purpose, although the methods, reasons, and justifications may differ.
But, abortion is not the same as mistakenly killing a wrongly convicted human being, via capital punishment.
Your argument is that in certain cases, purposeful killing is justified, as in the killing of a human being in the embryonic stage of development.
Your argument then contradicts itself when you say that innocent life in the adult stage of development is so precious that the risk of killing a human who has been wrongly convicted of a capital crime, is grounds to abolish purposeful death as punishment.
Then, in other threads you have advocated purposeful death of human beings (via neglect) who are living in the “ancient” state of development but again, as with abortion, without even the justification of punishment.
You seem to have a bit of the social justice warrior in you, in that you accuse others of what you yourself display, in this case, hypocrisy.
Truth is, you’re likely a victim of your own muddled thinking and prejudices. We can blame propaganda. Yeah, that's the ticket. Propaganda. The cause is third-party. Don't discount the power of conditioning.