Then at least we have one thing in common since "winning" never had anything to do with this discussion.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 3:42 pmYou see, I do not care whether or not I "win" this discussion.
If a Jewish preacher gathering his flock and preaching in the backwaters of Palestine inspires you to believe he is both god and savior then that is your choice. If you want to interpret the stories in a way anything but historical to confirm and uphold your beliefs so be it but don't expect others to follow as if it were irrefutably guaranteed and sealed.
Jesus was completely human except for those who have no problem transgressing all the known and established facts to assert the opposite. It would have been more appropriate and honest for a theist to say...fine, I understand all that but nevertheless..., thereby closing the argument for good accepting its true history yet surmounting it through belief which is precisely the absurdity of it as understood by only the most insightful of theists. Having said that, I'll assert again, there were far greater individuals, before and after, than Jesus inhabiting the planet.
...and you still haven't explained how other religions or beliefs are to avoid damnation in which Jesus has no part or at best, only a subordinate one.
But you don't have to explain; the lack thereof explains itself.