Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sat Nov 21, 2020 8:57 am Morality is about how human ought to act which will contribute to the objectives of the well being of the individuals and that of humanity.
As such how one ought to act must be in alignment with "what is fact" ought to be acted upon to meet the above objectives.
The determination of "what is fact" [moral] is recognized and realized within a Moral Framework and System.
... 'no human ought to kill another' is not a [typical] moral judgment, but a confirmation that it is a moral fact which is verifiable, justifiable, testable, repeatable and falsifiable. This is not a process of moral judgment.
Morality is thus about how humans naturally ought to act in alignment with the ought-not-to or ought-to of these inherent moral facts.
Peter Holmes is being ignorant and too hasty in the above.Peter Holmes wrote: ↑Sat Nov 21, 2020 9:31 am 1 The choice of goal - say, well-being - is subjective. It's not a fact that we should pursue well-being.
2 What ultimately constitutes well-being is a matter of opinion, and therefore subjective.
3 That an action is consistent with a goal can be a matter of opinion, and therefore subjective.
4 That a moral assertion is consistent with a goal does not confer factual status on the moral assertion.
I hope that's all from me. Enough said. More than.
The term 'well-being' is a very loose term that encompasses a wide range of the human conditions and being_ness.
In the above the contexts of 'well-being' is qualified to moral elements, moral facts and thus morality.
Moral facts are verifiable, justifiable, testable, repeatable, falsifiable with the moral framework, thus just like scientific facts, moral facts are objective, albeit grounded on inter-subjects [intersubjective] consensus and realizations within its framework and system.
Therefore it is imperative we understand the concept of 'well-being' thoroughly in its general and specific reference & contexts.
So what is 'well-being'?