There is no personal God or impersonal God.

[Dontaskme]

'Who' is writing their BOOK is thee one and ONLY, non visible, Mind, Itself.

'What' is writing their BOOK is thee one and ONLY, visible, Universe, Itself.

is there such a thing as an invisible WHO..?

The ''WHO mind'' is ( I DO NOT KNOW )who or what is writing the book - the WHO can only be an idea...

The visible ''What'' is ( I DO KNOW ) who or what is writing their book - is still an idea

SO AGAIN, all you've said is a lawnmower is writing the book. Or was it the boogieman?

The point is...I DO NOT KNOW who....but any label will do.

[Dontaskme]

1. I do NOT do 'theory'.
2. What I say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct.

Exactly.



You claim what you say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct. Then why do you need to make a copy of this proof.

If you can know this truth claim that what you say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct..then everyone can know it too.

The source of this truth claim will be the same for everyone.

So maybe your writing it for yourself, just for fun, just for a hobby, just for something to do to make your little electrons bounce up and down with excitment.

Beats boredom I suppose. There's nothing else to do here.

[Age]

'Who' is writing their BOOK is thee one and ONLY, non visible, Mind, Itself.

'What' is writing their BOOK is thee one and ONLY, visible, Universe, Itself.

is there such a thing as an invisible WHO..?

YES. As I have STATED and EXPLAINED previously.

The ''WHO mind'' is ( I DO NOT KNOW )who or what is writing the book - the WHO can only be an idea...

This is just an idea from the one known as "dontaskme".

This does not necessarily have any bearing on what is FACTUALLY True, Right, and/or Correct.

The visible ''What'' is ( I DO KNOW ) who or what is writing their book - is still an idea

Again, this is still just an idea from the one known as "dontaskme".

SO AGAIN, all you've said is a lawnmower is writing the book. Or was it the boogieman?

Thee ONLY one who has said this is the one known as "dontaskme".

The point is...I DO NOT KNOW who....but any label will do.

[Age]

1. I do NOT do 'theory'.
2. What I say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct.

Exactly.



You claim what you say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct. Then why do you need to make a copy of this proof.

How many times do 'I' NEED to tell 'you' that I do NOT 'need' to do any such thing, BEFORE 'you' comprehend this?

If you can know this truth claim that what you say has ALREADY been PROVEN True, Right, and Correct..then everyone can know it too.

OBVIOUSLY and OF COURSE.

The source of this truth claim will be the same for everyone.

OBVIOUSLY and OF COURSE.

The only difference here though is the 'you' known as "dontaskme" BELIEVES that this 'source' is UNDEFINABLE, EXPLAINABLE, and UNKNOWABLE. Whereas 'I' state that this 'source' is very easy to define, explain, and KNOW.

So maybe your writing it for yourself, just for fun, just for a hobby, just for something to do to make your little electrons bounce up and down with excitment.

When 'you' can answer the question; 'Who am 'I'?' properly and correctly and 'you' have also understood and KNOW how thee Mind and the brain actually work, then 'you' will NOT be wondering any more WHY 'I' am writing a book.

Oh, and by the way, you could just ask a CLARIFYING QUESTION instead.

Beats boredom I suppose. There's nothing else to do here.

'Where' is the word 'here' referring to, EXACTLY?

[Dontaskme]

The only difference here though is the 'you' known as "dontaskme" BELIEVES that this 'source' is UNDEFINABLE, EXPLAINABLE, and UNKNOWABLE. Whereas 'I' state that this 'source' is very easy to define, explain, and KNOW.

Oh, I see we are back to the difference between the 'you' and the 'I' game again.

Have fun talking to and with yourself Ken...because any other source would be different and not exactly useful for you would it.

You have no argument with anyone Idiot. Don't even bother, I've got you sussed, and you won't even be able to understand that because you are just another fool like me.

[Dontaskme]

'Where' is the word 'here' referring to, EXACTLY?

SOURCE


Sorry did you forget again...are you now requesting a clarification from another source....or is there only your source...gosh I really hope this other source is a satisfying answer.

[Dontaskme]

When 'you' can answer the question; 'Who am 'I'?' properly and correctly and 'you' have also understood and KNOW how thee Mind and the brain actually work, then 'you' will NOT be wondering any more WHY 'I' am writing a book.

No one ever wrote or read a book.

But I wish you lots of fun in la la land with your imaginary friend.

[Dontaskme]

When 'you' can answer the question; 'Who am 'I'?' properly and correctly and 'you' have also understood and KNOW how thee Mind and the brain actually work, then 'you' will NOT be wondering any more WHY 'I' am writing a book.

That's because 'you' won't have to know or wonder 'Who am I'' because the book will contain the answer to the question '' Who am I''

Only problem here is that the narrative would have to be believed. No belief, would mean there is no knowledge AT ALL of ''Who am I'' ?


And that is a dilemma for Ken, because Ken has no beliefs. Ken is just a fictional idea manifest in the form of an image, an image of the imageless. In reality the 'WHO' question never arises, the 'who' is just a fictional belief.

See how effortlessly this is explained.

The problem here is that SOURCE has NO need to be explained twice. SOURCE has no need for a copy...for one very good reason. Everyone knows this because everyone is no one.

So in my humble opinion, all yee distinguished ladies and gentlemen have no need to be selling water by the river. We've all heard the story so many times before over and over and over again.

I feel a song coming on...or even a movie or a book....

A reality made up of just water colours of paint written upon flowing water.

.

[Dontaskme]

SO AGAIN, all you've said is a lawnmower is writing the book. Or was it the boogieman?

Thee ONLY one who has said this is the one known as "dontaskme".

You can only know that as and through what was written.

So do you believe the narrative as it was written, as you read it ...do you believe this narrative that was written to be true?

Do you believe that a character called 'dontaskme' exists and that this character can say what you are claiming to have been said when you read the written words of this character?

[Dontaskme]

Age aka the physical universe is writing a book.

2 Questions to Age aka the physical universe:

1: what are you going to title your book?

2: what are you going to do with the book when it's finished?

[Dontaskme]

Dontaskme's new book already exists, it's titled '' Who am I ''

Here is the entire contents of the book for your perusal: ( Once upon a time, the end. )

Does anyone reading this thread think it will become a best seller?

It'll come in handy for when I run out of toilet rolls. Not that I'm one of those shitting myself kind of person or anything like that..

But then I guess the job is never finished until the paperwork is done.

[Age]

The only difference here though is the 'you' known as "dontaskme" BELIEVES that this 'source' is UNDEFINABLE, EXPLAINABLE, and UNKNOWABLE. Whereas 'I' state that this 'source' is very easy to define, explain, and KNOW.

Oh, I see we are back to the difference between the 'you' and the 'I' game again.

Have fun talking to and with yourself Ken...because any other source would be different and not exactly useful for you would it.

But those 'things' are NOT the 'source', as there is REALLY ONLY One 'source'.

Also, EACH and EVERY one of 'you' is EXTREMELY USEFUL for 'I'.

'you' REALLY do NOT YET have ANY comprehension NOR ANY understanding of what 'I' have been ACTUALLY MEANING here, have you?

You have no argument with anyone Idiot. Don't even bother, I've got you sussed, and you won't even be able to understand that because you are just another fool like me.

Okay. Understood.

This is what 'I' have been saying, AND MEANING. That is; 'I', in the non visible sense, is thee one and ONLY One, which is FOREVER and actually does SEE ALL.

[Dontaskme]

'you' REALLY do NOT YET have ANY comprehension NOR ANY understanding of what 'I' have been ACTUALLY MEANING here, have you?

'you' REALLY do NOT YET have ANY comprehension NOR ANY understanding of what 'I' have been ACTUALLY MEANING here, have you?

[Dontaskme]

This is what 'I' have been saying, AND MEANING. That is; 'I', in the non visible sense, is thee one and ONLY One, which is FOREVER and actually does SEE ALL.

No shit sherlock.

[Age]

'Where' is the word 'here' referring to, EXACTLY?

SOURCE

So, when the one known as "dontaskme" uses the word 'here', what that actually refers to is 'SOURCE', correct?

Sorry did you forget again...

But I have NEVER asked you this before. So, you have NEVER CLARIFIED this before.

You ALSO have NEVER said NOR explained this before. So, HOW could I "forget"?

See, I am NOT asking 'you' for what is the ACTUAL Truth of things IS. I am just asking 'you' to explain how 'you' SEE things.

Look, 'you' wrote;
There's nothing else to do here.

And I was curious as to what the one known as "dontaskme" actually refers to when they used the word 'here', here.

'you' CLARIFIED this by stating that the word 'here' refers EXACTLY to SOURCE. So, what 'you' are ESSENTIALLY saying IS:

There is nothing else to do SOURCE. You stated this in regards to YOUR BOREDOM and for YOUR WRITING.

Now, I have NO interest NOR curiosity at all in 'trying to' get 'you' to CLARIFY what this now ACTUALLY MEANS. So, I will just leave 'you' with what 'you' with what 'you' have written.

are you now requesting a clarification from another source....

NO, because, to me, there is NO "another" source. To me, there is REALLY only just One 'source', from which MANY interpretations are made.

Getting back to that One True Source, then ALL is REVEALED, SEEN, and KNOWN.

or is there only your source...gosh I really hope this other source is a satisfying answer.

But the ONLY 'satisfying answers' are those ones, which 'you' ALREADY BELIEVE are true and right, correct?

Look, 'you' ALREADY BELIEVE that 'you' ALREADY KNOW what the truth is, correct?

If this is correct, then what is 'it', which 'you' are seeking and looking for here, in this forum?