What is God

Is there a God? If so, what is She like?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: What is God

Post by Nick_A »

Dontaskme wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2020 9:06 am Nick..I do not see the world the way you do...and nothing you can say to me will ever convince me of valuing your ideas. I've already made up my mind about what is happening here. And NO, my understanding of what it is to be alive has not made me go mad or insane, in fact I'm totally at peace and comfortable with myself in every moment. I've never personally abused my own body or mind. But others have tried and failed to impose abuse upon me. So for me, the only positive about being born is the knowing that any thing born will die.

I already know myself from within my own direct experience of beingness here, I do not NEED to be informed by 'another' as to what the ''myself'' needs or what I am or what I am not. Only I can work out what it is I want to know. I'm the only reliable source of knowledge. I worked that out very early on in my life.

For me, there is no such thing as a utopian new man. The only utopia that could possibly exist in my logic is within the realm of the unborn.

There are no winners here in the realm of the born, life is designed to FAIL, it's a losing game everytime. If and when there is a winner, then that winner has only been made a winner because something else has been made a loser which is sick. And so even as the winner stands, that winner also loses in the end, life is a dead end, the default position. All totally meaningless, we're born without meaning, and we go out without meaning.

We can stop this meaningless existence any time we like by going extinct, but nature will do that for us eventually anyway, for every life form will at some point in the evolutionary assembly line go extinct, that's the way evolution works in my opinion, no intelligent brain made this universe, it's as dumb as rock.

The universe will not shed one tear if man goes extinct, in the same sense the universe DOES NOT cry for the non-life that is on Mars, or on the Moon, or on Jupiter .....if you get my drift.
Don't get me wrong> I'm not trying to convince you. We are sharing our conceptions of meaning. If your perspective satisfies your need for meaning, just be content. I've been kicked out of forums for half of what I've suggested with you. I'm fortunate now that irate secular intolerants and hostile mods seem to be temporarily asleep so we can get away with such a comparison of perspectives.

It is very difficult to discuss what God is and the purpose of Creation. It has become an emotionally charged topic and probably impossible to discuss on the internet where secularism is dominant. It has to move underground.

You are an emotionally sensitive woman so easy to understand why you believe as you do. Life is nothing more than a sadistic horrible joke. If it justifies your suffering there is nothing to object. I respect your beliefs and hopfully you respect my concern for the question of God and the purpose of our universe. It is an expression of my conscious need for meaning. This is the conclusion of an interview with Jacob Needleman. It will be ridiculed by secularism yet understood by those willing to share privately. The Internet gives us the opportunity to meet each other in order to share privately

https://www.watkinsmagazine.com/what-is ... -needleman
Q: How does our present confusion about the concept of God reflect a widespread psychological or spiritual starvation? How would you guide someone who is confused about the concept of God?

A: Every human being is born with an intrinsic yearning to understand, to contact and, eventually, to serve something higher in ourselves and in the universe. Plato calls this yearning eros. It defines us as human beings—even more than our biological nature, our social conditioning or our ordinary reasoning capacity. Our modern world-view tragically misperceives and wrongly defines what it is to be human. We are conditioned by our society to believe happiness comes from pleasure, or from getting things or power over people or money or fame or even health and survival. None of these sometimes very good things can bring ultimate meaning to our lives. We are born to be deeply conscious, inwardly free and deeply capable of love. The longing for these things is the definition of what it means to be human. At the present moment in our culture this yearning for meaning and consciousness, this yearning to give and serve something higher than ourselves, is breaking through the hard crust of our widespread cultural materialism and pseudo-scientific underestimation of what a human being is meant to be together with an equally tragic overestimation of what we human beings are capable of in our present everyday state of being. The intensity of the present confusion about the nature and existence of God is a symptom of this yearning within the whole of our modern culture.


As to how I would guide someone who is confused about the idea of God, I would suggest that he or she begins identifying what one might called “philosophical friends,”—people with whom one could seriously examine our thought about God through listening to each other, reading important and useful books together and trying to think for oneself while familiarizing oneself with the ideas of some of the world’s great thinkers. Cultivate openness without gullibility and skepticism without cynicism.

And, as soon as possible, be on the lookout for someone whose whole manner of speaking and being makes, as it were, a “sound” that draws your mind and heart. And then, little by little, try to see if that person can be of real help on the way to genuine self-knowledge and insight about what God is and is not. In this realm, more than any other even, the paradoxical marriage of both openness and scepticism is essential.
Obviousaly A special attitude is needed which we know by experience isn't possible for secular philosophy. But it can be found privately and people can consciously reason together free of emotional bias in their need for meaning.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: What is God

Post by Dontaskme »

Nick_A wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2020 5:17 pm
Don't get me wrong> I'm not trying to convince you. We are sharing our conceptions of meaning. If your perspective satisfies your need for meaning, just be content. I've been kicked out of forums for half of what I've suggested with you. I'm fortunate now that irate secular intolerants and hostile mods seem to be temporarily asleep so we can get away with such a comparison of perspectives.
Listen, the word ''meaning'' is a human contrived word, it's totally meaningless in reality, it's a fictional idea of which I have no idea about except what I want to BELIEVE...you know like I want to believe the place called ''Disney World'' is a REAL paradise where I can live forever in bliss...except it's just a fantasy.

Being kicked out of forums is normal when one tells the truth, because the 99% of people do not want to hear actual truth, it's too shocking and is why they invent fantasy to distract them from what's really happening here.
Nick_A wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2020 5:17 pmIt is very difficult to discuss what God is and the purpose of Creation. It has become an emotionally charged topic and probably impossible to discuss on the internet where secularism is dominant. It has to move underground.
It's not too difficult to discuss God, all you have to say is there isn't a God, and that life is just a replicating DNA molecule with absolutely no purpose or meaning except to make more of itself in as many diverse forms.
Nick_A wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2020 5:17 pm I respect your beliefs and hopfully you respect my concern for the question of God and the purpose of our universe. It is an expression of my conscious need for meaning. This is the conclusion of an interview with Jacob Needleman. It will be ridiculed by secularism yet understood by those willing to share privately. The Internet gives us the opportunity to meet each other in order to share privately
I respect your beliefs whatever they are 100% absolutely, simply because it is always your prerogative to make up any story you like and believe that story. That said, be that as it may, you don't have the right to impose it upon anyone but yourself. And that goes for every story teller, including my story. Now I'm not saying that my story is the only one that is true because like I've said before, I have no knowing of anything here except what I make up, what I believe.
All I can do is report my surround as it is being directly experienced. All humans are doing is showing each other their own unique stories. Some even try to SELL their stories which is gross, believing that they have found something special and then thinking other people would be interested in that special. In reality, people are only ever interested in their own personal story. Sometimes they want to compare their story to others peoples stories just to make doubley sure their own story is the truth.

Nick_A wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2020 5:17 pm Every human being is born with an intrinsic yearning to understand, to contact and, eventually, to serve something higher in ourselves and in the universe.
I don't agree. For a start, if we have to yearn or search for a higher meaning and purpose then it can't exist, because it would already exist and not be hidden from us. Thinking we have a higher purpose by having to actually discover it makes no sense to me, to me, this just means we somehow have this instrinsic yearning because we are uncomfortable with the way things actually are. So in our arrogance and selfish need we want to change how things actually are. Yes, we naturally want to move away from every unwanted feeling. But that dynamic of pain and pleasure is intrinsic to every sentient creature, it's a value based upon the idea I want pleasure because I don't want pain, and that's the only value that exists in the universe. But all sentient creatures automatically move away from pain because PAIN really does suck...it's disgusting...it's not just intrinsic to humans.

Animals endure the most insidious torure and horror in their lives every living moment. Imagine a cat is run over by a speeding car in the middle of the night, and is left crippled in the curb side with multiple broken bones, and everytime it tries to move, it's ouch gets more and more painful, eventually taking 5 hours to die, all alone, scared and in horrible pain, imagine if that was your experience Nick.

Truth is, no God was there to save that cat. Life is brutal and that's the truth no one wants to hear, except those who do hear and see it.

I could go on and on explaining millions of reason why life sucks, but I'll propbably just bore you, so I'll leave it here for now.
Belinda
Posts: 10548
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: What is God

Post by Belinda »

Pity is a manifestation of God. Reason is another. Awe is another. Pleasure is another manifestation of God.

In short, 'God' is another word, usually a personification, for 'good'.

DAM's scepticism is good. Nick's awe is good.After Nick and DAM are dead what they have caused will persist as long as people can tell the truth.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: What is God

Post by Age »

Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am
Nick_A wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2020 5:17 pm
Don't get me wrong> I'm not trying to convince you. We are sharing our conceptions of meaning. If your perspective satisfies your need for meaning, just be content. I've been kicked out of forums for half of what I've suggested with you. I'm fortunate now that irate secular intolerants and hostile mods seem to be temporarily asleep so we can get away with such a comparison of perspectives.
Listen, the word ''meaning'' is a human contrived word, it's totally meaningless in reality,
Is this 'your' fictional idea?
Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am it's a fictional idea of which I have no idea about except what I want to BELIEVE...you know like I want to believe the place called ''Disney World'' is a REAL paradise where I can live forever in bliss...except it's just a fantasy.
So, what IS actually REAL, and NOT fantasy?

Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am Being kicked out of forums is normal when one tells the truth, because the 99% of people do not want to hear actual truth, it's too shocking and is why they invent fantasy to distract them from what's really happening here.
How could 'truth' be "too shocking"?

And, what is 'really happening here'?
Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am
Nick_A wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2020 5:17 pmIt is very difficult to discuss what God is and the purpose of Creation. It has become an emotionally charged topic and probably impossible to discuss on the internet where secularism is dominant. It has to move underground.
It's not too difficult to discuss God, all you have to say is there isn't a God, and that life is just a replicating DNA molecule with absolutely no purpose or meaning except to make more of itself in as many diverse forms.
But, if there is a God, then WHY say, "there isn't a God"?

And, if 'life' is making more of itself, in as many diverse forms, then this could suggest that 'life' has a consciousness, and/or an ability, to create itself. Now, if this is the case, then WHY? (The answer, by the way, can be ascertained reasonably and logically.) But, if this is not the case, then how do 'you', a conscious being, KNOW this?

Nick_A wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2020 5:17 pm I respect your beliefs and hopfully you respect my concern for the question of God and the purpose of our universe. It is an expression of my conscious need for meaning.
The question of, 'What is God?', 'What is the purpose of THEE Universe?', and 'What is the meaning of ALL-OF-THIS?' is answered VERY simply and VERY easily, properly AND correctly, once you discover or learn HOW TO answer these VERY SIMPLE questions.
Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am
Nick_A wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2020 5:17 pm This is the conclusion of an interview with Jacob Needleman. It will be ridiculed by secularism yet understood by those willing to share privately. The Internet gives us the opportunity to meet each other in order to share privately
I respect your beliefs whatever they are 100% absolutely, simply because it is always your prerogative to make up any story you like and believe that story. That said, be that as it may, you don't have the right to impose it upon anyone but yourself. And that goes for every story teller, including my story. Now I'm not saying that my story is the only one that is true because like I've said before, I have no knowing of anything here except what I make up, what I believe.
All I can do is report my surround as it is being directly experienced. All humans are doing is showing each other their own unique stories. Some even try to SELL their stories which is gross, believing that they have found something special and then thinking other people would be interested in that special. In reality, people are only ever interested in their own personal story.
This is OBVIOUSLY not necessarily so.
Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am Sometimes they want to compare their story to others peoples stories just to make doubley sure their own story is the truth.
Nick_A wrote: Fri Nov 06, 2020 5:17 pm Every human being is born with an intrinsic yearning to understand, to contact and, eventually, to serve something higher in ourselves and in the universe.
I don't agree. For a start, if we have to yearn or search for a higher meaning and purpose then it can't exist, because it would already exist and not be hidden from us.
Human beings, collectively AND individually, do NOT start being able to SEE and UNDERSTAND ALL things. We, collectively AND individual, EVOLVE. Learning MORE and MORE most of the time.

The things mentioned above ALREADY EXIST, and they are NOT hidden from us. Until we discover or learn HOW TO SEE 'things', as they ACTUALLY ARE, then these 'things' are NOT YET SEEN/UNDERSTOOD, so they appear to be "hidden", from us.

When 'you', human beings, EVOLVE out of the 'human being' stage, then ALL is REVEALED, and thus thee Truth is SEEN, and KNOWN.
Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am Thinking we have a higher purpose by having to actually discover it makes no sense to me, to me, this just means we somehow have this instrinsic yearning because we are uncomfortable with the way things actually are.
And, EVERY one of 'you' is ABSOLUTELY FREE to think, and SEE, things in ANY way that you like and want to. Just like 'you' are here, now.

Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am So in our arrogance and selfish need we want to change how things actually are.
WHY do 'you' want to change how things actually are?
Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am Yes, we naturally want to move away from every unwanted feeling.
But WHY do 'you' want to do this?

And, 'you' wanting to do this is, OBVIOUSLY, 'you' wanting to change how things actually are.
Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am But that dynamic of pain and pleasure is intrinsic to every sentient creature, it's a value based upon the idea I want pleasure because I don't want pain, and that's the only value that exists in the universe.
Is this REALLY the ONLY 'value' that exists, in the Universe?

If yes, then how do 'you' KNOW this?
Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am But all sentient creatures automatically move away from pain because PAIN really does suck...it's disgusting...it's not just intrinsic to humans.

Animals endure the most insidious torure and horror in their lives every living moment.
Well that is how things actually are. So, WHY would ANY one want to change this?
Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am Imagine a cat is run over by a speeding car in the middle of the night, and is left crippled in the curb side with multiple broken bones, and everytime it tries to move, it's ouch gets more and more painful, eventually taking 5 hours to die, all alone, scared and in horrible pain, imagine if that was your experience Nick.

Truth is, no God was there to save that cat.
LOL What do you actually think, or imagine, what God COULD BE?
Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am Life is brutal and that's the truth no one wants to hear, except those who do hear and see it.
What do 'you' mean by "Life is brutal"?

'Life' is about living, is it not?

Some living bodies experience pain more than "others", and some experience more pain than "others", but ALL bodies STOP existing the way they are during Life. This is the story of life, and death. But this is NOT "brutal" in ANY real sense. This is just how things actually are, and wanting to change this is just an absurd, ridiculous, and VERY illogical idea.
Dontaskme wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 8:06 am I could go on and on explaining millions of reason why life sucks, but I'll propbably just bore you, so I'll leave it here for now.
If you were to go on and on explaining millions of reasons why 'life' sucks, TO YOU, then ALL you are REALLY doing is just explaining the reasons for WHY you SEE and BELIEVE 'life' "sucks".

To me, what appears to be the case here is that 'you' are just EXTREMELY FEARFUL of NOT being able to exist in Life, Itself, for much longer, and because you have NOT YET FOUND ANY purpose at all to "your" 'life' and to this 'Life' you are afraid that you will NOT, in time, so the FEAR is getting stronger EVERY day.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: What is God

Post by Nick_A »

age
How could 'truth' be "too shocking"?

And, what is 'really happening here'?
It is too shocking because it corrupts the youth of Athens and is to divisive to be tolerated. That is why Socrates had to be eliminated.

Years ago I thought this excerpt was an exaggeration. Now I know it is the way it is so the deeper exchanges concerning reality as opposed to pragmatic fantasy must be done in private. From Plato's cave allegory:
[Socrates] And if there were a contest, and he had to compete in measuring the shadows with the prisoners who had never moved out of the cave, while his sight was still weak, and before his eyes had become steady (and the time which would be needed to acquire this new habit of sight might be very considerable) would he not be ridiculous? Men would say of him that up he went and down he came without his eyes; and that it was better not even to think of ascending; and if any one tried to loose another and lead him up to the light, let them only catch the offender, and they would put him to death.
A genuine seeker of truth is in a dangerous position and it is probably better to find others with this sincere passion before getting to serious for those needing to avoid the hemlock.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: What is God

Post by Nick_A »

Belinda wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:56 am Pity is a manifestation of God. Reason is another. Awe is another. Pleasure is another manifestation of God.

In short, 'God' is another word, usually a personification, for 'good'.

DAM's scepticism is good. Nick's awe is good.After Nick and DAM are dead what they have caused will persist as long as people can tell the truth.
True, but why is it good? Is objective good a reality or are human beings living in Plato's cave limited to subjective conceptions of good?
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: What is God

Post by Nick_A »

DAM
It's not too difficult to discuss God, all you have to say is there isn't a God, and that life is just a replicating DNA molecule with absolutely no purpose or meaning except to make more of itself in as many diverse forms.
The word God turns off some people which is why I prefer to use meaning since God is meaning. What gives us meaning is our God. Once a person experiences that the world is meaningless, They seek to experience meaning beyond the domain of the world and what secularism provides.
I don't agree. For a start, if we have to yearn or search for a higher meaning and purpose then it can't exist, because it would already exist and not be hidden from us. Thinking we have a higher purpose by having to actually discover it makes no sense to me, to me, this just means we somehow have this instrinsic yearning because we are uncomfortable with the way things actually are.
Why can’t a dog experience higher meaning and limited to the cycle of dust to dust on the earth?

A dog is a living machine responding to nature’s laws. It lives by duality or the pulls of yes and no, affirmation and denial. The human organism is a tripartite soul which includes the third force that reconciles the duality you’ve described. Fallen Man has been taught to deny opening to the vertical third force of reconciliation so is forced to live by horizontal duality: affirmation and denial. You seem to have voluntarily emotionally denied the experience of the vertical third force.

Simone Weil defines La force. From Wiki
Weil introduces the central theme of her essay in the first three sentences:
The true hero, the true subject, the centre of the Iliad, is force. Force employed by man, force that enslaves man, force before which man's flesh shrinks away. In this work, at all times, the human spirit is shown as modified by its relations with force, as swept away, blinded, by the very force it imagined it could handle, as deformed by the weight of the force it submits to.
She proceeds to define force as that which turns anyone subjected to it into a thing – at worst, into a corpse. Weil discusses the emotional and psychological violence one suffers if forced to submit to force even when not physically hurt, holding up the slave and the supplicant as examples. She goes on to say force is dangerous not just to the victim, but to whoever controls it, as it intoxicates, partly by numbing the senses of reason and pity. Force thus can turn even its possessor into a thing – an unthinking automaton driven by rage or lust. The essay relates how the Iliad suggests that no one truly controls force; as everyone in the poem, even the mighty Achilles and Agamemnon, suffer at least briefly when the force of events turns against them. Weil says only by using force in moderation can one escape its ill effects, but that the restraint to do this is very rarely found, and is only a means of temporary escape from force's inevitable heft………………..
Freedom from La force comes through grace and consciously seeing its effects for what it is from a higher perspective rather than denying it. This seems to be our difference. We can deny becoming able to see and justify our efforts by defining it emotionally as a horror or we can become able to consciously see which the great beast violently rejects since it threatens its supremacy
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: What is God

Post by Dontaskme »

Nick_A wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:01 pmA dog is a living machine responding to nature’s laws. It lives by duality or the pulls of yes and no, affirmation and denial. The human organism is a tripartite soul which includes the third force that reconciles the duality you’ve described. Fallen Man has been taught to deny opening to the vertical third force of reconciliation so is forced to live by horizontal duality: affirmation and denial. You seem to have voluntarily emotionally denied the experience of the vertical third force.
The 3rd force is synonymous with the idea of a middle man, it's a strawman made of the false identification with a concept believed to be real. Nature operates without the need for a middle man.

It's a nice story Nick, but I'm just not sold, I'm not buying into the ludicrous story of a bunch of universal forces that can and will force suffering upon sentient creatures when it doesn't have to, that's just sick.

The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.

.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: What is God

Post by Dontaskme »

Nick_A wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:01 pm
Freedom from La force comes through grace and consciously seeing its effects for what it is from a higher perspective rather than denying it. This seems to be our difference.
Nick ..There is no freedom from the FORCE ..if there is/was, then you'd be able to force yourself not to be born. Seriously it's just not worth the price of admission, and no force on earth would convince me otherwise.

Pleasure is pains reward, it's a stupid dumb game to play. I'd just rather not play, smart people do not play dumb games.
Belinda
Posts: 10548
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: What is God

Post by Belinda »

Nick_A wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:11 pm
Belinda wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:56 am Pity is a manifestation of God. Reason is another. Awe is another. Pleasure is another manifestation of God.

In short, 'God' is another word, usually a personification, for 'good'.

DAM's scepticism is good. Nick's awe is good.After Nick and DAM are dead what they have caused will persist as long as people can tell the truth.
True, but why is it good? Is objective good a reality or are human beings living in Plato's cave limited to subjective conceptions of good?
I don't know and nobody knows, Some people have faith it is so. It does not matter whether a man has faith in objective good, or not. What matters is to seek good and do good. Your attachment to traditions, Nick is good as and when it's tempered with reason. I happen to see it the same general way as DAM, however that does not mean I am right.And I remain influenced by certain traditions.

The degree of freedom from the Force(Simone Weil) that we can have is the same as the degree of reason we bring to life.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: What is God

Post by Nick_A »

Belinda wrote: Sun Nov 08, 2020 11:49 am
Nick_A wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:11 pm
Belinda wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 11:56 am Pity is a manifestation of God. Reason is another. Awe is another. Pleasure is another manifestation of God.

In short, 'God' is another word, usually a personification, for 'good'.

DAM's scepticism is good. Nick's awe is good.After Nick and DAM are dead what they have caused will persist as long as people can tell the truth.
True, but why is it good? Is objective good a reality or are human beings living in Plato's cave limited to subjective conceptions of good?
I don't know and nobody knows, Some people have faith it is so. It does not matter whether a man has faith in objective good, or not. What matters is to seek good and do good. Your attachment to traditions, Nick is good as and when it's tempered with reason. I happen to see it the same general way as DAM, however that does not mean I am right.And I remain influenced by certain traditions.

The degree of freedom from the Force(Simone Weil) that we can have is the same as the degree of reason we bring to life.
The reality is that we don't know good from evil. We are attracted to evil and call it good. This requires a lot of sincerity to admit. Simone describes our situation.
Literature and morality: Imaginary evil is romantic and varied; real evil is gloomy, monotonous, barren, boring. Imaginary good is boring; real good is always new, marvellous, intoxicating. Therefore "imaginative literature" is either boring or immoral (or a mixture of both). It only escapes from this alternative if in some way it passes over to the side of reality through the power of art— and only genius can do that.

"Let us not think that because we are less brutal, less violent, less
inhuman than our opponents we will carry the day. Brutality,
violence, and inhumanity have an immense prestige that schoolbooks hide
from children, that grown men do not admit, but that everyone bows
before. For the opposite virtues to have as much prestige, they
must be actively and constantly put into practice. Anyone who is
merely incapable of being as brutal, as violent, and as inhuman as
someone else, but who does not practice the opposite virtues, is
inferior to that person in both inner strength and prestige, and he
will not hold out in . . . a confrontation." ~ Simone Weil
To do good requires the ability to do evil, experienced its attraction and have transcended it. Otherwise it is just slavery to a social idea sustained by fear. It is the exact opposite of objective good. How many can admit that they are incapable of objective good and do not even know what it is? They become slaves to subjective conceptions of good and the prestige it offers which are actually evil.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: What is God

Post by Nick_A »

Dontaskme wrote: Sun Nov 08, 2020 10:42 am
Nick_A wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 7:01 pm
Freedom from La force comes through grace and consciously seeing its effects for what it is from a higher perspective rather than denying it. This seems to be our difference.
Nick ..There is no freedom from the FORCE ..if there is/was, then you'd be able to force yourself not to be born. Seriously it's just not worth the price of admission, and no force on earth would convince me otherwise.

Pleasure is pains reward, it's a stupid dumb game to play. I'd just rather not play, smart people do not play dumb games.
You seem to be describing the essence of Buddhism which holds that by becoming detached from what we experience and what supports our opinions while not reacting to it, we eventually outgrow it and no longer go round and round on the wheel of Samsara

I am attracted to Christianity because it admits that only the force of Grace makes it possible. This doesn't deny the value of detachment but actually makes its reason to be possible.
"There is no detachment where there is no pain. And there is no pain endured without hatred or lying unless detachment is present too." - Simone Weil

'Attachment is the great fabricator of illusions; reality can be obtained only by someone who is detached.” ~ Simone Weil
Have you been able to practice detachment to verify the absence of objective reality and had success?
Belinda
Posts: 10548
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: What is God

Post by Belinda »

Nick_A wrote:
The reality is that we don't know good from evil. We are attracted to evil and call it good. This requires a lot of sincerity to admit.
Indeed it requires sincerity to know yourself. Sincerity alone is not enough for you to know yourself.
To know yourself also requires you to be reasonable and use whatever reason your can muster. Simone Weil never tries to discredit reason.
It's also true that a man can want to be good, and want to do good, and makes bad choices. God credits such people with good intentions. Good intentions are the same as conscience.

Nobody is attracted to evil as evil.Evil is absence of good.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: What is God

Post by Dontaskme »

Nick_A wrote: Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:11 pm
True, but why is it good? Is objective good a reality or are human beings living in Plato's cave limited to subjective conceptions of good?
Subjective conception of 'good' manifests only because something is not bad.

In reality, there is no subjective or objective good or bad except as fictional belief.
Personal delusion = mental illness = trapped within the workings of ones own mental map as it perceives itself to be.

Mass delusion = religion = another word for BELIEF = The manifestion of mental constructs. ALL just silly artificially composed fables imposed upon nothingness. The believing brain is nothing but a programmed robot.

.
User avatar
Dontaskme
Posts: 16929
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2016 2:07 pm
Location: Nowhere

Re: What is God

Post by Dontaskme »

Nick_A wrote: Sun Nov 08, 2020 3:56 pm
Have you been able to practice detachment to verify the absence of objective reality and had success?
Detachment from what though? ...I've personally never denied objective reality, or the absence of it. If something is believed to exist then it will.

As for the immediate direct experience of sentient sensation, I've never been able to detach from the pain or pleasure felt.

So I have no idea what this even means... :arrow: (Have you been able to practice detachment to verify the absence of objective reality and had success?) :?

The only useful value I can attach to the meaning of detachment is to realise there is no possible way of detaching from anything, because reality is all one thing anyway...in the sense that the outer is a projection of the inner and vice versa. Reality is a self sustaining automatic feedback loop.
Post Reply