No. I mean - and without averages, in this current time, PHYSICS. Everything considered beyond physics, still resides upon PHYSICS.
You are so confused.
You do not know the difference between the object of study and the study itself.
We are talking about what humans do.
Nothing whatever, has ever, nor ever will rely on physics.(def 1)
From a definition:
1. the branch of science concerned with the nature and properties of matter and energy. The subject matter of physics includes mechanics, heat, light and other radiation, sound, electricity, magnetism, and the structure of atoms.
2.the physical properties and phenomena of something.
eg. "the physics of plasmas"
Try and look for your brain.
Personally, U want me to look at MY brain>> ? BRIAN confused?
I fink not.
Attempt to describe a reality where physics does not apply.
Good luck..
Nothing you have said is relevant to the topic.
Try and read what I have said, before you respond.
When you say, "Attempt to describe a reality where physics does not apply.", what definition (from above) of physics are you thinking about 1 or 2 ?
Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:28 pm
You are so confused.
You do not know the difference between the object of study and the study itself.
We are talking about what humans do.
Nothing whatever, has ever, nor ever will rely on physics.(def 1)
From a definition:
1. the branch of science concerned with the nature and properties of matter and energy. The subject matter of physics includes mechanics, heat, light and other radiation, sound, electricity, magnetism, and the structure of atoms.
2.the physical properties and phenomena of something.
eg. "the physics of plasmas"
3. whatever atto says after he has drunk a litre bottle of Vodka.
Try and look for your brain.
Personally, U want me to look at MY brain>> ? BRIAN confused?
I fink not.
Attempt to describe a reality where physics does not apply.
Good luck..
Nothing you have said is relevant to the topic.
Try and read what I have said, before you respond.
When you say, "Attempt to describe a reality where physics does not apply.", what definition (from above) of physics are you thinking about 1 or 2 ?
Physics is useful insight into ontological questions of substance(s), but not a lot of use for moral philosophy or politics for which history, anthropology, and social psychology are more informative.
Belinda wrote: ↑Wed Oct 28, 2020 10:02 am
Physics is useful insight into ontological questions of substance(s), but not a lot of use for moral philosophy or politics for which history, anthropology, and social psychology are more informative.
[quote=Sculptor post_id=477496 time=1603882860 user_id=17400]
[quote=Belinda post_id=477490 time=1603875765 user_id=12709]
Physics is useful insight into ontological questions of substance(s), but not a lot of use for moral philosophy or politics for which history, anthropology, and social psychology are more informative.
[/quote]
