yep, we live in interestin' times (wasn't that an old arab curse? may you live in interesting times)RCSaunders wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:15 pmSadly, recent news is filled with more innocents being shot or harmed by the police than are being protected by them. I know it's anecdotal, but it does illustrate your point, Henry.henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:05 pmthose same folks, right now, surrounded by government & law do, crappy things
what good has government & law been in curtailin' 'em?
sometimes government & law even assists those garbage people in their misdeeds
self-responsible, self-directing, moral men have no need of government (they may have a use for proxies, though); and no use for law
criminals & the immoral (the ones who get all the attention but who are a minority) aren't particularly blunted by government or law (proxies, of the right kind, can help, though, in keepin' garbage people in line)
the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
- RCSaunders
- Posts: 4704
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Spuriously attributed to the Chinese. Called the, "Chinese curse," which no Chinese ever heard of.henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:18 pmyep, we live in interestin' times (wasn't that an old arab curse? may you live in interesting times)RCSaunders wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:15 pmSadly, recent news is filled with more innocents being shot or harmed by the police than are being protected by them. I know it's anecdotal, but it does illustrate your point, Henry.henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:05 pm
those same folks, right now, surrounded by government & law do, crappy things
what good has government & law been in curtailin' 'em?
sometimes government & law even assists those garbage people in their misdeeds
self-responsible, self-directing, moral men have no need of government (they may have a use for proxies, though); and no use for law
criminals & the immoral (the ones who get all the attention but who are a minority) aren't particularly blunted by government or law (proxies, of the right kind, can help, though, in keepin' garbage people in line)
Nevertheless it surely fits our times and I'm sure there are many Muslims who'd be glad to take credit for it. (Arabs are actually nice people. Many are Christians and most of the Arabs in the United States are not Muslims, and most of the Muslims in the world are not Arabs.)
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
lecturin' and pontificatin'
Spuriously attributed to the Chinese. Called the, "Chinese curse," which no Chinese ever heard of.
Nevertheless it surely fits our times and I'm sure there are many Muslims who'd be glad to take credit for it. (Arabs are actually nice people. Many are Christians and most of the Arabs in the United States are not Muslims, and most of the Muslims in the world are not Arabs.)

Nevertheless it surely fits our times and I'm sure there are many Muslims who'd be glad to take credit for it. (Arabs are actually nice people. Many are Christians and most of the Arabs in the United States are not Muslims, and most of the Muslims in the world are not Arabs.)
-
commonsense
- Posts: 5380
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
You’re correct and you have underscored the need for more government!henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:05 pmthose same folks, right now, surrounded by government & law do, crappy thingscommonsense wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 4:05 pmSome certainly wouldn’t.RCSaunders wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 3:19 pm
What? Unless some government makes you do the right thing, you wouldn't?
what good has government & law been in curtailin' 'em?
sometimes government & law even assists those garbage people in their misdeeds
self-responsible, self-directing, moral men have no need of government (they may have a use for proxies, though); and no use for law
criminals & the immoral (the ones who get all the attention but who are a minority) aren't particularly blunted by government or law (proxies, of the right kind, can help, though, in keepin' garbage people in line)
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
I ain't seein' how that's so.commonsense wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 10:46 pmYou’re correct and you have underscored the need for more government!henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:05 pmthose same folks, right now, surrounded by government & law do, crappy things
what good has government & law been in curtailin' 'em?
sometimes government & law even assists those garbage people in their misdeeds
self-responsible, self-directing, moral men have no need of government (they may have a use for proxies, though); and no use for law
criminals & the immoral (the ones who get all the attention but who are a minority) aren't particularly blunted by government or law (proxies, of the right kind, can help, though, in keepin' garbage people in line)
-
commonsense
- Posts: 5380
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
I think that was Chinese, spuriously.henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:18 pmyep, we live in interestin' times (wasn't that an old arab curse? may you live in interesting times)RCSaunders wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:15 pmSadly, recent news is filled with more innocents being shot or harmed by the police than are being protected by them. I know it's anecdotal, but it does illustrate your point, Henry.henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:05 pm
those same folks, right now, surrounded by government & law do, crappy things
what good has government & law been in curtailin' 'em?
sometimes government & law even assists those garbage people in their misdeeds
self-responsible, self-directing, moral men have no need of government (they may have a use for proxies, though); and no use for law
criminals & the immoral (the ones who get all the attention but who are a minority) aren't particularly blunted by government or law (proxies, of the right kind, can help, though, in keepin' garbage people in line)
Last edited by commonsense on Tue Aug 25, 2020 12:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
commonsense
- Posts: 5380
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Since criminals and the immoral aren’t blunted by the current level of government, clearly the current level is insufficient and we need more! QED.henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 11:10 pmI ain't seein' how that's so.commonsense wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 10:46 pmYou’re correct and you have underscored the need for more government!henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:05 pm
those same folks, right now, surrounded by government & law do, crappy things
what good has government & law been in curtailin' 'em?
sometimes government & law even assists those garbage people in their misdeeds
self-responsible, self-directing, moral men have no need of government (they may have a use for proxies, though); and no use for law
criminals & the immoral (the ones who get all the attention but who are a minority) aren't particularly blunted by government or law (proxies, of the right kind, can help, though, in keepin' garbage people in line)
- RCSaunders
- Posts: 4704
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2018 9:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: lecturin' and pontificatin'
It wasn't for you, Henry, it was for all the idiots who would turn what I said into an accusation of racism.henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:46 pm Spuriously attributed to the Chinese. Called the, "Chinese curse," which no Chinese ever heard of.
Nevertheless it surely fits our times and I'm sure there are many Muslims who'd be glad to take credit for it. (Arabs are actually nice people. Many are Christians and most of the Arabs in the United States are not Muslims, and most of the Muslims in the world are not Arabs.)
![]()
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
just the opposite: take away the power that shields criminals; take away the umbrella 'they' all cluster undercommonsense wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 12:22 amSince criminals and the immoral aren’t blunted by the current level of government, clearly the current level is insufficient and we need more! QED.henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 11:10 pmI ain't seein' how that's so.commonsense wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 10:46 pm
You’re correct and you have underscored the need for more government!
expose the lawless and immoral to the direct consequences of what they do
simple example: if the good people of seattle weren't spineless, if they hadn't turned over so much power to employees, then cops wouldn't do the shit they do, and garbage people wouldn't have an excuse to riot, and, if they rioted anyway, the residents, havin' zealously kept power for themselves, would put an end to unrest lickity-split themselves
instead of months of manure there'd have been a night of routing
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: lecturin' and pontificatin'
you worry too much about the idiots: fuck 'emRCSaunders wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 1:32 amIt wasn't for you, Henry, it was for all the idiots who would turn what I said into an accusation of racism.henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:46 pm Spuriously attributed to the Chinese. Called the, "Chinese curse," which no Chinese ever heard of.
Nevertheless it surely fits our times and I'm sure there are many Muslims who'd be glad to take credit for it. (Arabs are actually nice people. Many are Christians and most of the Arabs in the United States are not Muslims, and most of the Muslims in the world are not Arabs.)
![]()
accordin' to *some here: I'm a racist; a misogynist; and generally a rotten, no account, jackass
fuck 'em: fuck 'em, I say!
*here's a nasty lil example: Lacewing, who is currently on **your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.
**that bein' my ignore list
Last edited by henry quirk on Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
commonsense
- Posts: 5380
- Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Somehow I knew that you wouldn’t fall for my more-of-a-bad-thing-is-a-good-thing argument.henry quirk wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 1:51 amjust the opposite: take away the power that shields criminals; take away the umbrella 'they' all cluster undercommonsense wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 12:22 amSince criminals and the immoral aren’t blunted by the current level of government, clearly the current level is insufficient and we need more! QED.
expose the lawless and immoral to the direct consequences of what they do
simple example: if the good people of seattle weren't spineless, if they hadn't turned over so much power to employees, then cops wouldn't do the shit they do, and garbage people wouldn't have an excuse to riot, and, if they rioted anyway, the residents, havin' zealously kept power for themselves, would put an end to unrest lickity-split themselves
instead of months of manure there'd have been a night of routing
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
oh, I fell for it, just in my own waycommonsense wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 2:20 amSomehow I knew that you wouldn’t fall for my more-of-a-bad-thing-is-a-good-thing argument.henry quirk wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 1:51 amjust the opposite: take away the power that shields criminals; take away the umbrella 'they' all cluster undercommonsense wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 12:22 am
Since criminals and the immoral aren’t blunted by the current level of government, clearly the current level is insufficient and we need more! QED.
expose the lawless and immoral to the direct consequences of what they do
simple example: if the good people of seattle weren't spineless, if they hadn't turned over so much power to employees, then cops wouldn't do the shit they do, and garbage people wouldn't have an excuse to riot, and, if they rioted anyway, the residents, havin' zealously kept power for themselves, would put an end to unrest lickity-split themselves
instead of months of manure there'd have been a night of routing![]()
even my humiliations are spectacular and unique
I deserve a
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Yes, but everybody wants to achieve the goal. Nobody wants to fail at achieving that goal.commonsense wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 5:13 pm Yes, the goal is alike with others, but it’s not a group goal. It’s more a competitive goal. In the sense that one person may achieve his goal of wealth for himself and his family, while others may fail, it is non-unique.
And if everybody is to actually succeed at achieving the goal, then the game cannot be a zero-sum game.
So not-playing a zero-sum game is a group goal IF you want to minimise your individual risk of failing at your individual goal.
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Whatever the level of government by sorts of Mafia, that government is insufficient.commonsense wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 12:22 amSince criminals and the immoral aren’t blunted by the current level of government, clearly the current level is insufficient and we need more! QED.henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 11:10 pmI ain't seein' how that's so.commonsense wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 10:46 pm
You’re correct and you have underscored the need for more government!
No government that lines its own pockets , or legislates to empower itself, is a sufficient government. I wish to God there was an honest government somewhere in his world.
- henry quirk
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
- Contact:
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
stan, lou, and mack all want to achieve and maintain the same thing (keeping their families, safe, fed, clothed, educated, housed, etc)Skepdick wrote: ↑Tue Aug 25, 2020 8:47 amYes, but everybody wants to achieve the goal. Nobody wants to fail at achieving that goal.commonsense wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 5:13 pm Yes, the goal is alike with others, but it’s not a group goal. It’s more a competitive goal. In the sense that one person may achieve his goal of wealth for himself and his family, while others may fail, it is non-unique.
And if everybody is to actually succeed at achieving the goal, then the game cannot be a zero-sum game.
So not-playing a zero-sum game is a group goal IF you want to minimise your individual risk of failing at your individual goal.
certainly seems like a group or communal goal till you dig deeper
each man has his own particular take on what it means to further & maintain his family: stan and his are country folk, what they do to further themselves is not the same as what lou (a city dweller) and mack (an off-the-gridder) do
further, all three men (and their families) have different notions about what bein' safe, fed, clothed, educated, housed, etc. means
diggin' deeper, we can see what appears to be group or communal goals are really individual goals