the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Abortion, euthanasia, genetic engineering, Just War theory and other such hot topics.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

commonsense
Posts: 5380
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm

Re: "Should country folk be denied education because your ideology?"

Post by commonsense »

RCSaunders wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 3:19 pm Shaw was right, "Those who can, do; those who can't, teach."
Shaw has got it wrong. Those who can, do; those who believe others can, teach.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by Skepdick »

commonsense wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:16 pm Not shared if every individual wants to produce wealth for only himself or only himself and his family.
Every individual wants to produce wealth for only himself and only his family!

That still sounds like every individual wants the same thing.
commonsense
Posts: 5380
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by commonsense »

Skepdick wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:15 pm
commonsense wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:09 pm Take the risk and opt out, or huddle in perceived safety by remaining in.
The safety isn't perceived - it's actual.

Doctors, sanitation, electricity, reliable source of food.

The price you pay for all of those comforts is all the responsibilities it comes with.
Yes, the safety is real. I was referring to the idea that if real safety isn’t seen as real safety, the huddles would not have so much reason to huddle.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by Skepdick »

commonsense wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:30 pm Yes, the safety is real. I was referring to the idea that if real safety isn’t seen as real safety, the huddles would not have so much reason to huddle.
Yeah. Everybody wants real X for free...
commonsense
Posts: 5380
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2017 6:38 pm

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by commonsense »

Skepdick wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:36 pm
commonsense wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:30 pm Yes, the safety is real. I was referring to the idea that if real safety isn’t seen as real safety, the huddles would not have so much reason to huddle.
Yeah. Everybody wants real X for free...
Yup.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by henry quirk »

commonsense wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:43 pm
Skepdick wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:36 pm
commonsense wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:30 pm Yes, the safety is real. I was referring to the idea that if real safety isn’t seen as real safety, the huddles would not have so much reason to huddle.
Yeah. Everybody wants real X for free...
Yup.
nope

some of us wanna pay a fair price...we go out of our way to do that

free shit (not really free...somebody is payn' for it, in some fashion) is a goddamned leash
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by Skepdick »

henry quirk wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 6:09 pm nope

some of us wanna pay a fair price...we go out of our way to do that

free shit (not really free...somebody is payn' for it, in some fashion) is a goddamned leash
What would you say is a fair price for drinkable water?

The point is that somebody has to do the work. Part of politics is about who should bear the cost and how to collect on the bill.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by henry quirk »

What would you say is a fair price for drinkable water?

I can get a 16 oz bottle of nestle's water for 86 cents

seems fair to me

I pay about $50 monthly for water service, for two

seems fair to me


The point is that somebody has to do the work.

yeah, that's what I said


Part of politics is about who should bear the cost and how to collect on the bill.

no

all of politics is schmucks lookin' to make a dime on taxpayers
Belinda
Posts: 10548
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by Belinda »

henry quirk wrote: Sun Aug 23, 2020 7:14 pm What would you say is a fair price for drinkable water?

I can get a 16 oz bottle of nestle's water for 86 cents

seems fair to me

I pay about $50 monthly for water service, for two

seems fair to me


The point is that somebody has to do the work.

yeah, that's what I said


Part of politics is about who should bear the cost and how to collect on the bill.

no



all of politics is schmucks lookin' to make a dime on taxpayers
Like it or not we have to be governed by rule of law and to my mind politicians are better than kings or war lords. The thing is to try to inform myself which politicians are honest and intelligent and which are not, and vote accordingly.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by henry quirk »

Like it or not we have to be governed by rule of law and to my mind politicians are better than kings or war lords. The thing is to try to inform myself which politicians are honest and intelligent and which are not, and vote accordingly.

oh, I get it, I do

some folks need direction; some folks need to direct

you understand some folks want & need neither, yeah?


you confuse glibness & cleverness for honesty & intelligence
Belinda
Posts: 10548
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by Belinda »

henry quirk wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:16 pm Like it or not we have to be governed by rule of law and to my mind politicians are better than kings or war lords. The thing is to try to inform myself which politicians are honest and intelligent and which are not, and vote accordingly.

oh, I get it, I do

some folks need direction; some folks need to direct

you understand some folks want & need neither, yeah?


you confuse glibness & cleverness for honesty & intelligence
I have done so and hope I have learned to do better than that.

Certainly I understand some folks want liberty I want it for myself. But I can't have unlimited liberty as there are other people besides me to be considered if only because I need their goods and services.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by henry quirk »

Belinda wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:19 pm
henry quirk wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:16 pm Like it or not we have to be governed by rule of law and to my mind politicians are better than kings or war lords. The thing is to try to inform myself which politicians are honest and intelligent and which are not, and vote accordingly.

oh, I get it, I do

some folks need direction; some folks need to direct

you understand some folks want & need neither, yeah?


you confuse glibness & cleverness for honesty & intelligence
I have done so and hope I have learned to do better than that.

Certainly I understand some folks want liberty I want it for myself. But I can't have unlimited liberty as there are other people besides me to be considered if only because I need their goods and services.
no such animal

bein' free is man's natural state, to self-direct & be self-responsible

now, license & libertinism : that's what you get when folks ignore the self-responsibility part
Belinda
Posts: 10548
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by Belinda »

bein' free is man's natural state, to self-direct & be self-responsible
Was it Hobbes or was it Rousseau who claimed just that? I cannot remember.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by henry quirk »

Belinda wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:34 pm
bein' free is man's natural state, to self-direct & be self-responsible
Was it Hobbes or was it Rousseau who claimed just that? I cannot remember.
hell if I know
Belinda
Posts: 10548
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism

Post by Belinda »

henry quirk wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:36 pm
Belinda wrote: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:34 pm
bein' free is man's natural state, to self-direct & be self-responsible
Was it Hobbes or was it Rousseau who claimed just that? I cannot remember.
hell if I know
I did not expect you to know. I hoped you might do some googling for me.
Post Reply