Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Is there a God? If so, what is She like?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
Systematic
Posts: 365
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 5:29 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Systematic »

Systematic wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 5:14 am
Lacewing wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:51 am What if, instead of seeking specific "truth"... we sought to eliminate/reject obvious lies? Is that possible? :lol: Then see what's left?
Awesome. I actually hadn't thought of that. What are some obvious lies? I'll start: The Earth is flat. Slavery is good for slaves.

And we could do some obvious truths too (particularly truths that are not accepted all the time) : Child abuse hurts children. Most people in the U.S. work only for money. We are all going to die someday. Evolution happened. Cigarette smoke is radioactive (i.e. alpha particles).

What else you got?
OK, Lacewing, I do sort of see the point in doing that, but there needs to be some delineation between what works as working knowledge (what you would want to follow in the mean time), and what can be doubted. Right now I would say that I am about 99.99% certain that the above are lies and truths respectively. About some other things, we need to guess and make several guesses; because, we do not have the same amount of certainty. Though, people are accustomed to making the assertion that they are certain. Different methodology for different situation.

Edit: When you are doing epistemology, you should start with an open mind (e.g. the facts with several interpretations thereof). When you are living your life, you should start with what is most probably true. That distinction is very important.
Belinda
Posts: 10548
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Belinda »

Nick_A wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2020 10:41 pm Why did Jesus speak in parables? If he had something to say why not come out with it and make it clear? Was it a trick to make him appear important or is there an objective purpose for myths and parables the literal mind has become closed to?
Hear hear!
Belinda
Posts: 10548
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Belinda »

Immanuel Can wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:44 pm
Belinda wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:23 pm I don't agree men are better than wasps or orangutans. Sometimes men are like devils from hell.
:? :? :? NOBODY even suggested they were. I certainly didn't.

You asked if wasps or orangs could be "the cosmic lawgiver." I think that's pretty evidently silly, but I gave it a respect perhaps the comment didn't actually merit, and answered it. And now you can't even remember what it was that you yourself asked? :shock:
As for communism, good ideas...
"Good ideas" and "Communism" are manifestly opposites. Always have been. Over one hundred million dead people would say "amen" to that assessment, if they could. But Communism got them.
Of course it is sill and it's also silly to claim God is a very important sort of person. We well know persons of all ranks, ages, and states of health can be bad or at least, may be unhealthy. It is therefore probably best to not attribute personhood to God. An important point made by Jesus is God sort of becomes visible only through good actions; add "there is none good but God", and it looks like blasphemy to call God a person.

Communism is a good idea but in the matter of relativity it fails. Men are such they always compete for power: some men get to be ruling elite: totalitarian communism lacks checks and balances.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27605
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Nick_A wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 3:39 am New eyes and ears must refer to more than responding to nice people.
Of course. "Ears to hear" refers to the willingness to take in the claims of God AS the claims of God. But "eyes" are not mentioned in this passage, though they are in another. I'm thinking of John 9:41-42.

"Those of the Pharisees who were with Him heard these things and said to Him, “We are not blind too, are we?” Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would have no sin; but since you say, ‘We see,’ your sin remains."

Here, "seeing" refers to the claim to know enough to make a judgment. Actually, in English we use the word "see" in just about the same way, when we say, "I see," for "I understand," or "I get it." Or we say, "Seeing is believing," and "I'll believe it when I see it." That's the idea here, I think.

And again, we see that somebody who was not willing to use his God-given organs of hearing and sight to do what they were designed to do (to hear the words of God, and to perceive knowledge of God, respectively), then those people would get nothing out of the experience, even if God's words were spoken to them or a divine miracle was performed right before their eyes.
What does being born again mean to you? When a person experiences Christian rebirth, do they automatically experience new eyes to see and ears to hear?
Yes. But both are a product of a change of attitude in the heart, which allows things like the hearing of the word of God AS the word of God, or the willingness to recognize the evidence of God that is right before one's eyes. And there's more to it than that, but that's the start.
Is Christian rebirth rather than indoctrinated morality the essential message of Christianity? How do you understand Christian rebirth? How does it differ from emotional fantasy?
Very much so.
Now there was a Pharisee, a man named Nicodemus who was a member of the Jewish ruling council. 2 He came to Jesus at night and said, “Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher who has come from God. For no one could perform the signs you are doing if God were not with him.”

3 Jesus replied, “Very truly I tell you, no one can see the kingdom of God unless they are born again.[a]”

4 “How can someone be born when they are old?” Nicodemus asked. “Surely they cannot enter a second time into their mother’s womb to be born!”

5 Jesus answered, “Very truly I tell you, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless they are born of water and the Spirit. 6 Flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to spirit. 7 You should not be surprised at my saying, ‘You[c] must be born again.’ 8 The wind blows wherever it pleases. You hear its sound, but you cannot tell where it comes from or where it is going. So it is with everyone born of the Spirit.”[d]


To be born of woman is being born from below. Being born of the spirit is being born from above. Was making it possible for Man on earth Jesus mission?
Right. Another term for regular birth in Scripture is being "born of the flesh," and another is "being born of the will of man." Being born from above, or as some translations prefer, "born again," is exactly what puzzled Nicodemus. How can a person do that?

But you notice that Jesus does not indulge in some precise, detailed analysis of what "born again" means. Instead, he essentially says, "Nicodemus, there's something you're going to have to believe here, before you can see it fully. There's something you're going to have to trust. And it's Me. If you trust me, I can walk you through this experience; but if you will not trust me at all, then you will never see it, and no explanation will make you understand it, because it's something that only those who experience it can know."

And this is not actually an unusual requirement. There are many human circumstances in which the axiom, "I believe in order to know," (originally the Latin "Credo ut intellegam," which I think came from Anselm) applies. For instance, if one wants to know if a girl loves him, he will not know if she does unless he asks her out. But he will not know in advance what her answer will be, so he must first guess whether or not she is likely to accept him or slam the door in his face, and act in trust on that belief. He must invest some trust in her character and attitude, but without absolute certainty beforehand. And if he does, maybe he learns that he was right. If he does not, he never knows whether he would have been right or not.

So Jesus is only asking a simple thing: He says, essentially, have faith in Me, and I will show you what you don't know. Have no faith in Me, and you cannot have that experience, since that experience is only had in relation to Me. That's why Jesus goes on to say,

" If I told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things? No one has ascended into heaven, but He who descended from heaven: the Son of Man. As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up; so that whoever believes will in Him have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life."

And that's how it actually works.
User avatar
Immanuel Can
Posts: 27605
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Immanuel Can »

Belinda wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 10:40 am it looks like blasphemy to call God a person.
It depends on what you mean.

When we say "God is a Person," we actually mean something very complimentary. We mean that just as we people have things like an identity, volition, selfhood, cognition, intention and so on, so does God, but in far greater measure than we do, since He is the Creator and we are but the pallid reflections of the great Personhood He has.

That's no insult. Rather, it might be a complimentary deduction from the lower to the higher, from Creation to Creator. And it would indeed be blasphemy if we said, "God is not a Person," meaning he lacked even the basic features of personality, identity, volition, will, intention, integrity, and so on that mere human beings routinely possess.

So what do you mean by "calling God a person"?
Communism is a good idea but in the matter of relativity it fails. Men are such they always compete for power: some men get to be ruling elite: totalitarian communism lacks checks and balances.
What you say here about the reason that Communism fails is correct. It lacks a realistic view of human nature, and thus trusts perfidious men to behave well in positions of trust that many of them are not capable of holding without becoming corrupt. So tyranny and exploitation always ensue.

What you say about "checks and balances" is also correct, I think. Checks and balances are necessary because positions of power are held by mere men; and the holding of power is very corrupting to them, so that only with tight restrictions on their power can they be protected from falling, and the people be protected from being exploited. Fair enough?

But I can't make sense of the claim "Communism is a good idea," since it fails to take account of so basic a feature of reality, and has proven in practice to be very, very bad in every actual case of its application. Maybe we can say, "Communism sounds plausible if men were angels," but that's a mere hypothetical case that will never be actualized. For real persons, on this planet, in the real world we have, I don't think we can ever say that dabbling in Communism is "a good idea."
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

I think that this idea of new eyes and ears is far deeper than normally believed
Matthew 13:9-16

Whoever has ears, let them hear.”
10 The disciples came to him and asked, “Why do you speak to the people in parables?”
11 He replied, “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them.
12 Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them.
13 This is why I speak to them in parables: “Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand.
14 In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah: “ ‘You will be ever hearing but never understanding; you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.
15 For this people’s heart has become calloused; they hardly hear with their ears, and they have closed their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts and turn, and I would heal them.’
16 But blessed are your eyes because they see, and your ears because they hear.
It seems unfair to anyone who denies Man’s higher and lower natures. The mission of the Christ is to connect them so Man could function as One; receive from above so as to give to below. The world in darkness rejects it and as been conditioned to live from below. These are two levels of reality
Matthew 11:11

Truly I tell you, among those born of women there has not risen anyone greater than John the Baptist; yet whoever is least in the
kingdom of heaven is greater than he.
There seems to be a connection between the greatest from below and the least from above. Christ mission is to open the path that makes the connection between man’s animal and spiritual nature possible

For this a person has to consent to experience metanoia wrongly translated s repentance. The same idea is in Plato’s cave analogy and how the soul turns towards the light. When a person experiences this, new eyes and ears make perfect sense.

I’m not in AA but I do hve friends who do belong. They cannot drive now so I’m one of the volunteers who take them to meetings. One idea I’ve learned is the necessity for hitting bottom not intellectually but from the depths of the trapped crying soul. Then some can experience release from alcoholism. I Can explain how it happens but it is nothing in front of those who have hit bottom and acquired freedom

This is metanoia. The seed of the soul at the depth of their being has turned towards the light

Belief is intellectual. How can it become metanoia and be born from above? This is why these idea are spoken of in depthin private. This is to protect the higher mind from being contaminated by the literal understandings of the lower mind. Krishnmurti describes our problem
“You may remember the story of how the devil and a friend of his were walking down the street, when they saw ahead of them a man stoop down and pick up something from the ground, look at it, and put it away in his pocket. The friend said to the devil, “What did that man pick up?” “He picked up a piece of Truth,” said the devil. “That is a very bad business for you, then,” said his friend. “Oh, not at all,” the devil replied, “I am going to let him organize it."
Smart Christianity admits the problem of the human condition and why the Christ offers the quality of consciousness with the help of the Spirit to free those capable from the imagination keeping Man in psychological prison. Dumb Christianity relies on “experts” of interpretation to such a degree that even the devil himself marvels at Man's acquired ability for self self deception.
User avatar
Sculptor
Posts: 8859
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2019 11:32 pm

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Sculptor »

Systematic wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2020 11:15 pm
Systematic wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2020 5:50 am
OK, so what is the ideal of Christianity, if not being kind to others? And what about my other assertion: Would an ideal, expressed over centuries or even millenia, cause a biological change down to the DNA?
Sculptor wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2020 10:48 am Christianity is what you make it. Look in the Book, you can find anything you want there, and any contradiction you want to refute it. What makes you think it has an "ideal"?
Imagine that you had the ability to rewrite the Bible. You have an ideal that you want to accomplish. But no one can follow that ideal, because it is not in the genome to accomplish anything like that. No one can write a perfect book on how to become superintelligent, because they themselves are not superintelligent. (For example).
If I could re-write the bible I'd change the 10 commandments to include protection for women and children. The first four are wasted on the narcissistic, attention seeking god.
As for the genome - I said you have not idea about evolution, and you simply do not uderstand the function of the genome. hint - it is not the repository of moral law.
Sculptor wrote: Wed Jul 08, 2020 10:48 am Like most Christians you've not got a clue how evolution works.
The only things that effect changes in the DNA is death, mutation and differential reproductive success.
Success in the materialistic sense, could have effect on success in the reproductive sense. Most women won't even date a pauper--not even Courtney Love. You could be the biggest genius the world had ever seen, but if you got yourself blacklisted, you wouldn't have much of a chance of sowing your oats.

Also, let's say that everyone believes in one idea, and you believe in something else. You might have trouble surviving unto the age where you can reasonably be expected to reproduce.
You can say what you want. This is all pretty much nonsense.
Belinda
Posts: 10548
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:13 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Belinda »

Immanuel Can wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 1:01 pm
Belinda wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 10:40 am it looks like blasphemy to call God a person.
It depends on what you mean.

When we say "God is a Person," we actually mean something very complimentary. We mean that just as we people have things like an identity, volition, selfhood, cognition, intention and so on, so does God, but in far greater measure than we do, since He is the Creator and we are but the pallid reflections of the great Personhood He has.

That's no insult. Rather, it might be a complimentary deduction from the lower to the higher, from Creation to Creator. And it would indeed be blasphemy if we said, "God is not a Person," meaning he lacked even the basic features of personality, identity, volition, will, intention, integrity, and so on that mere human beings routinely possess.

So what do you mean by "calling God a person"?
Communism is a good idea but in the matter of relativity it fails. Men are such they always compete for power: some men get to be ruling elite: totalitarian communism lacks checks and balances.
What you say here about the reason that Communism fails is correct. It lacks a realistic view of human nature, and thus trusts perfidious men to behave well in positions of trust that many of them are not capable of holding without becoming corrupt. So tyranny and exploitation always ensue.

What you say about "checks and balances" is also correct, I think. Checks and balances are necessary because positions of power are held by mere men; and the holding of power is very corrupting to them, so that only with tight restrictions on their power can they be protected from falling, and the people be protected from being exploited. Fair enough?

But I can't make sense of the claim "Communism is a good idea," since it fails to take account of so basic a feature of reality, and has proven in practice to be very, very bad in every actual case of its application. Maybe we can say, "Communism sounds plausible if men were angels," but that's a mere hypothetical case that will never be actualized. For real persons, on this planet, in the real world we have, I don't think we can ever say that dabbling in Communism is "a good idea."
"Pallid reflections of great Personhood" is classic Platonism. I reject Plato's Theory of Forms if only because it leads to an elitist political regime, but more because the man who believes he is a reflection of the Almighty is conceited or worse can be and often is dangerous.

"Vanity vanity all is vanity" is also from the Greeks who obviously influenced the Jewish Preacher, and I like that humble reference to relativity.

Communism works okay when the the group is small enough for all the individuals to know each other and can share the means and rewards of production without cheating. Perhaps on the scale of a small town, and maybe for a limited duration perhaps during some emergency. Power has to be centralised in cases where all are permanently affected, such as environmental infrastructure, or endemic disease.
User avatar
Lacewing
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Lacewing »

Systematic wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 5:14 am
Lacewing wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:51 am What if, instead of seeking specific "truth"... we sought to eliminate/reject obvious lies? Is that possible? :lol: Then see what's left?
Awesome. I actually hadn't thought of that. What are some obvious lies? I'll start: The Earth is flat. Slavery is good for slaves.

And we could do some obvious truths too (particularly truths that are not accepted all the time) : Child abuse hurts children. Most people in the U.S. work only for money. We are all going to die someday. Evolution happened. Cigarette smoke is radioactive (i.e. alpha particles).

What else you got?
So, it's going to be different for each person, although we may agree on some things.

Obvious LIES to me:
- There is only one true path
- Humans are the pinnacle of creation that the Universe was created for
- Women are generally inferior to men
- Men are meant to be the leaders
- There's a male god who made man in 'his' image
- We should accept our societal role/position and not buck/question the system
- Established paths are the right paths
- People at the top of hierarchies are more intelligent or know best
- Ancient beliefs should drive who we are and what we think and do now

I feel hesitant to name obvious 'truths' -- perhaps that could lead to being swept up in more beliefs and noise. Rather, I'm focused on sweeping aside obvious lies/noise and living in a clearer space without them. :) What I (and others who've done similarly) have experienced as a result appears to be more freedom and love and ability and joy than conventional/traditional expectations and patterns -- because there's less limitation and more flexibility. I think that's a potential anyone can experience and do.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

Belinda

"Pallid reflections of great Personhood" is classic Platonism. I reject Plato's Theory of Forms if only because it leads to an elitist political regime, but more because the man who believes he is a reflection of the Almighty is conceited or worse can be and often is dangerous.

Lacewing

Obvious LIES to me:
- There is only one true path
- Humans are the pinnacle of creation that the Universe was created for
- Women are generally inferior to men
- Men are meant to be the leaders
- There's a male god who made man in 'his' image
- We should accept our societal role/position and not buck/question the system
- Established paths are the right paths
- People at the top of hierarchies are more intelligent or know best
- Ancient beliefs should drive who we are and what we think and do now
John 15:18-25

The World Hates the Disciples
18 “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19 If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. 20 Remember what I told you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’[a] If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also. 21 They will treat you this way because of my name, for they do not know the one who sent me. 22 If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not be guilty of sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin. 23 Whoever hates me hates my Father as well. 24 If I had not done among them the works no one else did, they would not be guilty of sin. As it is, they have seen, and yet they have hated both me and my Father. 25 But this is to fulfill what is written in their Law: ‘They hated me without reason.’
If the world is the domain of the prince of darkness and the majority live in darkness or attached to the shadows on the wall in Plato's cave, how can the world appreciate its situation? If people are asleep in Plato's cave, what knowledge does a sleeping person have?

Christianity is only for the minority who have felt the reality of the human condition and its loss of meaning as it exists in them and seek to awaken to experience meaning the world cannot provide
"Amazing grace! How sweet the sound
That saved a wretch like me!
I once was lost, but now am found;
Was blind, but now I see."
Does denying expressed as hatred of what is not experienced and understood make any sense? To the world it does. Nothing makes more sense to it than the joy of self justification expressed as blind denial
User avatar
Lacewing
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Lacewing »

Nick_A wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:36 pm
Lacewing wrote: Obvious LIES to me:
- There is only one true path
- Humans are the pinnacle of creation that the Universe was created for
- Women are generally inferior to men
- Men are meant to be the leaders
- There's a male god who made man in 'his' image
- We should accept our societal role/position and not buck/question the system
- Established paths are the right paths
- People at the top of hierarchies are more intelligent or know best
- Ancient beliefs should drive who we are and what we think and do now
John 15:18-25

The World Hates the Disciples
18 “If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first. 19 If you belonged to the world, it would love you as its own. As it is, you do not belong to the world, but I have chosen you out of the world. That is why the world hates you. 20 Remember what I told you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’[a] If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also. 21 They will treat you this way because of my name, for they do not know the one who sent me. 22 If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not be guilty of sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin. 23 Whoever hates me hates my Father as well. 24 If I had not done among them the works no one else did, they would not be guilty of sin. As it is, they have seen, and yet they have hated both me and my Father. 25 But this is to fulfill what is written in their Law: ‘They hated me without reason.’
Stories! You like and/or identify with such stories. Perhaps you need them for some kind of self-validation. I don't.
Nick_A wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:36 pmIf the world is the domain of the prince of darkness and the majority live in darkness or attached to the shadows on the wall in Plato's cave, how can the world appreciate its situation? If people are asleep in Plato's cave, what knowledge does a sleeping person have?
There can be endless questions about "If". It just creates more noise. Be in the moment and stop telling stories... then see what happens.
Nick_A wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:36 pmChristianity is only for the minority who have felt the reality of the human condition and its loss of meaning as it exists in them and seek to awaken to experience meaning the world cannot provide
Who's fault is it that there's a "loss of meaning", considering there are those who do not suffer from it, and they don't need religion or a god to awaken? You glorify weakness and blindness. Hmm, I wonder why. :lol:
Nick_A wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:36 pm
"Amazing grace! How sweet the sound
That saved a wretch like me!
I once was lost, but now am found;
Was blind, but now I see."
Well, that's too bad for you. Good luck with that. Your "vision" actually seems quite contrived and limited.
Nick_A wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:36 pm Does denying expressed as hatred of what is not experienced and understood make any sense?
You should answer that contrived question as it appears to apply to you.
Nick_A wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:36 pmTo the world it does. Nothing makes more sense to it than the joy of self justification expressed as blind denial
As usual, your delusion is to speak for the world.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

Lacewing
Nick_A wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:36 pm
Christianity is only for the minority who have felt the reality of the human condition and its loss of meaning as it exists in them and seek to awaken to experience meaning the world cannot provide
Who's fault is it that there's a "loss of meaning", considering there are those who do not suffer from it, and they don't need religion or a god to awaken? You glorify weakness and blindness. Hmm, I wonder why.


Another word for God is Meaning. What gives you meaning is your God. For secularists their meaning comes from the Great Beast or society itself. Meaning takes many forms. It could come from money, fame, prestige etc. These are its gods.

However for a minority they are insufficient and somehow sense that the source of meaning doesn’t come from the world or the great Beast. The source of meaning comes from “above” This minority must be attacked to defend the imagined supremacy of the Great Beast.

The higher can understand the lower but the lower cannot understand the higher. Certain ideas are intolerable for secularism to contemplate. That for example is what the Secular Intolerance thread proved. Ideas of a certain quality can only be discussed with those who have had a genuine experience with them as opposed to fantasy. Otherwise negativity and blind denial will ruin them.

Yes there are those who once were blind but now they see. Of course they will be persecuted by the world as they always have been but the new experiences of “meaning” and what it may lead to make it worthwhile.
User avatar
Lacewing
Posts: 6722
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2015 2:25 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Lacewing »

Nick_A wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2020 3:47 am
Nick_A wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:36 pm
Christianity is only for the minority who have felt the reality of the human condition and its loss of meaning as it exists in them and seek to awaken to experience meaning the world cannot provide
Lacewing wrote: Who's fault is it that there's a "loss of meaning", considering there are those who do not suffer from it, and they don't need religion or a god to awaken? You glorify weakness and blindness. Hmm, I wonder why.
Another word for God is Meaning. What gives you meaning is your God. For secularists their meaning comes from the Great Beast or society itself. Meaning takes many forms. It could come from money, fame, prestige etc. These are its gods.

However for a minority they are insufficient and somehow sense that the source of meaning doesn’t come from the world or the great Beast. The source of meaning comes from “above” This minority must be attacked to defend the imagined supremacy of the Great Beast.

The higher can understand the lower but the lower cannot understand the higher. Certain ideas are intolerable for secularism to contemplate. That for example is what the Secular Intolerance thread proved. Ideas of a certain quality can only be discussed with those who have had a genuine experience with them as opposed to fantasy. Otherwise negativity and blind denial will ruin them.

Yes there are those who once were blind but now they see. Of course they will be persecuted by the world as they always have been but the new experiences of “meaning” and what it may lead to make it worthwhile.
You're too full of stories, Nick. You just make up all kinds of shit that you can't see past. It's pointless to have any aware dialog with you because you're too busy crying about being hated as you claim to be part of a persecuted and sacred minority. Get over yourself. You're as much tangled up with a great beast as anyone I've ever seen. Your mangled stories are full of lies, and therefore, so are you. You are one of those people who sees everything beyond themselves as dark and evil. It's stupid. Wake up and see how sacred EVERYTHING and EVERYONE is. That includes you... it's not ONLY YOU! Your divisive ways are evil.
Dubious
Posts: 4637
Joined: Tue May 19, 2015 7:40 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Dubious »

Meaning consists of what is retained by the mind as an experience compared to what simply flows through it. It can relate to anything whether sacred, secular or a combination of the two and therefore relative to the fine-tuning capability of one's mental matrix which, like a giant chessboard, may contain an endless number of variations. What is preached at any one time is nothing more than single instance of it...although some of those "instances" are more valuable than others and not likely to appear on philosophy forums.
Nick_A wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2020 3:47 am The higher can understand the lower but the lower cannot understand the higher.
Not a problem! Easiest thing in the world. ALL you have to do is consider yourself one of the "higher" and bingo! you got it made, instant enlightenment that now knows the difference between high & low!

However, if the so-called lower have to look up causing the higher to strain and look down as their superiority compels them to do, I'm certain there exists a distinct formality or conformity of agreement between the two since a communication channel is thereby established as between a dog and his master.

Not everyone aspires to be Prince Tamino! Some of us are happy to be Papageno to whom a good glass of cider tastes better than empty cups of enlightenment which please neither one's spirit or one's taste.
Nick_A
Posts: 6208
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2012 1:23 am

Re: Smart Christianity / Dumb Christianity

Post by Nick_A »

Lacewing wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2020 4:39 am
Nick_A wrote: Sat Jul 11, 2020 3:47 am
Nick_A wrote: ↑
Fri Jul 10, 2020 6:36 pm
Christianity is only for the minority who have felt the reality of the human condition and its loss of meaning as it exists in them and seek to awaken to experience meaning the world cannot provide
Lacewing wrote: Who's fault is it that there's a "loss of meaning", considering there are those who do not suffer from it, and they don't need religion or a god to awaken? You glorify weakness and blindness. Hmm, I wonder why.
Another word for God is Meaning. What gives you meaning is your God. For secularists their meaning comes from the Great Beast or society itself. Meaning takes many forms. It could come from money, fame, prestige etc. These are its gods.

However for a minority they are insufficient and somehow sense that the source of meaning doesn’t come from the world or the great Beast. The source of meaning comes from “above” This minority must be attacked to defend the imagined supremacy of the Great Beast.

The higher can understand the lower but the lower cannot understand the higher. Certain ideas are intolerable for secularism to contemplate. That for example is what the Secular Intolerance thread proved. Ideas of a certain quality can only be discussed with those who have had a genuine experience with them as opposed to fantasy. Otherwise negativity and blind denial will ruin them.

Yes there are those who once were blind but now they see. Of course they will be persecuted by the world as they always have been but the new experiences of “meaning” and what it may lead to make it worthwhile.
You're too full of stories, Nick. You just make up all kinds of shit that you can't see past. It's pointless to have any aware dialog with you because you're too busy crying about being hated as you claim to be part of a persecuted and sacred minority. Get over yourself. You're as much tangled up with a great beast as anyone I've ever seen. Your mangled stories are full of lies, and therefore, so are you. You are one of those people who sees everything beyond themselves as dark and evil. It's stupid. Wake up and see how sacred EVERYTHING and EVERYONE is. That includes you... it's not ONLY YOU! Your divisive ways are evil.
You have it backwards.I am not emotionally involved with ideas as you are. That is why I don't hate them. You may cry about them but for me there is nothing gained by crying. The fact that I've seen the results of the persecution of ideas since virtually the beginning of time invites me to understand why it takes place in me and in the world.

Of course ideas of a certain quality are divisive and disruptive. That is why Socrates had to be killed. There is no sense crying about it; why not make the necessary efforts to understand why it happens.

As disruptive as they are, ideas that objectively reveal the human condition must be kept alive in the world. Without them animal Man loses the ability to become human.

I just quoted Jesus. Is it disruptive and divisive? Yes. That is its value. You can demand "give us Barabbas" and keep the peace. Others know the value of getting beyond the Barabbas mindset in order to experience objective human meaning and purpose
Post Reply