The Existential Crisis

[Atla]

What then?

He believes that we channel God/the universe when we are "open". Like together we could be the voice of God, except most humans are too dumb to participate. That's actually pretty funny.

I ABSOLUTELY and CERTAINLY do NOT believe this at all. What you said here could not be MORE FALSE, and therefore you could not be MORE WRONG.

What is actually hilarious is you actually assume that your own made up 'story' is actually true and right, and even funny still is you actually BELIEVE what you just said here is true and right?

And, what is the most humorous part of all of this is I have even told what thee Truth IS, but because you are so BLINDED by your assumptions and beliefs, you were, and still are, completely incapable of SEEING thee Truth of things.

Aand in this comment you just channeled the Universe again. Congrats.

[Age]

What then?

He believes that we channel God/the universe when we are "open". Like together we could be the voice of God, except most humans are too dumb to participate. That's actually pretty funny.

How sad, he spent years dropping hints that he had all the answers to all the the questions and then it turns out his grand idea is boring and derivative.

If you want to make the claim that "his grand idea is boring and derivative", then SURELY you must have some idea of what my "grand idea" actually IS.

So, to you, what supposedly is my so called "grand idea"?

Let us SEE where you get your ideas from exactly. Show us if you got your ideas from thee source, or just from "others".

[Age]

He believes that we channel God/the universe when we are "open". Like together we could be the voice of God, except most humans are too dumb to participate. That's actually pretty funny.

How sad, he spent years dropping hints that he had all the answers to all the the questions and then it turns out his grand idea is boring and derivative.

I've been trying to talk him/her out of this all along, to no avail. I'm slightly curious why it can't be done

Thee ANSWER to this is EXTREMELY OBVIOUS, well from my perspective it is anyway.

[Age]

I am just looking for people who are OPEN

I am detached rather than open because that way I dont have to have a position at all

Is that a position, itself?

And, why do you say that if you are, so called, "detached", then you do not have to have a position at all. But imply that if you are open, then you would have to have a position?

Also, what is 'it' exactly, which 'you' are supposedly 'detached' from?

I dont have the mental energy to decide on every single issue and so I just let them be

This has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with what I am talking about, and meaning.

By the way, absolutely NO so called 'mental energy' is needed in order to just remain OPEN.

As I have said before I am an observer rather than a participant and so that is what I do

If you are not open, as you say you are here, then you are not one that I am actually looking for, at the moment, which is perfectly fine.

Also, at those moments when 'you' are interacting with the "world", or Universe, around 'you', are 'you' being just an observer or a participant?

Also, when you write in this philosophy forum are 'you' being an observer, or, a participant, or both?

[Age]

He believes that we channel God/the universe when we are "open". Like together we could be the voice of God, except most humans are too dumb to participate. That's actually pretty funny.

I ABSOLUTELY and CERTAINLY do NOT believe this at all. What you said here could not be MORE FALSE, and therefore you could not be MORE WRONG.

What is actually hilarious is you actually assume that your own made up 'story' is actually true and right, and even funny still is you actually BELIEVE what you just said here is true and right?

And, what is the most humorous part of all of this is I have even told what thee Truth IS, but because you are so BLINDED by your assumptions and beliefs, you were, and still are, completely incapable of SEEING thee Truth of things.

Aand in this comment you just channeled the Universe again. Congrats.

What is it with you and the continual "channeling of the Universe" remarks?

Just because that is what you went looking for, thought you found it, but then realized it did not work for you, WHY do you see this in what "another" says?

If you EVER become OPEN enough, and interested enough, then you will actually find out and discover what 'it' is that I am actually saying, and meaning. Until then you will remain in your OWN ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS, and so you will continue to ONLY see what you are seeing now, which, by the way, is NOT what I am saying, and meaning, at all.

Oh, and by the way, the simplicity of manipulating 'you' to MAKE you SEE things, which are not even there, is so easily done. All I have to do is just write the two words 'thee truth', and you instantly go into your own ASSUMPTION that I am talking about some so called "channeling of the Universe". LOL. If you want to KNOW what I have been Truly saying, and meaning, that is; thee Truth, then I have informed you enough times already of HOW this can be very simply and very easily accomplished, by you or by anyone else. But do NOT let that deter you from your making up your very OWN assumptions, and believing them to be true.

[FlashDangerpants]

How sad, he spent years dropping hints that he had all the answers to all the the questions and then it turns out his grand idea is boring and derivative.

I've been trying to talk him/her out of this all along, to no avail. I'm slightly curious why it can't be done

Thee ANSWER to this is EXTREMELY OBVIOUS, well from my perspective it is anyway.

God no, I got completely bored of you after about 3 conversations. I don't give a fuck what you are on about.

[Atla]

What is it with you and the continual "channeling of the Universe" remarks?

Just because that is what you went looking for, thought you found it, but then realized it did not work for you, WHY do you see this in what "another" says?

If you EVER become OPEN enough, and interested enough, then you will actually find out and discover what 'it' is that I am actually saying, and meaning. Until then you will remain in your OWN ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS, and so you will continue to ONLY see what you are seeing now, which, by the way, is NOT what I am saying, and meaning, at all.

Oh, and by the way, the simplicity of manipulating 'you' to MAKE you SEE things, which are not even there, is so easily done. All I have to do is just write the two words 'thee truth', and you instantly go into your own ASSUMPTION that I am talking about some so called "channeling of the Universe". LOL. If you want to KNOW what I have been Truly saying, and meaning, that is; thee Truth, then I have informed you enough times already of HOW this can be very simply and very easily accomplished, by you or by anyone else. But do NOT let that deter you from your making up your very OWN assumptions, and believing them to be true.

Yeah yeah and once again you babble about how to channel the Universe.

[Age]

I've been trying to talk him/her out of this all along, to no avail. I'm slightly curious why it can't be done

Thee ANSWER to this is EXTREMELY OBVIOUS, well from my perspective it is anyway.

God no, I got completely bored of you after about 3 conversations. I don't give a fuck what you are on about.

Well then, obviously, do NOT read what I write.

And, if you seriously do not care what I am on about, then prove it, by NOT replying to what I write.

[Age]

What is it with you and the continual "channeling of the Universe" remarks?

Just because that is what you went looking for, thought you found it, but then realized it did not work for you, WHY do you see this in what "another" says?

If you EVER become OPEN enough, and interested enough, then you will actually find out and discover what 'it' is that I am actually saying, and meaning. Until then you will remain in your OWN ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS, and so you will continue to ONLY see what you are seeing now, which, by the way, is NOT what I am saying, and meaning, at all.

Oh, and by the way, the simplicity of manipulating 'you' to MAKE you SEE things, which are not even there, is so easily done. All I have to do is just write the two words 'thee truth', and you instantly go into your own ASSUMPTION that I am talking about some so called "channeling of the Universe". LOL. If you want to KNOW what I have been Truly saying, and meaning, that is; thee Truth, then I have informed you enough times already of HOW this can be very simply and very easily accomplished, by you or by anyone else. But do NOT let that deter you from your making up your very OWN assumptions, and believing them to be true.

Yeah yeah and once again you babble about how to channel the Universe.

Another PRIME EXAMPLE of one who is completely and utterly CLOSED to anything besides their OWN made up assumptions, which they also BELIEVE is thee irrefutably One and ONLY Truth. Yet, when asked for evidence or proof is completely and utterly incapable of providing BECAUSE what they say is ALL a figment of their own making.

[uwot]

Another PRIME EXAMPLE of one who is completely and utterly CLOSED to anything besides their OWN made up assumptions, which they also BELIEVE is thee irrefutably One and ONLY Truth. Yet, when asked for evidence or proof is completely and utterly incapable of providing BECAUSE what they say is ALL a figment of their own making.

Try saying that out loud. Do it in front of a mirror for maximum effect.

[Age]

Another PRIME EXAMPLE of one who is completely and utterly CLOSED to anything besides their OWN made up assumptions, which they also BELIEVE is thee irrefutably One and ONLY Truth. Yet, when asked for evidence or proof is completely and utterly incapable of providing BECAUSE what they say is ALL a figment of their own making.

Try saying that out loud.

Okay, I have done that.

Do it in front of a mirror for maximum effect.

What for?

Doing that does not change what I have said in reply.

I am willing to and can back up and support what I say. Unlike a lot of the claims being made here.

When I ask for evidence, proof, or even just clarity, what I usually get back is just 'deflection'. I will, once again, suggest that if anyone is going to make a an allegation, a claim, or even just a proposition, then they have at least some thing to back up and support what they say, before they say it.

Also, this coming from the one, if I recall correctly, states that the Universe is expanding, and therefore it 'must of' began. Yet, when questioned and challenged about this, is another one who instead of answering the actual questions posed and taking up the challenge turns to 'deflection' as well, or refusing to respond, which is clearly evidenced from our previous discussions, and which will be clearly evidenced again, soon enough.

[uwot]

Also, this coming from the one, if I recall correctly, states that the Universe is expanding, and therefore it 'must of' began.

You misunderstand. Yes it is true that I believe the universe is expanding. That is because I have made the effort to look at the evidence, which I find compelling, and the logical arguments which to me look valid. But if you can find any example of me saying 'must of', I will give you a lollipop. For one thing it is terrible grammar, but more to the point, if an MSc in History and Philosophy of Science teaches anything, it is that people who insist anything must be the case frequently end up with egg on their face.

Yet, when questioned and challenged about this, is another one who instead of answering the actual questions posed and taking up the challenge turns to 'deflection' as well, or refusing to respond, which is clearly evidenced from our previous discussions, and which will be clearly evidenced again, soon enough.

Here, look again, this is the evidence that I believe supports the hypothesis that the universe is expanding: https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogI ... c=postname

[Atla]

What is it with you and the continual "channeling of the Universe" remarks?

Just because that is what you went looking for, thought you found it, but then realized it did not work for you, WHY do you see this in what "another" says?

If you EVER become OPEN enough, and interested enough, then you will actually find out and discover what 'it' is that I am actually saying, and meaning. Until then you will remain in your OWN ASSUMPTIONS and BELIEFS, and so you will continue to ONLY see what you are seeing now, which, by the way, is NOT what I am saying, and meaning, at all.

Oh, and by the way, the simplicity of manipulating 'you' to MAKE you SEE things, which are not even there, is so easily done. All I have to do is just write the two words 'thee truth', and you instantly go into your own ASSUMPTION that I am talking about some so called "channeling of the Universe". LOL. If you want to KNOW what I have been Truly saying, and meaning, that is; thee Truth, then I have informed you enough times already of HOW this can be very simply and very easily accomplished, by you or by anyone else. But do NOT let that deter you from your making up your very OWN assumptions, and believing them to be true.

Yeah yeah and once again you babble about how to channel the Universe.

Another PRIME EXAMPLE of one who is completely and utterly CLOSED to anything besides their OWN made up assumptions, which they also BELIEVE is thee irrefutably One and ONLY Truth. Yet, when asked for evidence or proof is completely and utterly incapable of providing BECAUSE what they say is ALL a figment of their own making.

More certain statements coming from the Universe.

[surreptitious57]

And why do you say that if you are so called detached then you do not have to have a position at all ?

Because for me that is what detachment is namely the absence of fixed positions
And so instead I just let my thoughts be without committing to any specific views

[surreptitious57]

Also what is it exactly which you are supposedly detached from ?

Everything that does not directly affect me which is most things
Not wasting mental energy on that which has zero impact on me