Monisticv reduction to the wert or wurd everything?

[Eodnhoj7]

So, you admit definitions exsist?

All variations from a single source necessitates all variations as a definition of that single source.

So, you admit nature is distinguished from something else and individualized?

The source distinguishes itself through itself as itself as both one and many things. For example a series of monads results in parts composed of further parts as the objects which are composed of them. However each monad is fundamentally the same, thus the one is expressed through the many.

[TheVisionofEr]

And yet, how can they be fundementaly the same, considering that they have individual fates or paths through exsistence, and corespondingly are in different places.

[Eodnhoj7]

And yet, how can they be fundementaly the same, considering that they have individual fates or paths through exsistence, and corespondingly are in different places.

All being exists through a repetition as recursion. One thing repeats into another, in a new variation. This new phenomenon, as a variation of the original, in turn repeats through a new variation.

An example of this would be 1 repeating into 2. 2 repeats into 4, thus 1 is repeating through 2 and 4. 2 directs itself to 1 as 3, 3 to 1 as 4 and 3 to 3 as 6...etc.

All being is the source directing itself through itself, then through new variations back to itself.

[TheVisionofEr]

And yet, how can they be fundementaly the same, considering that they have individual fates or paths through exsistence, and corespondingly are in different places.

All being exists through a repetition as recursion. One thing repeats into another, in a new variation. This new phenomenon, as a variation of the original, in turn repeats through a new variation.

An example of this would be 1 repeating into 2. 2 repeats into 4, thus 1 is repeating through 2 and 4. 2 directs itself to 1 as 3, 3 to 1 as 4 and 3 to 3 as 6...etc.

All being is the source directing itself through itself, then through new variations back to itself.

Two things exsisting at the same time. How can that be repatition?

[Eodnhoj7]

And yet, how can they be fundementaly the same, considering that they have individual fates or paths through exsistence, and corespondingly are in different places.

All being exists through a repetition as recursion. One thing repeats into another, in a new variation. This new phenomenon, as a variation of the original, in turn repeats through a new variation.

An example of this would be 1 repeating into 2. 2 repeats into 4, thus 1 is repeating through 2 and 4. 2 directs itself to 1 as 3, 3 to 1 as 4 and 3 to 3 as 6...etc.

All being is the source directing itself through itself, then through new variations back to itself.

Two things exsisting at the same time. How can that be repatition?

1 existing through 2 as the repetition of 1 observes 2 as a variation of 1. Given an infinite continuum 1 exists through a number approaching infinity in a constant variation. 1 exists both as itself and through its variation. 1 has both 1 and many definitions thus is trifold: "1" and "n --> infinity" as "1".

[TheVisionofEr]

All being exists through a repetition as recursion. One thing repeats into another, in a new variation. This new phenomenon, as a variation of the original, in turn repeats through a new variation.

An example of this would be 1 repeating into 2. 2 repeats into 4, thus 1 is repeating through 2 and 4. 2 directs itself to 1 as 3, 3 to 1 as 4 and 3 to 3 as 6...etc.

All being is the source directing itself through itself, then through new variations back to itself.

Two things exsisting at the same time. How can that be repatition?

1 existing through 2 as the repetition of 1 observes 2 as a variation of 1. Given an infinite continuum 1 exists through a number approaching infinity in a constant variation. 1 exists both as itself and through its variation. 1 has both 1 and many definitions thus is trifold: "1" and "n --> infinity" as "1".

Hmm.