It's an interesting question on what is meant by aggression because it seems to depend on a standard?
Is it like beauty is in the eye of the beholder or can it be defined? What can you add to these thoughts?
PhilX
...No, but I would agree that men tend to be more physically aggressive.Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Tue Apr 10, 2018 11:09 amI won't deny that men, on average, are more aggressive than women in any number of ways.
There are enough documented legal and historical cases (e.x. female murders, gang members) that I'm surpised a question like this would even need to be asked. (As far as military history goes, it was always rarer, but women have served in combat during many historical periods, such as female snipers in the Soviet military); some might even equate a question this obvious to any mature adult with archaism and misogyny.Philosophy Explorer wrote: ↑Tue Apr 10, 2018 11:09 am I won't deny that men, on average, are more aggressive than women in any number of ways. This doesn't mean that women can't be aggressive.
It's an interesting question on what is meant by aggression because it seems to depend on a standard?
Is it like beauty is in the eye of the beholder or can it be defined? What can you add to these thoughts?
PhilX![]()