Secular equivalent: psychological projection.
Given any accusation A → B whose substance is (a):
If A(a) = TRUE, the accuser is the accused.
If A(a) = FALSE, the accuser is not the accused.
By first trying the accuser A as the accused B,
if A(a) = TRUE, A bears the 'Mark of Cain'. Such
accusations are due to the pathology of comparison:
"self vs. other" / "us vs. them" / "believer vs. unbeliever"
wherein enmity is invariably present in A.
"Islamophobia" is an example of a 'nature'"You're a bigot!"
Is the accuser the accused?
"You're a racist!"
Is the accuser the accused?
"You're an "Islamophobe!"
Is the accuser the accused?
"You're a (insert racial designation here) supremacist!"
Is the accuser the accused?
etc.
pathologically projected onto individuals
whose criticisms of the ideological 'state'
of Islam stirs the latent pathology as it resides
within the accuser (ie. "believer in/of Islam"),
rather than the accused (ie. "unbeliever").
The accusation is thus a practical "scapegoating" of
the pathology suffered by the House of Islam
and blamed on others if/when stirred
as if owing to others.
This "scapegoating" nature can only exist
if/when comparative "us vs. them" worldviews
actively culture enmity which, when elaborated,
approaches any/all desire to kill - the same
marking the behavior of the biblical Cain.
Ideological houses such as Islam rely on belief because
the 'state' has a need for believers to believe strategic
false accusations made by the House of Islam. These
false accusations target political adversaries, stir hatred for the accused
and such hatred is used to control/attack non-Muslim nations
from within by the hands of ignorant "goyim" "believers".
This is how Islamic jihad is fought - slander and accusation
of political adversaries to generate the needed hatred from the believers
from which to draw from and continue the jihad.
The global war thus reduces into "believer vs. unbeliever"
as perpetuated by the House of Islam for the division being
instrumental to the religion. The accusations made against "Jews",
for example, should be tried against the Muhammadans - if/when done,
one will know the 'Mark of Cain' with no degree(s) of uncertainty
as the House of Islam is certainly a 'marked' House.