God(s)

[Eodnhoj7]

Why NOT just annihilate ALL 'belief' itself? ALL 'belief' is unnecessary and the cause of being CLOSED.

It's not possible - if it were I would endeavor.

But so called "atheists" spill blood over 'belief' (in other things).

You take the atheists, I'll take the theists.

But that is just beleif as there is no knowledge based ignorance.

(!)

There is knowledge-based belief.

This is a tautology of beliefs.

State, "comrades", etc.

There is nothing intrinsically wrong with a 'state' or "comrades".

No, unless they are deified, which atheists states do.

They still rape, kill, etc.

Are you anti-semitic?

I am anti-monotheistic patriarchal swinery. Islam is a patriarchal swine ideology, not a race, which "borrowed" its essence from Judaism, which is also an ideology. It is Judaism, just an egregiously degenerated form of it.

Oh I see, a feminist.

But you are comparing yourself to believers according to your system. You are comparing yourself to the ignorant.

I am not comparing myself to anyone. I compare beliefs to what is / can be known which certainly falsify the belief.

So if you are not comparing yourself to anyone you are in fact no different than the "monotheistic patriarchal swinery"?

So all believe is ignorance, but prior you where (?) stating only beleif (?) based ignorance.

(!)

(!)

Yes - one can be ignorant, yet know they know not, which is a knowledge: Conscious Knowledge of Ignorance (Inference) Theorem CKIIT.

If we are aware of the limits of our knowledge, there will all be things we ignorant
of.

So you are accusing me of nazism for talking about circles....was Euclid as Nazi?

I am accusing you of no such thing.

So my circularity is not related to nazism?

Pain and suffering is subjective...you cannot prove it.

I will simply state: anyone who "believes" pain/suffering is "subjective" is either insane or using it as a device to bury ones own (or both).

Can you feel my physical pain?

Christ consciousness does not come less by way of knowing the suffering of others, and this is impossible if one suffers themselves esp. if they are searching for outside sources.

Oh...you have a message from God?

[nothing]

This is a tautology of beliefs.

No it is not - knowing something is certainly possible is knowledge.

No, unless they are deified, which atheists states do.

You are trying to scapegoat deity to atheists? Really?

Oh I see, a feminist.

It doesn't take feminism to care that women are abused on a daily basis by patriarchal swine.

So if you are not comparing yourself to anyone you are in fact no different than the "monotheistic patriarchal swinery"?

Monotheistic patriarchal swinery comes by way of comparison: Cain compared himself to Abel, thus grew enmity and desire to spill blood. The House of Islam always reduces into ad hominem attacks, and this is an infection that is taking hold globally: attacking people personally. It is not going to end well because the people who do not see it for what it is, will end up believing someone else is behind all of it, which is precisely the need for the House of Islam to scapegoat all of their crimes against humanity onto Jews and/or whoever else they are intended to kill.

If we are aware of the limits of our knowledge, there will all be things we ignorant
of.

Believers have no such knowledge of such limitation. They "believe" they have the truth already: a single book, and a dead pedophile whom they spill blood over. It is pathetic.

So my circularity is not related to nazism?

The only loose association is Nazism being a product of Islam, and Islam is a product of believing the same ignorant thing over and over again. However Nazism requires weaponizing power and forcibly suppressing opposition. For an example of this, see Islam and their use of "Islamophobia" as a Western adaptation of Sharia-based anti-blasphemy laws.

The OIC is trying to push criticisms of Islam as a global criminal offence which, if that passes, more than half of humanity will certainly commit suicide in the next 50-100 years without exception.

Can you feel my physical pain?

Not feel, but know of.

Oh...you have a message from God?

No - whenever that happens, lots of people start dying.

[Eodnhoj7]

This is a tautology of beliefs.

No it is not - knowing something is certainly possible is knowledge.

And if all that knowledge is grounded in a belief...it is a tautology of beliefs.

No, unless they are deified, which atheists states do.

You are trying to scapegoat deity to atheists? Really?

Far from it, I am saying it is inevitable and scapegoating to patriarchal western religions as a source of suffering is hypocritical.

Oh I see, a feminist.

It doesn't take feminism to care that women are abused on a daily basis by patriarchal swine.

So I am guessing someone is f""""ing you highschool crush?

So if you are not comparing yourself to anyone you are in fact no different than the "monotheistic patriarchal swinery"?

Monotheistic patriarchal swinery comes by way of comparison: Cain compared himself to Abel, thus grew enmity and desire to spill blood. The House of Islam always reduces into ad hominem attacks, and this is an infection that is taking hold globally: attacking people personally. It is not going to end well because the people who do not see it for what it is, will end up believing someone else is behind all of it, which is precisely the need for the House of Islam to scapegoat all of their crimes against humanity onto Jews and/or whoever else they are intended to kill.

You are referencing a story about people's actions. Last time I check Cain had little trust in the Western Diety.

If we are aware of the limits of our knowledge, there will all be things we ignorant
of.

Believers have no such knowledge of such limitation. They "believe" they have the truth already: a single book, and a dead pedophile whom they spill blood over. It is pathetic.

And who is this dead pedophile? You do understand that in pagan tribes young women are married off young as well? Or paedophilia in ancient pagan Greece?

So my circularity is not related to nazism?

The only loose association is Nazism being a product of Islam, and Islam is a product of believing the same ignorant thing over and over again. However Nazism requires weaponizing power and forcibly suppressing opposition. For an example of this, see Islam and their use of "Islamophobia" as a Western adaptation of Sharia-based anti-blasphemy laws.

Really, I don't remember Hiter flying a crescent moon flag.

The OIC is trying to push criticisms of Islam as a global criminal offence which, if that passes, more than half of humanity will certainly commit suicide in the next 50-100 years without exception.

Can you feel my physical pain?

Not feel, but know of.

No, you are imaging. If you know so much tell me the pains my body is feeling right now.

Oh...you have a message from God?

No - whenever that happens, lots of people start dying.

So you do not have divine authority in what you say?

[nothing]

And if all that knowledge is grounded in a belief...it is a tautology of beliefs.

No knowledge is "grounded" in belief - it is antithetical to belief.
Knowing any general sentiment to merely be a belief is a knowledge.
It would take a lack of knowledge to take a belief as a certainty.

If/when a belief(-based ignorance) is acted upon as a certainty, this defines a local collapse which invariably leads to suffering/death.

Far from it, I am saying it is inevitable and scapegoating to patriarchal western religions as a source of suffering is hypocritical.

Atheism is a Western "religion" - Islam is a Middle-Eastern one. It has its roots in Judaism and can not exist less Judaism. As such, all Muslims are technically the self-same "Jews" they scapegoat their own "nature" onto, because that is the pathology of M/E religions: to scapegoat.

As such 'the accuser is the accused' defines Islam to the same degree of accuracy as Adam accusing another for his eating of the tree. Islam is thus a/the elaboration of the 'original sin' and satisfies many needed conditions:

i. Mark: Original Sin - to blame another for ones own
ii. Mark of Cain: to scapegoat by drawing from ones own nature (Cain; tiller of the soil) and accuse others of the same viz. enmity and desire to spill blood (it takes a believer to believe evil is good)
iii. Mark of the Beast:

samech kaf samech = seks (sex) = 220
(psychological/emotional/motor-instinctual) = 660
vav (human spine connecting brain/heart/sex) = 6
____
666 - satisfied if/when a being thinks/desires/acts explicitly on satiation of sexual lust
= sexual degeneracy / rape / pedophilia / abuse of women and children
= Muhammad, the idol of Islam

Islam is marked by all three. CKIIT will derive this formally when the theorem goes "live".

There will be much whining and squealing. CKIIT will attempt to identify a true "Jew" based on the properties assigned to the "Jew" by Muhammadans themselves: like pigs/animals, according to them. Pigs certainly whine and squeal. Thus, whoever whines and squeals is a "Jew" according to the Muhammadans.

Do you think Muhammadans will whine and squeal if/when CKIIT designates the idol of Islam (first and foremost as just that: an idol worshiped) as equivalent to a pedophile pig Jew such that this is what they are worshiping? Of course they would kill me for it: it is predicted and will very likely happen.

If we are to take both the Christians and Muhammadans for their word that such men existed,
whereas Jesus sacrificed himself for the sake of humanity,
Muhammad sacrificed humanity for the sake of himself.
It is an inversion: Christ and anti-Christ.

You are referencing a story about people's actions. Last time I check Cain had little trust in the Western Diety.

I have no clue what you are "checking" as the story is just a story/garment that is layered on top of (what are really) geometric relationships. When CKIIT goes live, it will derive these geometries in full and contains aspects of my own private work/life (as an analyst) because the "proofs" are personal, thus have to be given a generic form that can be adopted/used by others to "test" for the same in their own. Whatever comes out of CKIIT has to be "testable" by anyone, thus a proper method has to be provided such that it would take "belief" to "believe" that such a method-proof can not exist. CKIIT will end this misconception by proving that a possible all-knowing god can be tested for, despite the ignorant claims of the "Western" cults like atheism, which is a kind of religion, though certainly distinct in some regards to various degrees.

And who is this dead pedophile? You do understand that in pagan tribes young women are married off young as well? Or paedophilia in ancient pagan Greece?

Muhammad is the dead pedophile whose "example" continues to serve as the justification for the leaders' own in/of the House of Swine. The Pagan tribes were/are comprised of the same inbred families presently controlling monotheism: Jews. Muhammad is of this kind: hence their worshiping of him as an idol.

Sexual degeneracy comes-and-goes within the context of the 25 920 - year cycle.
Last golden age: 11 500 BCE (pyramids)
Last dark age: 500 AD (Jewish pagan swine cults of Judaism/Christianity/Islam)

Humanity is still in a hang-over from the dark ages, exiting the Piscean age denoted by the two "fish", which are the two feet of man, which are "I KNOW" and "I BELIEVE". Do you really "believe" the distinction I draw between these is not rooted in the cosmic wheel of time? Those symbols exist for a reason - they attempt to capture the essence of wedges/slices of time and the "seasonality" of time, as time is spacial.

Really, I don't remember Hiter flying a crescent moon flag.

The Muhammadans hide behind whoever they can. They have an "order" which intentionally raises people from childhood to carry out specific functions (ie. attacks) against non-Muslim nations. Hitler was one. Obama is another. Trudeau is a semi-one: they picked him up off the streets, dusted him off and radicalized him. Do you know how the Muhammadans describe the Jews as having "goyim" slaves who work the system? They are projecting their own activity, but projecting it onto "Jews" despite themselves being the Jews.

Once you understand House of Islam = House of Jew, the global context makes a lot more sense.

No, you are imaging. If you know so much tell me the pains my body is feeling right now.

I have no idea about your physical pain. I was referencing internal wounds which are present, but buried. They hemorrhage so long as a person is unknowing of them. If when ones own internal suffering is overcome, they are no longer subject to the pain derived therefrom. It is for this reason CKIIT comes with a suture: how to heal internal wounds by being able to acknowledge them (absent fear).

So you do not have divine authority in what you say?

It would take a "believer" to "believe" that. I don't believe such a thing but rather defer to allowing the truth to speak for itself.

[Eodnhoj7]

And if all that knowledge is grounded in a belief...it is a tautology of beliefs.

No knowledge is "grounded" in belief - it is antithetical to belief.
Knowing any general sentiment to merely be a belief is a knowledge.
It would take a lack of knowledge to take a belief as a certainty.

If/when a belief(-based ignorance) is acted upon as a certainty, this defines a local collapse which invariably leads to suffering/death.

Far from it, I am saying it is inevitable and scapegoating to patriarchal western religions as a source of suffering is hypocritical.

Atheism is a Western "religion" - Islam is a Middle-Eastern one. It has its roots in Judaism and can not exist less Judaism. As such, all Muslims are technically the self-same "Jews" they scapegoat their own "nature" onto, because that is the pathology of M/E religions: to scapegoat.

As such 'the accuser is the accused' defines Islam to the same degree of accuracy as Adam accusing another for his eating of the tree. Islam is thus a/the elaboration of the 'original sin' and satisfies many needed conditions:

i. Mark: Original Sin - to blame another for ones own
ii. Mark of Cain: to scapegoat by drawing from ones own nature (Cain; tiller of the soil) and accuse others of the same viz. enmity and desire to spill blood (it takes a believer to believe evil is good)
iii. Mark of the Beast:

samech kaf samech = seks (sex) = 220
(psychological/emotional/motor-instinctual) = 660
vav (human spine connecting brain/heart/sex) = 6
____
666 - satisfied if/when a being thinks/desires/acts explicitly on satiation of sexual lust
= sexual degeneracy / rape / pedophilia / abuse of women and children
= Muhammad, the idol of Islam

Islam is marked by all three. CKIIT will derive this formally when the theorem goes "live".

There will be much whining and squealing. CKIIT will attempt to identify a true "Jew" based on the properties assigned to the "Jew" by Muhammadans themselves: like pigs/animals, according to them. Pigs certainly whine and squeal. Thus, whoever whines and squeals is a "Jew" according to the Muhammadans.

Do you think Muhammadans will whine and squeal if/when CKIIT designates the idol of Islam (first and foremost as just that: an idol worshiped) as equivalent to a pedophile pig Jew such that this is what they are worshiping? Of course they would kill me for it: it is predicted and will very likely happen.

If we are to take both the Christians and Muhammadans for their word that such men existed,
whereas Jesus sacrificed himself for the sake of humanity,
Muhammad sacrificed humanity for the sake of himself.
It is an inversion: Christ and anti-Christ.

You are referencing a story about people's actions. Last time I check Cain had little trust in the Western Diety.

I have no clue what you are "checking" as the story is just a story/garment that is layered on top of (what are really) geometric relationships. When CKIIT goes live, it will derive these geometries in full and contains aspects of my own private work/life (as an analyst) because the "proofs" are personal, thus have to be given a generic form that can be adopted/used by others to "test" for the same in their own. Whatever comes out of CKIIT has to be "testable" by anyone, thus a proper method has to be provided such that it would take "belief" to "believe" that such a method-proof can not exist. CKIIT will end this misconception by proving that a possible all-knowing god can be tested for, despite the ignorant claims of the "Western" cults like atheism, which is a kind of religion, though certainly distinct in some regards to various degrees.

And who is this dead pedophile? You do understand that in pagan tribes young women are married off young as well? Or paedophilia in ancient pagan Greece?

Muhammad is the dead pedophile whose "example" continues to serve as the justification for the leaders' own in/of the House of Swine. The Pagan tribes were/are comprised of the same inbred families presently controlling monotheism: Jews. Muhammad is of this kind: hence their worshiping of him as an idol.

Sexual degeneracy comes-and-goes within the context of the 25 920 - year cycle.
Last golden age: 11 500 BCE (pyramids)
Last dark age: 500 AD (Jewish pagan swine cults of Judaism/Christianity/Islam)

Humanity is still in a hang-over from the dark ages, exiting the Piscean age denoted by the two "fish", which are the two feet of man, which are "I KNOW" and "I BELIEVE". Do you really "believe" the distinction I draw between these is not rooted in the cosmic wheel of time? Those symbols exist for a reason - they attempt to capture the essence of wedges/slices of time and the "seasonality" of time, as time is spacial.

Really, I don't remember Hiter flying a crescent moon flag.

The Muhammadans hide behind whoever they can. They have an "order" which intentionally raises people from childhood to carry out specific functions (ie. attacks) against non-Muslim nations. Hitler was one. Obama is another. Trudeau is a semi-one: they picked him up off the streets, dusted him off and radicalized him. Do you know how the Muhammadans describe the Jews as having "goyim" slaves who work the system? They are projecting their own activity, but projecting it onto "Jews" despite themselves being the Jews.

Once you understand House of Islam = House of Jew, the global context makes a lot more sense.

No, you are imaging. If you know so much tell me the pains my body is feeling right now.

I have no idea about your physical pain. I was referencing internal wounds which are present, but buried. They hemorrhage so long as a person is unknowing of them. If when ones own internal suffering is overcome, they are no longer subject to the pain derived therefrom. It is for this reason CKIIT comes with a suture: how to heal internal wounds by being able to acknowledge them (absent fear).

So you do not have divine authority in what you say?

It would take a "believer" to "believe" that. I don't believe such a thing but rather defer to allowing the truth to speak for itself.

I scrolled through it, saw the word mahomedon (or whatever its spelling is) then I realized your stance is a reactionary movement to the Muslim invasion.

[nothing]

I scrolled through it, saw the word mahomedon (or whatever its spelling is) then I realized your stance is a reactionary movement to the Muslim invasion.

It's less to do with that, rather more to do with what accompanies it: raping of non-Muslim women given such serves as an incentive for Muhammadan men.

In the same way it takes a believer to believe evil is good, it takes a believer to believe raping a woman is "justified".

Muhammad's own pedophilia and raping of women (in front of their decapitated husbands), in conjunction with the idolatrous nature of Muhammadan men to "imitate" their idol Muhammad thus perform the same (kind of) actions against "unbelieving" women, using the (man-made) Qur'an and "sunnah" of Muhammad as "justification". This is idol worship, and very "Jewish" idol worship not unlike the idolatry of Moses/Torah. What Muhammad is to Qur'an, Moses was to Torah as these two historical tragedies are recapitulations of the same "form": history repeating itself.

Islam is a sexually degenerated "Jew" cult if even adopting the "definition" of "Jew" of/by the Muhammadans themselves: "pigs". By their own standards (not my own designation until granted) upon designating Muhammad as a polygamous pedophile infidel "pig", the Muhammadans themselves are "Jews" for:

i. incessantly whining and squealing over ridicule of their worshiped idol Muhammad, having no knowledge that an all-knowing god would all-knowingly know that only "shaytan" would require "BELIEF" as it takes a believer to believer evil is good / satan is god, and
ii. spilling blood over a dead man (ie. as definite proof they are worshiping a "graven image" of a dead man viz. 'idol' in/of their own psychology).

I have a pyramid.
The top 10% is comprised of the 'House of Swine'
The bottom 90% are the victims of the ideology who are comprised of good people, many very beautiful.

The latter point is what elevates Islam from 'crisis' to 'tragedy' with any less an understanding certainly being rooted in ignorance. There is a certain beauty in the soul of the Muslim that, if/when allowed to express itself outside of the patriarchal pig boundaries of Islam, it would sweep across the planet like a miracle cure of the plague - literally. The entire ordeal could end instantaneously if Muslims knew they were being lied to by their own leaders. It is the sum of all fears for the House of Swine: that their own leaders are revealed as being the real "Jews" behind it all.

[Sculptor]

I have a pyramid.

How nice for you - do you use it to sharpen your razor blades?
A pyramid is one thing, but you seem to be without a brain, my you could use that to sharpen the sidewalk by jumping off a high building and make the world a better place.

[nothing]

I have a pyramid.

How nice for you - do you use it to sharpen your razor blades?
A pyramid is one thing, but you seem to be without a brain, my you could use that to sharpen the sidewalk by jumping off a high building and make the world a better place.

This is a projection of your own nature, thus the advice is best-suited for yourself. It is evident thus: the basis of your response is ad hominem, thus you are in a state of enmity such to draw from your own nature and project it onto whoever stirs it from within you. This state of enmity is the same as "Canaanite": to draw from ones own nature. It is the first progeny of Adam, whose original sin was to religiously blame others (esp. women) for his own sin. Thus the original "religion of Adam" is getting kicked out of Eden, which necessitates that one eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil and "BELIEVE" to know it, which creates the Canaanite "us vs them" viz. "believer" vs. "unbeliever". Knowing all *not to* "BELIEVE" approaches any possible all-knowing god, and it can definitely be known that both the Torah/Bible and Qur'an are man-handled / man-made. In any event: the shahada is a false testimony contrary to the ten commandments, which are "in stone" for a reason(s) that can be known (rather than "believed"). Knowing the ten commandments negates belief-based ignorances otherwise adopted by "believers". A testimony of a dead man requires a graven image in the heavens, which is another violation of the ten commandments. Thus all Muslims are "marked" with the false testimony upon taking the shahada. Don't ask me how I know (not "believe") this - you will not like it.

What offends you? Do you have any justification? Or just ad hominem? What is it?

[Sculptor]

I have a pyramid.

How nice for you - do you use it to sharpen your razor blades?
A pyramid is one thing, but you seem to be without a brain, my you could use that to sharpen the sidewalk by jumping off a high building and make the world a better place.

This is a projection of your own nature, thus the advice is best-suited for yourself. It is evident thus: the basis of your response is ad hominem, thus you are in a state of enmity such to draw from your own nature and project it onto whoever stirs it from within you. This state of enmity is the same as "Canaanite": to draw from ones own nature. It is the first progeny of Adam, whose original sin was to religiously blame others (esp. women) for his own sin. Thus the original "religion of Adam" is getting kicked out of Eden, which necessitates that one eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil and "BELIEVE" to know it, which creates the Canaanite "us vs them" viz. "believer" vs. "unbeliever". Knowing all *not to* "BELIEVE" approaches any possible all-knowing god, and it can definitely be known that both the Torah/Bible and Qur'an are man-handled / man-made. In any event: the shahada is a false testimony contrary to the ten commandments, which are "in stone" for a reason(s) that can be known (rather than "believed"). Knowing the ten commandments negates belief-based ignorances otherwise adopted by "believers". A testimony of a dead man requires a graven image in the heavens, which is another violation of the ten commandments. Thus all Muslims are "marked" with the false testimony upon taking the shahada. Don't ask me how I know (not "believe") this - you will not like it.

What offends you? Do you have any justification? Or just ad hominem? What is it?

Racism offends me.
You are racist.

[Eodnhoj7]

I scrolled through it, saw the word mahomedon (or whatever its spelling is) then I realized your stance is a reactionary movement to the Muslim invasion.

It's less to do with that, rather more to do with what accompanies it: raping of non-Muslim women given such serves as an incentive for Muhammadan men.

In the same way it takes a believer to believe evil is good, it takes a believer to believe raping a woman is "justified".

Muhammad's own pedophilia and raping of women (in front of their decapitated husbands), in conjunction with the idolatrous nature of Muhammadan men to "imitate" their idol Muhammad thus perform the same (kind of) actions against "unbelieving" women, using the (man-made) Qur'an and "sunnah" of Muhammad as "justification". This is idol worship, and very "Jewish" idol worship not unlike the idolatry of Moses/Torah. What Muhammad is to Qur'an, Moses was to Torah as these two historical tragedies are recapitulations of the same "form": history repeating itself.

Islam is a sexually degenerated "Jew" cult if even adopting the "definition" of "Jew" of/by the Muhammadans themselves: "pigs". By their own standards (not my own designation until granted) upon designating Muhammad as a polygamous pedophile infidel "pig", the Muhammadans themselves are "Jews" for:

i. incessantly whining and squealing over ridicule of their worshiped idol Muhammad, having no knowledge that an all-knowing god would all-knowingly know that only "shaytan" would require "BELIEF" as it takes a believer to believer evil is good / satan is god, and
ii. spilling blood over a dead man (ie. as definite proof they are worshiping a "graven image" of a dead man viz. 'idol' in/of their own psychology).

I have a pyramid.
The top 10% is comprised of the 'House of Swine'
The bottom 90% are the victims of the ideology who are comprised of good people, many very beautiful.

The latter point is what elevates Islam from 'crisis' to 'tragedy' with any less an understanding certainly being rooted in ignorance. There is a certain beauty in the soul of the Muslim that, if/when allowed to express itself outside of the patriarchal pig boundaries of Islam, it would sweep across the planet like a miracle cure of the plague - literally. The entire ordeal could end instantaneously if Muslims knew they were being lied to by their own leaders. It is the sum of all fears for the House of Swine: that their own leaders are revealed as being the real "Jews" behind it all.

Got through two sentences and kept seeing "Muhammed" and "rape"...quite frankly not only is this a straw man (considering many non muslims rape as well and use logic to justify it) but shows an internal reactionary bias to your argument given this "faith" is fundamentally defines your argument by what it is not (ie the "faith" is not your argument and as not your argument it acts as the negative limits allowing it to exist).

[nothing]

How nice for you - do you use it to sharpen your razor blades?
A pyramid is one thing, but you seem to be without a brain, my you could use that to sharpen the sidewalk by jumping off a high building and make the world a better place.

This is a projection of your own nature, thus the advice is best-suited for yourself. It is evident thus: the basis of your response is ad hominem, thus you are in a state of enmity such to draw from your own nature and project it onto whoever stirs it from within you. This state of enmity is the same as "Canaanite": to draw from ones own nature. It is the first progeny of Adam, whose original sin was to religiously blame others (esp. women) for his own sin. Thus the original "religion of Adam" is getting kicked out of Eden, which necessitates that one eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil and "BELIEVE" to know it, which creates the Canaanite "us vs them" viz. "believer" vs. "unbeliever". Knowing all *not to* "BELIEVE" approaches any possible all-knowing god, and it can definitely be known that both the Torah/Bible and Qur'an are man-handled / man-made. In any event: the shahada is a false testimony contrary to the ten commandments, which are "in stone" for a reason(s) that can be known (rather than "believed"). Knowing the ten commandments negates belief-based ignorances otherwise adopted by "believers". A testimony of a dead man requires a graven image in the heavens, which is another violation of the ten commandments. Thus all Muslims are "marked" with the false testimony upon taking the shahada. Don't ask me how I know (not "believe") this - you will not like it.

What offends you? Do you have any justification? Or just ad hominem? What is it?

Racism offends me.
You are racist.

Offense is only taken, never given. That believers blame others for their own being "offended" is what makes them pathetic.

Ps. Islam is not a race - it is a belief-based ideology comprised of many races, and is a rather pathetic one for trying to hide behind "racism". For a people who "believe" to be in possession of such perfect language (in a single book), how do they not even understand basic words?

"ISM" - to single out
"RACE" - genetic lineage

Leave it to the "believer" to "believe" undermining a belief-based ideology is "rascism". This is what is destroying the planet - ignorant "believers".

Islam is, however, a racist 'state' for scapegoating its own supremacism onto "white people". It's the religion of Islam: to scapegoat the crimes of the "believers" onto the "unbelievers". It's also the Original Sin of Adam and Muslims are in for one "hell" of a Great Deception.

Complete inversion.

Got through two sentences and kept seeing "Muhammed" and "rape"...quite frankly not only is this a straw man (considering many non muslims rape as well and use logic to justify it) but shows an internal reactionary bias to your argument given this "faith" is fundamentally defines your argument by what it is not (ie the "faith" is not your argument and as not your argument it acts as the negative limits allowing it to exist.

Much wrong with this.

Muhammad is taken as the "greatest example for all of humanity" which involves a lifestyle of looting/pillaging/genocide and raping women (as taken from his own biography). Thus Muhammad establishes a global precedent for such incl. pedophilia wherein it is all state-sanctioned (ie. "protected"). Notice how the House of Islam is trying to scapegoat the problem of pedophilia onto the West. It is presently the biggest goal of Islam - to get the people to believe/condemn pedophilia on the other side to draw attention away from Islam (due to the real pedophiles' fear). Muhammad establishes the precedent for the pedophiles and Islam will attempt to blame on the West. It is their "religion" thus predictable.

It is protected by patriarchal swine men who abuse women/children for a living: the same is the religion of Muhammad's Islam for him having done the same. In the same way it takes a believer to believe evil is good, it takes the same to believe swine is divine.

Because the Muslim worships Muhammad (while having no knowledge of what idol worship is), they grow enmity and desire to spill blood if/when Muhammad is ridiculed as being an infidel man. The problem is: he was one, thus Islam is itself an infidel 'state' owing to it being established upon the sexual degeneracy of Muhammad himself which is taken as "acceptable". Or in other words: Muhammad is a "partner" to Allah, as his conduct if/when emulated is necessarily in "obedience" to god. This establishes the precedent/need for projecting their own infidelity onto others, which they do, and will indefinitely.

Whereas the Muhammad calls the Jew the pig, it is the Muhammadan who whines and squeals over ridicule of the idol Muhammad. Now they are going to whine and squeal at the U.N. for the recent book burnings (of a man-handled bloody mess of a book) and are threatening humanity with fear:

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/11/isla ... nsequences

Say hello to the real "Jews" - blood sacrifices over books and idols while point fingers at "Jews" (who are actually themselves projected outwardly), Christians, Atheists, Unbelievers, Infidels, Non-Muslims, "Enemies of Islam" etc.

Islam is the global root(s) of Nazism, Fascism and Socialism and would collapse the same day it can no longer blame others for its own crimes against humanity.

[Sculptor]

Because the Muslim worships Muhammad (while having no knowledge of what idol worship is), they grow enmity and desire to spill blood if/when Muhammad is ridiculed as being an infidel man. The problem is: he was one, thus Islam is itself an infidel 'state' owing to it being established upon the sexual degeneracy of Muhammad himself which is taken as "acceptable".

So much for all your hot air.
But so what?
What are you going to do about it?
And why should we care?

[henry quirk]

What are you going to do about it?

The more pertinent question: what will you do about it?

Consider: if Sharia gets a foothold you may find yourself as an inferior payin' a hefty tax for the luxury of bein' non-muslim.

[Sculptor]

What are you going to do about it?

The more pertinent question: what will you do about it?

Consider: if Sharia gets a foothold you may find yourself as an inferior payin' a hefty tax for the luxury of bein' non-muslim.

Nothing needs to be done because there is no problem.
Don't be a dick.
Didn't ask you.

[henry quirk]

"Nothing needs to be done because there is no problem."

I disagree.

#

"Don't be a dick."

You first.

#

"Didn't ask you."

I didn't ask you about natural law in the other thread: sure as shit you piped in anyway.

So: if I wanna pipe in here, or anywhere, I will. Get over it.