Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Is there a God? If so, what is She like?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 15722
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 6:11 am
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:40 am ....
....
All the other mainstream religions' focus in also on death and thus the subconscious fear of death.
Believers will give a range and spectrum of reasons why they are religious, but on deeper analysis, they are traceable to the subconscious fear of death.

Thus my above is why the subconscious fear of death is inherent within the subconscious mind and as a special case is suppressed from the conscious mind, except intermittently.

Thus my point;
The root cause of all religions is the subconscious fear of death.
Really...then explain martyrs and contemplative who renounce the world (ie both seeking death in different ways).
Really!!

Your question is very common counter.
Note this is about the subconscious fear of death, NOT the conscious fear of death.

I have stated elsewhere as a preliminary to the above;
Genetically, DNA-RNA wise, ALL humans are "programmed' with the will-to-live.
Nature is never perfect, thus there is a very small % of defects of various degrees.

This defect when triggered during the nurturing process will hinder the will-to-live in different degrees. At the extreme we have the suicidal.
Those who renounced and escaped to the wilderness still have the will-to-live as long as the can albeit not like the majority.

In the case of martyrs, they could be either have the suicidal tendency, brainwashed or are religious zealots.
Those who are suicidal would have no problem volunteering for some ideological cause.
There are martyrs who has been brainwashed and their will-to-live eroded, e.g. the Kami-Kazi pilots.

As for Islamic jihadists, they are promised by their all powerful God their journey to eternal life in paradise will be expedited with greater rewards if they die as martyrs. In this case, their will-to-live is not eroded but extended by the promise to live eternally in heaven. Obviously they have 100% faith and trust in their Allah to die physically on Earth and to live eternally in heaven.

Do you have a counter to the above?
Scott Mayers
Posts: 2485
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 1:53 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Scott Mayers »

Veritas,

(1) If the fear is subconscious, how can you be certain of this 'consciously'?
(2) If one is actually 'religious', do they interpret their own belief as due to a secular justification....a fear of anything?

While fear of death may be sincere among us all, the believer often learns of the system of beliefs prior to even understanding what death even means. The religions are more often long evolved and not created upon one suddenly questioning their existence.

I think if you refer to the source of the religions, they can derive from questioning WHY anyone should die at all. But for this to be a cause of religion, one would have to create their religion independent of formal traditional religions while pondering death itself.

Particular religions will argue the benefits of eternal life after bodily death to help curb the fears involved. This is a selling point to their particular beliefs. But it cannot be a cause. Rather, I think religion is a devolution of a prior secular interpretation of realities that lose the original meaning like the game of 'telephone'. What might have once been a variable uncertainty about source of life itself turns into a constant. What might originally be labeled, "unidentified flying objects" (an unknown variable ), turns into a newly redefined meaning of "UFO" to mean a "flying saucer", a specific knowable constant.

Death is not knowable directly. We only induce this from learning THAT other things we knew are lost unfavorably by our own experience. The only emotional association to relate to this concept has to be from literal experiences of pain and/or discomforts experienced IN LIFE. As such, the fear of the associated discomforts arise out of reality. Religious myth only aids to comfort where the myth already has been established.

Thus fear of death cannot be the causal factor of the phenomena.
Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 15722
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Scott Mayers wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 5:26 am Veritas,

(1) If the fear is subconscious, how can you be certain of this 'consciously'?
One can be conscious of the fear of snakes, i.e. when one see a known poisonous snake and one starts to fear it consciously.
However there is no such thing as one be 'subconscious' of the fear of snakes.

By 'subconscious' I mean in this case, there are parts of the brain that triggers upon stimuli without one being consciously aware of it.

Image

Note in the above image, there are two paths to how fear are triggered.

1. In the case of the 'high' road, fear is triggered after the sensory cortex has processed the information of the stimuli. In this case, one can be conscious of the fear subsequently.
Mortality being a fact will invoke fears. But the fear of death is a special case which is not relayed to the conscious mind except intermittently where there is a weakness.
DNA-RNA wise all humans are "programmed" such that the fear of death is not felt consciously because constant awareness will paralyze the person with fear of death, thus hindering productive living.

2. But there is the second path, i.e. the 'low' road, or the short-cut where the sensory cortex is bypassed and the fear response is automatically triggered without one being conscious of it.
In the case of death, whatever fear of death at this 'subconscious level' is not relayed to the conscious mind, i.e. suppressed.
As a result of the suppression of this terrible and very forceful fears, the subconscious- fear-of-death response exude indirectly in various fissures as terrible unease throughout the psyche of the person as Angst, anxieties, depression, despair, meaningless, and other negative feelings.

Theists resort to theistic religions to soothe these existential pains exuded indirectly from the subconscious fear of death.
This is supported by the point that all mainstream religions' main focus is about death. [evidence available]. Note John 3:16 offer eternal life to counter the certainty of death.
(2) If one is actually 'religious', do they interpret their own belief as due to a secular justification....a fear of anything?
There are theistic and non-theistic religions.
As stated above, John 3:16 implied the existence of the fear of death, thus the offer to relieve this fear with eternal life.
Thus it is not 'secular justification' but rather general objective knowledge.
While fear of death may be sincere among us all, the believer often learns of the system of beliefs prior to even understanding what death even means. The religions are more often long evolved and not created upon one suddenly questioning their existence.
Note this is not about any conscious fear of death, but rather the innate mechanisms that trigger fears re death and threats of death which in turn generate existential pains.
It is this innate existential pains exuding from DNA-RNA pre-programmed subconscious fear of death that drove humans to seek reliefs.
In the past, it was sacrificing property or humans to the higher power that are a threat to the death of the tribes, then it slowly evolved to poly-theism then to monotheism which we labelled collectively as religions.

The primary cause is not due to one questioning one's existence.
The primary cause is the subconscious fear of death mechanisms that generate terrible unease that lead one to question one's existence and other existential pains.
I think if you refer to the source of the religions, they can derive from questioning WHY anyone should die at all. But for this to be a cause of religion, one would have to create their religion independent of formal traditional religions while pondering death itself.
Note my argument re the root cause of religion is due to the pre-programmed mechanisms that trigger the fear of death at the subconscious depths of the brain/mind.
Particular religions will argue the benefits of eternal life after bodily death to help curb the fears involved. This is a selling point to their particular beliefs. But it cannot be a cause. Rather, I think religion is a devolution of a prior secular interpretation of realities that lose the original meaning like the game of 'telephone'. What might have once been a variable uncertainty about source of life itself turns into a constant. What might originally be labeled, "unidentified flying objects" (an unknown variable ), turns into a newly redefined meaning of "UFO" to mean a "flying saucer", a specific knowable constant.
Note my points;
  • 1. Genetically, ALL humans are 'programmed' with a will-to-live.
    2. To live all are programmed to avoid death.
    3. To avoid death - all are programmed with a neural mechanism to trigger fear of death AND other mechanisms.
    4. Mortality is a fact thus the subconscious-fear-of-death mechanism is triggered upon this fact fed to the subconscious.
    5. The terrible fear responses triggered at the subconscious level exudes indirectly as existential Angst, etc.
    6. Religion [with its selling point of salvation] is the most effective balm or 'opium' to soothe those existential pains.
If you think there are other causes, I don't see how they can be fit in prior to point 3 above.
Any??
Death is not knowable directly. We only induce this from learning THAT other things we knew are lost unfavorably by our own experience. The only emotional association to relate to this concept has to be from literal experiences of pain and/or discomforts experienced IN LIFE. As such, the fear of the associated discomforts arise out of reality. Religious myth only aids to comfort where the myth already has been established.

Thus fear of death cannot be the causal factor of the phenomena.
Death cannot be experienced directly.
But mortality [death] is a known fact.
This fact from million of years triggered the subconscious-fear-of-death to generate instinctual responses [suppressed from the conscious mind] that exude indirectly as existential and psychic pains.
The majority of humans resort to 'religions' [theistic and non-theistic] to soothe these indirect pains.

Theistic religions rely on the thought an omni-whatever God, i.e. the all-powerful that can do anything to soothe and provide a security blanket. This solution do not address the root cause directly. Theistic religions also has it pros and cons. Problem is the trend that the cons of theistic religions are outweighing their pros as we move towards the future.

On the other hand, non-theistic religions like Buddhism and others, identify the subconscious fear of death as a root cause and derived principles, strategies and practices to modulate its terrible impulses.

So my theory is not merely a fanciful speculation but rather it is already recognized and put into practice albeit on a black-box approach.
What I am proposing with my theory is to dig deep into the black-box and deal with the mechanisms within with more precision and thus promote greater efficiency.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 10708
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Veritas Aequitas wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:59 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 6:11 am
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:40 am ....
....
All the other mainstream religions' focus in also on death and thus the subconscious fear of death.
Believers will give a range and spectrum of reasons why they are religious, but on deeper analysis, they are traceable to the subconscious fear of death.

Thus my above is why the subconscious fear of death is inherent within the subconscious mind and as a special case is suppressed from the conscious mind, except intermittently.

Thus my point;
The root cause of all religions is the subconscious fear of death.
Really...then explain martyrs and contemplative who renounce the world (ie both seeking death in different ways).
Really!!

Your question is very common counter.
Note this is about the subconscious fear of death, NOT the conscious fear of death.

I have stated elsewhere as a preliminary to the above;
Genetically, DNA-RNA wise, ALL humans are "programmed' with the will-to-live.
Nature is never perfect, thus there is a very small % of defects of various degrees.

This defect when triggered during the nurturing process will hinder the will-to-live in different degrees. At the extreme we have the suicidal.
Those who renounced and escaped to the wilderness still have the will-to-live as long as the can albeit not like the majority.

In the case of martyrs, they could be either have the suicidal tendency, brainwashed or are religious zealots.
Those who are suicidal would have no problem volunteering for some ideological cause.
There are martyrs who has been brainwashed and their will-to-live eroded, e.g. the Kami-Kazi pilots.

As for Islamic jihadists, they are promised by their all powerful God their journey to eternal life in paradise will be expedited with greater rewards if they die as martyrs. In this case, their will-to-live is not eroded but extended by the promise to live eternally in heaven. Obviously they have 100% faith and trust in their Allah to die physically on Earth and to live eternally in heaven.

Do you have a counter to the above?
Yeah, the subconscious is a common counter to explain everything as it fundamentally is not only barely explored by inherently undefined by nature.

1. Research barely explains anything about it as it is barely even understood.
2. The subconscious is a state of absence of definition relative to the conscious.
3. The subconsciousness is the manner of assuming reality rather than a defined state of reality, thus what we understand of the subconsonsciousness is one as an assuming by nature. To argue the subconsonciousness requires the subconsciousness and we are left going around in circles.
Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 15722
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 1:07 pm
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:59 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 6:11 am

Really...then explain martyrs and contemplative who renounce the world (ie both seeking death in different ways).
Really!!

Your question is very common counter.
Note this is about the subconscious fear of death, NOT the conscious fear of death.

I have stated elsewhere as a preliminary to the above;
Genetically, DNA-RNA wise, ALL humans are "programmed' with the will-to-live.
Nature is never perfect, thus there is a very small % of defects of various degrees.

This defect when triggered during the nurturing process will hinder the will-to-live in different degrees. At the extreme we have the suicidal.
Those who renounced and escaped to the wilderness still have the will-to-live as long as the can albeit not like the majority.

In the case of martyrs, they could be either have the suicidal tendency, brainwashed or are religious zealots.
Those who are suicidal would have no problem volunteering for some ideological cause.
There are martyrs who has been brainwashed and their will-to-live eroded, e.g. the Kami-Kazi pilots.

As for Islamic jihadists, they are promised by their all powerful God their journey to eternal life in paradise will be expedited with greater rewards if they die as martyrs. In this case, their will-to-live is not eroded but extended by the promise to live eternally in heaven. Obviously they have 100% faith and trust in their Allah to die physically on Earth and to live eternally in heaven.

Do you have a counter to the above?
Yeah, the subconscious is a common counter to explain everything as it fundamentally is not only barely explored by inherently undefined by nature.

1. Research barely explains anything about it as it is barely even understood.
2. The subconscious is a state of absence of definition relative to the conscious.
3. The subconsciousness is the manner of assuming reality rather than a defined state of reality, thus what we understand of the subconsciousness is one as an assuming by nature. To argue the subconsciousness requires the subconsciousness and we are left going around in circles.
We don't need the subconscious to understand the subconscious.
I have to say you are very stupid on the above because the 'subconscious' is relatively easy to understand even common sense, personal experiences, and reported experiences by others and researched extensively by scientists.
Thus if one has basic intellect and intelligence, one will understand the "subconscious" easily.

Do you have any justified counter to my earlier explanations?

Do you agree you have instincts? Surely it has to be 'yes'.
Where does the instinct operates if not at the subconscious level of the brain/mind.
When babies are born they are driven by their subconscious brain/mind, i.e. suckle, cry, poop, respond in whatever ways, etc.

Note fear, thus fear of death,
You should not make too much noise when you are ignorant of the subject.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 10708
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Veritas Aequitas wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:13 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 1:07 pm
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:59 am
Really!!

Your question is very common counter.
Note this is about the subconscious fear of death, NOT the conscious fear of death.

I have stated elsewhere as a preliminary to the above;
Genetically, DNA-RNA wise, ALL humans are "programmed' with the will-to-live.
Nature is never perfect, thus there is a very small % of defects of various degrees.

This defect when triggered during the nurturing process will hinder the will-to-live in different degrees. At the extreme we have the suicidal.
Those who renounced and escaped to the wilderness still have the will-to-live as long as the can albeit not like the majority.

In the case of martyrs, they could be either have the suicidal tendency, brainwashed or are religious zealots.
Those who are suicidal would have no problem volunteering for some ideological cause.
There are martyrs who has been brainwashed and their will-to-live eroded, e.g. the Kami-Kazi pilots.

As for Islamic jihadists, they are promised by their all powerful God their journey to eternal life in paradise will be expedited with greater rewards if they die as martyrs. In this case, their will-to-live is not eroded but extended by the promise to live eternally in heaven. Obviously they have 100% faith and trust in their Allah to die physically on Earth and to live eternally in heaven.

Do you have a counter to the above?
Yeah, the subconscious is a common counter to explain everything as it fundamentally is not only barely explored by inherently undefined by nature.

1. Research barely explains anything about it as it is barely even understood.
2. The subconscious is a state of absence of definition relative to the conscious.
3. The subconsciousness is the manner of assuming reality rather than a defined state of reality, thus what we understand of the subconsciousness is one as an assuming by nature. To argue the subconsciousness requires the subconsciousness and we are left going around in circles.
We don't need the subconscious to understand the subconscious.
I have to say you are very stupid on the above because the 'subconscious' is relatively easy to understand even common sense, personal experiences, and reported experiences by others and researched extensively by scientists.
Thus if one has basic intellect and intelligence, one will understand the "subconscious" easily.

Do you have any justified counter to my earlier explanations?

Do you agree you have instincts? Surely it has to be 'yes'.
Where does the instinct operates if not at the subconscious level of the brain/mind.
When babies are born they are driven by their subconscious brain/mind, i.e. suckle, cry, poop, respond in whatever ways, etc.

Note fear, thus fear of death,
You should not make too much noise when you are ignorant of the subject.
Actually you do, because any conscious awareness of the subconsciousness is in itself unfolding from the subconsciousness. It is a loop and we are left with form being the true constant.
Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 15722
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:50 pm
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:13 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 1:07 pm To argue the subconsciousness requires the subconsciousness and we are left going around in circles.
We don't need the subconscious to understand the subconscious.
I have to say you are very stupid on the above because the 'subconscious' is relatively easy to understand even common sense, personal experiences, and reported experiences by others and researched extensively by scientists.
Thus if one has basic intellect and intelligence, one will understand the "subconscious" easily.

You should not make too much noise when you are ignorant of the subject.
Actually you do, because any conscious awareness of the subconsciousness is in itself unfolding from the subconsciousness. It is a loop and we are left with form being the true constant.
You are getting too loopy on the above.

You stated the following conclusion;
"because any conscious awareness of the subconsciousness is in itself unfolding from the subconsciousness."

Point is you are using your consciousness [with reasoning] to arrive at the above conclusion.
This is what I meant by;
Thus if one has basic intellect and intelligence, one will understand the "subconscious" easily.
It is a loop and we are left with form being the true constant.
Again it is not a loop as a true constant.
I would not analyze on how it actually begin but it is nevertheless an emergence that the subconscious drives the conscious mind and vice versa.
But it is not a loop in a 2D circular sense but in a 3D spiral in time.
You are shortsighted in this case by NOT looking from the side-view of the flow of spiral, note the below;

Image

Btw, the whole human system is an auto-servo mechanism/system.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servomechanism
All process are iterative in a spiral, moving on with time.

To insist on a loop [not circular but spiral] for everything is a toothless premise for the above argument.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 10708
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Veritas Aequitas wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 4:01 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:50 pm
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:13 am
We don't need the subconscious to understand the subconscious.
I have to say you are very stupid on the above because the 'subconscious' is relatively easy to understand even common sense, personal experiences, and reported experiences by others and researched extensively by scientists.
Thus if one has basic intellect and intelligence, one will understand the "subconscious" easily.

You should not make too much noise when you are ignorant of the subject.
Actually you do, because any conscious awareness of the subconsciousness is in itself unfolding from the subconsciousness. It is a loop and we are left with form being the true constant.
No I am showing the inevitable. If you use the consciousness to measure the subconsciousness, you are using conscious symbols that are grounded in the subconsciousness.


You are getting too loopy on the above.

You stated the following conclusion;
"because any conscious awareness of the subconsciousness is in itself unfolding from the subconsciousness."

Point is you are using your consciousness [with reasoning] to arrive at the above conclusion.
This is what I meant by;
Thus if one has basic intellect and intelligence, one will understand the "subconscious" easily.

It is a loop and we are left with form being the true constant.
Again it is not a loop as a true constant.

Rofl, a loop is a true constant. Your linear reasoning will not work either as you are left with a tautology from whatever premise you begin with.
I would not analyze on how it actually begin but it is nevertheless an emergence that the subconscious drives the conscious mind and vice versa.
But it is not a loop in a 2D circular sense but in a 3D spiral in time.
You are shortsighted in this case by NOT looking from the side-view of the flow of spiral, note the below;

Image

the inner and out dots are always going in circles...a spiral is still subjecting to looping...it is merely expanding and contracting circularity.

3d is merely changing 2d images.


Btw, the whole human system is an auto-servo mechanism/system.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servomechanism
All process are iterative in a spiral, moving on with time.

The spiral is not a mechanism as all mechanisms are replications of forms within nature. To say all processes are a spiral, with all of being subject to process as all being moves, is to say a constant form is inevitable and you are left with a definition of divinity.

To insist on a loop [not circular but spiral] for everything is a toothless premise for the above argument.

No, it is inevitable. I could put it under wittgensteins implication that everything is a tautology of a tautology.

Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 15722
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 4:44 am The spiral is not a mechanism as all mechanisms are replications of forms within nature. To say all processes are a spiral, with all of being subject to process as all being moves, is to say a constant form is inevitable and you are left with a definition of divinity.
I did not state the spiral is a mechanism.
I stated the spiral [an effect] arise from the whole human system being a auto-servo mechanism.
No, it is inevitable. I could put it under wittgensteins implication that everything is a tautology of a tautology.
This is merely linguistic.

Note everything is within a system, the human system, nature as a system, the solar system, the universe as a system.
This is a better explanation than your 'loopy' loop.
Do you know where the term 'loopy' [silly, stupid] comes from?
And you are insisting everything is in a loop.
Then insisting it is a constant, thus divine.
What a jump from loop to divine.

Everything is a system.
A system is an emergent.
System is a constant throughout reality.
But 'system' is not divine.

Everything is energy, particles or waves, etc.
These are constant but they are not divine.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Skepdick »

Veritas Aequitas wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:03 am This is merely linguistic.
It's not "merely linguistic". This "merely linguistic" distinction leads to a conceptual distinction, and the conceptual distinction leads to an empirical distinction.

Closed systems vs open systems. Mathematically it's the same distinction as closed vs open form equations.

The practical distinction is determinism vs non-determinism.
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:03 am Note everything is within a system, the human system, nature as a system, the solar system, the universe as a system.
If "everything" is within a system, what system is everything within?

The very claim you are making requires divinity. For you to assert anything about the universe mandates you assuming a reference frame external to the universe.
Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 15722
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Skepdick wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 9:43 am
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:03 am This is merely linguistic.
It's not "merely linguistic". This "merely linguistic" distinction leads to a conceptual distinction, and the conceptual distinction leads to an empirical distinction.

Closed systems vs open systems. Mathematically it's the same distinction as closed vs open form equations.

The practical distinction is determinism vs non-determinism.
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:03 am Note everything is within a system, the human system, nature as a system, the solar system, the universe as a system.
If "everything" is within a system, what system is everything within?

The very claim you are making requires divinity. For you to assert anything about the universe mandates you assuming a reference frame external to the universe.
Then what system is divinity within?

To jump over the 'grand canyon' without parachute to 'divinity' is due to psychology.

According to Hume 'cause and effect' is psychological [human experience of customs, habits and constant conjunction], if one jump into a 'first_cause', that is due to heavier psychology to soothe the dissonance.
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Skepdick »

Veritas Aequitas wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:00 am Then what system is divinity within?
You tell me - you are the one who is making divine claims. What system are you within?
Veritas Aequitas wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 10:00 am To jump over the 'grand canyon' without parachute to 'divinity' is due to psychology.
Then how did you do it?

How did you get to a vantage point where you can observe The Universe and make claims about it?

Are you soothing the dissonance?
Skepdick
Posts: 16022
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2019 11:16 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Skepdick »

The Universe is a system.

The above sentence is not a claim about the universe. It's a proposition about language.

The proposition can be interpreted trivially as follows: Hey, lets talk about the universe using the language, vocabulary and concepts from the shared body of knowledge known as "systems theory".

And if you are not familiar with the language of systems theory, you can say something like "I disagree - the universe is not a system", at which point you can propose a different language - one you are more familiar with.

Or if we both agree to use the language of systems theory we can then say things like "The universe its one of two types of systems: open or closed."

But it simply begs the question: Who determines whether the universe is an open or closed system and how?

The root of all religion is the need for a coherent, shared language so that we can speak about our emotional world. Colloquially, it's known as Emotional Intelligence - EQ. You are never going to develop a language to speak about the emotional universe when you keep all your attention focused on the external universe - that's not where the answers are.
Walker
Posts: 16388
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Walker »

Veritas Aequitas wrote: Mon Nov 11, 2019 8:40 am Thus my point;
The root cause of all religions is the subconscious fear of death.
Buddha eventually discovered that by facing his conscious fear of life, a human being actually faces his subconscious fear of death. Through the filter of life, this union of the conscious and the subconscious, the outer and the inner, appears to the senses as renouncing renunciation, which is why starving Buddha eventually left the forest to become the happy, round Buddha found enshrined on the gift shop shelf.

When a man say no to champagne, he say no to life.”
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 10708
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: Subconscious Fear of Death - the Root of Religions

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Veritas Aequitas wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 5:03 am
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Wed Nov 20, 2019 4:44 am The spiral is not a mechanism as all mechanisms are replications of forms within nature. To say all processes are a spiral, with all of being subject to process as all being moves, is to say a constant form is inevitable and you are left with a definition of divinity.
I did not state the spiral is a mechanism.
I stated the spiral [an effect] arise from the whole human system being a auto-servo mechanism.

And this auto servo mechanism occurs within time, this subject to the same nature.
No, it is inevitable. I could put it under wittgensteins implication that everything is a tautology of a tautology.
This is merely linguistic.

Note everything is within a system, the human system, nature as a system, the solar system, the universe as a system.
This is a better explanation than your 'loopy' loop.
Do you know where the term 'loopy' [silly, stupid] comes from?
And you are insisting everything is in a loop.
Then insisting it is a constant, thus divine.
What a jump from loop to divine.

Look it up in your history books how the circle was viewed.

Everything is a system.
A system is an emergent.
System is a constant throughout reality.
But 'system' is not divine.

System is a constant and omnipresent process then falling under one of the definitions of God.

Everything is energy, particles or waves, etc.
These are constant but they are not divine.

So energy, particles and waves are talking to themselves then?
Post Reply