'Islamophobia' viz. Projection and Scapegoating

Is there a God? If so, what is She like?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
nothing
Posts: 621
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:32 pm

'Islamophobia' viz. Projection and Scapegoating

Post by nothing »

The accuser is the accused.
is an expression which captures the essence of projection and scapegoating, wherein:
the substance(s) of any/all accusation(s) made against another(s) (esp. in enmity) reflects the 'state' of the accuser, rather than the accused.
For example, the House of Islam accuses non-Muslims of being "Islamophobic" for ridiculing the ridiculous "belief"-based ideology of Islam which exclusively relies on belief-in-and-of-itself, despite so-called satan requiring belief-in-and-of-itself for any believer to ever believe evil is good.

In reality, the House of Islam and/or Muslims (and their subdued apologists) are themselves "Islamophobic" wherein they are perpetually accusing others of what they are themselves guilty of: having such a phobia of ridicule of Islam viz. employing a dead polygamist warlord (who had sex with a child) "greatest example" for all of humanity idol-man. Further, like Adolph Hitler, this idol of Islam Muhammad amassed power via oration, weaponized the state against his political adversaries, expanded militarily while expending peace treaties only to subsequently use the resources of the state to commit organized genocide against Jews. This adequately describes both Adolph Hitler and Muhammad, and it is not a coincidence as Dr. Carl J. Jung also alluded to.

There are two real fears in/of Islam: a rational one and an accompanying irrational one.

The rational fear in/of Islam is by the House of Islam (ie. leaders of Islam; Muslim Brotherhood viz. sausages of the House of Swinery) for fearing the true nature of the (man-made) Qur'an to be exposed to the Muslims, and/or the true history of Islam involving the mosques facing Petra (in South Jordan) up to 100 years after the death of Muhammad (instead of Mecca), indicating that Muhammad can't have established a prayer towards Mecca where Muslims pray towards now. This means Muslims are de facto praying in the wrong direction contrary to a/the direction Muhammad would have prayed, which is certainly Petra. The House of Islam obviously can not afford to allow this reality into the public domain (where it belongs). The Muslims clearly have absolutely no idea about their own history, because the history they are given by their own leaders is nowhere near true/accurate - it is all belief-based and crafted to justify the existence of Islam. Mecca did not even exist in the time of Muhammad: Petra was the main artery trade route and the real terrain describes in/by the Qur'an. Therefor, the House of Islam certainly stands to lose all of its power should either of these two facts become mainstream: the Qur'an is man-made having been evolved from Syriac (not Arabic) Christian (not Islamic) strophic hymns, and/or Islam/Muhammad have a history in Petra, and not in Mecca. Unlike a phobia, this fear is absolutely rational.

The irrational fear in/of Islam is by the first victims of Islam: the believing Muslims. They believe the Qur'an is the perfect word of a god, thus fear Allah. The Qur'an is man-made; as is Islam, as is Sharia, thus any/all fear of Allah and/or not following Islam is intrinsically irrational. This is precisely what Muslims suffer because this very fear is the agency exploited by the House of Islam to control both its own adherents (ie. Muslims) and non-Muslims whom they persecute (and not the other way around).

Because Islam is the global root of fascism (they violently suppress this fact), it perpetually suppresses any/all criticisms of itself while perpetually scapegoating any/all of its own iniquities onto whoever their political adversary happens to be at the time. Geopolitically, this is the insanity of the Democratic/Liberal Left being used by/as a proxy of the House of Islam to wage jihad against "unbelievers" for not "believing" in the infidel 'state' of Islam. It projects the following:
i. Supremacism: accusing "white" people as being supremacist. In reality, Islam is a supremacist 'state' for "believing" it is in possession of the most supreme document on the face of the planet: the Qur'an (which is actually a bloody mess).

ii. Racism: Islam trying to scapegoat its supremacism onto "white people" is the real racism, while accusing those criticizing Islam as being "racist" despite Islam being not-a-race, but a belief-based ideology. Historically (and presently), Islam is also racist against blacks and (obviously) Jews. The latter is interesting as, if not for the Jew, the Muslim would not exist (ie. they are themselves 'of Jew nature')

iii. Bigotry: believing that the Qur'an is the perfect word of any god, and/or Muhammad is the greatest idol for humanity despite having been a polygamist genocidal pedophile is thoroughly bigoted (not to mention idol worship of a dead man)

iv. Nazism: Muhammad and Adolph Hitler are archetypal equivalents
It is invariably true that Islam pathologically scapegoats/projects the crimes of its own House onto any/all others, and this same fixed characteristic helps define the geopolitical Left-leaning Liberal-Democrats who suffer the same projection. China's designation of Islam being a kind of cancer is technically correct: when any problem-in-and-of-itself (ie. Islam) believes it is a solution-in-and-of-itself, this is the same thing as a cancer cell reproducing despite being lethal.

Islam is certainly lethal: it is the global source of fascism/socialism/Nazism and responsible for more genocide than any other comparable 'state' on the planet. That blood is routinely spilled over the Qur'an and/or Muhammad indicates that Islam is strictly idol worship: degenerate swine men worshiping a dead swine because his "example" of swinery justifies their own - the function of the idol. Us vs. them, believers vs. unbelievers, we must kill the unbelievers! Hundreds of millions of dead, and the only thing the Muslim can do is point fingers at someone else: never to look in the mirror of the guilt of it all.

And so the real Islamophobes accuse those who stir the Islamophobia within them: it lays dormant in the believer, and when one speaks, it is stirred and projected outward as if owing to the speaker. The problem is not the ones who stir, it is the ones who hate, and blaming another for ones own hatred is precisely what Islam both religious and pathologically does: project and scapegoat, blame, blame and blame.

To close, the Hebrew expression for 'satan' renders the general expression:
Any expression of being, (that is) bound in an ongoing (unresolved) state...
which can be any false belief. Islam certainly satisfies this expression and is certainly a satanic religion.
Veritas Aequitas
Posts: 15722
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 4:41 am

Re: 'Islamophobia' viz. Projection and Scapegoating

Post by Veritas Aequitas »

Agree with most of the above.
In reality, the House of Islam and/or Muslims (and their subdued apologists) are themselves "Islamophobic" wherein they are perpetually accusing others of what they are themselves guilty of: having such a phobia of ridicule of Islam.
You are saying those Muslims are engaging in some kind of phobia, i.e.
the phobia of Islamophobic?

I think you are right,
-the Muslim's fear of Islamophobic is itself irrational,
because to fear Islam is rational.
-therefore they are engaging in and are guilty of Islamophobic-phobia.

I have argued here, why the critique of Islam is not Islamophobic;
Is the Critique of Islam Islamophobic?
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=27642

The fear response to the ideology of Islam is not irrational because it is very rational to fear the potential fatal threats from the ideology of Islam as it is so evident.
Thus the justified critique of the ideology of Islam upon justified-fears* is not irrational.
* I have argued on this elsewhere that is it the ideology of Islam itself that exhorts Muslims to war against and kill non-Muslims.
viewtopic.php?p=431525#p431525

We need to present objective arguments and evidence why it is justified to fear the ideology of Islam, e.g.
  • 1. DNA-RNA wise ALL humans has the potential to commit evil and violent. Conservatively 20% are naturally born with an active evil and violent tendency.
    This mean there is a naturally existing pool of 300 million [out of 1.5b] evil prone Muslims.

    2. The core authority of Islam is the 6236 verses of the Quran which is the core authority ALL Muslims must comply with. More than 3400++ or 54% of the 6236 verses are directed contemptuosly in different degrees against non-Muslim and at the extreme to war against and kill non-Muslim upon vague threats [fasadin] against Islam.
We cannot resolve 1 at present because we cannot tweak the DNA-RNA which is very dangerous.
As such when these 300 million of evil prone Muslims are commanded by Allah to war against and kill non-Muslims, the zealous will carry out those commands to the 't' with the hope of greater merits of eternal life in paradise.

The reality of the evil consequence from the combination of 1 and 2 is so evident throughout the history of Islam where more than 200 million non-Muslims had been killed merely because they were non-Muslims. Note the recent stats [subject to some margin of error];

Image

Upon the above evidence of terrible atrocities, evil and violent acts by SOME Muslims being compelled directly by the ideology of Islam, it is very rational for non-Muslims to have a sense of fear [not with fright] to critique the ideology of Islam, thus such a fear of Islam is not Islamophobic.
nothing
Posts: 621
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2019 9:32 pm

Re: 'Islamophobia' viz. Projection and Scapegoating

Post by nothing »

You are saying those Muslims are engaging in some kind of phobia, i.e.
the phobia of Islamophobic?
It is projection and scapegoating: the internal state of the Muslim and/or apologist is 'Islamophobic" but they are blaming their own internal 'state' as being due to another.

It's like a glass of water with sediment:
if Islamophobia is the sediment,
the glass is the Muslim / apologist,
and a critic of Islam is the stirring rod,
as the rod stirs, the Islamophobia is stirred
and the Muslim / apologist blames the stirrer
instead of the sediment within themselves.
The same also applies to hatred.

The principle pathology of Islam is to blame/scapegoat whatever Islam is guilty of, onto any/all others.
I think you are right,
-the Muslim's fear of Islamophobic is itself irrational,
because to fear Islam is rational.
-therefore they are engaging in and are guilty of Islamophobic-phobia.
Fear of Islam/Allah is irrational.
Fear that the House of Islam has for the lies of Islam being exposed = rational.
The fear response to the ideology of Islam is not irrational because it is very rational to fear the potential fatal threats from the ideology of Islam as it is so evident.
Thus the justified critique of the ideology of Islam upon justified-fears* is not irrational.
Islam is the root of fascism: it will suppress any/all criticisms and label people racists/bigots/Islamophobes/supremacists etc. despite these qualities and characteristics describing the House of Islam and/or Muslims/apologists.

This is why understanding fear is superior to suffering it: to know who is afraid and why often alleviates ones own fear.

The House of Islam is perpetually in fear because they can't afford to have the Muslims know they've been lied to by their own leaders for over 1 000 years. Mecca did not even exist in the time of Muhammad and all of the mosques built up until ~730 CE (~100 years after the death of Muhammad) faced Petra, not Mecca, meaning Muhammad can't have established a direction of prayer there and Muslims are bowing in the wrong direction. This one truth would collapse the entire House of Islam. Hence: knowing the fear of others is superior to suffering fear. Now you know the need for fascist suppression of criticisms of Islam: it is the root of fascism and they manufacture genocide machines behind insane foreign dictators like Hitler. They are trying it again.
We need to present objective arguments and evidence why it is justified to fear the ideology of Islam, e.g.
I'm working on a Conscious Knowledge of Ignorance (Inference) Theorem that defeats the ideology of Islam entirely from the ground-up. It actually fits in a single 5-finger hand:

thumb: 0 I am (willing to...) <-*being with equal propensity for good/evil
index: -1 Know <-tree of living
middle: +2 of any/all <-*creation
ring: -2 *not to* <-*destruction
pinky: +1 Believe <-*tree of knowledge of good and evil
__________________________
any/all possible god: 0 - 1 + 2 - 2 + 1 = 0 I am willing to KNOW of any/all *not to* BELIEVE <-*tends towards any possible all-knowing god
any/all possible satan: 0 + 1 - 2 + 2 - 1 = 0 I am willing to BELIEVE *not to* of any/all KNOW <-*tends towards any possible satanic *belief-based ignorance
__________
*satan requires belief in order that any believer believe:
i. belief-in-and-of-itself is a virtue (?)
ii. evil is good
iii. satan is god

This establishes an orientation towards/away from the tree of knowledge of good and evil which causes suffering/death. It is belief-in-and-of-itself, which is a problem-in-and-of-itself, and not a solution-in-and-of-itself. If/when any problem pathologically believes itself to be a solution, it satisfies the expression rendered from the word 'satan':
S - shin - the expression of being (as conjunction of: psychology "heavens above" / emotions "earth below" and instinctual motor "water below"
T - tet - bound (ie. entangled)
N - nun (final) - ongoing (ie. indefinite; unresolved) state

ShayTehN

...any expression of being bound in an ongoing (unresolved) state...
Thus, because the Muslim believes that which is not true in an ongoing state, Islam is certainly satanic.

It takes a believer to believe evil is good (without the need to define them) and the shahada is a false testimony contrary to the ten commandments. If the Muslim tries to claim the ten commandments do not apply to them, this is a both a violation of the first commandment and a neglect of the fact that this document begins with the words "I AM" which is in the name of god "I AM that I AM" and the same given to Moses to liberate the Israelites. If the Muslim denies the ten commandments, they deny the god they claim to worship (it is not the same god at all).

Islam has no conscious knowledge of their own ignorance, therefor they blame their own ignorance on others.
Upon the above evidence of terrible atrocities, evil and violent acts by SOME Muslims being compelled directly by the ideology of Islam, it is very rational for non-Muslims to have a sense of fear [not with fright] to critique the ideology of Islam, thus such a fear of Islam is not Islamophobic.
They are eating from the wrong tree: they need to eat from the tree of life (ie. knowledge) which negates belief.
Post Reply