Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
Again no deep argument or nothing you haven't heard before, except to will be from a different angle.
The grounds of philosophy, and knowledge by default, is in "assumption".
This assumption, as without thought or form, is void and akin to an intellectual vaccuum. What is assumed is taken without thought. You heard me state this before...nothing new.
The dialectic and rhetoric, which revolves around these key assumptions, does in fact revolve like a spiral around these key assumptions in an effort not to elaborate and clarify them...but rather contain them and hide them.
Any progressive definition, negates the old, causing not just empty terminology but effectively a morphing of language into a vortex in form and function.
This also occurs, specifically speaking the "nihilistic tendencies", with the spiral nature of the scientific method where the emphasis on "facts" that are continually negated for new facts effectively leaves knowledge itself as meaningless.
It is the redefinition of language, through continual dialectic, that results in the very language trying to contain its hidden baseless nature as fundamentally causing it.
Philosophy, specifically the modern post presocratic sense, is story creation. Whoever gives the greatest degree of definition creates a story. This story is embodied within the psyche, forming and guiding perspective, and takes on a God complex.
We equate brilliance with definition for definition sparkles, much like the stars in the night sky. But underneath these definitions, between the lines, is an isomorphism of formlessness.
The greater the definition the greater the philosopher. With the increase in definitions comes an increase in interpretations. Thus philosophers such as kant or neitzche are "great" not because of the great degree of detail, but because this great degree of detail allows for a variety of interpretations that can equivocate to anything.
They are great because when we see them we see "us", and this mirror results in the narcissus myth hidden behind the nature of much of logic and reason.
Grind a stone to dust. Grind a fact to atomic facts.
Melt the dust. Melt the facts.
....and you get a glass mirror.
In these respects philosophy takes on a ritualistic nature of creating symbols, with these symbols being gods as they direct the psyche. Symbolism, is god creation. Definition, or rather story telling, is the worship of these gods.
As such it is religious in nature in an attempt to not just bind nihilistic tendencies within a dense layer of wording but to bind the words themselves to this hidden nihilism.
Things are given words, not to predict or help us understand, but to create a vaccuum within our security. This occurs with all knowledge, for the great irony is that the desire of knowledge is strictly what it is...a desire.
The grounds of philosophy, and knowledge by default, is in "assumption".
This assumption, as without thought or form, is void and akin to an intellectual vaccuum. What is assumed is taken without thought. You heard me state this before...nothing new.
The dialectic and rhetoric, which revolves around these key assumptions, does in fact revolve like a spiral around these key assumptions in an effort not to elaborate and clarify them...but rather contain them and hide them.
Any progressive definition, negates the old, causing not just empty terminology but effectively a morphing of language into a vortex in form and function.
This also occurs, specifically speaking the "nihilistic tendencies", with the spiral nature of the scientific method where the emphasis on "facts" that are continually negated for new facts effectively leaves knowledge itself as meaningless.
It is the redefinition of language, through continual dialectic, that results in the very language trying to contain its hidden baseless nature as fundamentally causing it.
Philosophy, specifically the modern post presocratic sense, is story creation. Whoever gives the greatest degree of definition creates a story. This story is embodied within the psyche, forming and guiding perspective, and takes on a God complex.
We equate brilliance with definition for definition sparkles, much like the stars in the night sky. But underneath these definitions, between the lines, is an isomorphism of formlessness.
The greater the definition the greater the philosopher. With the increase in definitions comes an increase in interpretations. Thus philosophers such as kant or neitzche are "great" not because of the great degree of detail, but because this great degree of detail allows for a variety of interpretations that can equivocate to anything.
They are great because when we see them we see "us", and this mirror results in the narcissus myth hidden behind the nature of much of logic and reason.
Grind a stone to dust. Grind a fact to atomic facts.
Melt the dust. Melt the facts.
....and you get a glass mirror.
In these respects philosophy takes on a ritualistic nature of creating symbols, with these symbols being gods as they direct the psyche. Symbolism, is god creation. Definition, or rather story telling, is the worship of these gods.
As such it is religious in nature in an attempt to not just bind nihilistic tendencies within a dense layer of wording but to bind the words themselves to this hidden nihilism.
Things are given words, not to predict or help us understand, but to create a vaccuum within our security. This occurs with all knowledge, for the great irony is that the desire of knowledge is strictly what it is...a desire.
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
You're stupid enough to believe that people feel threatened by your ramblings
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
Obviously if the post was deleted someone was offended. Clever idea with trying to spam the thread by the way. Also trying to split perspectives to gain a percievably upper hand, to appear "deep"...real...lol..."original".
Anyhow in spirit of the thread:
This perspectivism is nihilistic by nature, as it shows a fragmentation of the psyche.
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5783
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
not a response to nihilism but a response to leisure time...
-Imp
-Imp
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
I never asked for anything to be deleted on this forum. Even now you are showcasing how delusional you are.
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
I never said you had it deleted if you actually read the above...now you are projecting. Someone thinks I was playing to rough with you. Who is delusional now? (You next move is to say "eod is"... but if you say that after I tell you too...am I directing the conversation?)Atla wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 6:06 pmI never asked for anything to be deleted on this forum. Even now you are showcasing how delusional you are.![]()
Anyhow back to the spirit of the thread:
It is the fragmentation of perspectives which necessitates a fragmentation of symbols when the nature of perspective itself is grounded in symbols, specifically language.
The psyche, as inherently void due to is subconscious nature becomes conscious when it repeats both a symbol and series of symbols. The formless subconsciousness is encapsulated and bound by this form that the symbol inherently manifests, thus the irrational energies of man are directed causing an inherent sense of order and equilibrium.
We see this all the time. The mantra of a monk, the cadence of a military or paramilitary group, advertisement, and even a simple token of gratitude exchanged between friends, family or lovers.
These symbols, expressed verbally, physically or intellectual, act as an intrinsic force which not just guides the psyche(s) but binds them as well. The fundamental symbol of all of these things being language.
Thus with the exploitation of language, through an inherent fragmentation, comes not just a morphing of meaning that leads to a morphing of the psyche but with the increase of morphing comes an increase in change thus leading to a state of disorder intrinsically interconnected as both causal and retro causal to the psyche resulting into both individual and group psychosis.
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
Thus to combat nihilism, not in manner to hypocritically contain it but synthesize it with being, free will must be expressed through the creation and maintainance of symbols.
Philosophy is symbol manipulation by nature, with this manipulation within the modern era being increased due to a battle with the nihilistic elements of the void subconscious. This is reflected empirically with space exploration as an exploration of the void as well as atomic studies in light of evidence that these particles are primarily empty.
Philosophy is symbol manipulation by nature, with this manipulation within the modern era being increased due to a battle with the nihilistic elements of the void subconscious. This is reflected empirically with space exploration as an exploration of the void as well as atomic studies in light of evidence that these particles are primarily empty.
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
You said I couldn't hack it, not 'someone'.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 6:28 pmI never said you had it deleted if you actually read the above...now you are projecting. Someone thinks I was playing to rough with you. Who is delusional now? (You next move is to say "eod is"... but if you say that after I tell you too...am I directing the conversation?)
So yes "eod is", but you are so pathetic as usual, that you are implying that I'm only saying it because you told me to.
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
"Obviously if the post was deleted then someone was offended".Atla wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 6:35 pmYou said I couldn't hack it, not 'someone'.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 6:28 pmI never said you had it deleted if you actually read the above...now you are projecting. Someone thinks I was playing to rough with you. Who is delusional now? (You next move is to say "eod is"... but if you say that after I tell you too...am I directing the conversation?)
So yes "eod is", but you are so pathetic as usual, that you are implying that I'm only saying it because you told me to.
You being unable to hack it exists regardless of it being you or someone else who complained. I could care less either way.
Please continue spamming.
Anyhow back on topic.
The divergence of language and symbols is a divergence of pscyhe with code and hidden languages used not just during times of war but within various cultural divisions ranging from kids playing war to the tension between groups of people under religious or cultural sects.
Last edited by Eodnhoj7 on Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
Yeah okay please hallucinate some moreEodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 9:11 pm"Obviously if the post was deleted then someone was offended".Atla wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 6:35 pmYou said I couldn't hack it, not 'someone'.Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 26, 2019 6:28 pm
I never said you had it deleted if you actually read the above...now you are projecting. Someone thinks I was playing to rough with you. Who is delusional now? (You next move is to say "eod is"... but if you say that after I tell you too...am I directing the conversation?)
So yes "eod is", but you are so pathetic as usual, that you are implying that I'm only saying it because you told me to.
You being unable to hack it exists regardless of it being you or someone else who complained.
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
I dont have to....you just dont understand. Lol!!!!
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
But I do.
Re: Philosophy is A Response to Nihilism
No you don't...you don't understand quite much actually.
And of course the reasoning is circular (but also progressive), I follow the premises I argue.
So besides trolling the thread, to get some cheap revenge on the world for the football team gang banging your girlfriend in highschool, do you have any other responses?
Or do you just hide behind wiki pages to prove some point even you are not aware of?
You see, those are ad hominums...try copying the above and applying it. Copy and paste that in your journal under your porn links.
See...I just threw in another ad hominum using recursion theory, an ad hominum within ad hominum...bet they didn't teach that in math class.
See kids logic can be fun, like Atla's mom with the math teacher on prom night...oops just did it again.
I am so meta my my ad-hominums have ad-hominums.
Last edited by Eodnhoj7 on Sun Oct 27, 2019 4:51 am, edited 1 time in total.