Counting as grounded in Assumption of Void

[Dontaskme]

Lastly - if 'void' is only assumed - can you still count it? How many voids are there? I am guessing - at least 1.

The counter is the void that cannot count itself...for one very good reason ..check this > 0

[Skepdick]

The counter is the void that cannot count itself...for one very good reason ..check this > 0

How many counters are there? About 7.53 billion

Plus minus 1

[Dontaskme]

The counter is the void that cannot count itself...for one very good reason ..check this > 0

How many counters are there?

https://g.co/kgs/2EAA75

Plus minus 1

There is no questioner. A question is a supposition, it's an assumption.

[Skepdick]

There is no questioner. A question is a supposition, it's an assumption.

So there is no questioner but there are questions, suppositions and assumptions?

Who questions, supposes and assumes that? Nobody?

How many nobodies are there? About 7.53 billion

Plus minus 1

You were so close to non-dualism! And you failed.

[Dontaskme]

There is no questioner. A question is a supposition, it's an assumption.

So there are no questioners but there are questions, suppositions and assumptions?

Yes.

Who supposes and assumes that?

'Who' is an assumption, 'who' is a supposition upon what you already are which is the void ( 0 )

There is no knowledge of ( 0 )
Knowledge is assumption - in assuming 0 becomes 1 - but on knowing the 1 is instantly swallowed by the 0 the source of all assumptions.

.

[Dontaskme]

You were so close to non-dualism! And you failed.

There is no approach to non-dualism. You failed.

.

[Skepdick]

'Who' is an assumption, 'who' is a supposition upon what you already are which is the void ( 0 )

There is no knowledge of ( 0 )
Knowledge is assumption - in assuming 0 becomes 1 - but on knowing the 1 is instantly swallowed by the 0 the source of all assumptions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-by-one_error

[Skepdick]

There is no approach to non-dualism. You failed.

So is that at least 1 approach then. The "no approach" approach to non-dualism.

[Dontaskme]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-by-one_error

This is just no one's assumption, it's knowledge which only informs the illusory nature of itself.

[Skepdick]

This is just no one's assumption

How many "no ones" are there to assume things? About 7.53 billion

Plus minus 1

it's knowledge which only informs the illusory nature of itself.

How many illusionary selfs are there? About 7.53 billion

Plus minus 1

[Dontaskme]

There is no approach to non-dualism. You failed.

So is that at least 1 approach then. The "no approach" approach to non-dualism.

Knowledge cannot approach itself, in the same context an object of consciousness cannot approach consciousness since the contents of consciousness are inseparable from it. One cannot approach itself...it would have to split in two and then rejoin.

[Skepdick]

Knowledge cannot approach itself, in the same context an object of consciousness cannot approach consciousness since the contents of consciousness are inseparable from it. One cannot approach itself...it would have to split in two and then rejoin.

How many consciousnesses are there? About 7.53 billion

Plus minus 1

You can run but you can't hide.

[Dontaskme]

This is just no one's assumption

How many "no ones" are there to assume things? About 7.53 billion

Plus minus 1

it's knowledge which only informs the illusory nature of itself.

How many illusionary selfs are there? About 7.53 billion

Plus minus 1

There is only one no one.

.

[Skepdick]

There is only one no one.

There are about 7.53 billion "no ones"

Plus minus 1 "no one"

What label you assign to yourself has no bearing on how many of 'you' there are.

[Dontaskme]

There is only one no one.

No. There are about 7.53 billion

Plus minus 1

The above knowledge is an assumption.

There is only one no one

0 and 1