Göbekli Tepe

[Atla]

That's not the main meaning of "not even wrong".

Via argumentum ad populum it is the MAIN meaning (according to 6 different search engines).

It may not be YOUR meaning.

I'll help you okay, this is how it's most commonly used

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

[Skepdick]

Too bad you didn't understand any of it then

take your word salads elsewhere.

It seems he understood it more than you.

[Skepdick]

I'll help you okay, this is how it's most commonly used

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

Do you even read the links you post?

Not even wrong refers to any statement, argument or explanation that can be neither correct nor incorrect, because it fails to meet the criteria by which correctness and incorrectness are determined. As a more formal fallacy, it refers to the fine art of generating an ostensibly "correct" conclusion, but from premises known to be wrong or inapplicable.

"Not even wrong" is a pejorative applied to purported scientific arguments that are perceived to be based on invalid reasoning or speculative premises that can neither be proven correct nor falsified and thus cannot be discussed in a rigorous, scientific sense

[Atla]

LMFAO! "Harmful behaviour crossing a line ", you mean like asking you what you mean on a Philosophy forum? What a pitiful bag of insecurity you are, you have no willpower as you do not have to read or reply to Age's posts. You should ask for a refund for your studies in 'Computer Sciences' as apparently you can't even find the ignore function on a web-forum.

Keep digging that hole, idiot.
Age and I have a long posting history, for the first few months I clarified and clarified, usually the same thing over and over and over and he didn't understand a word of it.

"Most people"? So much for the nondualist. I give two shits what others think when it comes to pointing out the behaviour of nasty little minds like yours.

You say that like you had any idea what nondualism is.

[Atla]

I'll help you okay, this is how it's most commonly used

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

Do you even read the links you post?

Not even wrong refers to any statement, argument or explanation that can be neither correct nor incorrect, because it fails to meet the criteria by which correctness and incorrectness are determined. As a more formal fallacy, it refers to the fine art of generating an ostensibly "correct" conclusion, but from premises known to be wrong or inapplicable.

"Not even wrong" is a pejorative applied to purported scientific arguments that are perceived to be based on invalid reasoning or speculative premises that can neither be proven correct nor falsified and thus cannot be discussed in a rigorous, scientific sense

So you can't take in more than one paragraph at a time?

[Skepdick]

I'll help you okay, this is how it's most commonly used

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

Do you even read the links you post?

Not even wrong refers to any statement, argument or explanation that can be neither correct nor incorrect, because it fails to meet the criteria by which correctness and incorrectness are determined. As a more formal fallacy, it refers to the fine art of generating an ostensibly "correct" conclusion, but from premises known to be wrong or inapplicable.

"Not even wrong" is a pejorative applied to purported scientific arguments that are perceived to be based on invalid reasoning or speculative premises that can neither be proven correct nor falsified and thus cannot be discussed in a rigorous, scientific sense

So you can't take in more than one paragraph at a time?

Can you even count? There are two paragraphs in my post.

Heard of a Diff?

[Atla]

Do you even read the links you post?

So you can't take in more than one paragraph at a time?

Can you even count? There are two paragraphs in my post.

Heard of a Diff?

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

Please read more than 1 paragraph. Read at least the first half of the page.
"Not even wrong" aptly describes most of your computer arguments.

[Skepdick]

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

Please read more than 1 paragraph. Read at least the first half of the page.
"Not even wrong" aptly describes most of your computer arguments.

That's funny. Since computers are real, ostensible, empirical things. They are the physical realizations of logic/mathematics. Computers are time-variant systems and so everything I say about them is empirically testable AND falsifiable.

If you are going to use a phrase like "not even wrong", try to understand what it means.

[Atla]

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Not_even_wrong

Please read more than 1 paragraph. Read at least the first half of the page.
"Not even wrong" aptly describes most of your computer arguments.

That's funny. Since computers are real, ostensible, empirical things. They are the physical realizations of logic/mathematics and so everything I say about them is empirically testable AND falsifiable.

If you are going to use a phrase like "not even wrong", try to understand what it means.

This comment of yours was also not even wrong.

[Skepdick]

This comment of yours was also not even wrong.

Quick! Get the sophist a bigger shovel!

[Atla]

This comment of yours was also not even wrong.

Quick! Get the sophist a bigger shovel!

How are you coming along btw? Have you saved humanity yet using your unique insights?

[Skepdick]

How are you coming along btw? Have you saved humanity yet using your unique insights?

You'll know if we fail.

[Atla]

How are you coming along btw? Have you saved humanity yet using your unique insights?

You'll know if we fail.

If only they would listen to you..

[Skepdick]

If only they would listen to you..

Who am I to interfere with free will?

Listen, or don't. I benefit financially either way.

The game is rigged

[Arising_uk]

Keep digging that hole, idiot.
Age and I have a long posting history, for the first few months I clarified and clarified, usually the same thing over and over and over and he didn't understand a word of it. ...

Then that makes you even more of an imbecile.

You say that like you had any idea what nondualism is.

As if you are anywhere near attaining 'it'.