Atla wrote:I read and watch what I can find and come up with a conjecture that could be wrong.
Only someone as dense as you would suggest that what I say is based on one link. ...
And yet the link pretty much contains everything you say?
Right now no one knows what the site was intended for. ...
And unless we invent a time machine or find some kind of writings pretty much never will.
The idea that they may have connected the top of the pillars with planks and placed the dead there, and waited for vultures, came from me actually, as a possible missing central piece for the puzzle. ...
Coming up with ideas about Göbekli Tepe is the whole point of the topic, are you really this fucking braindead?
Large caps, always pretty much a sign of the interweeb loon.
Given this is a Philosophy site would you not be better off spouting your guff on an Archaeology site?
Ehh.. use google; thousands of pits, countless tools, at least one major harbour and some infrastructure were found. No melting factories however. Not "around the planet" you moron but at the Great Lakes and then downstream. It was the purest copper in the world back then. Almost all of it mined before 1200 BC. ...
I stand corrected.
So you are saying these Phoenicians/Minoans travelled all the way to the Great Lakes, mined this copper and left zero trace of their activities?
You claimed they travelled around the world and again left bugger all evidence of their travels?
Of course the 1200 BC collapse wasn't about the Chinese, everyone knows that. ...
So just the collapse of one empire then?
As a school teacher, do you understand what an 'ocean' is?
Who's a school teacher? You really shouldn't believe all you read on the internut.
But again, I stand corrected.
There have been regressions throughout history, what you said looks like something from a 1960s textbook.
Also don't tell me that a more advanced civilization can't give technology to a less advanced one.
What are you waffling about now? The Egyptians built the pyramids and we can see a clear engineering progression from the early ones to the later ones all within an acceptable time frame.
I did a google on "Missing copper, great lakes, minoans" and lo' and behold this came top of the list. Maybe you'll accept the word of an actual archaeologist as it's talking about you and the other loons.
www.ramtops.co.uk/copper.html
Look forward to you addressing the points it makes but actually don't hold out much hope that you'll read it as selective reading and confirmation bias are long-held attributes of the internut weebles.
(Maybe I should just post the whole article in full?)