This as stated is in itself an irrational argument since rationality as incorporated in humans is itself highly questionable and puts god in a very dubious position as to how rationality is defined. There is also the conclusion in this position that atheists by their non-belief are inherently irrational.
Theism in every way suffers from every kind of error. It's the ONE system devised by humans built on an encyclopedia of fallacies from A to Z.
Paradoxically, by a judicious use of such fallacies it's possible to create a fairly coherent system.
There is nothing irrational by not believing in something. The only error atheism suffers from is that all of them (atheists) are wrong.
Is that all there's to it. Gee, I didn't know. I'm so glad someone set me straight!
That's the kind of in the know guy I am, glad I could help!
attofishpi wrote:
The only error atheism suffers from is that all of them ( atheists ) are wrong
God either exists or does not exist but I fail to see exactly what is wrong with this statement of mine given that it is definitely true
I do not know whether or not God exists and I could study religion to find the answer but my actual ignorance is also definitely true
attofishpi wrote:
The only error atheism suffers from is that all of them ( atheists ) are wrong
God either exists or does not exist but I fail to see exactly what is wrong with this statement of mine given that it is definitely true
I do not know whether or not God exists and I could study religion to find the answer but my actual ignorance is also definitely true
What statement of yours?
Sure, glimpse at religion (perhaps ALL of them) but my best advice would be to comprehend physics as best you can.
P2 The existing God [P1] is rational
P3 God created the Universe
P4 The existing God-created-Universe is rational
C5 Therefore a Godless universe cannot exist.
Its non-sequitor.
P1 is merely assumed and is an unproven proposition.
P2 - rationality is conditioned [with assumptions and limitations] upon human beings
It is thus meaningless to assert rationality without also specifying the background model assumptions describing how the problem is framed and formulated. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationality
The conclusion is based on a non-sequitor argument, thus groundless.
