AlexW wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 11:34 pm
You understand (via objectification) what a "dog" is, but you cannot know it directly.
Logik wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 7:18 amHence me asking you: what did you experience when you interpreted/objectified a "dog"?
A ''dog'' is a known concept of I
There is no actual ''dog'' there apart from the I that conceives it...there's an image of a dog as perceived, interpreted, but there's no actual literal dog. No eye has ever seen a ''dog''
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:24 am
A ''dog'' is a known concept of I
There is no actual ''dog'' there apart from the I that conceives it...there's an image of a dog as perceived, interpreted, but there's no actual literal dog. No eye has ever seen a ''dog''
You are trying to explain your mental model of existence to no body, no one, no thing. Amusement or validation. One wonders.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:24 am
A ''dog'' is a known concept of I
There is no actual ''dog'' there apart from the I that conceives it...there's an image of a dog as perceived, interpreted, but there's no actual literal dog. No eye has ever seen a ''dog''
You are trying to explain your mental model of existence to no body, no one, no thing. Amusement or validation. One wonders.
Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:24 am
A ''dog'' is a known concept of I
There is no actual ''dog'' there apart from the I that conceives it...there's an image of a dog as perceived, interpreted, but there's no actual literal dog. No eye has ever seen a ''dog''
You are trying to explain your mental model of existence to no body, no one, no thing. Amusement or validation. One wonders.
Welcome to real reality.
.
How do you think human communication would fare if we all adopted your mode of being?
Logik wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:29 am
You are trying to explain your mental model of existence to no body, no one, no thing. Amusement or validation. One wonders.
Welcome to real reality.
.
How do you think human communication would fare if we all adopted your mode of being?
Real reality.
Humanity would realise what's actually going on rather than just what they they think is going on. They'd fair pretty well actually.
Logik wrote: ↑Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:29 am
You are trying to explain your mental model of existence to no body, no one, no thing. Amusement or validation. One wonders.
Welcome to real reality.
.
How do you think human communication would fare if we all adopted your mode of being?
'' Was it hard? I ask.
Letting go?
Not as hard as holding on to something that wasn't real. ''
________
Logik.. be sure to let go of the air when falling. Free falling...ulitmate liberation.