We are never going to agree exactly.
.
Nature never repeats exactly.
Re: Nature never repeats exactly.
Which is why it seems to me that there is no one way or one condition driving or at the root of anything. No single source/known/knowable. Nature seems to reflect currents of energy flowing into each other in constant motion and change. It is human beings that seem intent on creating, defining, and making things static and singular in order to claim to "know" them.
-
Impenitent
- Posts: 5775
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Exactly Exactly
guess I'm not natural...
-Imp
-Imp
Re: Nature never repeats exactly.
The I of you is exactly identical to the I that is me (Uncreated)
Anything created is the unrepeatable difference where there is none since nothing is creating the difference.
The I (created) aka the fictional I is a totally never to be repeated unique expression of the Uncreated...therefore there is no exact copy of the original uncreated I, for the uncreated I has no copyright. There is no copy of that which is uncreated...creation is the only unique difference where there is none.
.
Re: Exactly Exactly
Art is natural...nature is artificial.
.
-
Speakpigeon
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2017 3:20 pm
- Location: Paris, France, EU
Re: Nature never repeats exactly.
Try a different background colour to even get close.
Re: Nature never repeats exactly.
The background has no colour, it is that on which the foreground takes all colours, inseparably one and the same colourless image. Colour being another optical illusion of the colourless.
White never says it's white.
.
Re: Nature never repeats exactly.
I agree exactly.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 10:41 amThe I of you is exactly identical to the I that is me (Uncreated)
Anything created is the unrepeatable difference where there is none since nothing is creating the difference.
The I (created) aka the fictional I is a totally never to be repeated unique expression of the Uncreated...therefore there is no exact copy of the original uncreated I, for the uncreated I has no copyright. There is no copy of that which is uncreated...creation is the only unique difference where there is none.
.
Re: Nature never repeats exactly.
The I that agrees exactly with another is just a copy of the original I that has no copyright.Age wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2019 1:41 pmI agree exactly.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Thu Mar 28, 2019 10:41 amThe I of you is exactly identical to the I that is me (Uncreated)
Anything created is the unrepeatable difference where there is none since nothing is creating the difference.
The I (created) aka the fictional I is a totally never to be repeated unique expression of the Uncreated...therefore there is no exact copy of the original uncreated I, for the uncreated I has no copyright. There is no copy of that which is uncreated...creation is the only unique difference where there is none.
.
.
Re: Nature never repeats exactly.
well there is the master and the copy as in, like unto, or even of. but to say nothing is the same as another for such reasons is irrelevant, even if one thing is made up of and is exactly as the other, it is not, only for the reason that it is not the other, therefore not the same.