And that's why I can re-derive most of physics/Mathematics/computer science from first principles and use the equations to create artificial brains.
But maybe I misunderstood Feynman anyway.
Shoo indeed.
And that's why I can re-derive most of physics/Mathematics/computer science from first principles and use the equations to create artificial brains.
Shoo indeed.
You don't think that with all the excavated tombs we wouldn't have found at least one or two pieces of evidence for your claims. Don't tell me, they've all been stolen and hoarded by the illuminati.Atla wrote: Everything is bullshit that doesn't fit into your mainstream 2-digit IQ worldview
The pyramids are marvels of astronomy and structural engineering.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 8:25 am You don't think that with all the excavated tombs we wouldn't have found at least one or two pieces of evidence for your claims. Don't tell me, they've all been stolen and hoarded by the illuminati.![]()
I was talking about the great pyramids actually. I don't think anyone stole them.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 8:25 amYou don't think that with all the excavated tombs we wouldn't have found at least one or two pieces of evidence for your claims. Don't tell me, they've all been stolen and hoarded by the illuminati.Atla wrote: Everything is bullshit that doesn't fit into your mainstream 2-digit IQ worldview![]()
My apologies. What electromagnetic knowledge do you think they built into the pyramids?Atla wrote:I was talking about the great pyramids actually. I don't think anyone stole them.
I don't know, I can only guess. To me it seems that they may have harnessed the electromagnetism generated by the underground water channels. The pyramid may be used to collect and channel such electromagnetism upwards towards some stars, like the constellation Orion. I think they and the Indus Valley civ saw electromagnetism as this mysterious invisible force that may be all-permeating and is stronger in certain places.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:28 pmMy apologies. What electromagnetic knowledge do you think they built into the pyramids?Atla wrote:I was talking about the great pyramids actually. I don't think anyone stole them.
What underground water channels?Atla wrote:I don't know, I can only guess. To me it seems that they may have harnessed the electromagnetism generated by the underground water channels. ...
Where is the evidence that they used electromagnetism in any major way at all?The pyramid may be used to collect and channel such electromagnetism upwards towards some stars, like the constellation Orion. I think they and the Indus Valley civ saw electromagnetism as this mysterious invisible force that may be all-permeating and is stronger in certain places. ...
But we don't, apart from hubris there are in fact very good social and political reasons for a dynastic empire to build such things, see my post above.Maybe they built these structures so they could connect with the sky, or maybe travel to the sky, where their gods were. Of course today we know that building such structures is pretty pointless.
The aquifer of the Nile.
The pyramids are the evidence.Where is the evidence that they used electromagnetism in any major way at all?
I don't think there are. The great pyramids are just way too big to be justified, and why are they pretty much devoid of hieroglyphs then, if their main purpose is social/political.But we don't, apart from hubris there are in fact very good social and political reasons for a dynastic empire to build such things, see my post above.
And they'd produce electromagnetic energy how?Atla wrote:The aquifer of the Nile. ...
In what sense?The pyramids are the evidence. ...
It's the building of them that is the social and political purpose. As to the "way too big to be justified" just think the hubris of Pharaohs and Dynasties to have bigger and better tombs and that they just could. As to the hieroglyphs, well we have no idea I guess if there were or weren't as the facing stones have all been destroyed, nicked and reused. Maybe it was just aesthetics in these cases as there are hieroglyphs on other smaller pyramids and burial mounds in Egypt.I don't think there are. The great pyramids are just way too big to be justified, and why are they pretty much devoid of hieroglyphs then, if their main purpose is social/political.
I guess as the ground water is moving northwards or as the ground water level simply increases/decreases with the Nile floods, electromagnetism is generated due to friction. Maybe also ionizing the air in the shafts beneath the pyramid. The walls of the shafts are made of granite etc, doesn't seem to be coincidence. Well I guess we won't know if this thing worked at all since the pyramids aren't insulated now. (But the Egyptian acoustic chambers seem to work to this day, again showing that they knew what they were doing.)Arising_uk wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:41 amAnd they'd produce electromagnetic energy how?Atla wrote:The aquifer of the Nile. ...
In what sense?The pyramids are the evidence. ...
What purpose is there in making so many people work themselves to death for no good reason? The great pyramids don't look like tombs and their size is just way out of place (and why would 1 pharaoh need 3 tombs). The pharaohs were believed to be gods but I don't think they were this insane, if they were they would have erected more such huge pyramids in the following 2000 years or maybe be overthrown. Also, you can't just remove the facing stones inside the pyramid.It's the building of them that is the social and political purpose. As to the "way too big to be justified" just think the hubris of Pharaohs and Dynasties to have bigger and better tombs and that they just could. As to the hieroglyphs, well we have no idea I guess if there were or weren't as the facing stones have all been destroyed, nicked and reused. Maybe it was just aesthetics in these cases as there are hieroglyphs on other smaller pyramids and burial mounds in Egypt.
Does it move northwards? I thought groundwater moves according to pressure differentials and as such move any which way.Atla wrote:I guess as the ground water is moving northwards ...
Groundwater moves extremely slowly so I doubt it pops up and down as you suggest nor that its movement would be enough to produce the effects you wish.or as the ground water level simply increases/decreases with the Nile floods, electromagnetism is generated due to friction. ...
I thought the shafts walls were made of limestone?Maybe also ionizing the air in the shafts beneath the pyramid. The walls of the shafts are made of granite etc, doesn't seem to be coincidence. ...
I certainly agree that they knew what they were doing but doubt they were doing what you think they were.Well I guess we won't know if this thing worked at all since the pyramids aren't insulated now. (But the Egyptian acoustic chambers seem to work to this day, again showing that they knew what they were doing.)
You've been watching too many Hollywood movies, the workforce were well fed by all archaeological accounts. Did you not bother to read my post, one purpose, apart from the hubris of Kings, would be to occupy a large chunk of the population during the down times in their agricultural cycle, idle hands make for sedition.What purpose is there in making so many people work themselves to death for no good reason? ...
He didn't, each pyramid was built by a different pharaoh as their tomb. They look like exactly what would be produced over time from the earlier burial tombs due to advances in construction methods.The great pyramids don't look like tombs and their size is just way out of place (and why would 1 pharaoh need 3 tombs). ...
Or maybe their civilization was in decline and the Great pyramid was built at its peak and given the lesser ones were built afterwards and were smaller this seems to be a good explanation.The pharaohs were believed to be gods but I don't think they were this insane, if they were they would have erected more such huge pyramids in the following 2000 years or maybe be overthrown. ...
What facing stones inside the pyramids? The facing stones were on the outside and apparently much of them came down during a ground slippage and the rest were removed by the Sultans to build their mosques and palaces.Also, you can't just remove the facing stones inside the pyramid.
Arising_uk wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2019 11:04 amDoes it move northwards? I thought groundwater moves according to pressure differentials and as such move any which way.
Well maybe not necessarily North, but I keep finding information about all kinds of underground water shafts under the Giza plateau. Many other pyramids around the world were also built above underground water.Groundwater moves extremely slowly so I doubt it pops up and down as you suggest nor that its movement would be enough to produce the effects you wish.
Yeah okay, I confused it with the granite plugs.I thought the shafts walls were made of limestone?
I think having to work so hard for one pharaoh's hubris would make for sedition more, unless there were even higher causes involved. I know that they were well fed and organized, it wasn't slave-labour.You've been watching too many Hollywood movies, the workforce were well fed by all archaeological accounts. Did you not bother to read my post, one purpose, apart from the hubris of Kings, would be to occupy a large chunk of the population during the down times in their agricultural cycle, idle hands make for sedition.
YesHe didn't, each pyramid was built by a different pharaoh as their tomb. They look like exactly what would be produced over time from the earlier burial tombs due to advances in construction methods.
Well they seemed to have peaked during the Old Kingdom and regressed / lost technology afterwards. But still they could have gone for sheer size during those 2000 years I think.Or maybe their civilization was in decline and the Great pyramid was built at its peak and given the lesser ones were built afterwards and were smaller this seems to be a good explanation.
I mean there are no hieroglyphs inside the great pyramids, which I find highly unusual for primarily tombs/social/political buildings. Yes they may have been used as tombs as well, but that was a secondary function I think.What facing stones inside the pyramids? The facing stones were on the outside and apparently much of them came down during a ground slippage and the rest were removed by the Sultans to build their mosques and palaces.
I looked through the thread response, then looked at the first question.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:02 amWhat physics model? Which Russian studies? You haven't posted a single link yet?Eodnhoj7 wrote:Good, then debunk the physics model and the Russian studies.What? What? Seriously, what are you babbling on about?It is simple, you claim "truth"...but your country and people are dying. Your "philosophy" is dying. You represent nothing of value. You are not even a skeptic...just a nihilist.
You are officially barking mad!
What 'dichotomy'? Do you even understand what the word means? Newton's theory and Einstein's theory display exactly the localisation in 'science' that I mentioned. You think we use Einstein to lob artillery shells?
Add the dichotomy of Newtonian and Einstein's interpretations of physics, ...What are you talking about?numbers not being defined by mathematicians,...What are you talking about?etc. as strictly "classification" and we are left "science is just classification"...that is it. Cutting out one phenomenon and connecting it to another. ...Because of what's "probabilistic nature"?Because of its probabilistic nature, ...What? What are you babbling about? Are you talking about the over-determination of theories?and the infinite hypothesis that result in science...effectively we are left with "all" being true at one time or another under a specific context. ...
Ok. Will get back to you. Which kind of dowsing-rod are you using?angle some copper at 36 degree up top, create intersecting angles that stand up, and see if the dowsing rods (from the same copper or another material) move towards them or not...cross over them or not. Or just walk around and see if the rod's repeatedly cross in random areas.
Will you be doing this experiment in a double-blind test, i.e. put your pyramid under a cover along with a whole bunch of covers that don't contain a pyramid and see if you can get them to cross on the correct one?
p.s
Here you go, try this.
Double blind dowsing test
You have to be the dumbest person I have ran across recently:Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:07 amWhere is the evidence that "the pyramids are built over underground rivers or underground water"?Eodnhoj7 wrote:... Take into account the pyramids are built over underground rivers or underground water and the technology back then was dowsing. ...