The Classical law of identity (as stated) is inconsistent

[Eodnhoj7]

Men have small inactive tits (generally) women the inverse.

Small<----->Big is an assymmetry


False as size differential observes a common bond where variable x is observed in different states.

Inverse of penis. Phallic projection is observed inversely to vaginal receptive form.

Then the ass and mouth are also "phallic projections" e.g inverse receptive forms.

False, the mouth observes an inverse nature to the rectum, something goes in and another comes out. What defines these phenomenon are there directional properties.

Actually just pull up a diagram and it is more like "center".

Sure, when you redefine "center" to mean "slightly to the left".

https://www.bing.com/images/search?view ... ajaxhist=0

Why are you always talking about your balls around me?

You are always talking about your mind around me.

Actually not all at all. I argue thought composes reality.

Still two and differential relative to two objects is always isomorphism.

As recently as two posts back you accused me of re-purposing words to suit myself.
Now look what you have done to "isomorphism".

Any mathematician would shriek at your gross mis-appropriation of the term.

False, isomorphism always observes a minimum of two symmetrical inverse phenomenon. 1 and 2, are different but isomorphic in the respect they share a common symmetry of "one" but this symmetry effectively inverts through a similar state of one/many.

Isomorphism is grounded in "a relative many" and as such all base phenomenon that exist in a dualistic state have isomorophic properties.

I can take a squirrel and tree and observe certain common elements within them (minerals, fibers, etc.) but they diverge in how these properties manifest themselves. They maintain an inverse symmetry where they are composed of common elements but those elements effectively manifest in variation.

In simpler terms: The common elements exist as one, but they invert to a series of variations. This unity/many of the elements grounds even seamingly seperate phenomenon in an isomorphic state when observed dualistically.

In even simpler terms; isomorphism is grounded in one and many with all phenomenon having a common bond but existing in variation.


Besides, you claim math is a tool created by humans, so you are arguing from a fallacy of authority on your part.

Good, and man was created through x, therefore x is responsible for math through man.

And X is .... ?

Space...something you cannot program.

[Logik]

False, the mouth observes an inverse nature to the rectum, something goes in and another comes out. What defines these phenomenon are there directional properties.

Contrived contexts. If you are tossing salad tongue goes into anus.

If you are into scat.... what goes out of anus goes into mouth. Two girls one cup...

https://www.bing.com/images/search?view ... ajaxhist=0

Surely you aren't this stupid and you can tell the difference between a sketch and an an actual x-ray of the human anatomy, right?
https://za.pinterest.com/pin/537476536748560914

Why are you always talking about your balls around me?
Actually not all at all. I argue thought composes reality.

You are always talking about your mind around me.

So reality is constructed in the mind ? Geee - we might just make a constructivist out of you

You just can't bring yourself to agreeing with me while disagreeing with me. It must be so confusing living in you head.

False, isomorphism always observes a minimum of two symmetrical inverse phenomenon. 1 and 2, are different but isomorphic in the respect they share a common symmetry of "one" but this symmetry effectively inverts through a similar state of one/many.

No, isomorphism does not require inversion. That's your own idea.

Isomorphism and inversion are different phenomena.

Space...something you cannot program.

Space? You mean an N-dimensional matrix ?

Sure I can program it

https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.14.0 ... array.html

Here is a Rubik's cube: https://repl.it/@LogikLogicus/Space

a.k.a a 3x3x3 matrix

How many dimensions do you want/need in your "space" ?

[Eodnhoj7]

False, the mouth observes an inverse nature to the rectum, something goes in and another comes out. What defines these phenomenon are there directional properties.

Contrived contexts. If you are tossing salad tongue goes into anus.

If you are into scat.... what goes out of anus goes into mouth. Two girls one cup...


Of course you would argue about shit.

https://www.bing.com/images/search?view ... ajaxhist=0

Surely you aren't this stupid and you can tell the difference between a sketch and an an actual x-ray of the human anatomy, right?
https://za.pinterest.com/pin/537476536748560914

So the heart is not grounded in the center? Look at the x-ray again. Take into account weight, center of mass, etc.

Why are you always talking about your balls around me?
Actually not all at all. I argue thought composes reality.

You are always talking about your mind around me.

Good, quote it.

So reality is constructed in the mind ? Geee - we might just make a constructivist out of you

You just can't bring yourself to agreeing with me while disagreeing with me. It must be so confusing living in you head.

Space is mind...who says I am talking about my mind?

False, isomorphism always observes a minimum of two symmetrical inverse phenomenon. 1 and 2, are different but isomorphic in the respect they share a common symmetry of "one" but this symmetry effectively inverts through a similar state of one/many.

No, isomorphism does not require inversion. That's your own idea.

Actually both are connected. Inversion is strictly a reversal, a change in direction. Yin/Yang observes this. One phenomenon existing through many states also observes this.



Isomorphism and inversion are different phenomena.

Space...something you cannot program.

Space? You mean an N-dimensional matrix ?


Sure I can program it

Program a field without boundaries...pure point space.

https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.14.0 ... array.html

Here is a Rubik's cube: https://repl.it/@LogikLogicus/Space

a.k.a a 3x3x3 matrix

How many dimensions do you want/need in your "space" ?

What is a dimension but space...quantify space for me.