Pyramids of the Ancient Pre-Socratics as a Physicalization of Abstract Philosophical Theory

[Eodnhoj7]

Weirdly evasive answers. Either the pyramid does need to be aligned to the cardinal directions, in which case you can explain what difference that makes, or it doesn't, in which case why the unnecessary nonsense?

Describe the foreign experiments you are endorsing. You must have knowledge of their methodology. Explain it.

Hardly evasive; we are dealing with conceptual platonic type generalities and moving towards Aristotelian particulars.

What a weird way to start such a huge work of further evasion. The questions were simple and the answers should be as well.

You carried out an experiment in which you used a specific set of angles for your pyramid, and aligned the object to the cardinal directions. What difference did the cardinal alignment make in the experiment? This question does not require an essay on negentropy.

Actually it does considering the cardinal directions observe a "flow of electromagnetic movement" in both practice and theory ("all" is moving).

If these fields are in a state of moving (using the "rain on the roof example" in this thread...or wherever I put it) angulature redirects them. If you do not believe me then look at this 2018 study which is "not" out of russia and within the "context" of what many deem as "accredited":

https://phys.org/news/2018-07-reveals-g ... focus.html

Is there anything else you have to offer, or do you just want to come off as "knowing" something...?


After several day's of experimentation I was able to Distort "space" in such a manner as to induce "racing thoughts", "agitation", "nerve problems", "heart problems in those with weak hearts", "paranoia", etc. The theoretical, and "probable" hypothesis (one of many, yet a legitimate one nonetheless) is by creating a "positive ion field".

With enough work, this can be inverted to a negative ion field conducive to the polar opposite of symptoms.


And all it is, "is" "curved" copper and quartz. Nothing special and less than 10 dollars worth of material. The simplicity is beyond measure...a child can make it.

Measurable electromagnetic distortion from up to 160 ft, from a 14 inch tall 6 inch wide "framework" (literally because that is all it is...a framework).

[FlashDangerpants]

Hardly evasive; we are dealing with conceptual platonic type generalities and moving towards Aristotelian particulars.

What a weird way to start such a huge work of further evasion. The questions were simple and the answers should be as well.

You carried out an experiment in which you used a specific set of angles for your pyramid, and aligned the object to the cardinal directions. What difference did the cardinal alignment make in the experiment? This question does not require an essay on negentropy.

Actually it does considering the cardinal directions observe a "flow of electromagnetic movement" in both practice and theory ("all" is moving).

Are you are confirming that you have experimental data demonstrating an extraordinary effect within pyramids that occurs only when those pyramids are aligned to the cardinal directions? Because it sure looks like you are trying to just insinuate that you have done something with your imagination which you think is just as good.

If these fields are in a state of moving (using the "rain on the roof example" in this thread...or wherever I put it) angulature redirects them. If you do not believe me then look at this 2018 study which is "not" out of russia and within the "context" of what many deem as "accredited":

https://phys.org/news/2018-07-reveals-g ... focus.html

Erm, there's no mention of cardinal directions in there at all. Also all they did is model the expected effect of the pyramid on a specific set of wavelengths using entirely standard knowledge and a computer. It's sort of click bait science.

After several day's of experimentation I was able to Distort "space" in such a manner as to induce "racing thoughts", "agitation", "nerve problems", "heart problems in those with weak hearts", "paranoia", etc. The theoretical, and "probable" hypothesis (one of many, yet a legitimate one nonetheless) is by creating a "positive ion field".

With enough work, this can be inverted to a negative ion field conducive to the polar opposite of symptoms.

Sure ... because "positive ion fields" are totally a way to cause "racing thoughts" and agitation. Perhaps you can use them to diagnose "breezy ankles" and "ladies wibbles" while you are at it.

Obviously we should take you seriously now because otherwise you will make a giant triangular ray gun and give us all "eyebrow flutters" or "emergencies of the toenail" until we beg for mercy.

[Eodnhoj7]

What a weird way to start such a huge work of further evasion. The questions were simple and the answers should be as well.

You carried out an experiment in which you used a specific set of angles for your pyramid, and aligned the object to the cardinal directions. What difference did the cardinal alignment make in the experiment? This question does not require an essay on negentropy.

Actually it does considering the cardinal directions observe a "flow of electromagnetic movement" in both practice and theory ("all" is moving).

Are you are confirming that you have experimental data demonstrating an extraordinary effect within pyramids that occurs only when those pyramids are aligned to the cardinal directions? Because it sure looks like you are trying to just insinuate that you have done something with your imagination which you think is just as good.

If these fields are in a state of moving (using the "rain on the roof example" in this thread...or wherever I put it) angulature redirects them. If you do not believe me then look at this 2018 study which is "not" out of russia and within the "context" of what many deem as "accredited":

https://phys.org/news/2018-07-reveals-g ... focus.html

Erm, there's no mention of cardinal directions in there at all. Also all they did is model the expected effect of the pyramid on a specific set of wavelengths using entirely standard knowledge and a computer. It's sort of click bait science.

After several day's of experimentation I was able to Distort "space" in such a manner as to induce "racing thoughts", "agitation", "nerve problems", "heart problems in those with weak hearts", "paranoia", etc. The theoretical, and "probable" hypothesis (one of many, yet a legitimate one nonetheless) is by creating a "positive ion field".

With enough work, this can be inverted to a negative ion field conducive to the polar opposite of symptoms.

Sure ... because "positive ion fields" are totally a way to cause "racing thoughts" and agitation. Perhaps you can use them to diagnose "breezy ankles" and "ladies wibbles" while you are at it.

Obviously we should take you seriously now because otherwise you will make a giant triangular ray gun and give us all "eyebrow flutters" or "emergencies of the toenail" until we beg for mercy.

I would respond, and will, but because I have no respect or value to you or your opinion it will take some time as I am currently multitasking and your "value" to me is relatively low. So be patient, I will give you the attention you need.

[FlashDangerpants]

I would respond, and will, but because I have no respect or value to you or your opinion it will take some time as I am currently multitasking and your "value" to me is relatively low. So be patient, I will give you the attention you need.

Hah, you don't fool me! Those are the words of a despicable genius who is running off to the shed right away to build a "pyramid of ghastly anguish". All who fall within its icy beam will suffer "wooden elbows" and "tongue failures".

I will summon the villagers and we shall smite you verily, you heinous witchologist!

[Eodnhoj7]

I would respond, and will, but because I have no respect or value to you or your opinion it will take some time as I am currently multitasking and your "value" to me is relatively low. So be patient, I will give you the attention you need.

Hah, you don't fool me! Those are the words of a despicable genius who is running off to the shed right away to build a "pyramid of ghastly anguish". All who fall within its icy beam will suffer "wooden elbows" and "tongue failures".

I will summon the villagers and we shall smite you verily, you heinous witchologist!

Tesla did the same work, same stuff from a different angle. It all goes to the egyptians and the "one/many" paradigm. The "rain on the roof" example will back up the metaphysics by a very simple empirical example of our angulature can synthesis electromagnetic fields (represented by the rain, and the roof observed through the pyramids).

[FlashDangerpants]

I would respond, and will, but because I have no respect or value to you or your opinion it will take some time as I am currently multitasking and your "value" to me is relatively low. So be patient, I will give you the attention you need.

Hah, you don't fool me! Those are the words of a despicable genius who is running off to the shed right away to build a "pyramid of ghastly anguish". All who fall within its icy beam will suffer "wooden elbows" and "tongue failures".

I will summon the villagers and we shall smite you verily, you heinous witchologist!

Tesla did the same work, same stuff from a different angle. It all goes to the egyptians and the "one/many" paradigm. The "rain on the roof" example will back up the metaphysics by a very simple empirical example of our angulature can synthesis electromagnetic fields (represented by the rain, and the roof observed through the pyramids).

So far your only experiment involves sitting close to a triangle and getting the heebie-jeebies which you tried to pass off as science data because you take yourself exactly that seriously. You can't get out of it with a metaphor about rain, and comparing yourself to Tesla is an even worse idea. You are just going to have to let me have some fun at your expense. Otherwise I will make a triangle of my own and curse you with wobbliness of the nipple.






If you need to feel better about yourself, Prof once tried to use a opinion survey of 100 life coaches as his experimental data to inaugurate ethics as a science - and when that didn't pan out he just pretended it had been 1000 life coaches and one dude who draws supermarket store layouts with that HPV thing he loves so much. So you aren't technically the worst scientist ever just yet.

[Eodnhoj7]

Hah, you don't fool me! Those are the words of a despicable genius who is running off to the shed right away to build a "pyramid of ghastly anguish". All who fall within its icy beam will suffer "wooden elbows" and "tongue failures".

I will summon the villagers and we shall smite you verily, you heinous witchologist!

Tesla did the same work, same stuff from a different angle. It all goes to the egyptians and the "one/many" paradigm. The "rain on the roof" example will back up the metaphysics by a very simple empirical example of our angulature can synthesis electromagnetic fields (represented by the rain, and the roof observed through the pyramids).

So far your only experiment involves sitting close to a triangle and getting the heebie-jeebies which you tried to pass off as science data because you take yourself exactly that seriously. You can't get out of it with a metaphor about rain, and comparing yourself to Tesla is an even worse idea. You are just going to have to let me have some fun at your expense. Otherwise I will make a triangle of my own and curse you with wobbliness of the nipple.






If you need to feel better about yourself, Prof once tried to use a opinion survey of 100 life coaches as his experimental data to inaugurate ethics as a science - and when that didn't pan out he just pretended it had been 1000 life coaches and one dude who draws supermarket store layouts with that HPV thing he loves so much. So you aren't technically the worst scientist ever just yet.

False, as usual. Measured the electromagnetic changes as well, empirically. Will have to record actual frequencies.

[FlashDangerpants]

False, as usual. Measured the electromagnetic changes as well, empirically. Will have to record actual frequencies.

Excellent. So after all that painful evasion, you can now publish your data showing that alignment to the cardinal directions has a hitherto unsuspected effect without having to dick me around with fairy tales about rain on roofs.

Somebody call SpankPenguin quick, we need a man to randomly offer out Nobel prizes for small tasks.

[Eodnhoj7]

False, as usual. Measured the electromagnetic changes as well, empirically. Will have to record actual frequencies.

Excellent. So after all that painful evasion, you can now publish your data showing that alignment to the cardinal directions has a hitherto unsuspected effect without having to dick me around with fairy tales about rain on roofs.

Somebody call SpankPenguin quick, we need a man to randomly offer out Nobel prizes for small tasks.

What evasion do you keep premising your...whatever it is you claim...on?

You seem to be ignoring the fact "anglulature" curves reality.

[FlashDangerpants]

False, as usual. Measured the electromagnetic changes as well, empirically. Will have to record actual frequencies.

Excellent. So after all that painful evasion, you can now publish your data showing that alignment to the cardinal directions has a hitherto unsuspected effect without having to dick me around with fairy tales about rain on roofs.

Somebody call SpankPenguin quick, we need a man to randomly offer out Nobel prizes for small tasks.

What evasion do you keep premising your...whatever it is you claim...on?

You seem to be ignoring the fact "anglulature" curves reality.

Don't make me build a triangular ghost hut and point the "droopy nose-hair" ray in your direction.
You have been desperately not answering this question....

I can take 2 copper rods, bend them at 36 degrees with a base angle of 72 degrees, align them within the four cardinal directions in a pyramid shape of no higher than 2ft.... and cause a measurable warp in the electromagnetic fields of 120+ feet.

Is that a reproducible experiment that defies the known laws of physics in any way?

Reproducible...yes

Now explain what effect that relates the NSEW orientation of the pyramid can be reproduced measuring the warp of the electromagnetic field at 120 feet, so long as (or in spite of) the pyramid being no higher than 2ft...

Stop trying to get out of it by vaguely implying that non-specific claims such as '"anglulature" curves reality' somehow define your experimental results better than the data does.

[Eodnhoj7]

Excellent. So after all that painful evasion, you can now publish your data showing that alignment to the cardinal directions has a hitherto unsuspected effect without having to dick me around with fairy tales about rain on roofs.

Somebody call SpankPenguin quick, we need a man to randomly offer out Nobel prizes for small tasks.

What evasion do you keep premising your...whatever it is you claim...on?

You seem to be ignoring the fact "anglulature" curves reality.

Don't make me build a triangular ghost hut and point the "droopy nose-hair" ray in your direction.
You have been desperately not answering this question....

Is that a reproducible experiment that defies the known laws of physics in any way?

Reproducible...yes

Now explain what effect that relates the NSEW orientation of the pyramid can be reproduced measuring the warp of the electromagnetic field at 120 feet, so long as (or in spite of) the pyramid being no higher than 2ft...

Stop trying to get out of it by vaguely implying that non-specific claims such as '"anglulature" curves reality' somehow define your experimental results better than the data does.

Tell me what "data" is, considering continual reduction leads to not only obscurity but effectively useless data.

If I take angled copper wirer it measures a change of energy at "x" feet.
If I align the copper either with or against magnetic north at "y" or "z" feet.
If I do not angle the copper the change of energy may only be above the non-angled copper.

Angulature and orientation results in changes in electromagnetic energy relative to specific distances. The angulature effects the electromagnetic distortion.

If you do not like the rain on the roof example I can come up with others.

[FlashDangerpants]

I can take 2 copper rods, bend them at 36 degrees with a base angle of 72 degrees, align them within the four cardinal directions in a pyramid shape of no higher than 2ft.... and cause a measurable warp in the electromagnetic fields of 120+ feet.

You didn't actually do this did you? That's the real reason you aren't willing to divulge the results.

[Eodnhoj7]

I can take 2 copper rods, bend them at 36 degrees with a base angle of 72 degrees, align them within the four cardinal directions in a pyramid shape of no higher than 2ft.... and cause a measurable warp in the electromagnetic fields of 120+ feet.

You didn't actually do this did you? That's the real reason you aren't willing to divulge the results.

Wow...you are stupid...

Yes I did, I just said I did above, and am "currently" in the process of doing this...what results am I not divulging exactly?

[FlashDangerpants]

I can take 2 copper rods, bend them at 36 degrees with a base angle of 72 degrees, align them within the four cardinal directions in a pyramid shape of no higher than 2ft.... and cause a measurable warp in the electromagnetic fields of 120+ feet.

You didn't actually do this did you? That's the real reason you aren't willing to divulge the results.

Wow...you are stupid...

Yes I did, I just said I did above, and am "currently" in the process of doing this...what results am I not divulging exactly?

You said you have done this experiment. You are claiming it bore results. You measured the electromagnetic changes. Give us the results. Show us the measurements that prove the thing you are claiming about pyramids and cardinal directions.

[Eodnhoj7]

You didn't actually do this did you? That's the real reason you aren't willing to divulge the results.

Wow...you are stupid...

Yes I did, I just said I did above, and am "currently" in the process of doing this...what results am I not divulging exactly?

You said you have done this experiment. You are claiming it bore results. You measured the electromagnetic changes. Give us the results. Show us the measurements that prove the thing you are claiming about pyramids and cardinal directions.

Wow...I just told you a multitude of times I used both "dousing rods" and "distance" and that "I will need to measure the actual frequencies next...because it is an ongoing process".

I am actually impressed by how dumb you are...I mean really...it may come off as an insult, but it is not "easy" to be as "dumb" as you are acting.

It is actually impressive and almost enviable, I wish I was that dumb...maybe I am, or hopefully one day I will be if I am not.