Why humans can't get rid of their egos ?

[Logik]

SO YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOU HAVE ACCESS TO SOME FUCKING MAGICAL KNOWLEDGE!

Which is why I'm saying that you are a liar, contradict yourself, look down on others. But you are actually just another nutjob.

You should humble yourself, you too have the religious bug in your brain. Silly Aristotelian.

[Atla]

SO YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOU HAVE ACCESS TO SOME FUCKING MAGICAL KNOWLEDGE!

Which is why I'm saying that you are a liar, contradict yourself, look down on others. But you are actually just another nutjob.

You should humble yourself, you too have the religious bug in your brain. Silly Aristotelian.

No, you should humble yourself. There's nothing wrong with classical logic or English, they are just over your head. And we also know for a fact that you are a pathological liar.

[Logik]

No, you should humble yourself. There's nothing wrong with classical logic or English, they are just over your head. And we also know for a fact that you are a pathological liar.

Of course! Here's my humble fuck you.

for all x: x = x
https://repl.it/repls/AppropriateUnnaturalDesign

A = A => True falsity
A = A => False
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Beep Bop!
A = A => True
A = A => False truth
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => True
A = A => True
A = A => True
A = A => False truth
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Atla is a moron
A = A => True falsity
A = A => False truth
A = A => True falsity
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => True
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => False truth
A = A => Atla is a moron
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => False truth
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => True
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => False
A = A => False truth
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => True
A = A => False truth
A = A => False
A = A => Beep Bop!
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => Atla is a moron
A = A => False
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Beep Bop!
A = A => False
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Beep Bop!
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Atla is a moron
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Beep Bop!
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => False
A = A => Atla is a moron
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Beep Bop!
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => True
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => False
A = A => Philosophers are idiots
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => True
A = A => Atla is a moron
A = A => Atla is a moron
A = A => False truth
A = A => Beep Bop!
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => Atla is a moron
A = A => Atla is a moron
A = A => False truth
A = A => True
A = A => True
A = A => True
A = A => True
A = A => Atla is a moron
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => False
A = A => Beep Bop!
A = A => True falsity
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => Beep Bop!
A = A => Beep Bop!
A = A => Atla is a moron
A = A => Beep Bop!
A = A => Chicken Soup
A = A => True falsity
A = A => False truth
A = A => Philosophers are idiots

[Atla]

No, you should humble yourself. There's nothing wrong with classical logic or English, they are just over your head. And we also know for a fact that you are a pathological liar.

for all x: x = x
https://repl.it/repls/AppropriateUnnaturalDesign

No one cares about your unrelated little computer programs. If you don't understand the topic of discussion, or what philosophy is about at all, go away.

[Logik]

No, you should humble yourself. There's nothing wrong with classical logic or English, they are just over your head. And we also know for a fact that you are a pathological liar.

for all x: x = x
https://repl.it/repls/AppropriateUnnaturalDesign

No one cares about your unrelated little computer programs. If you don't understand the topic of discussion, or what philosophy is about at all, go away.

Of course you don’t care.

You shouldn’t care that the first axiom of your religion is bullshit anymore a theist cares that God doesn’t exist.

I can teach you what philosophy is about, you fucking Sophist.

[Atla]

for all x: x = x
https://repl.it/repls/AppropriateUnnaturalDesign

No one cares about your unrelated little computer programs. If you don't understand the topic of discussion, or what philosophy is about at all, go away.

Of course you don’t care.

You shouldn’t care that the first axiom of your religion is bullshit anymore a theist cares that God doesn’t exist.

I can teach you what philosophy is about, you fucking Sophist.

You are no teacher and people aren't interested in your delusions.

[Logik]

You are no teacher and people aren't interested in your delusions.

I've been schooling you all day and you shouldn't make it a habit to speak on behalf of others.

[Atla]

You are no teacher and people aren't interested in your delusions.

I've been schooling you all day and you shouldn't make it a habit to speak on behalf of others.

No, you've been spouting nonsense all day, for half a year now. I've been correcting most of it but mostly you didn't understand.

There never was anything that you could teach me, I told you this half a year ago. You were just too dumb to listen.

And I've yet to see any half-intelligent poster on this forum who is interested in your delusions.

[Logik]

There never was anything that you could teach me, I told you this half a year ago. You were just too dumb to listen.

But isn't that precisely the definition of "dumb"? Somebody who thinks they know everything.

[Age]

Stop lying,

Now, you allege that I am lying?

WHERE exactly do you say that I am lying.

Once again you accuse me of some thing, with NO evidence, and NO example, leaving me with NO THING to be able to reply to.

almost everything you've been going on and on about so far was about some "Truth" we gain access to when we are completely open, but you refused to say more.

Lol, was I MEANT to say more?

In WHAT Universe am I supposed to tell you more?

If you are Truly curious, then I have informed you, enough times already, of HOW to gain access to 'more'. If you have NOT yet read what I have written or you do NOT want to do what I have said, then that IS what it IS. If you have NOT yet learned from what I have said, then what else do you expect me to do?

I have already gotten you to write that I am wrong about almost everything that I write. I have also gotten you to admit that I have refused to say any more about how to gain access to thee Truth is by being completely OPEN. Now, if we are to look at these two statements that YOU wrote down, then HOW could you possibly KNOW that I am wrong about almost everything that I write, when you, yourself, say that I refuse to say any more other than; To gain access to Truth just be completely OPEN?

If you want to talk about contradicting one's self, in their comments, then how about we LOOK AT this one first? (See the difference between 'you' and 'I'? I give example/s of what the other is doing, so that we ALL can take a LOOK AT it, while also giving the other 'you' a chance to reply).

Spill it out already, what is it?

What is 'what'?

If you want clarity, then I have to KNOW what it is that you are questioning.

So far it completely looks like some bullshit made-up magical knowledge.

That is because I WANT you to be disillusioned. I WANT you to SEE things that are NOT even there. You have proven that you are completely disillusioned enough times already.

I have spelt out HOW to obtain the Truth of things. If you are unable to or incapable of recognizing that HOW, then so be it. I have informed you exactly of what to do if you do NOT yet KNOW some thing.

SO YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOU HAVE ACCESS TO SOME FUCKING MAGICAL KNOWLEDGE!

NO. NEVER have and NEVER would.

You just made up that ASSUMPTION, jumped to a CONCLUSION, and then BELIEVED what you, yourself, have made up and decided is TRUE, RIGHT, and CORRECT.

Which is why I'm saying that you are a liar, contradict yourself, look down on others. But you are actually just another nutjob.

You ask me a question, then jump to some conclusion, and write; Which is why I'm saying that you are a liar, BEFORE I am even given a chance to respond the question.

Even after the amount of times I talk about asking OPEN clarifying questions, I still get responses like this.

By the way you are yet to provide just one example of when I supposedly lied, contradicted myself, and/or looked down on others. YET you continue to say that I do these things.

You can call me a "nutjob", "fucktard", or any of the other name that you want to. They are NOT going to affect me in any way that you are hoping for. Also, are these examples of looking down on others, which you accuse me of doing?

Either you are going to provide examples and evidence of what you allege and accuse me of doing or you are NOT. You have NOT yet so far. But we will have to wait and see.

[Atla]

There never was anything that you could teach me, I told you this half a year ago. You were just too dumb to listen.

But isn't that precisely the definition of "dumb"? Somebody who thinks they know everything.

"thinks they know everything" describes you well, yes.

[Logik]

"thinks they know everything" describes you well, yes.

It doesn't.

I keep telling you I have no knowledge, but you keep calling me a liar...

Stop projecting your knowledge-religion onto me...

[Age]

SO YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOU HAVE ACCESS TO SOME FUCKING MAGICAL KNOWLEDGE!

Which is why I'm saying that you are a liar, contradict yourself, look down on others. But you are actually just another nutjob.

You should humble yourself, you too have the religious bug in your brain. Silly Aristotelian.

Do you still BELIEVE that I am "religious" at all?

[Logik]

SO YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOU HAVE ACCESS TO SOME FUCKING MAGICAL KNOWLEDGE!

Which is why I'm saying that you are a liar, contradict yourself, look down on others. But you are actually just another nutjob.

You should humble yourself, you too have the religious bug in your brain. Silly Aristotelian.

Do you still BELIEVE that I am "religious" at all?

Do you subscribe to classical logic/law of identity?

The answer to the above question is the same answer as "Are you religious?"

[Age]

You should humble yourself, you too have the religious bug in your brain. Silly Aristotelian.

Do you still BELIEVE that I am "religious" at all?

Do you subscribe to classical logic/law of identity?

No.

The answer to the above question is the same answer as "Are you religious?"

Then the answer MUST be NO, also.

Now that you have asked two clarifying questions, you now could have MORE clarity.

Unfortunately though you asked them in a very narrow or closed way, and so no matter what answer I give you will NOT believe it. Unless of course the answer fits in with your already held BELIEFS and ASSUMPTIONS.