Evaluating Scientific Theories

Discussion of articles that appear in the magazine.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Eodnhoj7
Posts: 10708
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: Evaluating Scientific Theories

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Logik wrote: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:52 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Mon Feb 04, 2019 7:45 pm It was heavily implied at minimum.

But man is part of the universal law, or rather "is the universal law" from the perspective of Protagoras.
And universal law is extinction.

Man rebels against his fate and seeks to gain control over nature.
But rebellion is extinction as rebellion is change.
Logik
Posts: 4041
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2018 12:48 pm

Re: Evaluating Scientific Theories

Post by Logik »

Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue Feb 05, 2019 7:25 pm But rebellion is extinction as rebellion is change.
Look how you have decided to abandon your dualism when talking about change. All change...

Some change is desirable.
Some change is undesirable.
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 10708
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

Re: Evaluating Scientific Theories

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

Logik wrote: Tue Feb 05, 2019 7:36 pm
Eodnhoj7 wrote: Tue Feb 05, 2019 7:25 pm But rebellion is extinction as rebellion is change.
Look how you have decided to abandon your dualism when talking about change. All change...

Some change is desirable.
Some change is undesirable.
I never abandoned the dualism, I just joined it into one.

Some change may be desirable.
Some change may be undesirable.
Desire may lead to change, under this logic, but change may have nothing to do with desire either.
Locked