Godels theorem is invalid as his G statement is banned by an axiom of the system he uses to prove his theorem

[Logik]

Then all dualistic measurements set the foundation for coincidence when changing the number of times over a given course before an even split is observed.

There is no law which necessitates 10 as the number of times without reverting this to 10, then that to ten, and that to ten, etc.

Of course. 10 is a thumb-suck. If you want more certainty do 100. Or 3000. There is no magic number, sadly. It's your call in the end.

This is fundamentally the art/science of risk management. So you don't become the Christmas Turkey when your predictions fail.

You must ALWAYS factor the cost of error.