The Neural Basis of NonDuality

[Atla]

I am processing more contexts than you are.

That is what causes ambiguity.

The ability to interpret words in multiple contexts IS ambiguity....

You are doing some kind of processing yes, but you still can't process context properly.

Which context ?

Context in general. Some part of your brain/mind doesn't seem to be functioning the way it functions in most people. And you are also too dumb to have noticed this so far.

[TimeSeeker]

You are doing some kind of processing yes, but you still can't process context properly.

Which context ?

Context in general. Some part of your brain/mind doesn't seem to be functioning the way it functions in most people. And you are also too dumb to have noticed this so far.

And he falls for the trap and admits to pluralism

IN GENERAL there is only one context. Most humans call this context The Universe.
IN PARTICULAR we (humans) have split up The Universe and INVENTED contexts/categories so that we can understand The Universe better!

It seems to me that you have forgotten that there is ONLY ONE CONTEXT (The Universe) and so you have failed to unify all your "contexts" leaving you with the NEED to "process context". You know - this holistic right brain stuff you SPEAK about, but you aren't actually DOING.

I don't NEED to context switch because I am a monist!

I am incredibly dumb. That has never been under debate. I openly admit that my knowledge is incomplete. The point in this exercise (for me) is to demonstrate how much dumber than me YOU are.

That part of your brain that "process context" is a heuristic engine that rapidly discards options and jumps to conclusions! It is exactly what makes you dumb!

[Atla]

Which context ?

Context in general. Some part of your brain/mind doesn't seem to be functioning the way it functions in most people. And you are also too dumb to have noticed this so far.

And he falls for the trap and admits to pluralism

IN GENERAL there is only one context. Most humans call this context The Universe.
IN PARTICULAR we (humans) have split up The Universe into contexts/categories so that we can understand it better!

It seems to me that you have forgotten that there is ONLY ONE CONTEXT and so you have failed to unify all your "contexts" leaving you with the NEED to "process context". You know - this holistic right brain stuff you speak about. I don't NEED to context switch BECAUSE I am a monist!

I am incredibly dumb. That has never been under debate. I openly admit that. The point in this exercise (for me) is to demonstrate how much dumber than me YOU are.

Again you demonstrate your inability to process context. And you are dumber than me, get used to it.

[TimeSeeker]

Again you demonstrate your inability to process context. And you are dumber than me, get used to it.

Smart people have no USE for contexts (PLURALISM!). Yet you cling onto it.

You should probably ask yourself why

[Atla]

Again you demonstrate your inability to process context. And you are dumber than me, get used to it.

Smart people have no USE for contexts (PLURALISM!). Yet you cling onto it.

Again you demonstrate your inability to process context.

[TimeSeeker]

Again you demonstrate your inability to process context.

Yeah. I demonstrate my inability to use a TOOL for memory management.

Because I don't need it. Natural ability, I guess...

[Atla]

Again you demonstrate your inability to process context.

Yeah. I demonstrate my inability to use a TOOL for memory management.

Because I don't need it. Natural ability, I guess...

Again you demonstrate your inability to process context.

[TimeSeeker]

Again you demonstrate your inability to process context.

Yeah. I demonstrate my inability to use a TOOL for memory management.

Because I don't need it. Natural ability, I guess...

Again you demonstrate your inability to process context.

When you communicate the new context you have switched to I will process it.

You don’t expect me to read your mind, do you?

[Atla]

Yeah. I demonstrate my inability to use a TOOL for memory management.

Because I don't need it. Natural ability, I guess...

Again you demonstrate your inability to process context.

When you communicate the new context you have switched to I will process it.

You don’t expect me to read your mind, do you?

Again you demonstrate your inability to properly process context.

[TimeSeeker]

Again you demonstrate your inability to process context.

When you communicate the new context you have switched to I will process it.

You don’t expect me to read your mind, do you?

Again you demonstrate your inability to properly process context.

Again you demonstrate your inability to properly communicate context switches.

[Atla]

When you communicate the new context you have switched to I will process it.

You don’t expect me to read your mind, do you?

Again you demonstrate your inability to properly process context.

Again you demonstrate your inability to properly communicate context switches.

I'm not your therapist, I don't intend to spend half a year psychoanalizing your comprehension issues.

[TimeSeeker]

Again you demonstrate your inability to properly process context.

Again you demonstrate your inability to properly communicate context switches.

I'm not your therapist, I don't intend to spend half a year psychoanalizing your comprehension issues.

I am not your speech therapist either, but I am spending quite a significant amount of time on you trying to help you with your communication issues.

By pointing your ambiguity, paradoxes and tautologies.

[Atla]

Again you demonstrate your inability to properly communicate context switches.

I'm not your therapist, I don't intend to spend half a year psychoanalizing your comprehension issues.

I am not your speech therapist either, but I am spending quite a significant amount of time on you trying to help you with your communication issues.

By pointing your ambiguity, paradoxes and tautologies.

No, you don't. You merely demonstrate your inability to process context properly (or think logically).

[TimeSeeker]

No, you don't. You merely demonstrate your inability to process context properly (or think logically).

I don't know how to process something which you have failed to communicate.

And as far as logic is concerned, that's my domain - computer science. Remember?

We have invented MANY logics. Like we have invented MANY contexts. Which logic are you USING for your thinking?

I am using Temporal type theory ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10258 ).

[Atla]

No, you don't. You merely demonstrate your inability to process context properly (or think logically).

I don't know how to process something which you have failed to communicate.

And as far as logic is concerned, that's my domain - computer science. Remember?

We have invented MANY logics. Like we have invented MANY contexts. Which logic are you USING for your thinking?

I am using Temporal type theory.

No, logic is not your "domain" - yet another pathetic lie.
You can neither process context properly, nor string together a logical argument.