The Key is Quantum Entanglement

[Michael MD]

In a past Thread I have given my ether model for how our world started (NOT with the so-called "Big Bang" of quantum physics). I'll use this Thread to show how my Ether Model can account for Quantum Entanglement, and the wideranging theoretic implications that would have.

In my ether model, the very first thing that happened was a universal oscillation, everywhere. -The only theoretically feasible substrate for such a universal process had to be original space. The concept is that original space was free of forces, and thus unlike present-day space, and that that made it more self-compatible than space is now, so that it contained reciprocally-oscillating point-localities throughout - a universal oscillation of space itself.

Then oscillatory fatigue induced pairs of neighboring elemental "points" to fall toward each other, in Yin-Yang fashion. Any such pairs would necessarily have had to reversibly revert to singleton elemental units, which then would have fallen out-of-phase with the oscillating elements. That would have broken the perfect symmetry of the oscillations, It would have transitioned the universal oscillations to universal vibrations. This now would have represented a universal ether, composed of elemental units acting energically via resonances of their outward vibrations with each other. These etheric elemental units would then have served as the basic ingredient of everything from then on (including any larger quantum units, formed via entrainment and linkages of the much-tinier elemental units, which might become "entangled" later in time.)

I propose that so-called quantum entanglement represents radiated packets of etheric energy which have the same vibratory pattern. Elemental ether units are the only actual participants in this phenomenon, with any pair of "entangled" quantum units being "walled off, kinetically, like the cool "arms" of a quiet, purring, universal, ether mechanism.

The way these elemental ether units act energically is via simple vibrational resonance, either with another elemental ether unit or with the elemental ether units that make up the fundamental composition of larger units, such as quantum units. This would be a perfectly linear type of energy, unlike the quantum forces familiar to physics, which act via fields, waves, vectors, spin, and so on.

I submit that this kind of model is the only one that rationally explains quantum entanglement. If true, this would have a major impact on physics. (Physics still dismisses the ether concept, dating back to certain optical experiment done in the nineteenth and early twentieth century, the theoretic assumptions of which have come under criticism by more modern scientists.)

[Eodnhoj7]

Ether would have to move at a rate of infinity, effectively making it motionless, considering it is argued as an "unchanging" glue to all phenomena.

The ether is not detectable except through reason, considering any tool used to measure it would effectively be the ether itself and a cycle ensues.

Under these terms the ether would relegated fundamentally to supertasks and geometry if it is to be understood, with the super task and geometry almost inseperable in one degree or another through the ether (Considering the ether as gluing all physical phenomenon together would have to exist through the processes of reason as thought extends from matter through the brain, etc.)

The ether cannot be detected through a scientific experiment without using the ether and any "dimension" of materiality founded would not be ethereal. This is considering all experiments have one seriously logical problem "interpretation".

[Michael MD]

It's true we are unable to directly detect the ether. It is too rarified for our quantum instrumentations. However, it could be possible to obtain indirect evidence of the existence of ether. -One way, I submit, is via rational logic, especially by carefully analyzing the phenomenon of quantum entanglement.

Another way of obtaining indirect evidence of the existence of ether would be if you were to produce a selectively-etheric energy field, and then show a predicted decrease of the density of materials in the test system. Another term for this would be levitation. -I actually have the design for a potential field test to generate such a field of energy, but the test would be expensive, and I haven't got a financial sponsor to get it done.

[Eodnhoj7]

It's true we are unable to directly detect the ether. It is too rarified for our quantum instrumentations. However, it could be possible to obtain indirect evidence of the existence of ether. -One way, I submit, is via rational logic, especially by carefully analyzing the phenomenon of quantum entanglement.

Another way of obtaining indirect evidence of the existence of ether would be if you were to produce a selectively-etheric energy field, and then show a predicted decrease of the density of materials in the test system. Another term for this would be levitation. -I actually have the design for a potential field test to generate such a field of energy, but the test would be expensive, and I haven't got a financial sponsor to get it done.

I remember your experiment Idea from a year ago, from an outside perspective (my own), it appears legitimate and worth exploring...however by now you know my doubts about the detectability of ether outside of pure reason.

With that being said,

While not specifically familiar with your invention, it appears (again from an outside perspective):

1) From a premise where ether is specifically a high rate of movement conducive to no movement (infinite movement)

2) to cause the matter to be suspended through the ether would require object x to be pulled apart so that it effectively "floats" on top of the ether through the ether's center point "which is everywhere" (considering the ether must be 1 dimensional in nature stemming through infinite dimensions giving it an appearance of 3 dimensional). The ether which composes the object would have to be effectively distributed in manner where the object itself it suspended by its interior nature; hence the object must be "broken open" without being "broken open". An ethereal field must be made.

3) But the ethereal field, as beyond time considering it holds "time" together (material movement), would effectively require such a high rate of movement. The particles which compose the object would have to be spun at such a high rate, without causing the object to "explode", as to cause the object to "rise" above "time" metaphorically speaking as its own time zone. To cause these particles to increase in spin would require something to speed them up while causing the surrounding environment to become denser "slower"; hence effectively cause the object to seperate from its environment and become suspended in it. The object would effectively be suspended in "zero point" space, (but this would not be zero point space, I am only using the term because it alludes me) where the "high rate of movement" causes a "self-levitation" through "nothingness" as the object itself "becomes" etherial.

4) However the faster particles move the heavier they become, hence the object would have to become so heavy it sinks through time so to speak where the "levitiation" is time being pulled together around the object causing the object to "appear" suspended. The "surrounding" time zone would have to become "slower" with the "object" as faster counter this "dualism" where our standard of time outside of the "warp" appears to be the same.

Hence time around the object would relatively expand as the movements which compose the one time zone "a" are slower than time zone "b" (the object). The object as time zone b would exist in time zone a, with both time zones fundamentally being localities of matter and both time zones as "1" causing our timezone to be the same and relatively unchanged. The object would effectively pull itself through a 0d point field so to speak. This dualism would cause "space" to be "offset" so to speak, where the dichotomy between the object and the surrounding time zone causes a divergence so to speak.


So density would be determined dually as a super high frequency and super low frequency of movement, where infinitely high movement causes an increase in density while infinitely low movement would cause an increase in density simultaneously considering density it a move towards "singularity". For example a number approaching infinity is both a whole number and a fractal but both are composed of the same parts. 7/1 and 1/7 are fundamentally symmetrical duals so to speak.


The ether is so dense in movement that it pulls reality together and loses its density as it rises above 0d point space. But considering the ether cannot rise above point space, considering point space is basically an infinite field without boundaries, it effectively causes a gravitional field through the 0d point space moving together.

Under these terms, could it be implied in the center of a black hole is pure "light"?

4) The question as to what would cause, "offset spatial divergence?":

Super High frequency soundwaves and super low frequencies applied simultaneously where the object is spun to such a degree through a high frequency that low frequency soundwaves bounce off it and affect the environment around the object?



All the particles would have to spun at the same time at proportional rates to there previous state, but this proportionality between the object and surround environment allows in a respective change of movement in the other.

5) However if the object is pulled apart it would effectively disintegrate over time/space locality "a". Unless the object was maintained in a seperate time/space locality "b", where the object is "proportionally" the same but is less dense because t/s locality "b" is much larger than "a". t/s locality b would have to be at such a high rate of movement that it must be slower than the




Thoughts? I may be talking out of my ass on this one...lol.

[Michael MD]

I derived my ether model from long-term research involving codebreaking a historical Document, a coded source which purports to be otherworldly. Therefore, my proposed field test to produce an etheric energy field comes from a source outside of our usual area of knowledge, (purportedly.) -Basically, in looking for a financial sponsor for such a test, I'm just seeking a chance to present what I have to a potential sponsor.

Your set of questions seems to be coming from a different set of perspectives on what an ether must be like. -Again, I believe my ether model's apparent novel perspective is worth looking into. -I'll try to discuss the points you made from the viewpoint of my ether model.

1. "Movement" of an ether. -In my model, the ether consists of a universal unstructured matrix, which exists universally, both amidst our structured quantum/atomic world, and also "by itself" in outer space. The ether is self-connected not by "moving," but rather by vibrational resonations between ether energy units, which exist everywhere, inside our universe/world, and further out in space.

2.Ether vis-a-vis "objects." -In my model the elemental units of ether act as an ether continuum, so that the elemental ether units outside an object in the "matrix," are constantly resonating with the elemental ether units of a solid object itself.

3.Time: In my model, Time is a rate which comes from the vibratory rate of the ether units. -The rate time passes can vary from a faster rate near a magnetically-energized (atomically structured) body, to a slower rate in outer space, where there is much less magnetic energy, inasmuch as there is less energy in outer space coming from the energies of bodies in space. There, the vibratory rate of the ether units, and the time rate, run at a less energic, slower, rate.

4. Levitation: In my model, if a solid body were to be subjected to an etheric energy (as in the proposed field test of mine), its atoms would become more etheric, and thus less quantized in their energic makeup, making the body less dense, or even possibly to levitate.

"Offset spatial divergence." -I don't know what you meant by this, so I can't relate it to my ether model.

[Eodnhoj7]

I derived my ether model from long-term research involving codebreaking a historical Document, a coded source which purports to be otherworldly. Therefore, my proposed field test to produce an etheric energy field comes from a source outside of our usual area of knowledge, (purportedly.) -Basically, in looking for a financial sponsor for such a test, I'm just seeking a chance to present what I have to a potential sponsor.

Your set of questions seems to be coming from a different set of perspectives on what an ether must be like. -Again, I believe my ether model's apparent novel perspective is worth looking into. -I'll try to discuss the points you made from the viewpoint of my ether model.

1. "Movement" of an ether. -In my model, the ether consists of a universal unstructured matrix, which exists universally, both amidst our structured quantum/atomic world, and also "by itself" in outer space. The ether is self-connected not by "moving," but rather by vibrational resonations between ether energy units, which exist everywhere, inside our universe/world, and further out in space.

I agree the ether cannot be moving, however this absence of movement would be through infinite movement considering all being which exists moves. A vibration at the rate of infinity would cause the vibration to exist as a field (Considering the vibration at a rate of infinity would have to occur through infinite directions as infinity exists relative to another infinity as multiple infinities which in itself is infinite).

To reduce the either to a linearly directed vibration would reduce it to a part, and hence not the ether. To observe the ether as a field of infinite vibrations as one would effectively mean it cannot be particulates without it not existing as ether.



2.Ether vis-a-vis "objects." -In my model the elemental units of ether act as an ether continuum, so that the elemental ether units outside an object in the "matrix," are constantly resonating with the elemental ether units of a solid object itself.



The matrix would have to composed of ether as well causing an effective wave in the ether, which would negate it as the ether. At best, again from an outside perspective, the matter would have to be sped up to an ethereal state where the object forms a pocket of matter around it. This matter would have to be denser causing the object as ethereal to be pulled through void/0d point space as matter. From an outside persepctive this dualism between ether and void would be observed in standard time with some time dilation to occur in waves...most likely. However the ethereal object would be above our time and effectively be in its own time zone.

It would entropy at a slower rate.

Again, I may be talking out of my ass.



3.Time: In my model, Time is a rate which comes from the vibratory rate of the ether units. -The rate time passes can vary from a faster rate near a magnetically-energized (atomically structured) body, to a slower rate in outer space, where there is much less magnetic energy, inasmuch as there is less energy in outer space coming from the energies of bodies in space. There, the vibratory rate of the ether units, and the time rate, run at a less energic, slower, rads.

Time would be an approximation of the ether considering one Time zone can be faster or slower than another. Time, as ethereal or an extension of it, would be effectively inverted through void. And object levitating would have to do so in a low frequency, near point zero, timezone/matrix with the object itself as ethereal having its atoms spinning (in a standard proportion to eachother otherwise the object dissipates) at such a high frequency it is pulled through the void.



4. Levitation: In my model, if a solid body were to be subjected to an etheric energy (as in the proposed field test of mine), its atoms would become more etheric, and thus less quantized in their energic makeup, making the body less dense, or even possibly to levitate.

I am not arguing against your point, it is a great idea. However density is relative so with its own field it would be of proportional density to its previous state. What would determine the density difference is the framework that effectively divides ether and void (dark matter)

"Offset spatial divergence." -I don't know what you meant by this, so I can't relate it to my ether model.
Space would have to be divided between high resonance ether and void as resonance close to zero...."offset" or not symmetrical. This offset nature of space would cause a divergence or division in our current space. Our space would seal up, but you would have temporal distortions most likely as gravity waves.

You could also advertise it as a gravity wave, time dilation test considering the current political climate...multiply your options so to speak and get a higher chance of funding. The "levitation" could just be an "accidental" result lol.

[Eodnhoj7]

The thought occurred.

I remember reading an account, potentially false but interesting none the less, of an Arab historian by the name of Heraclitus (or something) who claimed the Egyptians levitate the stones of the pyramid into place. They did this by moving the granite/quartz blocks onto a "magic" paper, striking the stone with a metal rod and the blocks levitate into place.

With that in mind the tapping of the rock with a metal rod would could a high frequency sound to occur with the paper of a specific composition causing the resonance of a low frequency sound. The high and low vibration dualism would in theory cause a form of levitation where one frequency floats on top of the other through the objects. The sound would potentially cause a phyzo-electric effects cause further frequency polarity between the block and what ever was in the paper.

[Michael MD]

As to my model's claim that there is an "elemental ether unit continuum" that continues across solid objects and into the spatial region near it, this leads to a rational new model of gravity.

The idea would be that the elemental ether units from inside a solid body are at a higher energy state, from being inside atoms, whereas the elemental ether units in nearby space would be vibrating at a lower energy level than that. However, the spatial ether units, being near the body's ether units, and vibrating with them, the ether units near the solid body would acquire a slightly higher energy than ether units would, which are further out in space. That would mean that the tiny portions of space of the ether units in the "auric" space next to the vibrating ether units would close off, as their vibrations increasingly make contact with (resonate) with each other, in this auric zone between two bodies, which would contract the ether between the bodies, attracting them toward each other gravitationally.

[Eodnhoj7]

As to my model's claim that there is an "elemental ether unit continuum" that continues across solid objects and into the spatial region near it, this leads to a rational new model of gravity.

Will respond to whole post from here. I can see somewhat where you are going with the ether pockets.

For an ether to occur in pockets would require the ether (field at a frequency at a rate of infinity) to effectively be veiled in dark matter as frequency at or approaching point zero. The 0d point field, or dark matter, would cause the ether to appear in pockets or particulate.

These particles would effectively encapsulate the dark matter in a means equivalent to the particle as 99.999... percent empty space (0d space) with the .000...01 percent being ether. The ether effectively is a pocket in this respect but considering the 0d space is nothing, the ether as pocket is effectively connected to the other ethereal pockets as 1. An example would be all atoms in void being inherently connected because only the atoms exist.

The levitation through a change in density would occur if dark matter or 0d point space would effectively accumulate causing a simultaneous manifestation of the ether as a larger "pocket". In other words if you cause the object to resonate at a higher frequency, effectively making it ethereal or close to it, the dark matter would accumulate around it cause the object to "levitate as it pulls itself through void.

The ether and void would maintain the same semblance of balance from and outside perspective and the object would appear to levitate from an outside perspective when it reality the object would be pulling itself through void. I don't thing the question is changing the ether resonance, as it is infinite, but causing an accumulation of ether energy by dividing dark matter with the division of dark matter occurring by causing, like I think you are implying, the ether to "pull itself together"...when in reality is is strictly dark matter dividing. The ether is always one, it is the void/dark matter/0d point space which gives appearance of change as it is finite.

To get the energy as that high of a level, it would have to be transmuted through the environment rather than applied only through a direct energy source, such as a generator. Considering the object is pulling itself through the 0d space, which composes the environment, the energy source would have to be what the object is pulled through...ie the object would have to connect to the ether and pull itself through the resulting void.

The object would have to exist in a framework that effectively divides 0d space resulting in an accumulation of ether. The framework would have to cycle electromagnetic energy to such a high rate that a disk or spherical form to the framework would be necessitated. In simpler terms you would have to rotate the electricity to create a sphere around the object...at least what I argue.



The idea would be that the elemental ether units from inside a solid body are at a higher energy state, from being inside atoms, whereas the elemental ether units in nearby space would be vibrating at a lower energy level than that. However, the spatial ether units, being near the body's ether units, and vibrating with them, the ether units near the solid body would acquire a slightly higher energy than ether units would, which are further out in space. That would mean that the tiny portions of space of the ether units in the "auric" space next to the vibrating ether units would close off, as their vibrations increasingly make contact with (resonate) with each other, in this auric zone between two bodies, which would contract the ether between the bodies, attracting them toward each other gravitationally.

[Michael MD]

This gravity model basically says that energy units of a universal ether are so elemental and fundamental that they are the basic constituents of everything else. In addition, these units act as a matrix, occupying space, including the space between a pair of objects that are being gravitationally attracted. -As these ether units vibrationally interact with each other (resonate), the units from inside the solid bodies, being at a higher energy level due to having been inside the atoms inside the objects, will raise the energy level of the elemental units in the space between the objects. That would mean that in this portion of space, there is an increase in the (magnetic type) energy )the same kind of energy as the magnetic forces that hold the atoms together.

Thus, in that "auric" space between the two bodies, there is an increased energic resonance among the spatial ether units and, by extension, among the other larger units, like atoms, in that portion of space. -The space itself doesn't change, of course, but the ether matrix contracts, or "tightens up" magnetically, which represents the force of gravity between the two bodies.

In this model, gravity is basically the same force as electromagnetism, although the spread-out nature of gravitational forces means that the "electro" property is attenuated so we don't detect it.

[Dalek Prime]

The past is done. It cannot be changed. So why concern ourselves with how it started? Seems fairly pointless. Does it matter who wrote Shakespeare's plays? Not really.

Just a theory, but I believe that there are myriad entropied universes around us, and ours is on its expansion to join them in entropy, followed by newer ones to come. Right or wrong, it doesn't matter much.

[QuantumT]

I submit that this kind of model is the only one that rationally explains quantum entanglement.

That's not the only rational explanation.
The universe could be a simulation, where "matter" forms when needed. In this scenario, entanglement is just a secondary "measurement" effect.
(Or an "oops" by the programmer...)

[Dalek Prime]

I submit that this kind of model is the only one that rationally explains quantum entanglement.

That's not the only rational explanation.
The universe could be a simulation, where "matter" forms when needed. In this scenario, entanglement is just a secondary "measurement" effect.
(Or an "oops" by the programmer...)

The programmer should switch to a functional language with no side effects.

[QuantumT]

I submit that this kind of model is the only one that rationally explains quantum entanglement.

That's not the only rational explanation.
The universe could be a simulation, where "matter" forms when needed. In this scenario, entanglement is just a secondary "measurement" effect.
(Or an "oops" by the programmer...)

The programmer should switch to a functional language with no side effects.

Well, if he suddenly changes nature as we know it, we go from a suspected simulation to a dead sure one. And I don't think they intended for us to figure it out in the first place.
Right now it's just a fringy idea than some of us support. It might die within a decade or two, and then the "game" is right back at it's "prime directive" again.

[Dalek Prime]

That's not the only rational explanation.
The universe could be a simulation, where "matter" forms when needed. In this scenario, entanglement is just a secondary "measurement" effect.
(Or an "oops" by the programmer...)

The programmer should switch to a functional language with no side effects.

Well, if he suddenly changes nature as we know it, we go from a suspected simulation to a dead sure one. And I don't think they intended for us to figure it out in the first place.
Right now it's just a fringy idea than some of us support. It might die within a decade or two, and then the "game" is right back at it's "prime directive" again.

Daleks like prime directives lol.

Btw, what do you think of the concentric ring theory, or sphere rather, that I mentioned?